heart rate monitor and big boobs?!
dp1228
Posts: 439 Member
okay im sorry if this is TMI or not approrpriate but i just wanted some feedback! i purchased a polar ft4 heart rate monitor and so far i THINK its working great. my only concern is where the chest strap has to be located and my chest size. i have a fairlyyy large chest and theres only so much a good bra can do! could the accurateness of my hrm be off because of my chest? idk if ive just been doing extra hard workouts since i got my hrm or what what ive been burning a lot and i just wanna make sure its not overestimating. a lot of the time the bottom of my bra ends up covering the front of the chest strap and im just concerned it may be moving around etc etc. i think it may be fine but i want to know if any other women have problems with their hrm chest straps because of their chests!
if this helps at all my most recent workout (an hour ago) i did cardio kickboxing for almost 40 minutes, my heart rate stayed between 165 and 185 and it says i burned about 540 calories. does that sound off to anyone? (btw i weigh 249 last time i checked if that helps!).
i just look for some feedback really. hope someone can relate!
if this helps at all my most recent workout (an hour ago) i did cardio kickboxing for almost 40 minutes, my heart rate stayed between 165 and 185 and it says i burned about 540 calories. does that sound off to anyone? (btw i weigh 249 last time i checked if that helps!).
i just look for some feedback really. hope someone can relate!
0
Replies
-
That calorie burn sounds about right to me. As long as your watch says it's receiving a good signal it should be fine. If mine moves around or I bend over and scrunch it too much it tells me signal was lost but comes right back when I straighten up. I'm sure it's fine . Oh, and great work out by the way!0
-
I'm considering buying a HRM and have the same situation that you do. I look forward to hearing everyone's responses!0
-
That sounds pretty accurate to me. I too am large chested, and my strap ends up being covered by my sports bra. I wouldn't be too concerned with it.0
-
could just get a wrist strap one. just saying. :happy:0
-
thanks! i was hoping you all would say that! im a bit of a worrywart sometimes and that def goes into high gear when it concerns eating habits and exercising loll0
-
Make sure to minus out the calories you would've burned anyway.
take the BMR that MFP gave you (mine is 1480 right now) and divide by 24 hours: 1480/24 = 61.6
Then take that number and divide by 60 minutes: 61.6/60 = 1.026 = 1.03
Multiply the number of minutes you exercised by that number: 50x1.03 = 51.5 = 52 burned doing nothing
Subtract that number from the number of calories burned: 400 calories burned - 52 = 448 calories burned during exercise.
And the wrist strap HRMs are nowhere near as accurate as the chest strap HRMs. The Polar HRMs are pretty accurate.0 -
your burn sounds right....as long as you have a constant heart rate reading on your watch/monitor you are good to go....0
-
could just get a wrist strap one. just saying. :happy:
i debated that! and researched and researched but everyone kept saying the ones with the chest strap are the most accurate! and especially the polar ones. so idk if thats really true but better to be safe then sorry i guess!0 -
Make sure to minus out the calories you would've burned anyway.
take the BMR that MFP gave you (mine is 1480 right now) and divide by 24 hours: 1480/24 = 61.6
Then take that number and divide by 60 minutes: 61.6/60 = 1.026 = 1.03
Multiply the number of minutes you exercised by that number: 50x1.03 = 51.5 = 52 burned doing nothing
Subtract that number from the number of calories burned: 400 calories burned - 52 = 448 calories burned during exercise.
dont worry about all that....just mark down your burn and call it a day....0 -
could just get a wrist strap one. just saying. :happy:
i debated that! and researched and researched but everyone kept saying the ones with the chest strap are the most accurate! and especially the polar ones. so idk if thats really true but better to be safe then sorry i guess!
you got the best kind....work your *kitten* of on your workouts and maybe you'll get a smaller bust in the meantime0 -
I have another question related to boobs and HRMs -
I wear a sports bra that contains underwire. Does anyone have experience with HRMs and underwire bras? I'm not even sure I could get the monitor to lay correctly on my chest because of the placement of the underwires. Any feedback is appreciated!0 -
could just get a wrist strap one. just saying. :happy:
i debated that! and researched and researched but everyone kept saying the ones with the chest strap are the most accurate! and especially the polar ones. so idk if thats really true but better to be safe then sorry i guess!
you got the best kind....work your *kitten* of on your workouts and maybe you'll get a smaller bust in the meantime
LOL that is DEF what im hoping for. not too small though. i dont think me OR my friends or family would know what to do if i didnt harge a semi large chest lolll. i think we'd all go into shock loll. need something up top since i feel like i dont have a butt LOL0 -
Why would it matter if it ends up under your sports bra? I put my HRM strap on before my bra - it should have no impact on the readings. For some baseline, since cal burn changes based on weight, age, exertion, etc....
I'm 5'7, 188 pounds
45 minutes of competitive volleyball - 545 calories
1 hour of personal training - 400 calories
30 minutes treadmill (3.5-4.5 speed) between 2-300 calories0 -
I just got my HRM this week and was wondering the same thing. My HR seems to run pretty high during boughts of ANY activity but the placement of the chest strap is a bit awkward. Guess I need to get a sports bra because it can get uncomfortable when worn with an underwire.0
-
Make sure to minus out the calories you would've burned anyway.
take the BMR that MFP gave you (mine is 1480 right now) and divide by 24 hours: 1480/24 = 61.6
Then take that number and divide by 60 minutes: 61.6/60 = 1.026 = 1.03
Multiply the number of minutes you exercised by that number: 50x1.03 = 51.5 = 52 burned doing nothing
Subtract that number from the number of calories burned: 400 calories burned - 52 = 448 calories burned during exercise.
dont worry about all that....just mark down your burn and call it a day....
Those calories can add up over time. I guess maybe it's different for me because I'm at 1250 calories and not subtracting what I would've burned anyway would make a difference. If that 52 calories was every day over a week that would be a 364 calorie difference. So maybe it doesn't matter as much if you have a lot more to lose - I don't really know. I have only a 230 calorie per day deficit to try a lose a few pounds. So I count it. You do what you want.0 -
I put my HRM on first. Then I'll add whatever bras or clothes I need after that. I always make sure the contact strips of the HRM strap are well... contacting my skin!0
-
I have another question related to boobs and HRMs -
I wear a sports bra that contains underwire. Does anyone have experience with HRMs and underwire bras? I'm not even sure I could get the monitor to lay correctly on my chest because of the placement of the underwires. Any feedback is appreciated!
hi! i know i should be embarrassed by what im about to tell you but oh well loll. i wear two bras when i work out. i have to or id probably knock myself out. one has wire which i wear on top and one doesnt which i wear underneath. that usually gives me the best support! as long as ythe underwire bar fits correctly it should lay flat. i was doubting that mine was but since everyone is saying as long as i have a constant signal im fine then im sure you'll be fine too.0 -
Why would it matter if it ends up under your sports bra? I put my HRM strap on before my bra - it should have no impact on the readings. For some baseline, since cal burn changes based on weight, age, exertion, etc....
I'm 5'7, 188 pounds
45 minutes of competitive volleyball - 545 calories
1 hour of personal training - 400 calories
30 minutes treadmill (3.5-4.5 speed) between 2-300 calories
for it ending up underneath my sports bra i was afraid it was moving around too much for an accurate reading thats all! but i guess it doesnt matter according to you guys0 -
Make sure to minus out the calories you would've burned anyway.
take the BMR that MFP gave you (mine is 1480 right now) and divide by 24 hours: 1480/24 = 61.6
Then take that number and divide by 60 minutes: 61.6/60 = 1.026 = 1.03
Multiply the number of minutes you exercised by that number: 50x1.03 = 51.5 = 52 burned doing nothing
Subtract that number from the number of calories burned: 400 calories burned - 52 = 448 calories burned during exercise.
And the wrist strap HRMs are nowhere near as accurate as the chest strap HRMs. The Polar HRMs are pretty accurate.
This has always been an interesting issue for me. I learned that the proper formulas used for calorie burn during exercise are supposed to take that "what you would haven burned anyways" figure into the mix. In other words, when you enter the duration of your exercise (and your weight, etc.), it's supposed to calculate your exercise burn minus what you would have already burned for the specific time/duration you entered for your exercise.
That said, I've always wondered which figures from which sites/sources do that properly and which might not (and thereby overestimate the calorie burn). If I were to take an educated guess as MFP numbers, they generally (not always!) seem to be high, so I might guess they don't take that into account. But I'm going to give the guys that crafted this site credit and assume that they do.
In short, I never recalculate calories burned for either myself or my clients and have never had a problem getting the weight loss based on the numerical calculations that skip that reduction step. Too much work for the incremental benefit in my humble opinion, especially in light of the fact that they SHOULD (but do they?) have already included that information into their calculation.0 -
Make sure to minus out the calories you would've burned anyway.
take the BMR that MFP gave you (mine is 1480 right now) and divide by 24 hours: 1480/24 = 61.6
Then take that number and divide by 60 minutes: 61.6/60 = 1.026 = 1.03
Multiply the number of minutes you exercised by that number: 50x1.03 = 51.5 = 52 burned doing nothing
Subtract that number from the number of calories burned: 400 calories burned - 52 = 448 calories burned during exercise.
dont worry about all that....just mark down your burn and call it a day....
Those calories can add up over time. I guess maybe it's different for me because I'm at 1250 calories and not subtracting what I would've burned anyway would make a difference. If that 52 calories was every day over a week that would be a 364 calorie difference. So maybe it doesn't matter as much if you have a lot more to lose - I don't really know. I have only a 230 calorie per day deficit to try a lose a few pounds. So I count it. You do what you want.
thanks! i might try it if i hit a plateau but so far its not an issue to not subract the calories i wouldve burned anyway0 -
Make sure to minus out the calories you would've burned anyway.
take the BMR that MFP gave you (mine is 1480 right now) and divide by 24 hours: 1480/24 = 61.6
Then take that number and divide by 60 minutes: 61.6/60 = 1.026 = 1.03
Multiply the number of minutes you exercised by that number: 50x1.03 = 51.5 = 52 burned doing nothing
Subtract that number from the number of calories burned: 400 calories burned - 52 = 448 calories burned during exercise.
And the wrist strap HRMs are nowhere near as accurate as the chest strap HRMs. The Polar HRMs are pretty accurate.
This has always been an interesting issue for me. I learned that the proper formulas used for calorie burn during exercise are supposed to take that "what you would haven burned anyways" figure into the mix. In other words, when you enter the duration of your exercise (and your weight, etc.), it's supposed to calculate your exercise burn minus what you would have already burned for the specific time/duration you entered for your exercise.
That said, I've always wondered which figures from which sites/sources do that properly and which might not (and thereby overestimate the calorie burn). If I were to take an educated guess as MFP numbers, they generally (not always!) seem to be high, so I might guess they don't take that into account. But I'm going to give the guys that crafted this site credit and assume that they do.
In short, I never recalculate calories burned for either myself or my clients and have never had a problem getting the weight loss based on the numerical calculations that skip that reduction step. Too much work for the incremental benefit in my humble opinion, especially in light of the fact that they SHOULD (but do they?) have already included that information into their calculation.
thanks! i appreciate your opiniion if i hit a wall with weight loss i might try it subtracting it. id try pretty much anything to trick my body into losing again since i have very little patience loll0 -
I'm considering buying a HRM and have the same situation that you do. I look forward to hearing everyone's responses!
buy one!! it really does work. try a polar hrm0 -
I have a polar too. Make sure you wet the electrodes on the back of the strap then attach transmitter. Put it on in the locker room bc one time I put kine on before I got there and lost signal.0
-
Make sure to minus out the calories you would've burned anyway.
take the BMR that MFP gave you (mine is 1480 right now) and divide by 24 hours: 1480/24 = 61.6
Then take that number and divide by 60 minutes: 61.6/60 = 1.026 = 1.03
Multiply the number of minutes you exercised by that number: 50x1.03 = 51.5 = 52 burned doing nothing
Subtract that number from the number of calories burned: 400 calories burned - 52 = 448 calories burned during exercise.
And the wrist strap HRMs are nowhere near as accurate as the chest strap HRMs. The Polar HRMs are pretty accurate.
This has always been an interesting issue for me. I learned that the proper formulas used for calorie burn during exercise are supposed to take that "what you would haven burned anyways" figure into the mix. In other words, when you enter the duration of your exercise (and your weight, etc.), it's supposed to calculate your exercise burn minus what you would have already burned for the specific time/duration you entered for your exercise.
That said, I've always wondered which figures from which sites/sources do that properly and which might not (and thereby overestimate the calorie burn). If I were to take an educated guess as MFP numbers, they generally (not always!) seem to be high, so I might guess they don't take that into account. But I'm going to give the guys that crafted this site credit and assume that they do.
In short, I never recalculate calories burned for either myself or my clients and have never had a problem getting the weight loss based on the numerical calculations that skip that reduction step. Too much work for the incremental benefit in my humble opinion, especially in light of the fact that they SHOULD (but do they?) have already included that information into their calculation.
I got this info from a number of posts here. Basically just a break down of what my body is burning an hour in 24 hours - using my BMR. It might not be burning the exact same amounts each hour and I might not get an exact number. And I get my calories burned from an HRM - not the database or another site. I don't trust those - they are too high. I have also recently learned that the BMR that MFP gave me is pretty much dead on.
I don't have much wiggle room when it comes to calories and trying to lose weight so to me every calorie can count.0 -
I have another question related to boobs and HRMs -
I wear a sports bra that contains underwire. Does anyone have experience with HRMs and underwire bras? I'm not even sure I could get the monitor to lay correctly on my chest because of the placement of the underwires. Any feedback is appreciated!
I wear underwire sports bras too and it doesn't bother me. The bottom of the bra lies right on top of the strap.0 -
I have a polar too. Make sure you wet the electrodes on the back of the strap then attach transmitter. Put it on in the locker room bc one time I put kine on before I got there and lost signal.
That's interesting - I can wear my Polar FT7 all day long and get a signal the entire time. I wonder what about the locker room / gym travel made yours lose it?0 -
I have a polar too. Make sure you wet the electrodes on the back of the strap then attach transmitter. Put it on in the locker room bc one time I put kine on before I got there and lost signal.
That's interesting - I can wear my Polar FT7 all day long and get a signal the entire time. I wonder what about the locker room / gym travel made yours lose it?
is it accurate to wear them all day? a couple of you have mentioned it already and now im wondering... i read somewhere (i dont even remember wheree at this point) that wearing it all day is kind of a bust. cant remember why or how they came up with that though.0 -
On the days I wore it all day long I was only curious to see how many calories I burned with normal activity. I didn't include any real exercise. I burned way more than this site thinks I do, but I fear it might be because I have a really abnormally high resting heart rate (between 95-110, the normal resting rate is 50-80 or something)
I can't see how it would adversely effect anything, it is still tracking the same stuff it tracks while you exercise, wether you wear it for 1 minute or 10,000 minutes.
It does, however, wear out the battery, I'm sure0 -
On the days I wore it all day long I was only curious to see how many calories I burned with normal activity. I didn't include any real exercise. I burned way more than this site thinks I do, but I fear it might be because I have a really abnormally high resting heart rate (between 95-110, the normal resting rate is 50-80 or something)
I can't see how it would adversely effect anything, it is still tracking the same stuff it tracks while you exercise, wether you wear it for 1 minute or 10,000 minutes.
It does, however, wear out the battery, I'm sure
ahhh rightt!! thats what it was. the difference in peoples heartbeats! yeah im sure its not a big deal but i want to prolong the day i have to send it back for a battery change as long as possible so ill stick to just workouts0 -
I bought the Garmin 405CX HRM because it is 'supposed' to have a more accurate calorie count, plus I'm a hiker so I like the GPS tracking feature.
It has me input my gender, weight, age, and resting heart rate. It then calculates calories burned based on my HR through the workout as well as the above factors.
The best (or worst depending on how you think about it) is that after my workout, I can download the entire thing to my pc and view my HR throughout the session. I then send the links to my trainer so she can see how the workouts are going....0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions