Devil's advocate: 1200 calories for petite/short women?

1356710

Replies

  • nixirain
    nixirain Posts: 448 Member
    I am 5'1 and have about 30 lbs to lose...it is hard for me to stay at 1200...I recently upped it to 1300 and feels so much better. I have energy and i'm not as cranky anymore. I haven't seen any significant weight loss (bouncing 3 lbs up and down) but hoping this higher intake will boost my metabolism like so many people on here say it will.

    100 calories is NOT going to boost your metabolism. it's rather negligible.

    If 100 makes no difference, then how could 200 or 300? They are all just 100 more than the other.

    quite simply...100 calories is less than a 10% increase in calories above 1200...300 calories is 25% of 1200. Quite different, eh?

    Yes, 25% will make more of a difference than 10%. That in no way translates to 10% makes no difference.

    Ok, but my BMR is only 1375 so to lose weight I need to be in a deficit so upping to 1400 or 1500 will make me gain weight right?!

    No your BMR is what you would need to eat if you were in a coma. You need to eat less than your TDEE (BMR + your activity basically ) Your TDEE is your maintenance number. If you eat over that you will gain weight.
  • bearxfoo
    bearxfoo Posts: 81 Member
    MFP put me at 1200 calories a day, and I did not see any results. I also thought I was "sedentary" but I also work out a minimum of 5 days a week - usually closer to 7. I do have a desk job, but I still make time to exercise and move around, so even though I may sit for awhile, I don't consider myself "sedentary". I THOUGHT I was, but putting my activity limit to "light" put me at 1400 calories a day and I find it's much more manageable - especially when I bike for two hours a day burning almost 1000 calories (as I've done in the past two days!). Yesterday I ate almost 1500 calories and still had 700 left - and I wasn't even a BIT hungry, I couldn't force myself to eat if I tried.

    I think 1200 is kind of a "bare minimal" but every person is different. For me, 1200 felt like too little, and I was hungry, thinking about food a lot and I wasn't seeing any results. I've seen many websites tell me my BMR is 1400 or higher, some even at 2000, and my TDEE or whatever is much higher, so I feel 1400 is a good place to be at.

    Oh, also, I'm only 5'1-5'2 (on a good day!) and I'm at 152 right now. I started at 156, so I've lost weight already.
  • cmccorma
    cmccorma Posts: 203 Member
    I am 5'1.5 and 1,200 is working for me. As another devil's advocate point, weight watchers approximately comes out to 1,200 calories as well for someone my height and that program is very successful for people. So I think each person's needs can be different.
  • Kooraloo
    Kooraloo Posts: 362 Member
    I'm 5'2.5, just about average, and I usually eat around 1200 calories. For me, this is enough. I eat a lot of veggies and fruit because they make me feel less lethargic and more awake, but since they're pretty low calorie-wise, my daily intake is around 1200. For me, this is enough, but I can see why some people would have trouble with it!
  • jj3120
    jj3120 Posts: 358
    I am 5' 0" I weigh 150.9 lb's and I eat 1958 calories

    I spent about 6 years at 1200 - 1500 weight came off, then on , then off...

    When I started again here mfp gave me 1430 calories but after reading all the great information here I used fat2fit to calculate my bmr (1263) and my GOAL weight maintainence (1958)

    I started by upping my calories to 1800 my appetite soon kicked in but then I found I was sometimes still hungry especially on non-workout days so now I am set at 1958 reguardless of exercise. This seems to be working for me I'm not feeling hungry when I go to bed.

    I had a lot of years where I ate too little, now I genuinely feel I am feeding by body, my diet has improved and my cravings/binges have stopped. My weight had stopped moving now I am also losing inches, my body fat is coming down and the scale is finally coming down again.

    Me = : D
  • Tzippy7
    Tzippy7 Posts: 344 Member
    Im 5 1 and 145 lbs (lost 27 lbs). I hardly ever eat over 1200. I work out A LOT and I usually feel great. When I dont its usually due to college lifestyle issues of staying up all night and drinking way too much coffee. Occasionally if im in a bad mood I eat a little more because i tend to get low blood sugar. For the most part it works for me! im not too strict, some days im a little under 1200 and some days im a little over. people often tell me i net too low but I just take it a day at a time and see how i feel.
  • Spanaval
    Spanaval Posts: 1,200 Member
    I am 5 ft tall and 120 lbs. and 40 years old. I use 1200 calories as my base, but I exercise EVERYDAY and I eat back every one of those calories. I would like to weigh less, but at the same time I feel healthier this way.

    Our stats are similar. I'm 5'1", 120 lbs (not sure, haven't weighed myself lately) and almost 41. My base was set to 1200 cals (now upped to 1300), and I eat back my exercise calories. I have a hard time reaching the caloric goals at times, however, and eat for the sake of eating, especially on days when I work out harder. If I ate strictly on the basis of how hungry I am, 1200 or 1300 is more than enough.
  • StarryEyed500
    StarryEyed500 Posts: 225 Member
    I'm 5'0". I'm currently aiming for 1700+ per day. I'm not particularly active, but I do lift weights 3 times a week. If I didn't do that, I'd be on 1400+ a week. I can't stick to 1200 - I get hungry, crabby and tired.
  • twinmomtwice4
    twinmomtwice4 Posts: 1,069 Member
    I'm 5'3" and have slowly increased my calories over the last 3-4 weeks and I'm now at 1700. Each time I adjust my calories, my body seems to get hungrier more often...which leads me to believe that it's happy it's finally being fed!!!
  • essjay76
    essjay76 Posts: 465 Member
    You make a valid point. The calorie needs for petite women can be on the low side.

    However, when you're getting down around 1200, adequate daily micronutrition starts to become an issue, IMO. Women that need to eat that little to lose weight would be better served to increase their activity and eat a little more.

    Exactly, which seems to be the healthiest approach for smaller women. Taking any kind of deficit (from food calories) could bring the gross calorie intake way too low. At least exercise will allow for a higher intake.
  • essjay76
    essjay76 Posts: 465 Member
    I'm 4'9 and 97 lbs, I eat roughly 1000-1200 calories a day if I'm hungry. When I'm not that hungry, I eat a lot less. I have literally gone a day or two without eating, because I just didn't think about it. To be honest, I wouldn't be on here if I didn't have kids, I almost done losing my baby weight.

    wow--not sure how you survive but i would surely recommend eating more!

    No idea, I've literally been eating this way my whole life, except during my pregancies. And I'm not stick thin or ever had a bad doctor's visit. I'm not recommending this at all, it's just me.


    Interesting, how were you able to lose any pregnancy weight you gained? If you were at 1000-1200 calories all your life, then what would your diet be like? I would imagine you'd be well under 900 calories a day to lose pregnancy weight?
  • essjay76
    essjay76 Posts: 465 Member
    Im 5 1 and 145 lbs (lost 27 lbs). I hardly ever eat over 1200. I work out A LOT and I usually feel great. When I dont its usually due to college lifestyle issues of staying up all night and drinking way too much coffee. Occasionally if im in a bad mood I eat a little more because i tend to get low blood sugar. For the most part it works for me! im not too strict, some days im a little under 1200 and some days im a little over. people often tell me i net too low but I just take it a day at a time and see how i feel.

    First off, congrats on your 27 lb weight loss.

    Curious for you and anyone else around our size who works out and lost a bunch of weight... how much did you eat regularly before? And what does working out "a lot" mean to you? Do you mean, burning off 600 calories a day, leaving yourself at net 600?

    Just curious because I think I work out a lot too, and can't imagine working out a lot on that many calories. I'm not knocking what you're doing, it's just amazing to me that it's enough fuel for a hard workout.
  • mfpcopine
    mfpcopine Posts: 3,093 Member
    It's interesting to hear this on countless "1200 calories" vs. "eat more to lose weight" discussions... people often say, "unless you're a dwarf" or "unless you're 4'8" " you really need at least 1200 calories a day. Well guess what? I happen to know that there are quite a few "dwarfs" :-) and petite women posting on MFP, me being one of them! (No offense taken to the "dwarf" comment, we're all just fun sized!) :-)

    This isn't really a question for calorie advice for me personally, but for all smaller ladies out there. Do smaller women really need more than 1200 calories? Surely if you're less than 5' and pretty sedentary, you won't need as much as a 5'7" woman, right?



    ******FYI, I'm 4'10" 105 lbs. and my mantra is that women in general should eat more and be more active. I personally can not live off of 1200 calories a day. I am waaaay too active (am a long distance runner) and love food and exercise way too much, but I realize not all women are training for marathons like I am.

    Thus, I welcome the different opinions, what do y'all think??

    It depends on the size of the woman and her activity level. I believe a very small or older woman with a slower metabolism who was sedentary might well have trouble losing weight on 1200. Many years ago, when I was at a spa and was EXTREMELY active all day I went down from 93 or 94 to 90. I still only ate the spa's 1400 calories-a-day plan.

    Only by observation and trial and error can a person figure out his or her ideal dieting calorie minimum.
  • acs4162
    acs4162 Posts: 99 Member
    I'm 5'4 133 lbs and 30 years old. I was 127 before I had kids and then 167 after kids. I've gradually been losing weight over the last 2.5 years by eating healthy and staying active, but the last 10-15 pounds just weren't coming off. I cut out alot of bad and junk foods I had been eating and now the weigh is coming off. I'm never, NEVER hungry. I have been staying in the 1000- 1200 calories most days. If I work out hard or run long distance, it may be around 1300 that day. I do plan to change my diet slightly once I get to my goal weight of 125. I do consider myself to be small framed and I know I'm not supposed to be eating the same as someone much taller than me. Growing up I thought I should eat as much as my friends and family that are taller/bigger than me, and then I would just be so sluggish and tired afterwards and wonder why they weren't. At lunch here at work, I watch others eat bread, yogart, and pizza for their lunch and wonder how they don't feel tired afterwards, because I want to take a nap after eating those foods.
    I do think it's more important to listen to your body and take note of how you feel after eating something, rather than trying to stick to some strict diet with rules. I love MFP, because I can keep track of what I've eaten that day- otherwise I really would forget!
  • fuzzyslipperz
    fuzzyslipperz Posts: 49 Member
    I'm 5'4 and I eat 2Kish per day, total - generally 1350-1500 net. I do a lot of farm work and running, so I use a fitbit for most things and log in specific exercise with a HRM. When I tried to stick to 1500 without eating exercise back.. woooowhee I was a nasty *kitten*. :)

    Oh, and I'm 44 years old (ugh) and about 120 pounds. And have been about the same weight give or take for 8 years after losing 50.

    I have never ever been someone who got 'so full' on 1200 cals - and I eat probably 80+ g/fiber a day and a ton of protein, so it's not like I sit around eating twinkies. I could eat 3K or more if I wouldn't turn into a twinkie. :)
  • danifo0811
    danifo0811 Posts: 544 Member
    I'm 5'3 and working to get back to 135 lbs. My weight gain came from pregnancy (50 lbs each time, lost it the first time ). I maintain my weight at 2300 calories /day with working out about 30 minutes 3-5 times per week.

    I'm currently losing (and breastfeeding) at 2300 and I'm working out 1 hour 5 days a week. when I'm at 2500 I'm maintaining.

    I'm also amazed at people who can't figure out how to eat over 1200.... I like nuts and cheese. I usually eat my calories all healthy but I like the wiggle room for treats like birthday cake or eating out. When I ate lower in the past it led to me feeling deprived about treats and binging.

    Honestly, my goal is to have as high a metabolism as possible so I can eat what I feel like. If people like to eat 1200 or less I just hope they are happy eating there.
  • strawberrie_milk
    strawberrie_milk Posts: 381 Member
    Honestly, I have no idea where "1200" even came from.. did someone just pull that number out of their butt? There's no ~magic~ number that you must eat at in order to not starve your body - everyone is different. Mini rant aside, I eat 1100-1200 calories a day (5'1") and I've managed to go from 123 lbs. to 104 lbs. thus far.
  • Sallycinnimon
    Sallycinnimon Posts: 102 Member
    I'm 5foot. I could not eat less than 1200. NOOO WAYYY! When I get to my goal, it may change though. Right now, I'm at 157 and my goal is 130ish. So I'm sure it could change.
  • Angybabefitzg
    Angybabefitzg Posts: 30 Member
    bump
  • janf15
    janf15 Posts: 242 Member
    I am sorry if this is a duplicate of what someone else has said - the way calorie needs are calculated is based on the BMR. There is a formula and there are several of them on the internet - google mayoclinic.com and bmr or go to www.fat2fitradio.com/bmr

    Typically they use the Harris Benedict equation. And it works for most people. People who are morbidly obese (based on their BMI) or people who have a low body fat percentage - is slightly different.

    The BMR is the amount of calories you will need to sustain life in a 24 hr period if you are sleeping/unconscious during that time period. Conversely the daily goal you get on MFP is rather close to your BMR.

    I don't know who are dreaming these 1200 calories up. For many people it is several hundred calories below their need and if they are really active - they go into starvation mode and it is not healthy for the. My grief with a lot of the posters here is that they don't do a lot of research and that is the reason they don't do as well as they would like....

    just my 10 cents FWIW
  • kjbbdoll
    kjbbdoll Posts: 86
    I am 5'7 and MFP put me at 1200 calories. Most days I don't have a problem staying within that amount. Even if I exercise I rarely eat back my calories. I also have a physical job which some days makes me very hungry but I just think everyone is different or maybe it has to do with your food choices as to what fills you up longer, etc? I almost always go over on protien.
  • ladyraven68
    ladyraven68 Posts: 2,003 Member
    I'm 4ft 11.5, I was set at 1200 by MFP initially, even to lose 1lb per week, but I just couldn't eat that little.

    I did some research, got my numbers ran my Helloitsdan, and now I'm losing nicely on 1600 net.
  • 2April
    2April Posts: 285 Member
    I'm 5'3 and working to get back to 135 lbs. My weight gain came from pregnancy (50 lbs each time, lost it the first time ). I maintain my weight at 2300 calories /day with working out about 30 minutes 3-5 times per week.

    I'm currently losing (and breastfeeding) at 2300 and I'm working out 1 hour 5 days a week. when I'm at 2500 I'm maintaining.

    I'm also amazed at people who can't figure out how to eat over 1200.... I like nuts and cheese. I usually eat my calories all healthy but I like the wiggle room for treats like birthday cake or eating out. When I ate lower in the past it led to me feeling deprived about treats and binging.

    Honestly, my goal is to have as high a metabolism as possible so I can eat what I feel like. If people like to eat 1200 or less I just hope they are happy eating there.
    Sometime your metabolism just slows a bit as you age. I gained at least 70 lbs during my pregnancy (twins) and the weight just came off while I was eating a massive amount of calories - over 3000 per day. Within 3 months I was back down to 110 lbs. I didn't do any exercise besides waking. Over the years I didn't watch what I ate and I slowly gained weight until I reached 130 lbs. I can easily eat WAY over 1200 calories but if I plan my meals I can net 1200 and feel satisfied. When I reach my goal of 115 ( 2 lbs to go) I plan on increasing my calories so I don't continue to lose. You just have to find what works for you.
  • quill16
    quill16 Posts: 373 Member
    I am 5'3" and have been eating 1200-13000 cals for 17 months and have consistently lost 8-10 lbs a month (a couple minor plateaus at 40, 90,120 and 150 lb losses) , I have 158 total loss so far with about 20 more lbs to lose. It is coming off slower now 5-7 lbs a month. I tried 1400-1500 cals for 2 weeks and didn't lose a thing. I also started exercising at the 40 lb loss point on a treadmill for 20 minutes and now have gradually increased to now where I run 5 miles on treadmill (1 hour)5 days a week and do pool exercises for 1 hour for 6 days a week. I increase the exercise as I feel I could handle it and now I have so much energy. I just think there are some people who cannot eat that many calories and lose. It is a guideline and I intend to keep gouing as I have been and be successful for me
  • chickentunashake
    chickentunashake Posts: 164 Member
    Wow, does that mean i have eating disorder? : i hope not, I'm 5' 6", working out on almost daily basis, sometimes even 2x a day, since I eat about 1000- 1300 cal a day, just have hard time to eat more. But maybe we all are just different
  • freckledrats
    freckledrats Posts: 251 Member
    You make a valid point. The calorie needs for petite women can be on the low side.

    However, when you're getting down around 1200, adequate daily micronutrition starts to become an issue, IMO. Women that need to eat that little to lose weight would be better served to increase their activity and eat a little more.

    Adequate daily micro-nutrition scales with size just like caloric needs do. Why would someone a foot shorter than someone else need the same amount of iron or vitamin D? Stick to a balanced diet, should be fine.
  • Wow, does that mean i have eating disorder? : i hope not, I'm 5' 6", working out on almost daily basis, sometimes even 2x a day, since I eat about 1000- 1300 cal a day, just have hard time to eat more. But maybe we all are just different

    it means you should most certainly make an effort to eat more.
  • Stephanie198907
    Stephanie198907 Posts: 163 Member
    I'm 5'4 and my calories are set at 1280 and I do just fine. Most days, even without exercising, I am under my calorie goal. A lot of times I have to force myself to eat because I'm not hungry but i still need to meet my daily calcium, iron, and protein allotments. On days when I workout I add an extra meal, usually a quinoa salad with roast peppers or an extra snack, popcorn and fresh fruit.
    There is absolutely NO WAY i could eat 1500+ calories like some people. I just physically cant.
  • devilwhiterose
    devilwhiterose Posts: 1,157 Member
    1200 is suitable for me (5'-0"). I actually have a few days here and there where I find it hard to get 1200, I'm just not hungry. I average 1200-1300. If I work out, I eat those calories back so I have at least a net of 1200.

    It's been working great for me!
  • melissan84
    melissan84 Posts: 487 Member
    I'm 5'1'' and Set mine to 1200 calories. Sometimes I achieve to eat it all and other times I don't. I have never been much of eater and the truth is I am now eating more than before and healthy.

    I have always as far as I remember drank coffee in the morning then a sandwich for lunch then a heavy carb dinner. No vegetables or fruits. Now I am eating a healthy breakfast, lunch and dinner along with snacks. I'm not hungry at 1000-1200 calories at all. I feel better and with more energy now then before.

    And no I didnt have eating disorder, I was never really hungry. I was a cook and I kind of got disgusted with seeing so much food, I suppose.