Is a heart rate monitor necessary?

npostemni
npostemni Posts: 102 Member
I was wondering if I should purchase a heart rate monitor. If so what kind should I purchase? I want one that works but that doesn't cost an arm and a leg.

Thanks!
«1

Replies

  • Dougf90
    Dougf90 Posts: 95 Member
    My Polar FT7 is one of the best purchases I've ever made, not even just for fitness but over anything else in general. As for an arm and a leg, it depends how you're pricing your arms and legs. I'd suggest finding the lowest price using the google shopping tool (or just Amazon) then finding a coupon code for that particular site... you'll probably get the best deal out there that way.
  • cmasonrock
    cmasonrock Posts: 50 Member
    I've been looking for something that I can sync with Endomondo using my Galaxy S4 - any suggestions?
  • toddis
    toddis Posts: 941 Member
    If you like gadgets get an HRM. They aren't terribly useful in my opinion unless you are training for a specific goal.

    I personally have a Polar FT7 was like 60 bucks?
  • Marymoe138
    Marymoe138 Posts: 68 Member
    I started out and own the FT4. I believe it was around $55. I am looking to upgrade to a FT7 in order to know what % of fat I am burning as I believe this product offers that feature. Personally I feel that it has been worth the money for me. MFP definitely overestimates what you burn here. Pairing that with a food scale and you can have a great combination in my opinion.
  • cmasonrock
    cmasonrock Posts: 50 Member
    I started out and own the FT4. I believe it was around $55. I am looking to upgrade to a FT7 in order to know what % of fat I am burning as I believe this product offers that feature. Personally I feel that it has been worth the money for me. MFP definitely overestimates what you burn here. Pairing that with a food scale and you can have a great combination in my opinion.

    I agree about the Overestimations by MFP's caloric burns. I usually shave some off the final number before I post. Try endomondo for all your fitness workouts. it will auto sync with MFP. Its great.
  • Sunshine2plus2
    Sunshine2plus2 Posts: 1,492 Member
    IDK I have never used one.
  • SLLRunner
    SLLRunner Posts: 12,942 Member
    I love my FT7 and have found it to be accurate for me when I do steady state cardio, as my results show this. I don't think it's real accurate for strength training/weight lifting, though, because that does not get my heart rate up.

    If you do get a HRM, I would suggest getting one with a chest strap.
  • acogg
    acogg Posts: 1,870 Member
    If I could do everything over again I would not have bought a heart rate monitor. For me, it was a waste of time and money that made me afraid to exercise. For me, it brought anxiety and I didn't push myself enough because I would see my elevated heart rate and then I worried that I was over exerting. I have become comfortable listening to and watching my body, knowing that my body is the best reflection of my workout.
  • npostemni
    npostemni Posts: 102 Member
    I meant I do not have over $100 to spend on a heart rate monitor right now.
  • lauren3101
    lauren3101 Posts: 1,853 Member
    I meant I do not have over $100 to spend on a heart rate monitor right now.

    None of the HRMs anyone has suggested here were over $100? If you don't want to buy one why ask the question?
  • npostemni
    npostemni Posts: 102 Member
    I meant for the arm and a leg question. That's what I meant by that statement. No need to be rude.
  • RLeighP
    RLeighP Posts: 232 Member
    Sometimes you can find good deals on Amazon. The one I got was on sale for $25, originally $75. So, just look around and wait till the price is right. I love mine. It's way more accurate than MFP or the machines.
  • cricket_77
    cricket_77 Posts: 165 Member
    Do you really need one? It depends on what you will be using it for. Are you wanting to know how many calories you burn during exercise? I use it strictly to track calories when doing cardio. I use an estimation when lifting as I hear it is not accurate for that.
  • GetFitForAJ
    GetFitForAJ Posts: 22 Member
    I have a polar FT4 and I wonder what i would do without it. It is not a necessity but good to have if you do strength/weight training exercises.
  • asp415
    asp415 Posts: 1,492 Member
    I had a Polar FT7. I used to think it was a must, but I only used it for a short time & sold it on ebay. The burns it showed are higher than MFP, but I just used MFP to be on the more conservative side. How I found the HRM useful was when I transitioned from the treadmill to outdoor running. The HRM really helped me learn to control my pace, other than that I never used it anymore. I like my fitbit one.

    edited to add this: On some people it shows that they are burning less than what MFP shows, in my case it showed a higher amount.
  • christinamariex
    christinamariex Posts: 2 Member
    I have the FT7 and LOVE it! I got it for around $100 at JCPenney.com :) Best $100 I ever spent!
  • kaypee65
    kaypee65 Posts: 120 Member
    I have a Timex that I really like. I was working out with my Kinect and felt that is grossly underestimated my calories burned. I started using the HRM and it seemed to correlate with my exertion level pretty well.

    I really want to improve my fitness level and the HRM helps to track fitness in an objective way.
  • They aren't really a necessity unless you want to know how much you are burning. If you are eating a clean diet and excersising regularly, you will see changes.
  • ohheytoned
    ohheytoned Posts: 34 Member
    My Polar FT7 is one of the best purchases I've ever made, not even just for fitness but over anything else in general. As for an arm and a leg, it depends how you're pricing your arms and legs. I'd suggest finding the lowest price using the google shopping tool (or just Amazon) then finding a coupon code for that particular site... you'll probably get the best deal out there that way.

    Yep, the FT7 is the best on the market right now simply because it's the most accurate. It works with a chest strap so you get a very accurate BPM and calories burned estimate. I can't work out without it now. A lot of people say that MFP actually OVER-estimates the calories you burn when working out, but I found that I'm pretty vigorous when I work out and MFP was actually UNDER-estimating the amount of calories I was burning (and not by a little - usually by like 100 cals!). It has helped me be able to eat more food because I know exactly how many cals I can eat back now, and as a result not be so hungry all the time.
  • knra_grl
    knra_grl Posts: 1,566 Member
    you can get cheaper ones but I guess it depends on what you want it for - i just ordered a loop but haven't gotten it yet but I believe I will still need a HRM for specific workout information? I don't know I am waiting to see what it has I know it tracks the same as a fitbit but there were some added options I think.
  • thingeringer
    thingeringer Posts: 241 Member
    No. But it is a lot of fun. And you'll get really accurate counts for your exercise calories. I eat all of mine back so I don't want to over estimate.
    PS - I got a FitBit for Christmas and it is even MORE fun than my old Polar Fit HRM!
  • bpotts44
    bpotts44 Posts: 1,066 Member
    If you want to do cardio correctly it is an essential item.
  • lisalsd1
    lisalsd1 Posts: 1,519 Member
    I was going to buy a heart rate monitor 2 years ago...and never did, b/c I didn't want to spend the money. I went from a size 10 to a 4, so technically, you don't NEED one. I just use the calories burned feature on the cardio equipment and the MFP estimates of cals burned. I usually input the lower estimate into MFP so I don't overestimate cals burned. I've also read repeatedly on MFP that they are very inaccurate for estimating cals burned while strength-training.
  • Ferrous_Female_Dog
    Ferrous_Female_Dog Posts: 221 Member
    You do not NEED one to be successful.
  • queenbea77
    queenbea77 Posts: 404 Member
    If I could do everything over again I would not have bought a heart rate monitor. For me, it was a waste of time and money that made me afraid to exercise. For me, it brought anxiety and I didn't push myself enough because I would see my elevated heart rate and then I worried that I was over exerting. I have become comfortable listening to and watching my body, knowing that my body is the best reflection of my workout.

    I quoted you because I wanted to comment on just about everything you said (not knocking your reasons). Me on the other hand - I'm total opposite. I am lost without my HR monitor. I find that it makes me want to work harder to reach the different levels (fat burn, cardio etc.). I keep a pocket calendar in my gym bag and after my workouts I write down what I did, how much time (and if TM the distance) and the calories I burned as well as other info (sore muscles, etc.) so I can look back over the dates and compare workouts, see where I can improve etc. As far as "over exerting myself" I know if I'm short of breath, dizzy etc. that I need to back off. I do look at my monitor at those times to see what my HR is.

    I guess bottom line it's all personal preference if you use one or not. I'm a real "info kind of person" - some people aren't. My DH works out but can't be bothered with using a HR monitor.

    OP - I have a Polar F4 and love it. I agree if you go with a HR monitor the ones with the chest strap are more accurate than the wrist ones (I had a MIO Fitness before my Polar) and it was way over on the calories I burned for exercise. Even worse than the HR monitors on the machines!. Good luck, let us know which one you decide to get.
  • erickirb
    erickirb Posts: 12,294 Member
    If you eat back exercise cals, it is a good tool. But if you are only going to buy one gadget for weight loss, I would suggest a digital kitchen scale.
  • queenbea77
    queenbea77 Posts: 404 Member
    No. But it is a lot of fun. And you'll get really accurate counts for your exercise calories. I eat all of mine back so I don't want to over estimate.
    PS - I got a FitBit for Christmas and it is even MORE fun than my old Polar Fit HRM!

    I toyed with the idea of the FitBit but at this point I can't justify it since my Polar F4 isn't that old. Maybe if I find a screaming deal.....:yawn:
  • agnes1377
    agnes1377 Posts: 740 Member
    I have the Polar FT4 that I got on Amazon for about $ 60. I wanted to know how many calories I actually burn because I wasn't sure if MFP was correct . I do Leslie Sansone's walks but I use weights or the stretchy toning band and it turns out I burn between 50-100 calories more than MFP says. Came in handy for me.
  • Ely82010
    Ely82010 Posts: 1,998 Member
    You do not NEED one to be successful.


    I agree! If people are successful eating at McDonald's, people can be successful without a HRM. If you feel that MFP overestimate the calories burned, just don't eat them all or trust more the numbers in the cardio equipment. That is what I did, and still do.

    On the other hand, if you like gadgets and feel more comfy wearing a HRM, just get one but be aware that they don't seem to be very accurate for strength training.
  • pecantan09
    pecantan09 Posts: 27 Member
    I think it is. I have the Polar FT40 and love it!! I push myself more being able to see what zone I am in on the watch. My fitnesspal grossly overestimates calories burned. Keep in mind...you pay for what you get.