It IS a SPORT!!!!

ScottyNoHotty

Games are fun
Sports are not.

tadpole242

Obviously tadpole has no idea what the word sport actually means.

sport - noun - an activity involving physical exertion and skill in which an individual or team competes against another or others for entertainment

And if you want to go old school with it, the original meaning of the word sport was "entertainment, pastime." Nothing to do with individual competition, or to the death. That's never been any part of the definition.

Hunting and fishing aren't sport, hunting and fishing are methods of procuring food. Farming isn't a sport either, just for the record. :huh:

If you have to hunt for food you are hunting for food, but if you don't have to hunt for food but still do, then you are hunting for pleasure. I.e. it becomes a sport.
"Wild animals caught for sport joy, fun, amusement” is the late 13c definition. This predates “game involving physical exercise” by 200 years.
And for the record, just because you disagree with me, does not mean you are right, it just means you disagree.
Mocking me just proves you are one of ‘those’ people who feels they are so inadequate; that the only way to make you feel better about yourself is to bring everything down to your level.
Kindly don’t.

wolverine66

i think people are confusing or mixing sport and athletics.

to me, you can be an athlete but not necessarily play a sport, and you can play a sport but not necessarily be an athlete.

i'm not sure why some need the validation of others to call it a sport. but regardless if someone thinks it is a sport, i don't think anyone would say that those who participate are not athletes - and really good ones, at that.

tadpole242

i think people are confusing or mixing sport and athletics.

to me, you can be an athlete but not necessarily play a sport, and you can play a sport but not necessarily be an athlete.

i'm not sure why some need the validation of others to call it a sport. but regardless if someone thinks it is a sport, i don't think anyone would say that those who participate are not athletes - and really good ones, at that.

This quoted for truth

crazy8ts

I delineate "sports" and "games" by offense and defense. I believe that a "sport" has an offense/defense.... and games have high/low scores you shoot for... which makes bowling not a sport... but pool a sport... golf not a sport but (I bite my tongue) NASCAR a sport... IMO, of course

judith3

Everyone has extremely valid points Personally i Believe that COMPETITIVE cheerleading should be considered a sport i agree with what others have stated about standing on the sidelines cheering is not a sport i was a cheerleader in high school and can honestly say its not a sport i did it for fun but competitive cheerleading is nothing like sideline cheerleading

ETA: although regular cheerleading isnt that intense the stunting is by no means easy i know i would never have been able to be on a competitive team those girls and some guys are beasts!

karenjoy

I also consider sex a sport, for the same reasons, just looking for the video on youtube now........

WilliamsPeggy

Games are fun
Sports are not.

:laugh:

TaraMKL

Hmmm - not entering the sport/no sport thing but I watched the video and that tick tock thing WAS pretty sweet.

RideaYeti

I'll jump in, but first let me state that I have a daughter that does competitive cheer (been to Nationals twice so far) so I have been around and have the utmost respect for the talent, work ethic, and athletic ability of competitive cheerleaders. They are without a doubt athletes in every sense of the word. That said, to me cheerleading is not a sport.

In sports winners are determined by objective measurements and not subjective opinion. For example: a runner crosses the finish line first, a basketball team puts the ball through the hoop more than the other team, a golfer has the fewest strokes, etc.

When the winner is CHOSEN because a panel of people said think that team/person did the best job, then it is not a sport.

Before you jump on me, I know how the scoring works and squads do get a certain amount of points for certain stunts (and deductions for missing stunts), but a judges personal opinion still comes into play. Otherwise all the judges scores should be identical and there would only need to be 1 judge and not a panel. As an example of the problems subjective scoring presents, we can look at the 2002 Olympic skating scandal.

IMO (and it is just an opinion) to be considered a sport, the winner is determined objectively, with no subjective component.

judith3

I'll jump in, but first let me state that I have a daughter that does competitive cheer (been to Nationals twice so far) so I have been around and have the utmost respect for the talent, work ethic, and athletic ability of competitive cheerleaders. They are without a doubt athletes in every sense of the word. That said, to me cheerleading is not a sport.

In sports winners are determined by objective measurements and not subjective opinion. For example: a runner crosses the finish line first, a basketball team puts the ball through the hoop more than the other team, a golfer has the fewest strokes, etc.

When the winner is CHOSEN because a panel of people said think that team/person did the best job, then it is not a sport.

Before you jump on me, I know how the scoring works and squads do get a certain amount of points for certain stunts (and deductions for missing stunts), but a judges personal opinion still comes into play. Otherwise all the judges scores should be identical and there would only need to be 1 judge and not a panel. As an example of the problems subjective scoring presents, we can look at the 2002 Olympic skating scandal.

IMO (and it is just an opinion) to be considered a sport, the winner is determined objectively, with no subjective component.

Wow nobody has ever put it like that before i completely understand your opinion and respect it i cant deny that well based on your line of reasoning cheer isnt a sport but dont tell my friend i ever said this

brittanymarie120

I have been cheering since the 5th grade, and i have debated this with so many people. lol. Im not sure if this is true or not, but i recently heard that they were making cheerleading an olympic sport...

[sport] straight from the dictionary:

noun
1. an athletic activity requiring skill or physical prowess and often of a competitive nature, as racing, baseball, tennis, golf, bowling, wrestling, boxing, hunting, fishing, etc.


without a doubt, cheerleading requires a great deal of athleticism (and spirit). i.e. tumbling, dancing, stunting, cheering, and jumping. unfortunately, most cheerleaders are not given the full credit they deserve

not only should a cheerleader possess the physical qualities required for the sport, but he or she must also be able to cultivate positivity and school spirit

Tracyramos1220

Yeah, that! ^

I can say this much, sport or not, my daughter can do things that the majority of the people in the world cannot! And, to be involved in such an exclusive group is pretty awesome! I've always loved this phrase, "Athletes lift weights. Cheerleaders lift athletes."

I don't understand why people have such a big problem admitting its a sport. From what I read, there have only been two "legit" definitions given and by the looks of it, cheerleading would be considered a sport. Anyone have a "legit" definition to prove otherwise or is it just your opinion that cheerleading isn't a sport because you just don't believe it is? There is a difference and frankly having an opinion is ok.

cobracars

I'll jump in, but first let me state that I have a daughter that does competitive cheer (been to Nationals twice so far) so I have been around and have the utmost respect for the talent, work ethic, and athletic ability of competitive cheerleaders. They are without a doubt athletes in every sense of the word. That said, to me cheerleading is not a sport.

In sports winners are determined by objective measurements and not subjective opinion. For example: a runner crosses the finish line first, a basketball team puts the ball through the hoop more than the other team, a golfer has the fewest strokes, etc.

When the winner is CHOSEN because a panel of people said think that team/person did the best job, then it is not a sport.

Before you jump on me, I know how the scoring works and squads do get a certain amount of points for certain stunts (and deductions for missing stunts), but a judges personal opinion still comes into play. Otherwise all the judges scores should be identical and there would only need to be 1 judge and not a panel. As an example of the problems subjective scoring presents, we can look at the 2002 Olympic skating scandal.

IMO (and it is just an opinion) to be considered a sport, the winner is determined objectively, with no subjective component.

Yep
Take out the judges and what do you have? Just people dancing.
And I agree with this definition when it comes to ice dancing, ballroom dancing, figure skating, and gymnastics. Certain parts of gymnastics could be judged on time, such as the Iron Cross, but most are too subjective. When you finish your event you should instantly know if you are in first place, not have to wait around on the sidelines wringing your hands and hoping the judges 'gave' you a high score.

Definitely major athletics involved though!

chrishgt4

I also consider sex a sport, for the same reasons, just looking for the video on youtube now........

Except in sex it's better not to win...