Paleo Backpedaling?
Replies
-
I'm pretty sure there were no bicycles in the palaeolithic era to be backpedaling with.... :bigsmile:
You've clearly never watched the flintstones!0 -
I'd say, or I would like to see more of a focus on how food reacts to each individual person. More so than the "We ALL have to cut this or that out of our diets!" approach. You know - how some people respond to certain foods a certain way.
There is quite a bit of research being done in this area. And the results point to genetics playing a bigger role than most people give them credit for when it comes to nutrition.
Yeah, I was very surprised when I heard about the percentages of lactose intolerance in various ethnic groups. I don't remember the exact numbers, but it was somewhere around 10% Caucasian, 60% African American, and 90% of Asian populations were intolerant. That is pretty wild to see such a vast difference. Apparently some of the cultures lack the enzymes to break down the lactose in dairy.
Similar to how some ethnicities cannot break down alcohol properly.
So we really are NOT all the same after all when it comes to nutrition? Mind blown.
Check this one out. It does cast doubt on the whole "a calorie is a calorie" argument in relation to weight control.
http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2014/03/genetic-link-between-fried-foods-and-obesity/0 -
I'd say, or I would like to see more of a focus on how food reacts to each individual person. More so than the "We ALL have to cut this or that out of our diets!" approach. You know - how some people respond to certain foods a certain way.
There is quite a bit of research being done in this area. And the results point to genetics playing a bigger role than most people give them credit for when it comes to nutrition.
Yeah, I was very surprised when I heard about the percentages of lactose intolerance in various ethnic groups. I don't remember the exact numbers, but it was somewhere around 10% Caucasian, 60% African American, and 90% of Asian populations were intolerant. That is pretty wild to see such a vast difference. Apparently some of the cultures lack the enzymes to break down the lactose in dairy.
Similar to how some ethnicities cannot break down alcohol properly.
So we really are NOT all the same after all when it comes to nutrition? Mind blown.
if you're descended from a population with a long tradition of dairy farming/herding then you're likely able to digest lactose. If you're not, then you're likely not. This is an example of natural selection happening in modern times. Dairy farming/herding populations have evolved the ability to digest lactose as adults.
Yep he say's that in one of his blogs.0 -
I'm pretty sure there were no bicycles in the palaeolithic era to be backpedaling with.... :bigsmile:
You've clearly never watched the flintstones!
that's where I think some of these paleo gurus get their info from...0 -
I'm pretty sure there were no bicycles in the palaeolithic era to be backpedaling with.... :bigsmile:
You've clearly never watched the flintstones!
that's where I think some of these paleo gurus get their info from...
It is. That's why we don't eat grain.0 -
I'd say, or I would like to see more of a focus on how food reacts to each individual person. More so than the "We ALL have to cut this or that out of our diets!" approach. You know - how some people respond to certain foods a certain way.
There is quite a bit of research being done in this area. And the results point to genetics playing a bigger role than most people give them credit for when it comes to nutrition.
Yeah, I was very surprised when I heard about the percentages of lactose intolerance in various ethnic groups. I don't remember the exact numbers, but it was somewhere around 10% Caucasian, 60% African American, and 90% of Asian populations were intolerant. That is pretty wild to see such a vast difference. Apparently some of the cultures lack the enzymes to break down the lactose in dairy.
Similar to how some ethnicities cannot break down alcohol properly.
So we really are NOT all the same after all when it comes to nutrition? Mind blown.
if you're descended from a population with a long tradition of dairy farming/herding then you're likely able to digest lactose. If you're not, then you're likely not. This is an example of natural selection happening in modern times. Dairy farming/herding populations have evolved the ability to digest lactose as adults.
It actually has nothing to do with the conversation, but for some reason your comment reminded me of it. :laugh:0 -
I'm pretty sure there were no bicycles in the palaeolithic era to be backpedaling with.... :bigsmile:
You've clearly never watched the flintstones!
that's where I think some of these paleo gurus get their info from...
It is. That's why we don't eat grain.0 -
I'm not sure how it's backpedaling when it's "...we're fast learning". As long as they're not blatantly ignoring new evidence, it's all good as far as I'm concerned.
Also, it seems the preparation still has a lot to do with it's effects (this cooked and cooled thing). This means I will go eat a big potato salad to celebrate.
Yeah - I wouldn't be surprised! And ditto, the diet sounds good to me too!! I'm a vaguely paleo, and I've found it was more the 'whole foods' aspect that did me good, above the 'no grains and legumes' stuff.
I'd say, or I would like to see more of a focus on how food reacts to each individual person. More so than the "We ALL have to cut this or that out of our diets!" approach. You know - how some people respond to certain foods a certain way. That's not really Paleo though... or Primal or whatever.
Is it bad that the more scientific evidence comes out about stuff, the less I care and decide to do what I want anyway?!
No. I think that many of us go try different things and kind of end up in the same place. The more experienced users try to make that journey faster, but most of us aren't ready to hear them until we've done our own experimentation.0 -
I'm pretty sure there were no bicycles in the palaeolithic era to be backpedaling with.... :bigsmile:
You've clearly never watched the flintstones!
that's where I think some of these paleo gurus get their info from...
It is. That's why we don't eat grain.
who isn't?0 -
I'm pretty sure there were no bicycles in the palaeolithic era to be backpedaling with.... :bigsmile:
You've clearly never watched the flintstones!
that's where I think some of these paleo gurus get their info from...
It is. That's why we don't eat grain.
who isn't?
+10 -
I'm pretty sure there were no bicycles in the palaeolithic era to be backpedaling with.... :bigsmile:
You've clearly never watched the flintstones!
that's where I think some of these paleo gurus get their info from...
It is. That's why we don't eat grain.
hmmmm - those ribs would be an ideal meal for me.0 -
But I just listen to my body and eat what makes it happy. There is no diet name for that, tho.
You could make a buck if you came up with a name. The Believe Your Body diet?
I actually feel my best eating a diet similar to what you describe.
That's pretty much the GoKaleo strategy.0 -
http://www.marksdailyapple.com/the-definitive-guide-to-resistant-starch/
At least, I kind of feel like this article is saying "you know those foods I told you to avoid because they were bad for you? It turns out they are good for you, so you shouldn't be avoiding them."
:bigsmile:0 -
Were potatoes formerly not ok foods but are now?)
They are a "nightshade" plant.0 -
But I just listen to my body and eat what makes it happy. There is no diet name for that, tho.
You could make a buck if you came up with a name. The Believe Your Body diet?
I actually feel my best eating a diet similar to what you describe.
That's pretty much the GoKaleo strategy.0 -
I'm pretty sure there were no bicycles in the palaeolithic era to be backpedaling with.... :bigsmile:
You've clearly never watched the flintstones!
that's where I think some of these paleo gurus get their info from...
It is. That's why we don't eat grain.
who isn't?
*raises hand* If had a rack of ribs of that big I'd eat it all. And that would pretty much be my calories for the entire week.0 -
I'd say, or I would like to see more of a focus on how food reacts to each individual person. More so than the "We ALL have to cut this or that out of our diets!" approach. You know - how some people respond to certain foods a certain way.
There is quite a bit of research being done in this area. And the results point to genetics playing a bigger role than most people give them credit for when it comes to nutrition.
Yeah, I was very surprised when I heard about the percentages of lactose intolerance in various ethnic groups. I don't remember the exact numbers, but it was somewhere around 10% Caucasian, 60% African American, and 90% of Asian populations were intolerant. That is pretty wild to see such a vast difference. Apparently some of the cultures lack the enzymes to break down the lactose in dairy.
Similar to how some ethnicities cannot break down alcohol properly.
So we really are NOT all the same after all when it comes to nutrition? Mind blown.
if you're descended from a population with a long tradition of dairy farming/herding then you're likely able to digest lactose. If you're not, then you're likely not. This is an example of natural selection happening in modern times. Dairy farming/herding populations have evolved the ability to digest lactose as adults.
It actually has nothing to do with the conversation, but for some reason your comment reminded me of it. :laugh:
no it's cool, this is a much more interesting topic of conversation! :drinker:
yeah Homo sapiens evolved in Africa, and all non-Africans are descended from what's essentially an evolutionary bottleneck of those who left Africa. However, upon leaving Africa, they interbred and Neanderthals and Denisovans (and probably some other human species who were around, e.g. Asian Homo erectus, but the DNA evidence for that hasn't been found yet) so there are some traits in non-Africans that don't exist in Africans. It's also possible that many of these traits that are adaptations to specific climates, e.g. white skin and big noses in Europeans, came from neanderthals, etc. When you look at patterns of variation around the world in different prehistoric eras, there are some very interesting patterns emerging. And a big part of this picture seems to be that humans like to have sex with other humans from very different populations.... just waiting for scientists to announce the discovery of Asian Homo erectus DNA in modern populations, or the discovery of a whole new species of human which, surprise surprise, left some of its DNA in modern humans...)0 -
I'm pretty sure there were no bicycles in the palaeolithic era to be backpedaling with.... :bigsmile:
You've clearly never watched the flintstones!
that's where I think some of these paleo gurus get their info from...
It is. That's why we don't eat grain.
who isn't?
*raises hand* If had a rack of ribs of that big I'd eat it all. And that would pretty much be my calories for the entire week.
it's a shame the woolly mammoth is extinct because I'm sure a rack of woolly mammoth ribs would be that big. And as elephants are kind of vaguely related to pigs, they'd probably taste rather like pigs ribs.
ETA: and my avatar (or at least the woman who my avatar is a reconstruction of) probably ate mammoth ribs... *jealous*0 -
I'm pretty sure there were no bicycles in the palaeolithic era to be backpedaling with.... :bigsmile:
You've clearly never watched the flintstones!
that's where I think some of these paleo gurus get their info from...
It is. That's why we don't eat grain.0 -
I'd say, or I would like to see more of a focus on how food reacts to each individual person. More so than the "We ALL have to cut this or that out of our diets!" approach. You know - how some people respond to certain foods a certain way.
There is quite a bit of research being done in this area. And the results point to genetics playing a bigger role than most people give them credit for when it comes to nutrition.
Yeah, I was very surprised when I heard about the percentages of lactose intolerance in various ethnic groups. I don't remember the exact numbers, but it was somewhere around 10% Caucasian, 60% African American, and 90% of Asian populations were intolerant. That is pretty wild to see such a vast difference. Apparently some of the cultures lack the enzymes to break down the lactose in dairy.
Similar to how some ethnicities cannot break down alcohol properly.
So we really are NOT all the same after all when it comes to nutrition? Mind blown.
if you're descended from a population with a long tradition of dairy farming/herding then you're likely able to digest lactose. If you're not, then you're likely not. This is an example of natural selection happening in modern times. Dairy farming/herding populations have evolved the ability to digest lactose as adults.
It actually has nothing to do with the conversation, but for some reason your comment reminded me of it. :laugh:
no it's cool, this is a much more interesting topic of conversation! :drinker:
yeah Homo sapiens evolved in Africa, and all non-Africans are descended from what's essentially an evolutionary bottleneck of those who left Africa. However, upon leaving Africa, they interbred and Neanderthals and Denisovans (and probably some other human species who were around, e.g. Asian Homo erectus, but the DNA evidence for that hasn't been found yet) so there are some traits in non-Africans that don't exist in Africans. It's also possible that many of these traits that are adaptations to specific climates, e.g. white skin and big noses in Europeans, came from neanderthals, etc. When you look at patterns of variation around the world in different prehistoric eras, there are some very interesting patterns emerging. And a big part of this picture seems to be that humans like to have sex with other humans from very different populations.... just waiting for scientists to announce the discovery of Asian Homo erectus DNA in modern populations, or the discovery of a whole new species of human which, surprise surprise, left some of its DNA in modern humans...)0 -
bump0
-
I'd say, or I would like to see more of a focus on how food reacts to each individual person. More so than the "We ALL have to cut this or that out of our diets!" approach. You know - how some people respond to certain foods a certain way.
There is quite a bit of research being done in this area. And the results point to genetics playing a bigger role than most people give them credit for when it comes to nutrition.
Yeah, I was very surprised when I heard about the percentages of lactose intolerance in various ethnic groups. I don't remember the exact numbers, but it was somewhere around 10% Caucasian, 60% African American, and 90% of Asian populations were intolerant. That is pretty wild to see such a vast difference. Apparently some of the cultures lack the enzymes to break down the lactose in dairy.
Similar to how some ethnicities cannot break down alcohol properly.
So we really are NOT all the same after all when it comes to nutrition? Mind blown.
if you're descended from a population with a long tradition of dairy farming/herding then you're likely able to digest lactose. If you're not, then you're likely not. This is an example of natural selection happening in modern times. Dairy farming/herding populations have evolved the ability to digest lactose as adults.
It actually has nothing to do with the conversation, but for some reason your comment reminded me of it. :laugh:
no it's cool, this is a much more interesting topic of conversation! :drinker:
yeah Homo sapiens evolved in Africa, and all non-Africans are descended from what's essentially an evolutionary bottleneck of those who left Africa. However, upon leaving Africa, they interbred and Neanderthals and Denisovans (and probably some other human species who were around, e.g. Asian Homo erectus, but the DNA evidence for that hasn't been found yet) so there are some traits in non-Africans that don't exist in Africans. It's also possible that many of these traits that are adaptations to specific climates, e.g. white skin and big noses in Europeans, came from neanderthals, etc. When you look at patterns of variation around the world in different prehistoric eras, there are some very interesting patterns emerging. And a big part of this picture seems to be that humans like to have sex with other humans from very different populations.... just waiting for scientists to announce the discovery of Asian Homo erectus DNA in modern populations, or the discovery of a whole new species of human which, surprise surprise, left some of its DNA in modern humans...)
yeah, Java man = Homo erectus :drinker:0 -
I'd say, or I would like to see more of a focus on how food reacts to each individual person. More so than the "We ALL have to cut this or that out of our diets!" approach. You know - how some people respond to certain foods a certain way.
There is quite a bit of research being done in this area. And the results point to genetics playing a bigger role than most people give them credit for when it comes to nutrition.
Yeah, I was very surprised when I heard about the percentages of lactose intolerance in various ethnic groups. I don't remember the exact numbers, but it was somewhere around 10% Caucasian, 60% African American, and 90% of Asian populations were intolerant. That is pretty wild to see such a vast difference. Apparently some of the cultures lack the enzymes to break down the lactose in dairy.
Similar to how some ethnicities cannot break down alcohol properly.
So we really are NOT all the same after all when it comes to nutrition? Mind blown.
if you're descended from a population with a long tradition of dairy farming/herding then you're likely able to digest lactose. If you're not, then you're likely not. This is an example of natural selection happening in modern times. Dairy farming/herding populations have evolved the ability to digest lactose as adults.
It actually has nothing to do with the conversation, but for some reason your comment reminded me of it. :laugh:
no it's cool, this is a much more interesting topic of conversation! :drinker:
yeah Homo sapiens evolved in Africa, and all non-Africans are descended from what's essentially an evolutionary bottleneck of those who left Africa. However, upon leaving Africa, they interbred and Neanderthals and Denisovans (and probably some other human species who were around, e.g. Asian Homo erectus, but the DNA evidence for that hasn't been found yet) so there are some traits in non-Africans that don't exist in Africans. It's also possible that many of these traits that are adaptations to specific climates, e.g. white skin and big noses in Europeans, came from neanderthals, etc. When you look at patterns of variation around the world in different prehistoric eras, there are some very interesting patterns emerging. And a big part of this picture seems to be that humans like to have sex with other humans from very different populations.... just waiting for scientists to announce the discovery of Asian Homo erectus DNA in modern populations, or the discovery of a whole new species of human which, surprise surprise, left some of its DNA in modern humans...)
Sometimes I worry about what the lack of near human relatives means for us as a species. But, this indicates that all the subgroups disappeared because we all interbred...that makes a lot of sense and is better than the conclusion I was drawing.
ETA: LOL - Homo erectus.0 -
I'm pretty sure there were no bicycles in the palaeolithic era to be backpedaling with.... :bigsmile:
You've clearly never watched the flintstones!
that's where I think some of these paleo gurus get their info from...
It is. That's why we don't eat grain.
who isn't?
*raises hand* If had a rack of ribs of that big I'd eat it all. And that would pretty much be my calories for the entire week.
it's a shame the woolly mammoth is extinct because I'm sure a rack of woolly mammoth ribs would be that big. And as elephants are kind of vaguely related to pigs, they'd probably taste rather like pigs ribs.
ETA: and my avatar (or at least the woman who my avatar is a reconstruction of) probably ate mammoth ribs... *jealous*
Perhaps the reason why the woolly mammoth is extinct is because they were *that good*0 -
I'm pretty sure there were no bicycles in the palaeolithic era to be backpedaling with.... :bigsmile:
You've clearly never watched the flintstones!
that's where I think some of these paleo gurus get their info from...
It is. That's why we don't eat grain.
who isn't?
*raises hand* If had a rack of ribs of that big I'd eat it all. And that would pretty much be my calories for the entire week.
it's a shame the woolly mammoth is extinct because I'm sure a rack of woolly mammoth ribs would be that big. And as elephants are kind of vaguely related to pigs, they'd probably taste rather like pigs ribs.
ETA: and my avatar (or at least the woman who my avatar is a reconstruction of) probably ate mammoth ribs... *jealous*
Perhaps the reason why the woolly mammoth is extinct is because they were *that good*
Yes I think you are correct.
And I also think that the whole reason why modern people are so miserable all the time is due to the lack of mammoth ribs in our diets.0 -
I'd say, or I would like to see more of a focus on how food reacts to each individual person. More so than the "We ALL have to cut this or that out of our diets!" approach. You know - how some people respond to certain foods a certain way.
There is quite a bit of research being done in this area. And the results point to genetics playing a bigger role than most people give them credit for when it comes to nutrition.
Yeah, I was very surprised when I heard about the percentages of lactose intolerance in various ethnic groups. I don't remember the exact numbers, but it was somewhere around 10% Caucasian, 60% African American, and 90% of Asian populations were intolerant. That is pretty wild to see such a vast difference. Apparently some of the cultures lack the enzymes to break down the lactose in dairy.
Similar to how some ethnicities cannot break down alcohol properly.
So we really are NOT all the same after all when it comes to nutrition? Mind blown.
if you're descended from a population with a long tradition of dairy farming/herding then you're likely able to digest lactose. If you're not, then you're likely not. This is an example of natural selection happening in modern times. Dairy farming/herding populations have evolved the ability to digest lactose as adults.
It actually has nothing to do with the conversation, but for some reason your comment reminded me of it. :laugh:
no it's cool, this is a much more interesting topic of conversation! :drinker:
yeah Homo sapiens evolved in Africa, and all non-Africans are descended from what's essentially an evolutionary bottleneck of those who left Africa. However, upon leaving Africa, they interbred and Neanderthals and Denisovans (and probably some other human species who were around, e.g. Asian Homo erectus, but the DNA evidence for that hasn't been found yet) so there are some traits in non-Africans that don't exist in Africans. It's also possible that many of these traits that are adaptations to specific climates, e.g. white skin and big noses in Europeans, came from neanderthals, etc. When you look at patterns of variation around the world in different prehistoric eras, there are some very interesting patterns emerging. And a big part of this picture seems to be that humans like to have sex with other humans from very different populations.... just waiting for scientists to announce the discovery of Asian Homo erectus DNA in modern populations, or the discovery of a whole new species of human which, surprise surprise, left some of its DNA in modern humans...)
Sometimes I worry about what the lack of near human relatives means for us as a species. But, this indicates that all the subgroups disappeared because we all interbred...that makes a lot of sense and is better than the conclusion I was drawing.
ETA: LOL - Homo erectus.
the field of palaeoanthropology seems to be coming to this conclusion too. Humans seem to be Borg. "you will be assimilated"0 -
I'm pretty sure there were no bicycles in the palaeolithic era to be backpedaling with.... :bigsmile:
You've clearly never watched the flintstones!
that's where I think some of these paleo gurus get their info from...
It is. That's why we don't eat grain.
who isn't?
*raises hand* If had a rack of ribs of that big I'd eat it all. And that would pretty much be my calories for the entire week.
it's a shame the woolly mammoth is extinct because I'm sure a rack of woolly mammoth ribs would be that big. And as elephants are kind of vaguely related to pigs, they'd probably taste rather like pigs ribs.
ETA: and my avatar (or at least the woman who my avatar is a reconstruction of) probably ate mammoth ribs... *jealous*
Perhaps the reason why the woolly mammoth is extinct is because they were *that good*
Yes I think you are correct.
And I also think that the whole reason why modern people are so miserable all the time is due to the lack of mammoth ribs in our diets.
...a genetic longing for the lost food of a golden era...0 -
I'm pretty sure there were no bicycles in the palaeolithic era to be backpedaling with.... :bigsmile:
You've clearly never watched the flintstones!
that's where I think some of these paleo gurus get their info from...
It is. That's why we don't eat grain.
who isn't?
*raises hand* If had a rack of ribs of that big I'd eat it all. And that would pretty much be my calories for the entire week.
it's a shame the woolly mammoth is extinct because I'm sure a rack of woolly mammoth ribs would be that big. And as elephants are kind of vaguely related to pigs, they'd probably taste rather like pigs ribs.
ETA: and my avatar (or at least the woman who my avatar is a reconstruction of) probably ate mammoth ribs... *jealous*
Perhaps the reason why the woolly mammoth is extinct is because they were *that good*
Yes I think you are correct.
And I also think that the whole reason why modern people are so miserable all the time is due to the lack of mammoth ribs in our diets.
...a genetic longing for the lost food of a golden era...
exactly.0 -
I'm pretty sure there were no bicycles in the palaeolithic era to be backpedaling with.... :bigsmile:
You've clearly never watched the flintstones!
that's where I think some of these paleo gurus get their info from...
It is. That's why we don't eat grain.
who isn't?
*raises hand* If had a rack of ribs of that big I'd eat it all. And that would pretty much be my calories for the entire week.
it's a shame the woolly mammoth is extinct because I'm sure a rack of woolly mammoth ribs would be that big. And as elephants are kind of vaguely related to pigs, they'd probably taste rather like pigs ribs.
ETA: and my avatar (or at least the woman who my avatar is a reconstruction of) probably ate mammoth ribs... *jealous*
She probably did. But she probably didn't have a desk job. :ohwell:0 -
the field of palaeoanthropology seems to be coming to this conclusion too. Humans seem to be Borg. "you will be assimilated"0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 395.7K Introduce Yourself
- 44.1K Getting Started
- 260.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.3K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.8K Fitness and Exercise
- 448 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.2K Motivation and Support
- 8.2K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 4.3K MyFitnessPal Information
- 16 News and Announcements
- 1.4K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions