Confessions of a recovering clean eater

mumblemagic

How can eating clean and IIFYM be the same nutritionally? A Big Mac from McDonalds might fit your macros but nutritionally it's no where near the same nutritional value of the same amount of calories of vegetables, fruits and whole foods. Am I thinking too simple?

Definitely not the same. Processed foods have lots of chemicals and they're made to slide right down with minimal chewing (or many are), so your body barely notices them and you want more. Clean eating has made me like the processed stuff less; I swear I can taste some of the chemicals, particularly in the aftertaste. I do eat some stuff that's not healthy- mainly on the sweet side because I really like desserts. All in moderation and carefully chosen, though.

Which particular chemicals are you talking about, and what do you define as processed foods?

e.g. I just had Covent Garden Soup for lunch. It comes in a packet that you reheat. However, the recipe they make it to is pretty much the same as I would make (although they put cream in, which I would never have thought of doing). Does that count as processed? Or are you speaking of things like Big Macs etc. If so, I'm wondering what chemicals exactly you are tasting because as far as I can tell, Big Macs taste of cardboard and not much else

Well, how fast did the soup slide down your throat? That's the real scientific way to tell if it's processed or not.

:laugh:

Lol! :laugh:

Anyway, as far as I understand it, the IIFYM approach isn’t about whether each individual foodstuff you eat is nutritionally balanced, but rather whether your overall diet is – there is an unwritten rule that you don’t just hit your macros, you hit your micros too. Many people seem to (wilfully?) misunderstand this concept. There is no argument that a Big Mac has the nutritional value of a chunk of 2x4 but living off *only* Big Macs is against the IIFYM ethos anyway so in many ways that is irrelevant.

Besides, while I agree that there are some artificial additives in processed foods that you may want to avoid, this is personal preference rather than health (as all artificial additives in the UK at least have been certified fit for human consumption), I doubt very much that a person can “taste the chemicals”.

NavyKnightAh13

Bumping to read later.

mccindy72

How can eating clean and IIFYM be the same nutritionally? A Big Mac from McDonalds might fit your macros but nutritionally it's no where near the same nutritional value of the same amount of calories of vegetables, fruits and whole foods. Am I thinking too simple?

Definitely not the same. Processed foods have lots of chemicals and they're made to slide right down with minimal chewing (or many are), so your body barely notices them and you want more. Clean eating has made me like the processed stuff less; I swear I can taste some of the chemicals, particularly in the aftertaste. I do eat some stuff that's not healthy- mainly on the sweet side because I really like desserts. All in moderation and carefully chosen, though.

Chemicals, huh?:huh:

+1

Babbs1977

Following.

bcattoes

The blog is blocked at work so all I could read was the cliff notes. I went through a clean eating phase - the Macrobiotic diet, to be exact. I actually found it really easy at first, and always easy when I was at home, since I was living alone at the time. But it was too hard to maintain when eating away from home.

But, I am very glad I did it. I learned a lot about food during that time. And I made some healthy diet changes that have stuck with me through the decades since I did it.

I would encourage anyone to give sensible clean eating a try. If they stick with it, then that's great. If they find it too restrictive and relax a bit, that great too. And hopefully they will learn from it and develop new healthy habits, as I did.

mccindy72

The blog is blocked at work so all I could read was the cliff notes. I went through a clean eating phase - the Macrobiotic diet, to be exact. I actually found it really easy at first, and always easy when I was at home, since I was living alone at the time. But it was too hard to maintain when eating away from home.

But, I am very glad I did it. I learned a lot about food during that time. And I made some healthy diet changes that have stuck with me through the decades since I did it.

I would encourage anyone to give sensible clean eating a try. If they stick with it, then that's great. If they find it too restrictive and relax a bit, that great too. And hopefully they will learn from it and develop new healthy habits, as I did.

Ah, there you are. Really? Wonderful. new healthy habits like what?

auddii

The blog is blocked at work so all I could read was the cliff notes. I went through a clean eating phase - the Macrobiotic diet, to be exact. I actually found it really easy at first, and always easy when I was at home, since I was living alone at the time. But it was too hard to maintain when eating away from home.

But, I am very glad I did it. I learned a lot about food during that time. And I made some healthy diet changes that have stuck with me through the decades since I did it.

I would encourage anyone to give sensible clean eating a try. If they stick with it, then that's great. If they find it too restrictive and relax a bit, that great too. And hopefully they will learn from it and develop new healthy habits, as I did.

Here is the blog post:

Yes, I used to be a “clean eater” and am proud to say I no longer am. I used to smoke too, and when I realized I was slowly killing myself, I stopped.

The clean eating change was almost the same for me. Obviously “clean eating” wasn’t killing me, but it was killing my relationships with people and my passion for life.

What is “clean eating”? If you are reading this you have certainly heard the term before, but exactly how would you explain it to people? How would you define clean eating? I would like to hear your definition and why you feel that way.

My definition (back when I was a CE’er) was whole foods, nothing from a box, low fat and low carb. Six meals a day (gotta eat every 2.5 hours to keep the metabolism burning)! I ate the same old thing each time and “always carried my food”.



Most competitors I know define it as broccoli, asparagus, sweet potatoes, chicken breast, tilapia, rice, (usually brown), and maybe 10 almonds. Six or seven times a day, every day for weeks or even months on end. And not much food either. Many people think that it is the only way to get lean. Of course most of the same people spend hours and hours a week doing cardio, and even worse “fasted cardio”. Yup, starve themselves then try to exercise, often to the point of exhaustion.

Of course you can get lean like that! You are severely restricting calories, controlling the food like a Nazi guard and eating the same stuff over and over so you get sick of it and would not even consider over eating.

You start chewing with your front teeth only because all you want to do is chew and swallow, you are sick of the stuff you are putting in your mouth and don’t want to really even taste it! I remember each competition when I got to that stage it was mind over matter, I wanted real food and had to choke down the same old dry crap meal after meal!

We all want to look good. And for competitors that desire is even more ingrained in our day to day lives. We NEED to look good all the time, when we go off our competition diets and look like a “normal” person, we feel fat so we start eating like we are prepping again for a competition, even though we aren’t. It’s a sick and viscous circle that we put ourselves through.



At some point I took a long look at my life and those around me, whom I love very much. My family, my friends. I no longer ate many meals with my family, or if I did, it was cold chicken out of a plastic bag. I didn’t go to many social functions as it was too much eating and drinking, I really didn’t want to be around it.

I knew there was a better way, there had to be. Life is not meant to be lived in purgatory, it’s meant to be enjoyed.

If you have read my last few posts you know I started working with Dr. Layne Norton for my nutrition and now he is doing my training programming also (only because Roy closed his gym, and that’s a whole other story!).

The change was scary at first. We all see the “IIFYM” (If It Fits Your Macros) people, they love to show all the ridiculously unhealthy looking recipes they concoct with fat free this and low cal that. It’s frightening when you come from the belief that there are many “bad” foods out there!

Unlike what most traditional bodybuilder/competitors believe, those of us who follow “flexible dieting” do not all eat crap, at least not all the time. I rarely eat packaged foods, although I eat a lot more than I used to.

It took me a long time to actually believe that “a carb is a carb”. Seriously! I did as I was instructed, and at every weekly check in would ask things like “Is sourdough bread ok?” “May I eat mangoes?” Doesn’t that sound ridiculous?! He would laugh and say “Of course!”



As of this writing, I have had exactly 6 pop tarts! (in a six month span of working with Layne). And…. I LIKE pop tarts now! You see, a carb is a carb and if you tell me that my body knows the difference between a piece of whole wheat toast and a pop tart and will build muscle accordingly (or gain fat), I will tell you to show me proof. Show me a study. I am not going to rely on a steroid taking old school bodybuilder who insists that is true “just because it’s always been done that way”.

One large slice of whole wheat toast has the same (actually a bit more) carbohydrate than one pop tart. I am eating 310 grams of carbohydrate a day, which means I eat 108.5 grams pre training! Sometimes I don’t want three pieces of toast, so I have two pieces and a pop tart (along with yams, raspberry & dark chocolate Greek yogurt and whey protein).

I tend to eat whey to fill in missing protein now. I like whole food best and as much as I can get.



No foods are off limits, but I have learned that there are some that are much more calorie dense than others, and I have also learned that if I want a peanut butter and jelly sandwich, it means on very low carb bread and not pre or post training, the meal timing is crucial as I am working to maintain a very low bodyfat while adding muscle.


I don’t eat “cheat meals”, there is no need as I can eat anything I want, as long as I stick to my macro nutrient ratios, meal timing and calories. If I want a glass of wine, I have one, but it means less food that day (the food wins 99% of the time).

I also eat fewer meals. I eat five meals Monday through Thursday and only four on Friday, Saturday and Sunday. It allows me to have larger portions when I have fewer meals, I sometimes go 5 hours between a meal, I have not lost a leg, all my muscle or died, I look good. And I have muscle, believe me.

My favorite dinner is a cheddar cheese omelet (real, full fat cheese and egg whites) with mushrooms and broccoli raab, all cooked in a small amount of raw butter and garlic sourdough toast. I frequently eat 2 pound salads made of mixed cooked vegetables, hard cooked eggs and chicken breast, all tossed with fresh lemon and tahini sauce, followed by a crisp apple and almond butter

I tend to eat meals that are very filling, so lots of vegetables and leaner meats then I add tahini sauce or almond butter or avocado for fat. I can eat the fattier meats but then I cannot have the almond butter! Decisions, decisions!



People are willing to try everything it seems. Many eat “gluten free” even though they do not have celiac disease; thousands follow a Paleo diet when there is no reason to believe we should eat like cavemen ; there are vegetarians, vegans, dairy free, fish free, you name it there is a diet! They all work for one reason- calorie restriction. BOOM! You cut a major food group out of your diet, or decide you can only eat a few things and you are controlling portion right there.


If people want to be “clean eaters” I support them for attempting to live a healthy life and take control of their nutrition, but I do want to express that there are other ways and other diets that work just as well. People become very passionate about what they strongly believe in, often to the point that they lash out at others who disagree. There is no need for “diet wars”, we should all be free to choose our own method to our madness; however, I hate seeing poor misguided young women (and it’s usually women), fall into the belief that the unhealthy starvation and excess cardio routine is the way to go. These same women are the ones who live “cheat meal” to “cheat meal” and often binge.

Do I think you are less a person for following a clean eating diet? No, not at all. Nor do I think I am superior, I too followed it for many years and swore it was the only way. But in life, we learn as we progress. Change is never easy, and if you don’t want to change, it is even more difficult. When you are ready for a change, when you are no longer happy with the way your life is, you may take a peek and see how the other side lives, the side I am on. Yes, the grass is greener over here!

It’s been almost six months now; I actually just entered into an agreement with Layne for training and nutritional coaching for another year and a half. I was planning a May 10 competition, but I have gotten so lean, that he is encouraging me to do a competition a month earlier, he said I won’t need to diet long and it shouldn’t be difficult.




Did I mention I have lost 10 pounds doing this? Yes, I went from eating 1550 calories a day and weighed 131 pounds in August, to eating 2510 calories a day and I weigh 121 pounds. I am lean and ripped, and I am doing cardio two times a week, for a total of 24 minutes each time (that is including the 5 minute warm up and 5 minute cool down).


Eating this way, reverse dieting (adding calories slowly, the opposite of dieting where you subtract calories) and following a flexible diet have been one of the most challenging things I have ever done, but one of the most rewarding. It’s been six months of daily calculations of every single thing I eat and drink, preparing way ahead, and reviewing restaurant menus before stepping foot into the restaurant. But my body has responded well. I am muscular, very lean, strong, physically and, more importantly, emotionally healthy. I do not feel deprived at all, I feel liberated actually. I am not worried about how I look constantly, or worried that I will “blow up” from eating a certain food. I am no longer bound by the self imposed chains that held me so long.

bcattoes

The blog is blocked at work so all I could read was the cliff notes. I went through a clean eating phase - the Macrobiotic diet, to be exact. I actually found it really easy at first, and always easy when I was at home, since I was living alone at the time. But it was too hard to maintain when eating away from home.

But, I am very glad I did it. I learned a lot about food during that time. And I made some healthy diet changes that have stuck with me through the decades since I did it.

I would encourage anyone to give sensible clean eating a try. If they stick with it, then that's great. If they find it too restrictive and relax a bit, that great too. And hopefully they will learn from it and develop new healthy habits, as I did.

Ah, there you are. Really? Wonderful. new healthy habits like what?

More whole grains, more vegetables, more olive oil, less animal fats. I tried many new foods and food combinations. I (eventually) learned to roll sushi without having sicky rice all over me and the kitchen. A more plant based diet.

mccindy72

The blog is blocked at work so all I could read was the cliff notes. I went through a clean eating phase - the Macrobiotic diet, to be exact. I actually found it really easy at first, and always easy when I was at home, since I was living alone at the time. But it was too hard to maintain when eating away from home.

But, I am very glad I did it. I learned a lot about food during that time. And I made some healthy diet changes that have stuck with me through the decades since I did it.

I would encourage anyone to give sensible clean eating a try. If they stick with it, then that's great. If they find it too restrictive and relax a bit, that great too. And hopefully they will learn from it and develop new healthy habits, as I did.

Ah, there you are. Really? Wonderful. new healthy habits like what?

More whole grains, more vegetables, more olive oil, less animal fats. I tried many new foods and food combinations. I (eventually) learned to roll sushi without having sicky rice all over me and the kitchen. A more plant based diet.

that has nothing to do with this point of this thread. The point of this thread is that as long as you meet your macro needs, you can still eat other foods that fit into your calorie goals and lose weight. Please read the blog post that audii was so kind as to copy and paste in for you. 'Clean eating' isn't necessary. IIFYM is the point.

Because treats,

bcattoes

The blog is blocked at work so all I could read was the cliff notes. I went through a clean eating phase - the Macrobiotic diet, to be exact. I actually found it really easy at first, and always easy when I was at home, since I was living alone at the time. But it was too hard to maintain when eating away from home.

But, I am very glad I did it. I learned a lot about food during that time. And I made some healthy diet changes that have stuck with me through the decades since I did it.

I would encourage anyone to give sensible clean eating a try. If they stick with it, then that's great. If they find it too restrictive and relax a bit, that great too. And hopefully they will learn from it and develop new healthy habits, as I did.

Here is the blog post:

What is “clean eating”? If you are reading this you have certainly heard the term before, but exactly how would you explain it to people? How would you define clean eating? I would like to hear your definition and why you feel that way.

My definition (back when I was a CE’er) was whole foods, nothing from a box, low fat and low carb. Six meals a day (gotta eat every 2.5 hours to keep the metabolism burning)! I ate the same old thing each time and “always carried my food”.

I'll have to read the full article later as I have to go to meeting in just a few min. But this ^^ is very different from how I would describe clean eating. What does meal timing have to do with whether a food is clean or not?? Also, how does fat or carb affect whether a food is clean? Is an avocado not clean? If this is the common definition of clean eating then it has changed greatly over the years.

I define clean food as whole unprocessed food. The more processing, the less clean. Whole grains are minimally processed so pretty clean, though not as clean as say a vegetable picked fresh from the garden. Homemade whole grain bread is less clean than whole grains. Store bought whole grain bread that has man-made food additives would be even less clean. Etc.

bcattoes

The blog is blocked at work so all I could read was the cliff notes. I went through a clean eating phase - the Macrobiotic diet, to be exact. I actually found it really easy at first, and always easy when I was at home, since I was living alone at the time. But it was too hard to maintain when eating away from home.

But, I am very glad I did it. I learned a lot about food during that time. And I made some healthy diet changes that have stuck with me through the decades since I did it.

I would encourage anyone to give sensible clean eating a try. If they stick with it, then that's great. If they find it too restrictive and relax a bit, that great too. And hopefully they will learn from it and develop new healthy habits, as I did.

Ah, there you are. Really? Wonderful. new healthy habits like what?

More whole grains, more vegetables, more olive oil, less animal fats. I tried many new foods and food combinations. I (eventually) learned to roll sushi without having sicky rice all over me and the kitchen. A more plant based diet.

that has nothing to do with this point of this thread. The point of this thread is that as long as you meet your macro needs, you can still eat other foods that fit into your calorie goals and lose weight. Please read the blog post that audii was so kind as to copy and paste in for you. 'Clean eating' isn't necessary. IIFYM is the point.

Because treats,

It had to do with the question I was asked.

Sheila_Ann

bumping for later.

redversustheblue

How can eating clean and IIFYM be the same nutritionally? A Big Mac from McDonalds might fit your macros but nutritionally it's no where near the same nutritional value of the same amount of calories of vegetables, fruits and whole foods. Am I thinking too simple?

Definitely not the same. Processed foods have lots of chemicals and they're made to slide right down with minimal chewing (or many are), so your body barely notices them and you want more. Clean eating has made me like the processed stuff less; I swear I can taste some of the chemicals, particularly in the aftertaste. I do eat some stuff that's not healthy- mainly on the sweet side because I really like desserts. All in moderation and carefully chosen, though.

wth. I'm pretty sure my body knows when I eat something, whether its "processed" and fully of "disgusting chemicals" or not.

mccindy72

The blog is blocked at work so all I could read was the cliff notes. I went through a clean eating phase - the Macrobiotic diet, to be exact. I actually found it really easy at first, and always easy when I was at home, since I was living alone at the time. But it was too hard to maintain when eating away from home.

But, I am very glad I did it. I learned a lot about food during that time. And I made some healthy diet changes that have stuck with me through the decades since I did it.

I would encourage anyone to give sensible clean eating a try. If they stick with it, then that's great. If they find it too restrictive and relax a bit, that great too. And hopefully they will learn from it and develop new healthy habits, as I did.

Ah, there you are. Really? Wonderful. new healthy habits like what?

More whole grains, more vegetables, more olive oil, less animal fats. I tried many new foods and food combinations. I (eventually) learned to roll sushi without having sicky rice all over me and the kitchen. A more plant based diet.

that has nothing to do with this point of this thread. The point of this thread is that as long as you meet your macro needs, you can still eat other foods that fit into your calorie goals and lose weight. Please read the blog post that audii was so kind as to copy and paste in for you. 'Clean eating' isn't necessary. IIFYM is the point.

Because treats,

It had to do with the question I was asked.

Which was asked sarcastically because you had not read the entire thread, or the orginal blog, so did not understand what any of it was referring to. Now please read audii's post and understand that the idea is that clean eating is not necessary, as long as you are able to fit foods into your macro and calorie goals. It's perfectly fine to eat most foods in moderation.

3dogsrunning

I'll have to read the full article later as I have to go to meeting in just a few min. But this ^^ is very different from how I would describe clean eating. What does meal timing have to do with whether a food is clean or not?? Also, how does fat or carb affect whether a food is clean? Is an avocado not clean? If this is the common definition of clean eating then it has changed greatly over the years.

I define clean food as whole unprocessed food. The more processing, the less clean. Whole grains are minimally processed so pretty clean, though not as clean as say a vegetable picked fresh from the garden. Homemade whole grain bread is less clean than whole grains. Store bought whole grain bread that has man-made food additives would be even less clean. Etc.

One of the problem with the term "clean eating" is that it has no definition,
The OP of that article had her definition, which is similar to yours, however, hers was also stricter.
While you two may not agree on what was clean, you both have the bottom line that "processed" or "packaged" food is not clean. She addresses that as well in the article. To me, that is a big part of her point.
Whether you both agree an avocado or white rice is clean or dirty doesn't really matter. For her I believe it was more in the context of bodybuilding that was fueling the "good" carb and "bad" carb thing.
The fact that she has learned that she has nothing to fear from eating a pop tart - which you both would agree wasn't classified as clean - is the bigger point.

mumblemagic

The blog is blocked at work so all I could read was the cliff notes. I went through a clean eating phase - the Macrobiotic diet, to be exact. I actually found it really easy at first, and always easy when I was at home, since I was living alone at the time. But it was too hard to maintain when eating away from home.

But, I am very glad I did it. I learned a lot about food during that time. And I made some healthy diet changes that have stuck with me through the decades since I did it.

I would encourage anyone to give sensible clean eating a try. If they stick with it, then that's great. If they find it too restrictive and relax a bit, that great too. And hopefully they will learn from it and develop new healthy habits, as I did.

Ah, there you are. Really? Wonderful. new healthy habits like what?

More whole grains, more vegetables, more olive oil, less animal fats. I tried many new foods and food combinations. I (eventually) learned to roll sushi without having sicky rice all over me and the kitchen. A more plant based diet.

that has nothing to do with this point of this thread. The point of this thread is that as long as you meet your macro needs, you can still eat other foods that fit into your calorie goals and lose weight. Please read the blog post that audii was so kind as to copy and paste in for you. 'Clean eating' isn't necessary. IIFYM is the point.

Because treats,

One of the major issues I have with “eating clean” is that everybody seems to have a different definition of what a “clean” and “dirty” food is (see the blog and http://www.wannabebig.com/diet-and-nutrition/the-dirt-on-clean-eating/#). The wide variation means that actually, the phrase has no real meaning.

In any case, it isn’t necessary to “eat clean” to realise that eating plenty of vegetables, home-cooked food, few artificial additives, not too much salt etc. is a good thing to do; There is endless advice from health agencies that this is a good idea, without restricting various foods and food groups and arbitrarily labelling foods as bad or good based on little scientific evidence. Demonizing foods in this way seems far too much like disordered eating for me to feel that it is a good way forward.

Edit:

Also this

One of the problem with the term "clean eating" is that it has no definition,
The OP of that article had her definition, which is similar to yours, however, hers was also stricter.
While you two may not agree on what was clean, you both have the bottom line that "processed" or "packaged" food is not clean. She addresses that as well in the article. To me, that is a big part of her point.
Whether you both agree an avocado or white rice is clean or dirty doesn't really matter. For her I believe it was more in the context of bodybuilding that was fueling the "good" carb and "bad" carb thing.
The fact that she has learned that she has nothing to fear from eating a pop tart - which you both would agree wasn't classified as clean - is the bigger point.

farmboyphotography

Eating according to IIFYM does not automatically mean that one eats only " dirty " ( no matter if it's just a bit dirty or really dirty all the way ) and that it is necessary to live a happy and fulfilled life..
I understand that IIFYM means " eat whatever you want once your macros are covered ".

I LOVE the idea of IIFYM and I do eat ice cream and high calorie foods sometimes. But I probably shouldn't. I hear all the time that if you do not allow yourself to eat junk food once in a while, you will binge (or other statements to that effect). But this is me and why clean eating works for me better than IIFYM:

I'm a junk food junkie. I admit it. I can never eat just one of anything when it comes to junk food, donuts, cookies, candy, chocolate, etc. In the checkout line, I picked up a candy bar. Then I thought about all the sugar in the candy bar. I thought about all the health problems that come with being insulin resistant. I thought about how lousy being unfit feels. I thought about the probability of never seeing my daughter walk down the aisle (in about 40 years!) if I eat a little junk food. I put the candy bar back. For me, eating clean works better because for some reason, I just can't stop eating junk food once I start. :frown:

bcattoes

I read the whole article and I would have to say that Cliff should be fired because his notes suck.

This sounds more like a descriptions of an eating disorder than clean eating. I still say that trying sensible clean eaing (eliminating most processed foods/meals) is not a bad thing. If you become obsessive about it, then it is not sensible.

I guess it's just my age but clean eating used to have a more consistent definition in my day. Whole foods. Packaging, carb or fat content, weight loss, macros, had nothing to do with it. It was about eating natural foods. The closer the food was to it's natural state the cleaner it was. Period. It was a health thing, not a weight loss thing.

Anyway, I think it sounds like that blogger had and still has food issues.

mumblemagic

I read the whole article and I would have to say that Cliff should be fired because his notes suck.

This sounds more like a descriptions of an eating disorder than clean eating. I still say that trying sensible clean eating (eliminating most processed foods/meals) is not a bad thing. If you become obsessive about it, then it is not sensible.

I guess it's just my age but clean eating used to have a more consistent definition in my day. Whole foods. Packaging, carb or fat content, weight loss, macros, had nothing to do with it. It was about eating natural foods. The closer the food was to it's natural state the cleaner it was. Period. It was a health thing, not a weight loss thing.

Anyway, I think it sounds like that blogger had and still has food issues.

Everything in moderation eh!

Totes agree with you here - the packaging thing is a ridiculous argument but eating whole foods is definitely good. When you take it to the extreme it can cause issues, though.

bcattoes

I read the whole article and I would have to say that Cliff should be fired because his notes suck.

This sounds more like a descriptions of an eating disorder than clean eating. I still say that trying sensible clean eating (eliminating most processed foods/meals) is not a bad thing. If you become obsessive about it, then it is not sensible.

I guess it's just my age but clean eating used to have a more consistent definition in my day. Whole foods. Packaging, carb or fat content, weight loss, macros, had nothing to do with it. It was about eating natural foods. The closer the food was to it's natural state the cleaner it was. Period. It was a health thing, not a weight loss thing.

Anyway, I think it sounds like that blogger had and still has food issues.

Everything in moderation eh!

Totes agree with you here - the packaging thing is a ridiculous argument but eating whole foods is definitely good. When you take it to the extreme it can cause issues, though.

I didn't really mean everything in moderation by the bolded segment. I meant all that nonsense in the article about eating the same things every day and needing to eat at certain intervals and avoiding family meals.

Personally, I don't care for the phrase 'everything in moderation' because it has no real definition. But that's for another thread, I suppose.

mumblemagic

I read the whole article and I would have to say that Cliff should be fired because his notes suck.

This sounds more like a descriptions of an eating disorder than clean eating. I still say that trying sensible clean eating (eliminating most processed foods/meals) is not a bad thing. If you become obsessive about it, then it is not sensible.

I guess it's just my age but clean eating used to have a more consistent definition in my day. Whole foods. Packaging, carb or fat content, weight loss, macros, had nothing to do with it. It was about eating natural foods. The closer the food was to it's natural state the cleaner it was. Period. It was a health thing, not a weight loss thing.

Anyway, I think it sounds like that blogger had and still has food issues.

Everything in moderation eh!

Totes agree with you here - the packaging thing is a ridiculous argument but eating whole foods is definitely good. When you take it to the extreme it can cause issues, though.

I didn't really mean everything in moderation by the bolded segment. I meant all that nonsense in the article about eating the same things every day and needing to eat at certain intervals and avoiding family meals.

Personally, I don't care for the phrase 'everything in moderation' because it has no real definition. But that's for another thread, I suppose.

Again, I agree with you. The "everything in moderation" comment was intended as a tongue in cheek over-simplification of a very good point I think I knew what you meant.

maillemaker

I'm a junk food junkie. I admit it. I can never eat just one of anything when it comes to junk food, donuts, cookies, candy, chocolate, etc. In the checkout line, I picked up a candy bar. Then I thought about all the sugar in the candy bar. I thought about all the health problems that come with being insulin resistant. I thought about how lousy being unfit feels. I thought about the probability of never seeing my daughter walk down the aisle (in about 40 years!) if I eat a little junk food. I put the candy bar back. For me, eating clean works better because for some reason, I just can't stop eating junk food once I start. :frown:

I'm the same way. The idea of "everything in moderation" only works if you have the willpower to eat very tempting foods in moderation. It's like telling a gambling addict it's OK to just play one game of slots. Easier to stay out of the casino.

Steve

farmboyphotography

I'm a junk food junkie. I admit it. I can never eat just one of anything when it comes to junk food, donuts, cookies, candy, chocolate, etc. In the checkout line, I picked up a candy bar. Then I thought about all the sugar in the candy bar. I thought about all the health problems that come with being insulin resistant. I thought about how lousy being unfit feels. I thought about the probability of never seeing my daughter walk down the aisle (in about 40 years!) if I eat a little junk food. I put the candy bar back. For me, eating clean works better because for some reason, I just can't stop eating junk food once I start. :frown:

I'm the same way. The idea of "everything in moderation" only works if you have the willpower to eat very tempting foods in moderation. It's like telling a gambling addict it's OK to just play one game of slots. Easier to stay out of the casino.

Steve

Exactly! Eating clean works better for me for that reason. It doesn't bother me to skip the junk food completely, ONCE I GET OUT OF THAT HABIT. There are enough tasty clean foods that it does not have to be a boring menu that is the same every day. It is exactly like a gambling addict who is in recovery, if you want to call it that -- it is best to just not go down that path and open the door to that old habit that is hard to moderate.

Anyway, that is my situation. Of course mileage will vary from one person to another. What is working for me will not necessarily also be true for others. IIFYM may be just fine for some, but not for me. :ohwell:

readyin5weeks

I think that most "normal" people (as opposed to a competitive bodybuilder) will not fully grasp the content of the blog. 90% of the bodybuilding community insists you ned to "eat clean" and only specific foods, every 2.5 hours to diet down for a competition, it is the generally accepted method of prepping, it s not unusual at all..