In place of a road map!

191012141526

Replies

  • shell3986
    shell3986 Posts: 98
    Bump!
  • dbevisjr
    dbevisjr Posts: 183
    Bump

    Thanks for the clarification Dan.
  • krunchykat
    krunchykat Posts: 158 Member
    Bump
  • iluxoxo211
    iluxoxo211 Posts: 241 Member
    bump thank u!
  • elishabeish
    elishabeish Posts: 175 Member
    Bump to digest properly later!! :smile:
  • Weaz66
    Weaz66 Posts: 1,846 Member
    Thanks!
  • scottywor
    scottywor Posts: 140 Member
    Ok...so I feel like a idiot posting this, but here goes, I think I'm starting to understand this, I have a bad habit of over thinking and confusing the obvious, i just need to know that I am on at least the right track.

    Consuming so many more calories is scary, but I understand the concept of doing so.

    A little background, My wife and i have been here for over 2 months, we eat clean, have eaten well under our daily calories each day, and have only done cardio, and 5 times a week at 45 min sessions. We have over 80 lobs of weight loss combined. Including muscle :( and fat :) We wanted a quick loss and we got it, but at the obvious expense of lean muscle. Long story short we have wised up, which has led us to this thread. Sttrength trining now 3 days per week and shorter more intense cardio 3 x per week.

    I just want to clarify the stats I have calculated etc... sorry again for my stupidity and over complication... :cry: Hopefully someone can confirm for me...Hopefully I am on the right track... :ohwell:

    STATS:
    Age 36
    HT: 5'11"
    WT: 193.6 ---- goal 180lbs
    BF:28.1%

    Goal - Drop body Fat, increase Lean muscle mass


    My BMR is 1735
    TDEE is 2858 - mod active - crazy number

    TDEE+20% = 3429 - this is a crazier number that I cant wrap my head around...wow... That seems just way to much

    SO hopefully i understand the basic concept here....

    Ok... so Im not eat below 1735, I understand that fine.

    Confusion sets in with total daily amount to eat... is it as simple as 3429 cals per day case closed? Or is the amount somewhere between 3429 and 1735, that being the 2858 cals?

    Supposing I eat TDEE 3459- assuming i burn 500 cals thats 2929 total daily. I do not have to eat back any thing and all is well? So if I just aimed to hit 3400 cals daily, even with exercise that I do daily I shouldn't have to worry about eating anything back anything correct? OR should I be using the TDEE less the 20% - which would put me a 2858, even so I would always be well over my BMR with exercise daily, as i will never be doing more than say 1000 cals per day exercise...Keeping in mind that I set my goal weight for 180, i should be losing body fat, while eating this much...seems crazy, enter my confusion.... :(

    Should I be aiming for somwhere between BMR and TDEE???

    Please any advice is greatly appreciated....

    Best post on the forums....

    Thank you very very much.


    Scotty

    You pretty much have it right. Assuming you used the fit2fat calculator tool, your deficit and exercise is baked into the 2,858 number - so you should be eating as near to this as possible.


    Yeah , i should have mentioned i used the F2F calculations!

    Cool... I was hoping i was on the right path... Man that seems like so much food...considering all i have really been eating for the last 3 months is 1200-1400 cals per day and not even eating my exercise cals back.. not even coming close to my BMR...eeeeks.... Although, the wife and myself enjoy a Friday night off from clean eating...lol - we do dinner out and a few snacks/drinks that night. Then its back to normal. Have to allow yourself every now and then, or we would go nutty.

    I am going to start slowly adding calories until I get up to around the 2800 mark, thinking 200-300 per day is a reasonable addition to start?

    I have also changed my macros to 30% for both protein and fat... although 214g of protein is going to be very hard to attain I think. I noticed that Dan recommends 1g per lbs of lean muscle mass, which would make it 139g of protein, I'm going to start there and see how it goes.

    I understand its a total balancing act, so armed with this new information I'm going to give it a shot, and tweak it as I go along.

    Noticed that when I set this up in MFP it gave me a caloric def of -208 and a -0.4 weight loss (= weight gain) Assuming I work as hard as I have been (doing cardio - wont worry about burning muscle), and lift heavy on my strength training days, I shouldn't be worried about gaining body fat, I assuming the net gain should and will be lean muscle, assuming a proper diet, which I have been following for 3 months now!! Just have to up the amount and such I take it?

    Is this reasonable to assume and a good starting point?

    Thanks again
  • rufus1973
    rufus1973 Posts: 13
    sounds complicated - but thanks will try
  • Sarauk2sf
    Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member
    Ok...so I feel like a idiot posting this, but here goes, I think I'm starting to understand this, I have a bad habit of over thinking and confusing the obvious, i just need to know that I am on at least the right track.

    Consuming so many more calories is scary, but I understand the concept of doing so.

    A little background, My wife and i have been here for over 2 months, we eat clean, have eaten well under our daily calories each day, and have only done cardio, and 5 times a week at 45 min sessions. We have over 80 lobs of weight loss combined. Including muscle :( and fat :) We wanted a quick loss and we got it, but at the obvious expense of lean muscle. Long story short we have wised up, which has led us to this thread. Sttrength trining now 3 days per week and shorter more intense cardio 3 x per week.

    I just want to clarify the stats I have calculated etc... sorry again for my stupidity and over complication... :cry: Hopefully someone can confirm for me...Hopefully I am on the right track... :ohwell:

    STATS:
    Age 36
    HT: 5'11"
    WT: 193.6 ---- goal 180lbs
    BF:28.1%

    Goal - Drop body Fat, increase Lean muscle mass


    My BMR is 1735
    TDEE is 2858 - mod active - crazy number

    TDEE+20% = 3429 - this is a crazier number that I cant wrap my head around...wow... That seems just way to much

    SO hopefully i understand the basic concept here....

    Ok... so Im not eat below 1735, I understand that fine.

    Confusion sets in with total daily amount to eat... is it as simple as 3429 cals per day case closed? Or is the amount somewhere between 3429 and 1735, that being the 2858 cals?

    Supposing I eat TDEE 3459- assuming i burn 500 cals thats 2929 total daily. I do not have to eat back any thing and all is well? So if I just aimed to hit 3400 cals daily, even with exercise that I do daily I shouldn't have to worry about eating anything back anything correct? OR should I be using the TDEE less the 20% - which would put me a 2858, even so I would always be well over my BMR with exercise daily, as i will never be doing more than say 1000 cals per day exercise...Keeping in mind that I set my goal weight for 180, i should be losing body fat, while eating this much...seems crazy, enter my confusion.... :(

    Should I be aiming for somwhere between BMR and TDEE???

    Please any advice is greatly appreciated....

    Best post on the forums....

    Thank you very very much.


    Scotty

    You pretty much have it right. Assuming you used the fit2fat calculator tool, your deficit and exercise is baked into the 2,858 number - so you should be eating as near to this as possible.


    Yeah , i should have mentioned i used the F2F calculations!

    Cool... I was hoping i was on the right path... Man that seems like so much food...considering all i have really been eating for the last 3 months is 1200-1400 cals per day and not even eating my exercise cals back.. not even coming close to my BMR...eeeeks.... Although, the wife and myself enjoy a Friday night off from clean eating...lol - we do dinner out and a few snacks/drinks that night. Then its back to normal. Have to allow yourself every now and then, or we would go nutty.

    I am going to start slowly adding calories until I get up to around the 2800 mark, thinking 200-300 per day is a reasonable addition to start?

    I have also changed my macros to 30% for both protein and fat... although 214g of protein is going to be very hard to attain I think. I noticed that Dan recommends 1g per lbs of lean muscle mass, which would make it 139g of protein, I'm going to start there and see how it goes.

    I understand its a total balancing act, so armed with this new information I'm going to give it a shot, and tweak it as I go along.

    Noticed that when I set this up in MFP it gave me a caloric def of -208 and a -0.4 weight loss (= weight gain) Assuming I work as hard as I have been (doing cardio - wont worry about burning muscle), and lift heavy on my strength training days, I shouldn't be worried about gaining body fat, I assuming the net gain should and will be lean muscle, assuming a proper diet, which I have been following for 3 months now!! Just have to up the amount and such I take it?

    Is this reasonable to assume and a good starting point?

    Thanks again


    Sounds like a really good plan. And I would ignore the MFP stats - they do not include exercise and are usually on the low side for non-workout acivity levels.
  • honestlysweet
    honestlysweet Posts: 221 Member
    Bump
  • Thanks, Dan!

    bump
  • kokaneesailor
    kokaneesailor Posts: 337 Member
    Bumpity Bump :wink:
  • SPNLuver83
    SPNLuver83 Posts: 2,050 Member
    Ok this makes NO SENSE! When I did the Military Body Fat Calculator it says my body fat is only 17%. That is so not right. I have terrible saddlebags, flabby arms and a ton of fat on my legs and thighs. Theres just no way this is right :/
  • SPNLuver83
    SPNLuver83 Posts: 2,050 Member
    I'm interested to try this, since eating more is always a good thing in my book, and I've got my numbers all figured out - BUT, I had to use the regular body fat calculator because the result I got from the military one was obviously ridiculous. 14%. Lol no. (As compared to 29% from the regular one and just by looking at my chubby thighs I know it's definitely not below 25%). Did I do something wrong or what? I'd rather use the military one because you said it was more accurate, but that is apparently not the case for me and I'd like to be sure before I start tweaking my goals and stuffing my face.

    NOT ALONE! I got 17%, which is soooo not the case. I'm about to use the reg. one too

    The normal one says 26%. What's with the huge difference??
  • SPNLuver83
    SPNLuver83 Posts: 2,050 Member
    ok I just posted this in a thread, but noone ever reads my threads, so I am posting this in hopes of someone helping me, because I am soo confused!

    "Ok, I'll admit, I'm not the brightest. I just read that thread, or rather, "roadmap" but I am very confused at this point.... I've been doing that standard net 1200 from MFP, but admittingly I have been feeling hungry, even after eating back the calories burned from exercise. I am TERRIFIED to eat more, especially as much as what I think this formula is telling me to eat.... Any help would be sooo much appreciated!!!

    Ok so the Military Body Fat Calculator says I only have 17% body fat. That is SO not the case.

    I did the original body fat calculator and it says 26%. That makes more sense. That equals to 36.6 lbs of body fat.

    I am currently 141 lbs and 5'6. My goal is 125 lbs.

    The Katch-McArdle formula says my BMR is 1391.

    Adding 20% to that would make my TDEE 1669.

    So is THAT what my calories should be netting?

    I exercise 6-7 days a week. That little chart on Fat 2 Fit says, with all the above info, that I should be eating between 2134-2375 calories a day. Now I am assuming that is WITH the exercise. But to eat that much seems like a lot... It's more than what MFP tells me to eat even on my long cardio days when I burn the most.

    HELP! "
  • anttrail
    anttrail Posts: 37 Member
    Bump
  • Sarauk2sf
    Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member
    ok I just posted this in a thread, but noone ever reads my threads, so I am posting this in hopes of someone helping me, because I am soo confused!

    "Ok, I'll admit, I'm not the brightest. I just read that thread, or rather, "roadmap" but I am very confused at this point.... I've been doing that standard net 1200 from MFP, but admittingly I have been feeling hungry, even after eating back the calories burned from exercise. I am TERRIFIED to eat more, especially as much as what I think this formula is telling me to eat.... Any help would be sooo much appreciated!!!

    Ok so the Military Body Fat Calculator says I only have 17% body fat. That is SO not the case.

    I did the original body fat calculator and it says 26%. That makes more sense. That equals to 36.6 lbs of body fat.

    I am currently 141 lbs and 5'6. My goal is 125 lbs.

    The Katch-McArdle formula says my BMR is 1391.

    Adding 20% to that would make my TDEE 1669.

    So is THAT what my calories should be netting?

    I exercise 6-7 days a week. That little chart on Fat 2 Fit says, with all the above info, that I should be eating between 2134-2375 calories a day. Now I am assuming that is WITH the exercise. But to eat that much seems like a lot... It's more than what MFP tells me to eat even on my long cardio days when I burn the most.

    HELP! "

    With the exercise you do, your TDEE is more than 1669 (the 20% is for sedentary). Just take the number from the chart based on your activity level as you have done and eat what it tells you. That is with exercise, so you do not 'eat your exercise calories back' as they are already baked in.
  • Kickinkim418
    Kickinkim418 Posts: 257 Member
    bump
  • Thank you!!
  • primalpdx
    primalpdx Posts: 3 Member
    GREAT INFO! This will really help me. :smile: Thanks!
  • Pebbles536
    Pebbles536 Posts: 199
    :smile:
  • EllaA26
    EllaA26 Posts: 48
    bump
  • susannamarie
    susannamarie Posts: 2,148 Member
    I'm interested to try this, since eating more is always a good thing in my book, and I've got my numbers all figured out - BUT, I had to use the regular body fat calculator because the result I got from the military one was obviously ridiculous. 14%. Lol no. (As compared to 29% from the regular one and just by looking at my chubby thighs I know it's definitely not below 25%). Did I do something wrong or what? I'd rather use the military one because you said it was more accurate, but that is apparently not the case for me and I'd like to be sure before I start tweaking my goals and stuffing my face.

    NOT ALONE! I got 17%, which is soooo not the case. I'm about to use the reg. one too

    The normal one says 26%. What's with the huge difference??

    Heh, yeah. The military one says 31% for me, the normal one says 26% and the covert-bailey one says 27%.
  • jacklynb46
    jacklynb46 Posts: 39 Member
    bump
  • JRRCLR
    JRRCLR Posts: 338 Member
    Bump
  • scienceteacherAK
    scienceteacherAK Posts: 94 Member
    bump
  • dixiecup19
    dixiecup19 Posts: 50 Member
    bump
  • Celeigh12
    Celeigh12 Posts: 763 Member
    saving...
  • midoswife
    midoswife Posts: 35 Member
    Bunp
  • jamkat
    jamkat Posts: 77 Member
    bump
This discussion has been closed.