Eating back exercise cals does not wok for me

onwarddownward

I've read the topics here on eating back exercise cals and had some comments that said I needed to eat more. But I'm here to say that eating back the cals is making me gain. I've put on five pounds and it's NOT muscle.

I'm going back to what was working, 1200-1400 cals a day and keeping my workout cals burned to boost my fat loss.

The theory sounds good, eat more and lose, but it's not happening for me.

I also think that MFP way inflates the cals earned during exercise.

yarwell

Some of the exercise calories are overstated, for sure.

It's also not clear to me if they are "extra" calories or include what you would have burned anyway - if I walk for an hour and MFP says 400 is that 400 plus the 80 I would have burned anyway or 320 + 80 = 400. If it's the latter I wouldn't want to "eat it back" to the full 400 even if I did think exercising to eat more was a valid concept.

PlayerHatinDogooder

1. Yes. For most people the calorie burns may be inaccurate. Some may be higher, some maybe lower.

2. I'm glad you realize you didn't gain 5 pounds of muscle.

3. You should still eat back most of your exercise calories. The fact that you 'gained 5 pounds' doesn't mean it was 5 pounds of fat. So many things contribute to your weight that using only the scale isn't an accurate way to measure progress. You should weigh yourself once a week, and at the same time every week. You should also be taking waist, hip, and thigh measurements as well.

4. Not eating back your exercise calories will raise your cortisol levels and your body will be more likely to use muscle tissue as fuel than fat. This will eventually slow down your BMR and make losing weight even more difficult.

5. I would suggest that you a) remain patient b) slightly lower calories by 150-250 per week c) start taking measurements.

emblu

Whatever works for you hunni but on the exercise cals calculation bit I tend to find that they are lower than what my other gadgets say. There is usually 200cal more burnt on a long run using my gps than what mfp calculates and have found this with other activities too.
If not eating back your cal works hun stick to it, everyone is different and deep down we all know what is needed to achieve our goals. All the best hun

Saliang

I have just done the same as of this week. I have been using MFP for four months whilst exercising on average 30 mins a day. I lost around 2 kilos, but I expected better improvements overall.

Will see how it goes now with a smaller calorie intake!

monica2410

Not eating mine has been working for me. I only eat the exercise calories if I am hungry.

Even though I weigh my food, I figure I make errors here and there, so my calorie consumption is underestimated in any case.

But, I am doing more weight training than cardio at the moment so I don't have that many extra to eat.

Listen to your own body and good luck:flowerforyou:

baozytools12

1. You eat more than you think
2. You burn less calories than you think

put 1 and 2 together and you got weight gain. stop lying to yourself when you log your food and exercise.

supplemama

Get a heart rate monitor so that you'll know how many calories you're burning.

Broejen

How long did you try the higher calories for? There's usually an initial gain but then you go back to losing. Try it for a few weeks at least. If you didn't eat 17500 calories more than your TDEE x (whatever amt. of days), you didn't gain fat.

lisaabenjamin

Weight loss is about a simple mathematical formula: calories consumed - calories burnt = weight loss.
To use this formula correctly, you need to put in accurate numbers, so for 'calories consumed' you need to be accurately tracking each and every calorie consumed by being honest about what you are consuming, and weighing out portion sizes. You probably do this already. For calories burnt, you also need to be as accurate as possible, although admittedly this is more difficult. Work out your TDEE using an online calculator and estimate calories burnt during exercise as accurately as possible – a gadget with a heart rate monitor is the best way. The exercises in the MFP database can only give an average estimate of calories burnt during different exercises - the actual amount burnt depends on your body, and how hard you are actually working out.
The average female has a maintenance calorie allowance of 2000 cals (though check you TDEE to make sure what is more accurate for you). So, as long as your calories consumed – calories burnt = less than 2000, you should lose weight.

LeeWorrall88

Why would you eat them back after you bother to burn them off in the first place, if weight loss is what you are after, then that is just stupid
Cardio junkies never truly succeed anyway, learn properly what you are doing and stop wasting your time, all of you

Heres a nice little article that might help

http://www.precisionnutrition.com/cardio-confusion

running_shoe

Woks for me.

SoViLicious

Do what you want

TavistockToad

Why would you eat them back after you bother to burn them off in the first place, if weight loss is what you are after, then that is just stupid
Cardio junkies never truly succeed anyway, learn properly what you are doing and stop wasting your time, all of you

Heres a nice little article that might help

http://www.precisionnutrition.com/cardio-confusion

just wow!

wutaday1

I think it is great that you tried it to see what really works for you. Everyone is different and it is good that you found what is right for you and not someone else. As far as the calories burned go, I tend to agree with others, I think sometimes they are higher than what I am probably burning. One of these days I will invest in those things you wear on your arm to get an accurate portrayal of what I am actually burning. Have a great day and good luck!!!

jolodo

Seems stupid and surely defeats the point if you burn off 300 cals then these are added back to your allowance to eat?!?!?:huh:

amy1612

1. Yes. For most people the calorie burns may be inaccurate. Some may be higher, some maybe lower.

2. I'm glad you realize you didn't gain 5 pounds of muscle.

3. You should still eat back most of your exercise calories. The fact that you 'gained 5 pounds' doesn't mean it was 5 pounds of fat. So many things contribute to your weight that using only the scale isn't an accurate way to measure progress. You should weigh yourself once a week, and at the same time every week. You should also be taking waist, hip, and thigh measurements as well.

4. Not eating back your exercise calories will raise your cortisol levels and your body will be more likely to use muscle tissue as fuel than fat. This will eventually slow down your BMR and make losing weight even more difficult.

5. I would suggest that you a) remain patient b) slightly lower calories by 150-250 per week c) start taking measurements.

Some good advice here. Have you worked out your TDEE and BMR?

BeachGingerOnTheRocks

1. You eat more than you think
2. You burn less calories than you think

put 1 and 2 together and you got weight gain. stop lying to yourself when you log your food and exercise.

Maybe not the nicest way to put it, but nonetheless the most truthful advice.

Weigh and measure absolutely everything you eat, don't forget to weigh even a teaspoon of oil, ketchup, dressing, that one cracker or handful of chips you grab from the pantry, etc. because those calories add up quickly.

The calorie burn is off with a lot of the cardio listed. A good estimate if you don't want to get a HRM is 350 calories/hour for intense, 300 for moderate exercise. Obviously that is not accurate for everyone, but it's a good estimate. Calories burned from exercise are very hard to estimate because it is different for everyone based on age, weight, fitness level, hormones, etc.

amy1612

Ive just taken a look at your diary, what exercise are you doing to burn up to 2000 calories a day?

Food wise, days like Sun May 12th look quite good (good amount of protein, carbs and fats). Maybe add another snack into a day like that or eat a bigger portion if youre doing a lot of exercise. Much better than the day where you had chips for lunch (chips arent a meal!)

ehsan517

this is exactly why i dont track exercise cals....
i go by my TDEE which already incorporates my activities and just cut out whatever i want from that to get my daily goals.
i do not complicate it and add in exercise cals and eat those back and what not. if you are going by your BMR, then perhaps you can, but i prefer not to log exercise since its all estimates and what not...i just see how my body reacts to changes and i make alterations accordingly.

watfordjc

Why would you eat them back after you bother to burn them off in the first place, if weight loss is what you are after, then that is just stupid
Cardio junkies never truly succeed anyway, learn properly what you are doing and stop wasting your time, all of you

Heres a nice little article that might help

http://www.precisionnutrition.com/cardio-confusion

Stupid? Wasting my time? As someone who consumes 1,400 to 4,700 calories per day, and who lost 40.9 pounds between 6th December 2012 and 24th April 2013 (of which 99.56% was fat), saying I shouldn't balance exercise with hunger so I can eat more on the days I'm hungry because of your beliefs about what works for me and that I won't succeed... I have enough data to know what I'm doing is working and that hunger is not necessary.