One free night a year
Options
Replies
-
well considering I am in the lifestyle one free night a year means you need better friends
:drinker: :drinker:0 -
I think that one can have sex without being intimate and one can be intimate without sex. There is no such thing as open intimacy.
stop making me like you.0 -
well considering I am in the lifestyle one free night a year means you need better friends
:drinker: :drinker:
*gives the super secret handshake* :drinker: :drinker: :drinker: :drinker: :drinker: :drinker:0 -
My opinion: If you're seeking sexual/romantic gratification from someone OTHER than your wife/SO, then you're cheating. I don't care if it's "approved" by the spouse... If you truly cared for and loved your spouse, you wouldn't want to be with ANYONE else.
Disagree. Then again, I don't buy into the idea of being only able to love one person at a time. Just because you love and marry someone, doesn't mean you can't love other people too.0 -
And this is what's wrong with the world.0
-
My opinion: If you're seeking sexual/romantic gratification from someone OTHER than your wife/SO, then you're cheating. I don't care if it's "approved" by the spouse... If you truly cared for and loved your spouse, you wouldn't want to be with ANYONE else.
No, no and NO.
I love and care for my spouse. I would die without him but it doesn't mean I love him less because I find someone else attractive and I want to sleep with them (provided he finds their spouse attractive as well. It's a team sport)0 -
I would be for this, if I had not already found the perfect woman. I really don't need a night of disappointment once a year.0
-
My opinion: If you're seeking sexual/romantic gratification from someone OTHER than your wife/SO, then you're cheating. I don't care if it's "approved" by the spouse... If you truly cared for and loved your spouse, you wouldn't want to be with ANYONE else.
No, no and NO.
I love and care for my spouse. I would die without him but it doesn't mean I love him less because I find someone else attractive and I want to sleep with them (provided he finds their spouse attractive as well. It's a team sport)
Wanting to sleep with another person who isn't your spouse is a lot different than actually sleeping with that person.0 -
My opinion: If you're seeking sexual/romantic gratification from someone OTHER than your wife/SO, then you're cheating. I don't care if it's "approved" by the spouse... If you truly cared for and loved your spouse, you wouldn't want to be with ANYONE else.
No, no and NO.
I love and care for my spouse. I would die without him but it doesn't mean I love him less because I find someone else attractive and I want to sleep with them (provided he finds their spouse attractive as well. It's a team sport)
Wanting to sleep with another person who isn't your spouse is a lot different than actually sleeping with that person.
?? Apparently you don't understand my post.0 -
I think that one can have sex without being intimate and one can be intimate without sex. There is no such thing as open intimacy.
stop making me like you.
sorry not sorry0 -
I'm way too insecure to handle something like that.0
-
this thread is interesting...it seems to be fairly common to think that having an open marriage means something is wrong with the marriage and/or there is no love there.
there are PLENNNNTY of couples that happily and successfully engage in open relationships, swapping, additional partners, and a myriad of other activities considered nontraditional.
the fact that this is so taboo and equates to not loving the other person is just archaic.0 -
nah threeways are more fun0
-
this thread is interesting...it seems to be fairly common to think that having an open marriage means something is wrong with the marriage and/or there is no love there.
there are PLENNNNTY of couples that happily and successfully engage in open relationships, swapping, additional partners, and a myriad of other activities considered nontraditional.
the fact that this is so taboo and equates to not loving the other person is just archaic.
^^^ This. A million times this.0 -
this thread is interesting...it seems to be fairly common to think that having an open marriage means something is wrong with the marriage and/or there is no love there.
there are PLENNNNTY of couples that happily and successfully engage in open relationships, swapping, additional partners, and a myriad of other activities considered nontraditional.
the fact that this is so taboo and equates to not loving the other person is just archaic.
Pretty much this. Monogamy is a social/behavioral construct resulting from the necessarily high level or parental investment for raising human offspring and even in this context it is the exception, not the rule. Monogamy =/= love.0 -
Just a little pro-tip: Monogamy is a fairly recent concept for humans. Its also tied to the idea that women are possessions (which is why its MORE taboo for women to engage in poly relationships than it is for men).0
-
I threw up a little when I thought about this. Definitely not for me.
Although... If a certain Hollywood actress.... back in her prime came up to me... NO!0 -
Just a little pro-tip: Monogamy is a fairly recent concept for humans. Its also tied to the idea that women are possessions (which is why its MORE taboo for women to engage in poly relationships than it is for men).
Males in non-monogamous relationships (not necessarily just referencing humans here) risk the potential of investing in offspring that do not actually carry any of their genetic material, so these taboos and social structures do exist for a reason. An archaic and entirely unnecessary reason in modern society, but my point was to hi-light that the entire concept of monogamy is the result of evolutionary adaptation and has nothing to do with genuine feelings of affection experienced by two people.0 -
this thread is interesting...it seems to be fairly common to think that having an open marriage means something is wrong with the marriage and/or there is no love there.
there are PLENNNNTY of couples that happily and successfully engage in open relationships, swapping, additional partners, and a myriad of other activities considered nontraditional.
the fact that this is so taboo and equates to not loving the other person is just archaic.
Marriage is between two people. Not three, not four. TWO.
If an individual cannot be/does not want to be with one person, there is absolutely no point in getting married.0 -
this thread is interesting...it seems to be fairly common to think that having an open marriage means something is wrong with the marriage and/or there is no love there.
there are PLENNNNTY of couples that happily and successfully engage in open relationships, swapping, additional partners, and a myriad of other activities considered nontraditional.
the fact that this is so taboo and equates to not loving the other person is just archaic.
Marriage is between two people. Not three, not four. TWO.
If an individual cannot be/does not want to be with one person, there is absolutely no point in getting married.
This concept of an open marriage is obviously too adult for you to handle0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 392K Introduce Yourself
- 43.6K Getting Started
- 259.8K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.7K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 402 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.8K Motivation and Support
- 7.9K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.4K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 998 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.4K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions