Should I buy this HRM?? No chest strap....
eeebee
Posts: 471 Member
http://www.xone1.com/watches/heart-rate-sports-watch/
I am tempted, there are only a few left but given the fact the price is a lot less than a Polar (plus it has no "chest strap" do you think it'd be inaccurate?
Any experts/seasoned HRM user out there who could give me their views?
I am tempted, there are only a few left but given the fact the price is a lot less than a Polar (plus it has no "chest strap" do you think it'd be inaccurate?
Any experts/seasoned HRM user out there who could give me their views?
0
Replies
-
That looks good but I really want a FitBit. http://www.fitbit.com/
I know it's not a HRM but it syncs to MFP. How cool is that?!?!0 -
I have one without a chest strap and now I wish I had returned it. It's convenient in a way, but you have to manually check your heart rate fairly frequently in order to be able to get a decent reading. Also, once I hit a certain level of sweat it stops working. Go with the chest strap and I think you will be happier.0
-
I am under the impression that the chest strap ensures more accurate readings. I don't personally have one yet so I am just repeating what I have heard. I have several friends who have the Fitbit and love it. Even though it is not a HRM they say it motivates them to make sure they are moving more and more everyday. I think if you have a certain fitness level already, then a HRM would be more helpful than the fitbit as it does not monitor HR.0
-
I have heard and read the HRM without the chest strap are not as accurate... I purchased the Polar FT60 and love it!! Works everytime, never loses my HR and also measure my V02Max and has built in training programs as well as the fact it is GPS upgradable in the future if I ever want to add the foot pod..... Good Luck!!0
-
Thanks so much for your input guys.
I think chest strap HRM is the way forward. I want it to be as accurate as possible basically, but they all just seem too costly right now. It'll be worth it in the long run I guess.
By the way....that Fitbit actually looks brilliant - love it - who knows anyone that has one (or indeed who has one themseles)?0 -
Also - I cycle a lot....do you think a Fitbit would be able to track calories burned doing that?0
-
i have a hrm that isn't and i like it alot. it's a mio classic and i have found it to be pretty accurate. i only paid around 30 bucks for it.0
-
I have a HRM and a fit bit. Bought the fit bit first but found that MFP goes on and off syncing with it. Frankly I like the HRM better. I bought the Triathalon one...cheaper than polar, functions as a sport watch too and I love it. Has a chest strap so you get an accurate reading and it tracks calories burned based on your weight which is programmed into the watch.
Did a bunch of research and extremely good value for money. The fit bit is lonely on my desk.0 -
http://www.amazon.com/Polar-Womens-Heart-Monitor-Bronze/dp/B001U0OFD2/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1330697843&sr=8-1
I have one of these, I am not sure what British pounds transfer to in American $$, but I love this. I wear it all the time just to see how many calories it takes to do things0 -
Also - I cycle a lot....do you think a Fitbit would be able to track calories burned doing that?
I have a Fitbit and I do love it but I don't have it synced to the MFP anymore. As for cycling no, it is not good for that since you wear it on your waist or bra strap. You would have to input that you did cycling and for how long then it will adjust your calories.0 -
I'm not a "seasoned user" by any means...in fact I just got mine and have only used it once. Its a Polar and was $75 US Dollars and shipping was free. It came with a chest strap and I do think that having that makes it more accurate.
I always see people on here say "you get what you pay for" and thats true. The first one I bought was much cheaper but it was HORRIBLE! I took it back after using it one time. Spend the extra money and get a durable HRM with a chest strap. You won't be disppointed! And most of the good brands have a two-year guarantee.
Hope this helps...good luck! :flowerforyou:0 -
I have the Polar chest one and love it. It is very good i think. It is more accurate then the treadmill for sure.0
-
I have both the fit bit and a HRM I use the fitbit for walking and steps and sleep and then at the gym HRM without chest strap S7 from walmart. has great reviews and is cheap.28.000
-
I would save a little more and get one with a chest strap.... otherwise for an accurate burn you are going to basically have to be reaching across and touching the metal points on the top of the watch constantly to get an accurate burn.0
-
I wouldn't buy one without a chest strap. I had bought one without a chest strap before I got my polar and it was not accurate at all. I love my polar and I have had it for 2 years!!0
-
I got a garmin HRM watch / chest strap, and the additional bike cadence/speed/distance monitor, very helpful for cycling.0
-
I received a Polar FT7 for Christmas and I love it. I think it was around $70. If you search online you can find different prices. I would definitely go for one with a chest strap, though.0
-
Short answer: Only if you like to waste money
If it doesn't have a chest strap, its' not going to be accurate. You may as well use the guesses from MFP or some other website that thinks its knows what you burn -- they are all just as inaccurate.
You get what you pay for. Spend a little more and get a good HRM with a chest strap.
I would not actually trust the calorie burned on a fitbit either - if thats your real reason for wanting an HRM.
That is more of a boosted up pedometer and its very cool for certain activities, but not tracking acurrate calories burned.0 -
It is not going to be accurate without a chest strap.0
-
i had the watch type that used your fingers i HATED it was WAY off on accuracy!!! its a pain in the but to test your heart rate when your going strong on a machine, and sometimes if your moving around to much it wont even take your heart rate you have to stop wait for it to take it and then start working out again no good!!! i recently got one with a cheast strap and boy do i regret ever getting the other one...
it was very affordable so i wish i could have never gotten the other type which was only $10 less!!!
i got a oregon from walmart.com its not fansy but it does the job!!!0 -
Its not nearly as accurate as a chest strap because you have to continuously stop and manually check it. i bought a 50.00 one with the watch and chest strap at walmart and have had it over a month and it works great! i absolutley love it! Good luck with whatever you decide0
-
If it doesn't have a chest strap, save your money. It is useless for calorie estimation.0
-
Every person i know who has purchased the watch type hates it! I bought the Polar FT7 and it is super accurate and such a help with keeping me on track. I think if you tried it you'd be very happy with it. Def worth the money0
-
If it doesn't have a chest strap, save your money. It is useless for calorie estimation.
Amen!!0 -
That looks good but I really want a FitBit. http://www.fitbit.com/
I know it's not a HRM but it syncs to MFP. How cool is that?!?!
I freaking love my FitBit. I'm finding it to be so much more useful than my HRM, that is now collecting dust!0 -
Such helpful feedback everyone, really appreicate your advice!
I've decided I'm definitely going for a Polar with chest strap, it'll really come in handy for years to come so I've no doubt that it will be used day in day out.
Knowing this, it'll most certainly be a very worthwhile investment.0 -
http://www.xone1.com/watches/heart-rate-sports-watch/
I am tempted, there are only a few left but given the fact the price is a lot less than a Polar (plus it has no "chest strap" do you think it'd be inaccurate?
Any experts/seasoned HRM user out there who could give me their views?
I really wouldn't recommend an HRM without a chest strap.0 -
Thanks for starting this thread...I'm also trying to figure out which to buy! I have seen a few people mention the Polar FT7. Does that come with chest strap or do you buy the chest strap separately?0
-
I have both the fit bit and a HRM I use the fitbit for walking and steps and sleep and then at the gym HRM without chest strap S7 from walmart. has great reviews and is cheap.28.00
This is the one I have, not sure what kind of results you are getting from it and how accurate it is???? Any info on what you have personally seen using it?0 -
Love my Polar FT4!! It has a chest strap and saw one on Amazon just the other day for around $70.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions