Splenda!!! Friend or Foe
Malani2010
Posts: 245
I'm just curious what you guys think. I just got chewed out by a facebook friend's relative for suggesting splenda instead or sugar for baking. I guess I'm not into the whole thing as to why its as evil as sugar. lol. Please enlighten me.
0
Replies
-
Let the comments begin...0
-
Splenda: A Natural Sweetener?
The chemical name of Splenda is sucralose. While sucralose begins as as a sugar molecule, it is the process by which it's made that is concerning. Sucralose is a synthetic chemical that is manufactured in a five-step patented process. During this process, three chlorine molecules are added to a sugar molecule. The initial, natural sugar molecule is a disaccharide made up of two single sugars bound together; these single sugars are glucose and fructose.
The chemical process used in making sucralose modifies the chemical makeup of the sugar so much that it is converted into a molecule that does not normally occur in nature. Because this artificial molecule is not natural, the body does not know how to metaboize it. According to the manufacturers of Splenda, this is the very grounds on which Splenda is calorie neutral -- it is not broken down or metabolized by the body. Splenda simply passes through your digestive tract without depositing any caloric residue.
This is misleading, however, as Splenda's no calorie status would only hold up if the body did have the capability to metabolize it. More troubling, the fact that sucralose is a wholly artificial ingredient proves questions about its safety, especially if used in large amounts over a long period of time. There is the additional matter of insulin reaction. While research reports are still inconclusive, the medical research community widely theorises that Splenda elicits an increase in insulin levels, which, despite the calorie content, will signal the body to hold on to fat reserves or even store more fat.
http://www.womenshealthweightloss.com/oct08/splenda.html0 -
0
-
Agree with the Stevia comment. I get the same sweetening without the chemical processing. The verdict may still be out, but it can't hurt to go natural.0
-
I don't use the brand Splenda, but i have replaced the sugar in my tea with sweeteners, and I've never felt better! Saved me roughly 400 cals a day!
Some will say it causes cancer. Then again, what doesn't cause cancer these days. Like anything, taken in moderation, it's fine
Remember, if it makes you live longer, it just means you're dying slower. One life, don't overcomplicate it. Enjoy it0 -
Turbinado sugar is fine too, it's just raw sugar.0
-
it's a friend to me..curse my sweet tooth.0
-
I do use Stevia. :drinker:0 -
I won't use it. My neurologist made me throw out all artificial sweeteners.0
-
I can't have artificial sweeteners so it is a foe. Good luck finding the answers you need though.0
-
I can't speak about splenda, I know there is a lot of misinformation in the form of alarmism out there. I do know agave is very low on the glycemic index, low calorie, all natural and very sweet.. Plus, you can make tequila out of it! Go tequila!0
-
I do use Stevia. :drinker:
You mean this Stevia? Yeah...sounds reeeeeal healthy :P
Dangers of Stevia
Stevia has been linked to several long term side effects which has made it a reason for controversy and doubt in the recent years. Although it has been used since centuries by the natives, there are several claimed dangers of stevia. The following are some of the claimed dangers or side effects of stevia.
* Firstly, it is said to be the biggest hindrance in the process of metabolism in the body. Regular consumption of stevia slows down or stops energy metabolism and hence, disrupt the process of conversion of food into energy.
* Secondly, one of the biggest stevia dangers is its link to cancer. When tested in a laboratory, it was found that stevia was capable of bringing mutations in cell's DNA or the genetic material. This is only a claimed side effect as this effect has not been observed in human beings till date. However, scientists and researchers have still not confirmed whether stevia can cause this mutation in human beings or not.
* Thirdly, difficulties or problems in reproduction is also believed to be one of the stevia side effects. Long term regular consumption of stevia is claimed to affect the male reproduction system, specially leading to a decreased amount of sperm production. When tested on female animal, it was found that stevia led to decreased number of offsprings.0 -
Yeah I would go with Stevia or something similar. I did more research into Splenda and I try to stay away from it. I've also heard people get allergic reactions to it too.0 -
I use agave nector in my hot cerals in the mornings, and the distilled gift of it at night. Agave necter rocks, Any reicpe that calls for honey, try agave necter instead, great flavor change up.0
-
Let the comments begin...
I was taking a deep breath as I hit "post" I knew it would be a rough ride. lol0 -
Unfortunately, Stevia doesn't work well with baking. I do use Splenda in moderation. (Not daily or even weekly, or in large amounts)0
-
HmonsterX- That post would mean more if it had a link... (just sayin)
http://healing.about.com/cs/uc_directory/a/uc_stevia_jones.htm0 -
Ughhhh who to believe? I use Splenda and was considering switching to Stevia, but now I am not sure. I suppose for now I will stay with Splenda.0
-
It's my friend. I'm a "better living through chemistry" kind of person.
If I had bad reactions to an artificial sweetener, as I know some people do, I'd avoid it. Personally, I have bad reactions to Ivory soap and the glue on Bandaid brand bandages, but I don't tell anyone else not to use those products.0 -
I don't like the taste of stevia or splenda. I use honey or sugar. It might slow my weight loss, but I would rather enjoy the foods I eat than be miserable eating crappy-tasting food for the rest of my life.0
-
I use Sweet N Low (Saccharin) almost exclusively when I drink iced tea because it dissolves better in cold liquids instead of sitting at the bottom like sugar does. Also sweetens better in smaller quantities than any other sweetener I have tried. Yes, it's a chemical. And it's been around for over 140 years. I'm sure many people condemn it too, but I feel safe using it.
Just because things are natural, doesn't make them safe. Arsenic, cyanide, rattlesnakes, and molten lava are all natural, but it doesn't mean you want any of them in your kitchen.0 -
HmonsterX- That post would mean more if it had a link... (just sayin)
http://healing.about.com/cs/uc_directory/a/uc_stevia_jones.htm
http://www.30thstreetclinic.com/general-reviews/100-stevia-dangers.html
I only post that as im sick of people saying that stevia is the best thing since sliced bread. It, like ANYTHING else, can have nasty side effects and scaremongering attached to it.0 -
Splenda may be bad for the environment. Just incase that matters at all in your decision...
http://rimcountrygazette.blogspot.com/2011/06/splenda-leaves-lingering-aftertaste-on.html0 -
My chemistry professer worked for the FDA as a food chemist. (PhD in Chemistry from UC Berkeley) She said the ONLY reason it is deemed safe for human consumption is so that they can collect long term wide range data.
I had to study this garbage in chemistry, microbiology, bacteriology, nutrition and human anatomy. I would advise ANYONE using this stuff to do REAL research and not just look at the first page that comes up on google. Sweeteners are absolute garbage and horrible for your body.0 -
unfortunately, there is something wrong with just about everything! there are alot of "natural" choices out there, that does not mean they were meant to be consumed. everybody's bodies have the chance of reacting negatively to different sweetners, natural and artificial. you may take ok to splenda or truvia or nutra sweet or cane sugar or beet sugar or corn sugar or whatever the latest craze is...or you may not. just keep in mind when suggesting to others what you use, it may not be appropriate for them. good luck!0
-
I don't use the brand Splenda, but i have replaced the sugar in my tea with sweeteners, and I've never felt better! Saved me roughly 400 cals a day!
Some will say it causes cancer. Then again, what doesn't cause cancer these days. Like anything, taken in moderation, it's fine
Remember, if it makes you live longer, it just means you're dying slower. One life, don't overcomplicate it. Enjoy it
Seriously. Everything causes cancer.0 -
NOBODY USES PURE STEVIA! Most of the stevia products are sugar alcohol! Everything if overdone can be bad for you; ESPECIALLY being so neurotic about every little thing you consume.0
-
Let the comments begin...
I was taking a deep breath as I hit "post" I knew it would be a rough ride. lol
You are one brave woman, my friend! Next post you should ask if you should eat your exercise calories...LOL0 -
Let the comments begin...
I was taking a deep breath as I hit "post" I knew it would be a rough ride. lol
You are one brave woman, my friend! Next post you should ask if you should eat your exercise calories...LOL
:laugh:0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.8K Introduce Yourself
- 43.9K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.1K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 15 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions