so my low cal diet won't work to lose 50 pounds?

riverview9

I weighed 251 2.5 weeks ago. I'm down to 236. I should be eating 1700 calories according to the 'in place of a road map' thread. I did all the calculators.
i've been eating about 900 calories a day. Its easy for me to do and i'm losing a lot of weight. i don't think i'm capable of eating 1700 calories. I can either eat a lot of calories (like 2600) or very little.

my plan is to stay on 900 a week until I stop losing weight and then start adding 100 calories a week back. I think ill plateau around 180 pounds and probably gain back like 10 pounds while my metabolism goes up when I add back calories

Taylorferguson1

I suggest 1200 calories, I do this because yeah you are loosing weight just now but that's just liquid fat.Very soon you will stop loosing weight on this calorie scale and that is because your body will start storing fat from 1. Lack of calories and 2. it will be panicking because it's loosing the fat too fast. To help you along your way try eating 6 small meals a day that add up to 1200 calories and you won't even realize that you are over 900 calories. Best of luck!

likitisplit

You are losing weight. Probably a combination of lean muscle, fat and bone density. If you lost at a lower rate while eating a healthy number of calories, you would lose more fat and less muscle. If you did weight training at the same time, you would lose mostly fat, almost no lean muscle and no bone density. It's really up to you what "weight" you want to lose.

All this being to say: MFP isn't about trying to eat the fewest possible number of calories. It's about learning to eat at a healthy level for your body - not too much and not too little. Here are some ideas for adding healthy calories, since you say you are struggling with this:

Chicken with the skin
Steak
Cheese
Whole eggs (including deviled eggs, egg salad)
Full fat dairy (including cottage cheese, yogurt)
Fruit,
Peanut butter or other nut butters
Nuts
Avocado
Dried fruit (raisins, apricots, apples)
Brown rice
Dark chocolate
Salmon
Add Chia seeds to salads or yogurt
Olive oil
Smoothies
Granola/sports nutrition bars
Whole grains or whole grain products

ggxx100

Oh my goodness...My breakfast was about 2/3 of your daily intake.

You'll probably hear this again and again on here, but you should eat more. Your organs need enough nutrition and calories to function. It's probably not getting all it needs at this point. I wouldn't wait until you plateau, but rather start upping the calories little by little now.


With a metabolic reset and exercise program (along with clean eating and nutrient dense foods that most often keep you fuller than processed foods) you will not get fat if you consume well over your current intake, I assure you.

Live4theLift

Never under any circumstances eat under 1200 cals. Your metabolism will be shot and it does absolutely no good to eat that low. Another problem people can run into is if they start adding calories they feel like their getting bigger so they go on a more extreme diet. Long story short eat 1500 right now if you can't reach the 17 but never ever go under 12

difabu

...i don't think i'm capable of eating 1700 calories. I can either eat a lot of calories (like 2600) or very little...

This makes absolutely NO sense to me, but anyways. Good luck! You've obviously got it all squared away.

SonyaCele

wow, well good luck to you on 900 calories a day. that is not a "lifestyle change" diet and is a recipe for disaster. I've been eating 1500-1600 calories a day, well balanced, healthy foods since i started and have been consistantly losing each week. You will screw up your body on 900 calories, and a screwed up body and metabolism is not gonna be a very good fat burning machine. When your 900 calorie diet starts not working and you start feeling tired, sick, cold , hungry.... try switching to what the roadmap says, 1700 calories.

quirkytizzy

900 calories a day is skirting around eating disorder territory.

Newborns eat more than this.

You are an adult. Eat more. Add in calorie dense foods - nuts, avacados, full fat versions of foods you already eat. You don't have to drastically increase volume to get more calories in. But you should most certainly be eating MORE.

Crankstr

NO...just no.

baxterwagner

this does not make logical sense. I would not go below 1,200 as others have said. make sure what makes up those calories are good, sensible, and well balanced foods. what are you eating?

eagertoloseweight1

I am 5"10 and weigh 146.8 lbs and eat healthy, no junk food at all!

purpleipod

"i don't think i'm capable of eating 1700 calories. I can either eat a lot of calories (like 2600) or very little"

All that says to me is I'm terrible at planning so I'm either going to pig out or eat almost nothing. It's really not that hard. Put a little effort into it, plan your meals the day before if you need to, and EAT. You will never keep weight off by crash dieting, so enjoy gaining it all back if you continue doing this.

LoraF83

Sure it will work.

But you'll be losing muscle along with the fat. Which means you won't be as happy with your appearance when you get to your goal weight.

And, very little calories usually means fatigue, so you're risking being tired all the time. In addition, some people experience hair loss, brittle nails, skin issues, etc. Your body isn't getting much, so the "extras" don't get the nutrients. On top of all that, you risk slowing down your metabolism. That means when you get to your goal, your maintenance calories will be lower than someone who had been eating at a more moderate deficit.

DopeItUp

i don't think i'm capable of eating 1700 calories. I can either eat a lot of calories (like 2600) or very little.

Sounds legit.

TigerPawsSC

I wish folks would stop spouting off the same unsubstantiated nonsense about "starvation mode" and the human body "storing all of its fat" because it is losing it too fast. This board has to be the biggest exercise in group think on the entire Internet, which is saying a lot.

There are many problems associated with eating too little. You lack energy. You're more prone to binging. It's harder to maintain your weight loss once it's gone because you haven't developed sustainable habits. There are actual health-related risks to your body. Etc. These reasons should be sufficient to dissuade people without lying about how they will eventually stop losing weight on a low calorie diet.

They will lose weight. It will still be a combination of fat and muscle mass (the composition of those two depends upon a number of factors). They may hurt their bodies in the process, and it's probably neither necessary or healthy. But as I said, there are enough good, legitimate reasons to avoid a very low calorie diet that people should quit relying on unsubstantiated lies in these discussions.

likitisplit

****

jonnythan

I should be eating 1700 calories according to the 'in place of a road map' thread.

i've been eating about 900 calories a day.

my plan is to stay on 900

Really?

Think about this for a second.

You didn't get to 250 pounds because you're so darn smart about food. You don't become obese because you make good decisions about nutrition. Right?

So, you went and read a thread full of fantastic info and direction about weight loss because you're 250 pounds and want to lose weight. So what do you do? Throw all that advice and information out the window.

Really?

ekahnicole

If you are thinking about losing weight right now as quickly as possible, regardless of how unhealthy it is in the long run, you will fail.

End of story.

Energizer06

I weighed 251 2.5 weeks ago. I'm down to 236. I should be eating 1700 calories according to the 'in place of a road map' thread. I did all the calculators.
i've been eating about 900 calories a day. Its easy for me to do and i'm losing a lot of weight. i don't think i'm capable of eating 1700 calories. I can either eat a lot of calories (like 2600) or very little.

my plan is to stay on 900 a week until I stop losing weight and then start adding 100 calories a week back. I think ill plateau around 180 pounds and probably gain back like 10 pounds while my metabolism goes up when I add back calories

Not sure of the point of this post. Your question was/is...... so my low cal diet won't work to lose 50 pounds? I bet my life saving if you actually eat 900 cal/day and stick to it you will definitely lose 50lbs. Without a doubt! I wouldn't do it...but hey, its your body and your old enough to make your own decisions. Best of luck to ya! Wish you the best in acheiving your goals.

rosemaryhon

My concern with such low cal would be that I don't wanna mess up my metabolism and put myself at realistic risk I wouldn't be able to maintain as a lifelong lifestyle.

justwanderful

Enjoy your 900 calorie days while they last.
Once you lose around 10% of your weight, your body will start putting up a fight, and at 900 calories, it's going to be a slug-fest.

likitisplit

Also, why would you want to be 190, unless you are six feet tall?

sexymuffintop

I have absolutely nothing constructive to add to this thread. Your style of weight loss just leaves me confused and wondering why would anyone want to treat their body in such a way? :sad:

mstrickland9

You are hurting your body. You won't be able to sustain a 900 calorie diet. Please stop and eat responsibly.

Hadabetter

I should be eating 1700 calories according to the 'in place of a road map' thread.

i've been eating about 900 calories a day.

my plan is to stay on 900

Really?

Think about this for a second.

You didn't get to 250 pounds because you're so darn smart about food. You don't become obese because you make good decisions about nutrition. Right?

So, you went and read a thread full of fantastic info and direction about weight loss because you're 250 pounds and want to lose weight. So what do you do? Throw all that advice and information out the window.

Really?

A little harsh, but sort of what I was thinking.

riverview9

A couple friends used to weight about as much as me. They signed up with a medical weight loss clinic. One has lost 40 pounds in the last two months. She eats about 900 calories a day, she's still losing. The other has hit a plateau at about 180. They don't eat sugar or salt, all protein, carb and veg. I don't eat the same thing as them.

If I could quickly get down to 180 it would be easier to focus on the best way to lose for long term health.

Could I get information instead of just bashing?

elyelyse

what happens when you hit the inevitable plateau... and there's nowhere to go from there because eating less would be even more dangerous? (answer: you will have to up your calories in order to regulate, which means putting on a few pounds before you can even think about trying to lose again)

what happens when you reach your goal weight? are you gong to eat at under 1000 calories for the rest of your life? no? then plan to get fat again. what you are doing is one of the major causes of yo-yo dieting.

I've lost close to 100 pounds in under a year. (i'm 5ft3, 40 yrs old) yeah i admit, the first few weeks i ate under 1200 because i was so pumped and motivated and wanted that initial big loss. but after that, ive been eating between 1500-1800 depending on the days activity and I have been losing (mostly) consistently. 100 pounds in a year is freaking fantastic, I am SO HAPPY, and I didn't have to resort to behaviors that will make me tired, thin my hair, result in loss of lots of muscle, or make me look sick. Plus, I get to enjoy lots of food i love, so I'm not going to have one of those days where I am so frustrated with my restricted diet that i go on an uncontrollable binge and eat all the things I have been missing.

mstrickland9

A couple friends used to weight about as much as me. They signed up with a medical weight loss clinic. One has lost 40 pounds in the last two months. She eats about 900 calories a day, she's still losing. The other has hit a plateau at about 180. They don't eat sugar or salt, all protein, carb and veg. I don't eat the same thing as them.

If I could quickly get down to 180 it would be easier to focus on the best way to lose for long term health.

Could I get information instead of just bashing?

No none here is trying to bash you. We are all trying to help you see the disaster you are headed for!

jess7386

A couple friends used to weight about as much as me. They signed up with a medical weight loss clinic. One has lost 40 pounds in the last two months. She eats about 900 calories a day, she's still losing. The other has hit a plateau at about 180. They don't eat sugar or salt, all protein, carb and veg. I don't eat the same thing as them.

If I could quickly get down to 180 it would be easier to focus on the best way to lose for long term health.

Could I get information instead of just bashing?

your friends are likely being monitored by doctors. you don't seem as if you are and as such, what you're doing is very dangerous.

jonnythan

If I could quickly get down to 180 it would be easier to focus on the best way to lose for long term health.

Could I get information instead of just bashing?

In what way would a crazy crash diet make it "easier to focus on the best way to lose for long term health"?

That doesn't make any sense.

Carrying out your plan is a bad idea and you know it. Did you expect something other than bashing by posting a plan you know well and good is horrible?

OP posts: "So my low cal diet won't work?"
OP hopes to get: "No, it's fine! Lose 50 pounds through malnutrition and crash dieting now. Worry about silly things like health and long term success later. What you need now is a crazy plan you know is wrong."
OP gets: "Uh, no, it won't work and you know it."
OP responds: "Can I just get information instead of bashing?"

tigermorris

I have my calories set to what MFP suggest, but I keep hearing and have read about the TDEE - 20% I had a personal trainer/nutritionist tell me to use the MFP calories. I am scared to bump the calories to the TDEE -20% MFP has me at 1250, it was 1350, but since I lost 15 lbs, it took me down to 1250. It is hard to know what to do, becuase different people say diffenernt things.