Attraction Question

Options
135

Replies

  • apedeb09
    apedeb09 Posts: 805 Member
    Options
    Definitely need to be sexually attracted in someway.. but it has alot to do with personality as well.. I've dated a guy before that I wasn't very physically attracted to at first, but then after getting to know him I thought he was very sexy.. And on the flip side there has also been guys who I thought were really cute and we were both physically attracted to eachother but we had nothing in common so in the long run it didn't work out.
  • RobynC79
    RobynC79 Posts: 331 Member
    Options
    I think you are confused about 'natural selection' which only tangentially deals with mate choice. Selection of a mate and natural selection are not the same thing.

    Essentially, mate choice follows some fairly universal tenets: Females usually choose the male. Females trade assurance of resource provision (the male's job is to hold onto to, and provide her with, those resources) against an assurance of paternity (provided by the female allowing continued mating opportunity). A male with higher Resource Holding Potential (that's the real term for it) will be chosen by MORE females, not necessarily by females of higher quality.

    Generally, females are choosy, males are opportunistic and not selective,.

    In humans, mate choice is decided largely on proxy - what is typically attractive in females indirectly signals fertility and fecundity. In males, good looks, fancy stuff and money signal a high-quality mate who provides both good genes and the resources to provide for those offspring.

    Like it or not, humans aren't that different to any other species. Highly fertile females are obtained and guarded by highly resourced males. Females require males to demonstrate their resource holding potential (which suggests a solid genetic makeup) before mating, then permit or encourage the male to assume exclusive rights, thereby encouraging continued provision of the resources she needs to bear healthy offspring.
  • sunshine_gem
    sunshine_gem Posts: 390 Member
    Options
    for sure.

    I am attracted to guys with dark eyes, dark hair, olive skin. Not only can I not resist dark features, but it basically assures me that my children will not be gingers!
    Completely untrue, by the way. Red hair is a double recessive. Which means that the last person in either family that had red hair could be many generations in the past, but you can still get a baby with red hair. Ain't genetics a wonderful crap shoot? On the other hand, if I have a child with a red haired woman, it will have red hair, without exception. Sort of a built in paternity test...unless she has a thing for redheads.

    Sorry, not true. My family is littered with redheads, at least one in every generation and not all of their children have red hair. And before you say it, no there was no infidelity.
  • j_wilson2012
    j_wilson2012 Posts: 293
    Options
    I think you are confused about 'natural selection' which only tangentially deals with mate choice. Selection of a mate and natural selection are not the same thing.

    Essentially, mate choice follows some fairly universal tenets: Females usually choose the male. Females trade assurance of resource provision (the male's job is to hold onto to, and provide her with, those resources) against an assurance of paternity (provided by the female allowing continued mating opportunity). A male with higher Resource Holding Potential (that's the real term for it) will be chosen by MORE females, not necessarily by females of higher quality.

    Generally, females are choosy, males are opportunistic and not selective,.

    In humans, mate choice is decided largely on proxy - what is typically attractive in females indirectly signals fertility and fecundity. In males, good looks, fancy stuff and money signal a high-quality mate who provides both good genes and the resources to provide for those offspring.

    Like it or not, humans aren't that different to any other species. Highly fertile females are obtained and guarded by highly resourced males. Females require males to demonstrate their resource holding potential (which suggests a solid genetic makeup) before mating, then permit or encourage the male to assume exclusive rights, thereby encouraging continued provision of the resources she needs to bear healthy offspring.

    Kudos to that. Yes, the apperance is the tangible trait, but if you have BOTH the attractiveness and the personality, it makes it a ton easier to find a lifelong mate and/or better life than one who lacks one or the other. That would be my assumption. Is that correct?

    I am trying to figure out what is going on in my own life to make myself less confident and not as sociable as a lot of people. That is why I am digging into this question. there may be other theoretical questions forthcoming.
  • jdploki70
    jdploki70 Posts: 343
    Options
    for sure.

    I am attracted to guys with dark eyes, dark hair, olive skin. Not only can I not resist dark features, but it basically assures me that my children will not be gingers!
    Completely untrue, by the way. Red hair is a double recessive. Which means that the last person in either family that had red hair could be many generations in the past, but you can still get a baby with red hair. Ain't genetics a wonderful crap shoot? On the other hand, if I have a child with a red haired woman, it will have red hair, without exception. Sort of a built in paternity test...unless she has a thing for redheads.

    Sorry, not true. My family is littered with redheads, at least one in every generation and not all of their children have red hair. And before you say it, no there was no infidelity.
    I think you misunderstood me. If a red head (real red, not bottled, not sort of auburn, but really red) marries a real red head, they will have red headed children. I've been having this argument for 30+ years since my grandmother disowned me for being "not her progeny" due to red hair, so by all means, show me the punnet squares that prove your point.
  • RobynC79
    RobynC79 Posts: 331 Member
    Options

    Kudos to that. Yes, the apperance is the tangible trait, but if you have BOTH the attractiveness and the personality, it makes it a ton easier to find a lifelong mate and/or better life than one who lacks one or the other. That would be my assumption. Is that correct?
    Sure, although overall appeal is obviously combinatorial - as a somewhat flippant example, if you are weird looking or socially awkward, having plenty of money makes up for a lot of that (see, Zuckerberg, Mark, for example). Alternatively, if you are plain looking but a generally lovely person, of course that helps too. If you've got it all, so much the better, but it's hardly the only way. And ultimately, gaining access to a high-quality mate is no assurance of life-long happiness - that's something totally different that is more about mutual matching of personality, not about matching up genetic traits of similar quality.
    I am trying to figure out what is going on in my own life to make myself less confident and not as sociable as a lot of people. That is why I am digging into this question. there may be other theoretical questions forthcoming.
    Personality just is - there's not much you can do to change yours, nor can you change anyone else's. I'm a severe introvert - that's how I am and there's no changing it. Remember - confidence is a performance. Perform enough and it starts to be more natural - it's a learned behaviour. In my opinion, there is a fairly weak relationship between objective measures of mate-quality and confidence of the owner of them.

    Just pretend. Sometimes it works! ;-)
  • crisanderson27
    crisanderson27 Posts: 5,343 Member
    Options
    for sure.

    I am attracted to guys with dark eyes, dark hair, olive skin. Not only can I not resist dark features, but it basically assures me that my children will not be gingers!

    Why, hello there.

    More seriously...for me, I need to be physically attracted to my partner initially, but once I'm in the relationship...if that changes, I don't fall out of love...or cheat. My physical attraction is based on a lot of things, and oddly enough...many times the physical part of it is surprisingly small.

    Also, never in my life has what my kids might look like with someone ever crossed my mind lol.
  • Jules2Be
    Jules2Be Posts: 2,267 Member
    Options
    for sure.

    I am attracted to guys with dark eyes, dark hair, olive skin. Not only can I not resist dark features, but it basically assures me that my children will not be gingers!

    Why, hello there.

    More seriously...for me, I need to be physically attracted to my partner initially, but once I'm in the relationship...if that changes, I don't fall out of love...or cheat. My physical attraction is based on a lot of things, and oddly enough...many times the physical part of it is surprisingly small.

    Also, never in my life has what my kids might look like with someone ever crossed my mind lol.

    Chris, I am glad you're here...when i read her answer my heart broke a little bit.
  • Lift_This_
    Lift_This_ Posts: 2,756 Member
    Options
    for sure.

    I am attracted to guys with dark eyes, dark hair, olive skin. Not only can I not resist dark features, but it basically assures me that my children will not be gingers!



    screw that...i want lots of baby gingers running around my house!!!
  • crisanderson27
    crisanderson27 Posts: 5,343 Member
    Options
    for sure.

    I am attracted to guys with dark eyes, dark hair, olive skin. Not only can I not resist dark features, but it basically assures me that my children will not be gingers!

    Why, hello there.

    More seriously...for me, I need to be physically attracted to my partner initially, but once I'm in the relationship...if that changes, I don't fall out of love...or cheat. My physical attraction is based on a lot of things, and oddly enough...many times the physical part of it is surprisingly small.

    Also, never in my life has what my kids might look like with someone ever crossed my mind lol.

    Chris, I am glad you're here...when i read her answer my heart broke a little bit.

    Ahh Jules! Who could resist all that fuzzy red hair? I mean...the teeth are a bit offputting...but at least they are out there in the open for everyone to see right?? No surprises with you pretty lady!

    Except the good ones of course!

    :flowerforyou:
  • Contrarian
    Contrarian Posts: 8,138 Member
    Options
    for sure.

    I am attracted to guys with dark eyes, dark hair, olive skin. Not only can I not resist dark features, but it basically assures me that my children will not be gingers!

    Wow. Did you even consider how insensitive this comment was before you typed it? There are lovely people with all kinds of hair colours and complexions.

    I hope you have a delightful ginger baby who totally changes your attitude.
  • fat2fitKara
    fat2fitKara Posts: 136
    Options
    I know the old cliche:"Its what is on the inside that counts." But do you really want the nicest, smoothest guy if he looks like McLovin?


    YES. Especially if he's wearing a vest and looks like aladdin.
  • JeaninePaige
    JeaninePaige Posts: 464 Member
    Options
    t it basically assures me that my children will not be gingers!


    ಠ_ಠ

    Ditto. WTF
  • MrsRipdizzle
    MrsRipdizzle Posts: 490 Member
    Options
    for sure.

    I am attracted to guys with dark eyes, dark hair, olive skin. Not only can I not resist dark features, but it basically assures me that my children will not be gingers!

    Wow. Just wow. How incredibly shallow and rude. I add red to my hair because, quite frankly, it's gorgeous and a true ginger is such a rare beauty.
  • Afterblue
    Afterblue Posts: 78 Member
    Options
    My graduate degree is in Social Psychology. I consider Evolutionary Psychology to be...er..dubious. There is a reason why they can never prove any of their major theories in a peer reviewed journal. And why they cannot explain why their theories do not work across cultures when we have all descended from the same "people".

    A lot of what Evopsych claims to be the result of evolution is nothing more than culture at play.

    That is my personal view anyway.
  • AABru
    AABru Posts: 610 Member
    Options
    for sure.

    I am attracted to guys with dark eyes, dark hair, olive skin. Not only can I not resist dark features, but it basically assures me that my children will not be gingers!
    Interesting theory...my husband is a brunette with dark eyes, and I am a brunette with blue-grey eyes...guess what? We have a beautiful red haired, brown eyed girl...love, love, love my ginger!:heart:
  • roachhaley
    roachhaley Posts: 978 Member
    Options
    natural selection isnt about your kids "looking good".

    for example, a reason why fair skin is sometimes "superior" is because it is easier to spot disease on people with fair skin - NOT that their skin tone is more "attractive".
  • TriThreat
    TriThreat Posts: 313
    Options
    while I think physical attraction is very BIG part of a relationship, I think that LOVE isn't completely about physical attraction.

    LOVE is what makes you want to grow old together.

    LOVE is what keeps you there when you "lose" your looks

    LOVE is partially physical attraction, but it's more about WHO you are and not HOW YOU LOOK.

    Physical attaction will be a factor, but LOVE will be the big thing for me :) and that's in my lil arrogant opinion haha feel free to disagree, I truly believe it's all subjective
  • AABru
    AABru Posts: 610 Member
    Options
    There are two things at work here. There is natural selection, which is simply your ability to survive long enough to procreate. This has absolutely nothing to do with finding a mate, it just means that you are unlikely to, say, die of a horrible disease or starve to death because your food supply is gone. In the human species, there are a lot of people that, under normal circumstances, would not survive to reach breeding age, which is about 13 or so (we're talking biology, not society or morality).

    The other factor at work is sexual selection. This is a much harder concept to measure. Basically sexual selection is natural selection that does not take into account survival any more. In nature there are several examples of birds for whom long plumage is considered a sexually selective trait, as they can attract the most mates and therefore procreate more often. The problem with this is that the gene that indicates long plumage is almost always in both the mother and father, so the offspring have even longer plumage. Which, of course, results in their not being able to fly. And they generally get eaten long before they get to mate.

    I teach this in my 10th grade Bio class... nicely worded. Sexual selection is a completely different animal. I joke that I married my average height/weight husband in a feeble attempt to cull my gene pool for my children. The men in my family are well over 6 feet (brother is 6'8"), and we are all built like trucks. But really that attraction was because he never pushed me to do anything I didn't want to, made me laugh and has perfect kissable lips. :blushing:
  • Jacwhite22
    Jacwhite22 Posts: 7,012 Member
    Options
    for sure.

    I am attracted to guys with dark eyes, dark hair, olive skin. Not only can I not resist dark features, but it basically assures me that my children will not be gingers!

    I hope you end up with a house full of Annie's