YES!!! or NO!!!
Replies
-
I am on a low 'no' diet -- so I only eat 'yes'! When you are on a low-no diet, you force your body to love only yes. After a few days of eating only yes, you lose inches on your waist and hips. You have more energy and you sleep like a baby. Yes doesn't taste as good as no, but a diet of mostly no is definitely not healthy. So, the only answer is YES. There, I rest my case. :bigsmile:0
-
I feel that since everyone is an individual the answer might be YES! for some and NO! for others.0
-
50-50...damn i used that..
can i phone a friend? men this is hard! ummmm ummmm ummm...i sayy....ummmm..i cant decide
your all confusing me..y do ya;s make it so hard.!
Majority rules!
finally.
BTW look where ask the audience got ya..lol0 -
I think you can only say Maybe if you're willing to eat back your calories from being indecisive.0
-
Do your research and find your own answer
http://mind.oxfordjournals.org/content/109/436/781.short
In what does the sense of a sentential connective consist? Like many others, I hold that its sense lies in rules that govern deductions. In the present paper, however, I argue that a classical logician should take the relevant deductions to be arguments involving affirmative or negative answers to yes-or-no questions that contain the connective. An intuitionistic logician will differ in concentrating exclusively upon affirmative answers. I conclude by arguing that a well known intuitionistic criticism of classical logic fails if the answer 'No' is accorded parity with the answer 'Yes'.
So clearly to prevent the failure of logic the answer is "yes"0 -
My cousin's girlfriend's uncle has a PhD in YESorNO and he says that YES is absolutely the right answer. So you are a total blithering idiot for believing no. Clearly I am right and you are stupid.
LOL - I love this.0 -
Do your research and find your own answer
http://mind.oxfordjournals.org/content/109/436/781.short
In what does the sense of a sentential connective consist? Like many others, I hold that its sense lies in rules that govern deductions. In the present paper, however, I argue that a classical logician should take the relevant deductions to be arguments involving affirmative or negative answers to yes-or-no questions that contain the connective. An intuitionistic logician will differ in concentrating exclusively upon affirmative answers. I conclude by arguing that a well known intuitionistic criticism of classical logic fails if the answer 'No' is accorded parity with the answer 'Yes'.
So clearly to prevent the failure of logic the answer is "yes"
I think you win the internet.0 -
Do your research and find your own answer
http://mind.oxfordjournals.org/content/109/436/781.short
In what does the sense of a sentential connective consist? Like many others, I hold that its sense lies in rules that govern deductions. In the present paper, however, I argue that a classical logician should take the relevant deductions to be arguments involving affirmative or negative answers to yes-or-no questions that contain the connective. An intuitionistic logician will differ in concentrating exclusively upon affirmative answers. I conclude by arguing that a well known intuitionistic criticism of classical logic fails if the answer 'No' is accorded parity with the answer 'Yes'.
So clearly to prevent the failure of logic the answer is "yes"
I think you win the internet.
"white stuff in my pee" already won the internet.
I say Yes, as long as it's sprayed with Windex first. Otherwise, NO.0 -
I don't care either way .... Just don't take my coffee away! I'm begging you.... :00
-
Well In the peer review sources of www.wikipedia.org/ The answer was NO!0
-
Well In the peer review sources of www.wikipedia.org/ The answer was NO!
I have to seriously question your logic if you actually believe that.0 -
Well In the peer review sources of www.wikipedia.org/ The answer was NO!
I have to seriously question your logic if you actually believe that.
Logic has no place in this debate!0 -
Well, YES of course.
I'm a YES girl.0 -
The proposed dichotomy relies on a fallacious premise.
That said, not just no, but HELL no.0 -
I'm Switzerland!0
-
YES of course there are aliens, big foots, lochness monsters and yedi's!0
-
umh...NO... I like this lol0
-
My YES!!! is better than your cumulative no's....0
-
HMMMMM, trying to decide.......0
-
I'm more agreeable than most so I'll go with yes.0
-
Well In the peer review sources of www.wikipedia.org/ The answer was NO!
I have to seriously question your logic if you actually believe that.
Logic has no place in this debate!
What's logic again? One of my sisters friends tried it and it works plus I am a MAN!:laugh:0 -
Does YES!!! weigh heavier than NO!!!?
One pound of YES weighs more than one pound of NO.
Duh.
The correct way to say that is "YES weighs more than NO *PER VOLUME*"0 -
Are you kidding me?!?!? YES! ABSOLUTELY.
No...... wait. Upon further consideration.....
No. Not even.
Although....there was that one time at band camp.......no. no no no no, I must say yes. Clearly I must say yes.
YES.
0 -
I don't necessarily like to debate pointless arguments, but I sure do like to watch everyone else do it! :drinker: ...I guess that makes me a stalking fence sitter0
-
Do your research and find your own answer
http://mind.oxfordjournals.org/content/109/436/781.short
In what does the sense of a sentential connective consist? Like many others, I hold that its sense lies in rules that govern deductions. In the present paper, however, I argue that a classical logician should take the relevant deductions to be arguments involving affirmative or negative answers to yes-or-no questions that contain the connective. An intuitionistic logician will differ in concentrating exclusively upon affirmative answers. I conclude by arguing that a well known intuitionistic criticism of classical logic fails if the answer 'No' is accorded parity with the answer 'Yes'.
So clearly to prevent the failure of logic the answer is "yes"
This gave me a headache trying to read it. Are you running for President? Sounded like a debate answer.
I will have to go with yes because I didn't eat all my exercise calories back so I ate the no so I didn't go into starvation mode : /0 -
I'm taking the 5th.0
-
Does YES!!! weigh heavier than NO!!!?
One pound of YES weighs more than one pound of NO.
Duh.
[/quote The correct way to say that is "one pound of YES weighs more than one pound of NO *PER VOLUME*"
So does that mean, that I can eat back my calories?0 -
Does YES!!! weigh heavier than NO!!!?
One pound of YES weighs more than one pound of NO.
Duh.
The correct way to say that is "YES weighs more than NO *PER VOLUME*"
That's ridiculous! Much too logical! I refuse to believe it!0 -
Clearly the metabolic spikes of several small NOs taken in the course of the day roughly equals the thermic effect of a few large YESs.
I'm fairly certain I read that on Alan Aragon's website.0 -
turn it up to 11!0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.3K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 424 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions