Not loosing very quick - how many cals?

teachmond

I think your doing great. Keep up the good work.

ohnuts14

I know it's frustrating, but 6 lbs in a month really is good. Some people do get that initial drop in the begining like what you're referring to, but everyones bodies work differently. Some people drop a lot of weight when they make drastic changes all of a sudden, but some people... their metabolism will kind of go into shock. I mean, not literally, but either way, both reactions are temporary. When I first started trying to lose weight, I changed my diet drastically, and started working out everyday (after never having been active my whole life), and those first two months, I think I lost a total of 3 lbs. Then all of a sudden, month 3 or 4, the weight just started dropping. Everyones bodies work differently. The fact that you're losing weight, it's probably not that you're doing anything wrong, it's all about patience now. Just keep at it, keep exercising, and keep eating well. The weight will come off! Also, just a tip, sometimes the reason we stop losing weight is actually because we're not eating enough. Try to stay within your calorie goal. It's probably better to go a dropppp over than it is to go under. Calories are the fuel the metabolism needs to function, so if you're not getting enough calories, your metabolism will slow down!

nettiek42

I am like you. I want it to come off faster. I have been losing about 1 pound a week. I have read that if you take it off slowly like this, it will stay off longer so think of it as a positive thing. One thing I did was a vegetable/fruit diet for one week. No caffeine, dairy, alcohol, sugar. Smoothie's for breakfast, vegetable soup for lunch and veggies/fruit for dinner. I did it just for one week and I dropped four pounds that week and it stayed off. Just an idea. Nettie

maidentl

Insofar as losing at 1200 cals — why are you eating so much? 1200 calories can be an excellent way to lose weight but, if it's not working, why not try eating less?

Are you serious?

vandana123

Need help........Few days ago i ve started using this site ....I am vegetarian i was wondering what kind of grocery have to buy for lunch and dinner........

BerryH

There's this great tool called MFP that will calculate exactly how many calories you need to eat for a gradual, sustainable weight loss without feeling deprived

You've told MFP your weight, height, activity level etc., go back and change your goal to lose 1lb a week - bet you get more than 1,200! Eat all of them and a good portion of your exercise calories (I eat all of mine, but a margin or error is good) in good, honest, real food and you'll lose weight like magic without being deprived and keep it off.

Exercise most days of the week, combining cardio and resistance training, and Bob's your uncle!

Jus1molbplz

Did you choose 1200 calories a day or did MFP? Also - up your water intake SERIOUSLY - this will help in ways you never thought. In face I dont know how long its been but I drink nothing but water - no sodas - teas.. ect. After a few weeks other drinks disgust me - I took a sip of a mt. dew after all these changes - HATED the taste - this is how I easily drink 15 classes of water a day... Good luck to you girl - the worst thing you can do is give up on yourself - even if its only 6lbs that month - lets say you continue that path all year and in 10 months you've lost 60lbs... seems worth it then doesnt it? I always have to remind myself that yes it may take another 6 months to lose the rest of the weight - BUT if im still alive then, I'll be around by then -and wouldn't I like to be at my goal size by then even if it means working my butt off now? Stay with it honey!

NancyNiles

This is in reply to the person who said you should not eat below your BMR. While that may work well for you, this is concrete information available from any reputable website (I happened to use Mayo Clinic and WebMD for the details but I haven't found a site yet that says differently) and should be taken into consideration when determining how many calories you need to consume. Everyone is different and adjustments are often necessary, but this information applies to the VAST majority of us.

First of all, for those who don't already know, it stands for Basal Metabolic Rate. It is the number of calories required to run your body. Any weight loss will ONLY occur below your BMR. If you are eating above your BMR, you will not lose weight. Now, mind you, the BMR calculator is only a guess. If you have a slow metabolism, you do not use as many calories to function, so you will find your progress slower than average. If you have a fast metabolism, you will enjoy more progress. That much most people know.

Ok, so your BMR is the number of calories your body uses to function if you expend zero calories (lay on the sofa all day). To determine the number of calories you are actually using in a normal day (not laying on the sofa), you need to determine your activity level (sedentary, lightly active, very active, etc.) That shows how many MORE calories you need in a day to 1. run your body and 2. perform your daily functions. Once you know this, you can then SUBTRACT for your weight loss.

This information is from BOTH WebMD and the Mayo Clinic. It is the forumula used to show your daily caloric NEEDS based on your BMR and activity level.
If you are sedentary (little or no exercise): BMR x 1.2
If you are lightly active (easy exercise/sports 1-3 days/week): BMR x 1.375
If you are moderately active (moderate exercise/sports 3-5 days/week): BMR x 1.55
If you are very active (hard exercise/sports 6-7 days a week): BMR x 1.725
If you are extremely active (very hard exercise/sports and physical job): BMR x 1.9

My BMR is 2000. My activity level is "lightly active" because I go to the gym 3x a week. So my daily caloric needs are about 2750 (2000 x 1.375). So, in order for me to achieve weight LOSS (using my fat as fuel instead of caloric INTAKE) I must reduce my caloric intake. I can't eat 2750 and lose weight.

Most of us use a calculator (like the on in MFP) to determine how much to knock off to lose 1 or 2 lbs a week. But its a fairly simple formula. It's takes a 3,500 calorie deficit to burn 1 lb of fat. So take your daily caloric needs (2,750 for me) and multiply that by 7 (19,250). That's your weekly caloric needs. Reduce that number by either 3,500 calories for 1 lb a week of weight loss, or 7,000 for 2 lbs a week of weight loss (12,250). Then divide that number by 7 to get the number of calories needed per day to lose weight at the rate you chose (1750).

So to recap, my BMR is 2000, but my target calories per day to lose weight is 1750.

Now, your BMR will be different, of course, because it is based on current weight and age, which is different for everyone. So you can either use the MFP calculator in the Settings tab to do the work for you, or you can go to one of several BMR calculators on the internet to get your actual BMR, then go from there.

I realize this may be confusing, but mostly I just wanted to put this out there because of the gal who said you should never eat less than your BMR. In reality, you should not be eating MORE than your BMR if you want to lose weight. Simply put, you want your body to go to your fat stores to fuel your body, so you must take in LESS calories than your body needs to function. That is the basic idea behind dieting. In fact, if you eat above you BMR, you MUST expend those extra calories or it will result in a weight GAIN.

Hope that wasn't too confusing. I'm new to MFP (doing it with a friend) and I haven't lost much yet, but this isn't my first trip on the dieting pony. Unfortunately knowing how it works doesn't help when I'm faced with a chocolate cupcake I wish you the best of luck Picabo!

sandown12

In 2010 I average 1.5lbs a week and lost 57lbs in 8 months so about average of 7lbs a month so it does even out even if you start losing fast I lost
14lbs in 5 weeks
28lbs in 14 weeks
42lbs in 22 weeks
57lbs in 40 weeks

I started off fast then it evened out was 100% all the time had 2 gains even one of 3.5lbs and I stuck to my plan.
I think its trial and error with eating exercise calories upping my water never lost me more sadly but I try and get 4 cups in a day
If you lost 6lbs a month how quick would you be at goal? Sme people lose quick some slow but as said your body will adjust and you'll lose lbs when it wants to just keep doing what you do

psuLemon

This is in reply to the person who said you should not eat below your BMR. While that may work well for you, this is concrete information available from any reputable website (I happened to use Mayo Clinic and WebMD for the details but I haven't found a site yet that says differently) and should be taken into consideration when determining how many calories you need to consume. Everyone is different and adjustments are often necessary, but this information applies to the VAST majority of us.

First of all, for those who don't already know, it stands for Basal Metabolic Rate. It is the number of calories required to run your body. Any weight loss will ONLY occur below your BMR. If you are eating above your BMR, you will not lose weight. Now, mind you, the BMR calculator is only a guess. If you have a slow metabolism, you do not use as many calories to function, so you will find your progress slower than average. If you have a fast metabolism, you will enjoy more progress. That much most people know.

Ok, so your BMR is the number of calories your body uses to function if you expend zero calories (lay on the sofa all day). To determine the number of calories you are actually using in a normal day (not laying on the sofa), you need to determine your activity level (sedentary, lightly active, very active, etc.) That shows how many MORE calories you need in a day to 1. run your body and 2. perform your daily functions. Once you know this, you can then SUBTRACT for your weight loss.

This information is from BOTH WebMD and the Mayo Clinic. It is the forumula used to show your daily caloric NEEDS based on your BMR and activity level.
If you are sedentary (little or no exercise): BMR x 1.2
If you are lightly active (easy exercise/sports 1-3 days/week): BMR x 1.375
If you are moderately active (moderate exercise/sports 3-5 days/week): BMR x 1.55
If you are very active (hard exercise/sports 6-7 days a week): BMR x 1.725
If you are extremely active (very hard exercise/sports and physical job): BMR x 1.9

My BMR is 2000. My activity level is "lightly active" because I go to the gym 3x a week. So my daily caloric needs are about 2750 (2000 x 1.375). So, in order for me to achieve weight LOSS (using my fat as fuel instead of caloric INTAKE) I must reduce my caloric intake. I can't eat 2750 and lose weight.

Most of us use a calculator (like the on in MFP) to determine how much to knock off to lose 1 or 2 lbs a week. But its a fairly simple formula. It's takes a 3,500 calorie deficit to burn 1 lb of fat. So take your daily caloric needs (2,750 for me) and multiply that by 7 (19,250). That's your weekly caloric needs. Reduce that number by either 3,500 calories for 1 lb a week of weight loss, or 7,000 for 2 lbs a week of weight loss (12,250). Then divide that number by 7 to get the number of calories needed per day to lose weight at the rate you chose (1750).

So to recap, my BMR is 2000, but my target calories per day to lose weight is 1750.

Now, your BMR will be different, of course, because it is based on current weight and age, which is different for everyone. So you can either use the MFP calculator in the Settings tab to do the work for you, or you can go to one of several BMR calculators on the internet to get your actual BMR, then go from there.

I realize this may be confusing, but mostly I just wanted to put this out there because of the gal who said you should never eat less than your BMR. In reality, you should not be eating MORE than your BMR if you want to lose weight. Simply put, you want your body to go to your fat stores to fuel your body, so you must take in LESS calories than your body needs to function. That is the basic idea behind dieting. In fact, if you eat above you BMR, you MUST expend those extra calories or it will result in a weight GAIN.

Hope that wasn't too confusing. I'm new to MFP (doing it with a friend) and I haven't lost much yet, but this isn't my first trip on the dieting pony. Unfortunately knowing how it works doesn't help when I'm faced with a chocolate cupcake I wish you the best of luck Picabo!

You have it partially right. There is BMR (which you described correctly) and then there is total daily energy expended (TDEE) which is actually the number of calories you burn throughout a normal course of the day. So my BMR is 2080. I have a sedentary job, so my TDEE multiplier is 1.2 based on Katch McArdle. I workout 6 days a week and burn 700 calories per session. So my TDEE is:

2080*1.2+700 = 3196


Now, there are several ways you can do a deficit. You can do the standard number based on the parameters below. Or you can do based on body fat percentage. So a person with 20% body fat, would use a 20% deficit, a person with 10% would take a 10% body fat... etc...

If you have 75+ lbs to lose 2 lbs/week is ideal,
If you have 40-75 lbs to lose 1.5 lbs/week is ideal,
If you have 25-40 lbs to lose 1 lbs/week is ideal,
If you have 15 -25 lbs to lose 0.5 to 1.0 lbs/week is ideal, and
If you have less than 15 lbs to lose 0.5 lbs/week is ideal.


For me, I have 12% body fat so I use about a 10% deficit.

3196 * .9 = 2876


This means, that I would eat around 2876 calories to lose weight. I eat 3000 calories in a day. I am losing inches, body fat and weight while maintaining lean body mass (the controller for your metabolic rate) based on body fat readings (with body calipers). So this alone disproves your analysis/theory that you can't lose weight while eating above. Now if you said, you can't lose weight by eating above your TDEE, i would agree. Maybe you confused it, maybe you did. Either way.....


Also, lets look at this from a logical standpoint. You just stated BMR is "It is the number of calories required to run your body", then why would you eat below the calories for your body to function?


Also, below are some good links (even with some of the information you were referring to) that explains the difference between the two.

:drinker:


http://www.cordianet.com/calculator.htm

http://www.shapefit.com/basal-metabolic-rate.html

purpleipod

You're complaining about losing 6 pounds in a month? Would you rather have gained 6 pounds? This isn't the Biggest Loser, you aren't going to lose 80 pounds in 3 months. Keep doing what you're doing and it will keep coming off.

larsanna

I have noticed fast food makes me bloat. I drink water with lemon slices in it and it helps get rid of that water retension.

maidentl

You're complaining about losing 6 pounds in a month? Would you rather have gained 6 pounds? This isn't the Biggest Loser, you aren't going to lose 80 pounds in 3 months. Keep doing what you're doing and it will keep coming off.

Someone else complained about "only" losing eight. :noway:

subigirl

As I always say...slow and steady wins the race!!! In my struggles, I've looked for the quick weight loss. I've tried probably every diet out there. Sure, I lost the weight quickly with all the gimmicks, but gained it back PLUS some just as fast! It wasn't until I went with a steady exercise routine and healthy eating...losing sometimes only a half a pound a week, that the weight finally came off and has stayed off!

NancyNiles

This is in reply to the person who said you should not eat below your BMR. While that may work well for you, this is concrete information available from any reputable website (I happened to use Mayo Clinic and WebMD for the details but I haven't found a site yet that says differently) and should be taken into consideration when determining how many calories you need to consume. Everyone is different and adjustments are often necessary, but this information applies to the VAST majority of us.

First of all, for those who don't already know, it stands for Basal Metabolic Rate. It is the number of calories required to run your body. Any weight loss will ONLY occur below your BMR. If you are eating above your BMR, you will not lose weight. Now, mind you, the BMR calculator is only a guess. If you have a slow metabolism, you do not use as many calories to function, so you will find your progress slower than average. If you have a fast metabolism, you will enjoy more progress. That much most people know.

Ok, so your BMR is the number of calories your body uses to function if you expend zero calories (lay on the sofa all day). To determine the number of calories you are actually using in a normal day (not laying on the sofa), you need to determine your activity level (sedentary, lightly active, very active, etc.) That shows how many MORE calories you need in a day to 1. run your body and 2. perform your daily functions. Once you know this, you can then SUBTRACT for your weight loss.

This information is from BOTH WebMD and the Mayo Clinic. It is the forumula used to show your daily caloric NEEDS based on your BMR and activity level.
If you are sedentary (little or no exercise): BMR x 1.2
If you are lightly active (easy exercise/sports 1-3 days/week): BMR x 1.375
If you are moderately active (moderate exercise/sports 3-5 days/week): BMR x 1.55
If you are very active (hard exercise/sports 6-7 days a week): BMR x 1.725
If you are extremely active (very hard exercise/sports and physical job): BMR x 1.9

My BMR is 2000. My activity level is "lightly active" because I go to the gym 3x a week. So my daily caloric needs are about 2750 (2000 x 1.375). So, in order for me to achieve weight LOSS (using my fat as fuel instead of caloric INTAKE) I must reduce my caloric intake. I can't eat 2750 and lose weight.

Most of us use a calculator (like the on in MFP) to determine how much to knock off to lose 1 or 2 lbs a week. But its a fairly simple formula. It's takes a 3,500 calorie deficit to burn 1 lb of fat. So take your daily caloric needs (2,750 for me) and multiply that by 7 (19,250). That's your weekly caloric needs. Reduce that number by either 3,500 calories for 1 lb a week of weight loss, or 7,000 for 2 lbs a week of weight loss (12,250). Then divide that number by 7 to get the number of calories needed per day to lose weight at the rate you chose (1750).

So to recap, my BMR is 2000, but my target calories per day to lose weight is 1750.

Now, your BMR will be different, of course, because it is based on current weight and age, which is different for everyone. So you can either use the MFP calculator in the Settings tab to do the work for you, or you can go to one of several BMR calculators on the internet to get your actual BMR, then go from there.

I realize this may be confusing, but mostly I just wanted to put this out there because of the gal who said you should never eat less than your BMR. In reality, you should not be eating MORE than your BMR if you want to lose weight. Simply put, you want your body to go to your fat stores to fuel your body, so you must take in LESS calories than your body needs to function. That is the basic idea behind dieting. In fact, if you eat above you BMR, you MUST expend those extra calories or it will result in a weight GAIN.

Hope that wasn't too confusing. I'm new to MFP (doing it with a friend) and I haven't lost much yet, but this isn't my first trip on the dieting pony. Unfortunately knowing how it works doesn't help when I'm faced with a chocolate cupcake I wish you the best of luck Picabo!

You have it partially right. There is BMR (which you described correctly) and then there is total daily energy expended (TDEE) which is actually the number of calories you burn throughout a normal course of the day. So my BMR is 2080. I have a sedentary job, so my TDEE multiplier is 1.2 based on Katch McArdle. I workout 6 days a week and burn 700 calories per session. So my TDEE is:

2080*1.2+700 = 3196


Now, there are several ways you can do a deficit. You can do the standard number based on the parameters below. Or you can do based on body fat percentage. So a person with 20% body fat, would use a 20% deficit, a person with 10% would take a 10% body fat... etc...

If you have 75+ lbs to lose 2 lbs/week is ideal,
If you have 40-75 lbs to lose 1.5 lbs/week is ideal,
If you have 25-40 lbs to lose 1 lbs/week is ideal,
If you have 15 -25 lbs to lose 0.5 to 1.0 lbs/week is ideal, and
If you have less than 15 lbs to lose 0.5 lbs/week is ideal.


For me, I have 12% body fat so I use about a 10% deficit.

3196 * .9 = 2876


This means, that I would eat around 2876 calories to lose weight. I eat 3000 calories in a day. I am losing inches, body fat and weight while maintaining lean body mass (the controller for your metabolic rate) based on body fat readings (with body calipers). So this alone disproves your analysis/theory that you can't lose weight while eating above. Now if you said, you can't lose weight by eating above your TDEE, i would agree. Maybe you confused it, maybe you did. Either way.....


Also, lets look at this from a logical standpoint. You just stated BMR is "It is the number of calories required to run your body", then why would you eat below the calories for your body to function?


Also, below are some good links (even with some of the information you were referring to) that explains the difference between the two.

:drinker:


http://www.cordianet.com/calculator.htm

http://www.shapefit.com/basal-metabolic-rate.html

To answer your first question "why would you eat below the calories for your body to function?" ... the reason is the principle of dieting itself. If you consume less than you use, the rest is obtained through the conversion of body fat into fuel. You're making up the difference through burning fat.

As far as TDEE goes, I did include that but I didn't use that term. I am lightly active, so I used myself as an example, but I listed all of the multipliers for it. But you are right, if you have very little body fat to start with and/or you exercise considerably, you could definitely eat more than your BMR and still lose weight.

While I was replying to your comment, I was speaking more directly to Picabo who indicated she did not like to exercise and she had more than 50 lbs to lose. In her case, specifically, following your instructions to never consume less than her BMR isn't going to be helpful. I would venture to say that nearly 90% of people in her situation (fairly inactive with a lot to lose) are eating less than their BMR.

But thank you for the links! Any day I can learn something new is a day worth living through

dollipop

Thanks everyone! Well hopefully my body will adjust soon. I know 6lbs a month as not bad at all. But I'm greedy and want more! But really, someone who has to loose 50-60lbs SHOULD loose a bit faster than someone who only needs to loose those last 5lbs. Rate of loss should be higher wouldn't it??

6lbs in a month is awesome! Remember, you're not in the Biggest Loser, you're in real life! Eat well, eat your exercise cals, and drink heaps of water. You can do it