We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

Arguing on the webernet

GuitarJerry
GuitarJerry Posts: 6,102 Member
edited January 12 in Chit-Chat
Is there any peer reviewed research about the psychology of people that argue on Internet forums?

Just curious.
«13

Replies

  • SwimFan1981
    SwimFan1981 Posts: 1,430 Member
    Didn't I just see you offering to argue everyone down in the "Concerns over dairy" thread? :laugh:
  • sissiluv
    sissiluv Posts: 2,205 Member
    To me the only difference between arguing IRL and doing it over the computer are a) I have references to make my points with on hand, b) I don't have to deal with my stuttering that pops up when I'm stressed and c) I don't have to fear it coming to blows.

    However just because it's over the internet I don't feel it makes anyones concerns any less valid, poignant or real. This is still real human interaction, its just not face to face.

    It's fun as peas too.
  • whierd
    whierd Posts: 14,025 Member
    Is there any peer reviewed research about the psychology of people that argue on Internet forums?

    Just curious.

    Is your profile picture saying "Come At Me Bro!"
  • This content has been removed.
  • stephdeeable
    stephdeeable Posts: 1,407 Member
    What else are we supposed to do on here? It can't ALL be cat gifs.
  • Showmm
    Showmm Posts: 406 Member
    There's a HUGE difference between arguing in real life and online. Or disagreeing or discussing or whatever you want to call it.

    This is what happens online. You take a complicated topic. Person A expresses an opinion about it and Person B disagrees strongly, and tells Person A why B's opinion is better. Person A takes 10% of what B said and argues only on that point, ignoring the rest of the arguments. In real life, you would say, "Let's leave point Z out of it for now. What about A-Y?" Online, they can far more easily ignore you or your rebuttals than they can in real life.

    I occasionally get dragged into an online argument, but usually nowadays I have enough sense to stay out of them. Otherwise I turn into this:

    duty_calls.png
  • ILiftHeavyAcrylics
    ILiftHeavyAcrylics Posts: 27,732 Member
    What else are we supposed to do on here? It can't ALL be cat gifs.

    Moving-animated-picture-of-tired-kitty-cat_zpsb40f0e16.gif

    I actually prefer internet arguments. I tend not to get into them but I like to read them because people can actually link to studies or articles, I can go off and read those things and then come back. It's less stressful to me than witnessing an argument IRL.

    I don't know that most people are much different online than they are IRL. I'm pretty non-confrontational either way.
  • FitBeto
    FitBeto Posts: 2,121 Member
    To me the only difference between arguing IRL and doing it over the computer are a) I have references to make my points with on hand, b) I don't have to deal with my stuttering that pops up when I'm stressed and c) I don't have to fear it coming to blows.

    However just because it's over the internet I don't feel it makes anyones concerns any less valid, poignant or real. This is still real human interaction, its just not face to face.

    It's fun as peas too.

    People do not argue IRL, any where near the extent they do on the Internet, in my life experience. It's the anonymity that provokes *kitten*-like behavior and over-the-top incessant point-making.

    If you want to test my theory, have a huge MFP get-together and make friends with a ton of these people. Soon, you'll find that you pretty much stop with the barking.

    Maybe 78% of people don't argue like this "IRL" - but from where I'm standing your barking sounds alot like meowing
  • darrensurrey
    darrensurrey Posts: 3,942 Member
    What else are we supposed to do on here? It can't ALL be cat gifs.

    :laugh:
  • TylerJ76
    TylerJ76 Posts: 4,375 Member
    To me the only difference between arguing IRL and doing it over the computer are a) I have references to make my points with on hand, b) I don't have to deal with my stuttering that pops up when I'm stressed and c) I don't have to fear it coming to blows.

    However just because it's over the internet I don't feel it makes anyones concerns any less valid, poignant or real. This is still real human interaction, its just not face to face.

    It's fun as peas too.

    People do not argue IRL, any where near the extent they do on the Internet, in my life experience. It's the anonymity that provokes *kitten*-like behavior and over-the-top incessant point-making.

    If you want to test my theory, have a huge MFP get-together and make friends with a ton of these people. Soon, you'll find that you pretty much stop with the barking.

    Why are you trying to argue this?
  • darrensurrey
    darrensurrey Posts: 3,942 Member
    To me the only difference between arguing IRL and doing it over the computer are a) I have references to make my points with on hand

    Yep. It's annoying arguing down the pub.

    "Cows have 5 legs."
    "No, they don't."
    "Yes, they do, I saw a whole herd of them yesterday. At least 4,000. I asked the farmer and he said most cows do have 5 legs."
  • jamie610811
    jamie610811 Posts: 1,735 Member
    shut up
  • stephdeeable
    stephdeeable Posts: 1,407 Member
    What else are we supposed to do on here? It can't ALL be cat gifs.

    Moving-animated-picture-of-tired-kitty-cat_zpsb40f0e16.gif

    I actually prefer internet arguments. I tend not to get into them but I like to read them because people can actually link to studies or articles, I can go off and read those things and then come back. It's less stressful to me than witnessing an argument IRL.

    I don't know that most people are much different online than they are IRL. I'm pretty non-confrontational either way.

    I watched that for so long I started to feel creepy.
  • HelloDan
    HelloDan Posts: 712 Member
    Some good points raised already.

    Another contributing factor is body language and tone of voice.
    In real life, it's possible to disagree without being aggressive, and to have a civil discussion, despite having different viewpoints.

    On the internet, because you cannot see the other person, or hear their tone, you miss the soft cues as to how they intend a point to come across, and most people instinctively assume a disagreeing response as some kind of aggressive act and escalate their reply accordingly, until it is well and truly out of hand.
  • darrensurrey
    darrensurrey Posts: 3,942 Member
    What else are we supposed to do on here? It can't ALL be cat gifs.

    Moving-animated-picture-of-tired-kitty-cat_zpsb40f0e16.gif


    http://youtu.be/EHW_r5Jpbic
  • darrensurrey
    darrensurrey Posts: 3,942 Member
    Some good points raised already.

    Another contributing factor is body language and tone of voice.
    In real life, it's possible to disagree without being aggressive, and to have a civil discussion, despite having different viewpoints.

    On the internet, because you cannot see the other person, or hear their tone, you miss the soft cues as to how they intend a point to come across, and most people instinctively assume a disagreeing response as some kind of aggressive act and escalate their reply accordingly, until it is well and truly out of hand.

    YOU ARE WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!









    I would call you out but you're too close so might actually turn up.
  • SteveJWatson
    SteveJWatson Posts: 1,225 Member
    To me the only difference between arguing IRL and doing it over the computer are a) I have references to make my points with on hand

    Yep. It's annoying arguing down the pub.

    "Cows have 5 legs."
    "No, they don't."
    "Yes, they do, I saw a whole herd of them yesterday. At least 4,000. I asked the farmer and he said most cows do have 5 legs."

    trigger.jpg?w=500

    Alright Dave?
  • darrensurrey
    darrensurrey Posts: 3,942 Member
    To me the only difference between arguing IRL and doing it over the computer are a) I have references to make my points with on hand

    Yep. It's annoying arguing down the pub.

    "Cows have 5 legs."
    "No, they don't."
    "Yes, they do, I saw a whole herd of them yesterday. At least 4,000. I asked the farmer and he said most cows do have 5 legs."

    trigger.jpg?w=500

    Alright Dave?

    :laugh:
  • Bethie_B
    Bethie_B Posts: 292 Member
    It's not the webernet. It's the interwebz. Everyone knows that.
  • darrensurrey
    darrensurrey Posts: 3,942 Member
    It's not the webernet. It's the interwebz. Everyone knows that.

    Is there any peer reviewed research to prove this?
  • HelloDan
    HelloDan Posts: 712 Member
    Some good points raised already.

    Another contributing factor is body language and tone of voice.
    In real life, it's possible to disagree without being aggressive, and to have a civil discussion, despite having different viewpoints.

    On the internet, because you cannot see the other person, or hear their tone, you miss the soft cues as to how they intend a point to come across, and most people instinctively assume a disagreeing response as some kind of aggressive act and escalate their reply accordingly, until it is well and truly out of hand.

    YOU ARE WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!









    I would call you out but you're too close so might actually turn up.

    LOL!

    I was actually waiting for the disagreeing response from the moment I clicked post!
  • likitisplit
    likitisplit Posts: 9,420 Member
    Because everybody is a troll on the internet. Can you imagine what it would be like if we weren't?

    Person A: I only ate 1000 calories today and I'm hungry!
    Person B: You go!
    Person C: Eat some mud and fill yourself up.
    Person D: Some great ideas on here. You guys rock.
    Person E: Here's a cat gif.
  • WendyTerry420
    WendyTerry420 Posts: 13,274 Member
    Is there any peer reviewed research about the psychology of people that argue on Internet forums?

    Just curious.

    Since I'm a "know-it-all," that's my excuse. I have several corners of the internet where a debate will last for days, or even weeks.
  • darrensurrey
    darrensurrey Posts: 3,942 Member
    Is there any peer reviewed research about the psychology of people that argue on Internet forums?

    Just curious.

    Since I'm a "know-it-all," that's my excuse. I have several corners of the internet where a debate will last for days, or even weeks.

    Usually about religion.
  • g0tr00t
    g0tr00t Posts: 192 Member
    Homemade waffles are ALWAYS better than store brand garbage. I'm right, I know, don't you dare respond.
  • SoDamnHungry
    SoDamnHungry Posts: 6,998 Member
    To me the only difference between arguing IRL and doing it over the computer are a) I have references to make my points with on hand, b) I don't have to deal with my stuttering that pops up when I'm stressed and c) I don't have to fear it coming to blows.

    However just because it's over the internet I don't feel it makes anyones concerns any less valid, poignant or real. This is still real human interaction, its just not face to face.

    It's fun as peas too.

    People do not argue IRL, any where near the extent they do on the Internet, in my life experience. It's the anonymity that provokes *kitten*-like behavior and over-the-top incessant point-making.

    If you want to test my theory, have a huge MFP get-together and make friends with a ton of these people. Soon, you'll find that you pretty much stop with the barking.

    Maybe 78% of people don't argue like this "IRL" - but from where I'm standing your barking sounds alot like meowing

    Probably because of all the cat gifs.
  • scs143
    scs143 Posts: 2,190 Member
    Why are you trying to start arguing on the "webernet"?
  • Crankstr
    Crankstr Posts: 3,958 Member
    no
  • n0ob
    n0ob Posts: 2,390 Member
    People also don't have the time to say such WRONG and LONG explanations of things IRL either.

    I'd stop someone for saying something as wrong as much of the stuff posted in a real conversation...
  • TylerJ76
    TylerJ76 Posts: 4,375 Member
    no

    YES.
This discussion has been closed.