Forced flu shot at work

I challenge you all to watch this video!!!

Shots In The Dark Silence On Vaccine

http://youtu.be/fVwLo3lmKyo

I see people throwing on the guilt trip of 'if you don't get your child vaccinated/yourself vaccinated, you are putting those who cannot get vaccinated at risk for that disease.'

The fact of the matter is that even if you are vaccinated, you can carry the disease. Just not quite as long as a person who is unvaccinated. A vaccination only makes it so that your immune system will react faster to kill the organism than that of an unvaccinated person. So, even if a nurse is vaccinated, she/he could carry the disease and infect others with that disease.

Then I hear those who are saying that vaccinations prevent children from becoming sick and dying. What about the children who are vaccinated and die from reactions to the vaccination? What do you tell those parents? Do you tell them, "Hey, I am sorry, but it is your duty to vaccinate your children so that other's children don't die"?

Many times, the long-term affect of vaccinations is not considered. Chickenpox is a fine example of the long-term consequences of a vaccination program. Have you ever wondered why people in their 20s, 30s, 40s, and 50s are now getting shingles? Well, it is because of the chickenpox vaccination program. In the old days, before the vaccination, when a person who had the chickenpox as a child was exposed to a child with chickenpox when they were an adult, it was like receiving a booster shot. This prevented adults from getting the shingles until they were in their 70s or 80s. Keep in mind that Zostrivax, the vaccination to prevent shingles, is not offered until a person is up there in age. The youngest person I know to have the shingles is 24.

I would like to point out that many of the diseases that were prevalent in the early 1900s were prevalent because of poor sanitation, poor personal hygiene, and lack of knowledge about the disease. Diseases like polio were already decreasing in incidence prior to the advent of the polio vaccination.

I also would like to say that most people who are against vaccinations are very knowledgeable regarding vaccinations. Yes, they hold a different opinion from you, but you should be asking why they hold that opinion. What information do they have that you don't have? Not all pro-choice vaccination people believe that vaccinations lead to autism, ADHD, ADD, bipolar disorder, etc. As a nurse, I know that the Vaccination Information Sheet (VIS) does not list all the possible side-effects that can be caused by a vaccination.

Let me share a little information that I have found out:

It was back in the early 1900s that scientists and vaccine developers were trying to grow human cells in order to make their vaccines. They were having trouble with growing human cells: The cells would divide so far and then die. Or they didn't divide fast enough. Along came a woman named Henrietta Lacks. She had a cancerous tumor on her cervix that was removed at John Hopkins Hospital and sent to a researcher who found that the cells from this cancerous tumor were not only able to multiply quite fast, but they also survived quite well outside of the human body.

These cells survived so well, that other researchers started asking for some of them. Thus, cells from this one cancerous tumor were shipped across the U.S. to be used in vaccine research and other research. The thing is this: When used for growing vaccines, it is possible that the cancerous cells were transmitted to the person being vaccinated during the inoculation process. Indeed, it is very possible that some people acquired cancer due to a vaccination that they received that was grown using these cancerous cells. (Refer to The Immoral Life of Henrietta Lacks by Rebecca Skloot)

Another tidbit that many people are not aware of is that AIDs did not start from a human male having sex with a monkey or a person being bit by a monkey. AIDs is most likely a result of the use of Simian cells in the development of the hepatitis vaccination. The cells were taken from a monkey that carried the Simian form of what we call AIDs. The hepatitis vaccination was initially developed in those cells and later tested on a group of homosexual men in Africa. Why homosexual men? Because it was thought that their lifestyle put them at greater risk for hepatitis. Thus, this many in this group of homosexual men developed AIDs. Later, the same vaccination made the same way was tested on a group of homosexual men in New York City. The majority of these young men also got AIDs. This is how the AIDs virus became associated with gay men and, therefore, called the 'gay disease'.

I have to point out to those who like to tout that the rate of Pertussis, Measles, Mumps, Rubella, etc. have gone down that while those have gone down, the rate of autism, bipolar disorder, MS, ADHD, ADD, and many other afflictions has gone up. Now, the avid supporter of vaccinations would say that this rise in these diseases is a coincidence or because of better diagnoses methods. When I was growing up and in school, not one students demonstrated the characteristics that today would garner them a diagnosis of autism, ADD, ADHD, or bipolar syndrome.

I would like to steer you in the direction of the Gardasil vaccination. Over 100 young ladies have died of this vaccination and 10 times that many have been afflicted with neurological disease within a year, and in many cases within days, of receiving the Gardasil vaccination. For those who like to look at the correlation between the introduction of a vaccination and the decrease in disease rate, I would like you to look at the correlation between the Gardasil vaccination and the deaths and neurological afflictions that has affected these young ladies who were active and healthy until they received the vaccination and had no familial history of neurological problems. Please go to http://truthaboutgardasil.org and read the stories of these young ladies.

If you wish to hold up the correlation between reduction in disease and the introduction of vaccinations, please allow me to hold up a correlation between the Gardasil vaccination and the deaths and neurological damage that it has inflicted on many young women. If your correlation is valid, why is mine invalid?

Gardasil was fast-tracked by its manufacturer and the FDA because there was nothing like it on the market. Yes, cervical cancer is a terrible disease, but Gardasil doesn't protect against all genital warts that could cause cervical cancer. In many cases, the warts resolve on their own. I think it would be great to have a vaccine to protect our female children from cervical cancer, but at what cost? At the cost of all these young girls lives that are displayed at the truth about gardasil site? At the cost of another girl being neurologically damaged by the vaccine.

One thing that many who are pro-choice for vaccinations know is that vaccinating a child before the age of 2 is taxing to that child's liver. All medications, and vaccinations are a medication, must be cleared from the body through the liver. The liver is the detox center of the body. The gastrointestinal system of a child is not completely developed and it is for this reason that I go along with the policy common in many European countries of not vaccinating a child until after they are 2 years of age.

The other thing to keep in mind is that with any live vaccination, the virus can cross the blood-brain barrier, causing encephalitis , which is a severe inflammation of the brain. This is what my second child died from. I was told that if he didn't die, he would be severely handicapped. This brings me to wonder if children who have autism, ADHD, ADD, bipolar disorder, etc. have been 'damaged' by vaccinations. It is just a thought that runs through my head, but it is based on scientific understanding of the theory of vaccination and the affects of disease on the human body.

I just wish that those who are all for vaccinations could step out of their comfort zone and learn about why others are against them. Maybe the person is not against them. Maybe, like many pro-choice for vaccination parents, they want their children vaccinated, but they would like to choose when they want their child to get them and which ones they want their child to get. To me, with the knowledge that I have regarding vaccinations, I think that is a sane choice.

I liken this discussion to one about religion and atheism. Like many religious people, many people who are for vaccinations have not read the many volumes of information about how harmful vaccinations are. They just parrot what their doctors, nurses, parents, or others around them say. Please, pick up a book. Read the other side of the story before you pass judgement on those who are pro-choice for vaccinations. It may actually change you mind.

this thread makes me want to tear my hair out with disbelief. Though I AM australian, and we don't seem to be exposed to quite the same extent of fearmongering that the US is.

if you didn't immunize your children, you don't get into daycares and other mothers will want to keep their children away from yours. That's how it is here. And a person who announced that they weren't immunizing their children would be considered anything from a conspiracy theorist to dangerously negligent.

Ugh, SMH.

Being a nurse for close to twenty years,I have very strong feelings about this one. If you are working in healthcare, your primary responsibility is to protect the welfare of the people who are entrusting you with their lives. Where I work you either get the shot or have to wear a mask whenever you are at work. If you opt out of the shot and are caught not wearing the mask, you will be terminated. I worked with a nurse who was very vocal about how she didn't believe in them etc...and I would have been the first one to get in her face had she not had that mask on.

Read the research, the flu shot is WAY safer for you to take than the risk you are exposing your ill patients to of contacting the flu ( which kills hundreds of people every year).

bless you.

I got a flu shot for the first time last year because I work at a daycare and I thought it would be the responsible thing to do... wrong! I have never been sick so much in one winter in my life. Never again, and if they try to force you, no matter where you work, you should never be forced to do something like that. Its wrong.

this thread makes me want to tear my hair out with disbelief. Though I AM australian, and we don't seem to be exposed to quite the same extent of fearmongering that the US is.

if you didn't immunize your children, you don't get into daycares and other mothers will want to keep their children away from yours. That's how it is here. And a person who announced that they weren't immunizing their children would be considered anything from a conspiracy theorist to dangerously negligent.

Ugh, SMH.

Just a reminder...if your child is not ummunized then your child is at risk...NOT the other children. Now if all the children were not immunized then they would all be at risk. If we decide to not do this to our children then we are the only ones who can be held responsible.

That's a very self-centered way of looking at it. What you conveniently forget is that there are some children with allergies who are unable to take vaccinations. Therefore, you put those children at risk too.

As I see/hear about so many people I know currently fighting the flu I am counting down the days (14) until I can get that bugger! I'll be the first in line, thankyouverymuch!

If you work around the elderly, infants or immune compromised people get the shot, if you don't want to, quit or get fired. People go to the hospital to get better, not get sicker because someone working there refuses to not spread a potentially lethal virus. Worked in healthcare long? Doesn't seem like it if your unwilling to do everything you can to keep yourself and your patients well.

People working in healthcare have some of the strongest immune systems because they are always being exposed to germs, so the body is able to build up immunity to most viruses and bacteria naturally.

Forcing people to get a shot is so ridiculous and then on top of it they are threatening people's jobs because of it also.

There are only 2 strains of the flu virus included in the shot this year, Strain B and H1N1. There are 5 strains, so basically there won't be a lot of instances of Strain B and H1N1 this winter, but there might be a LOT of cases of Strain A, C and H3N2 flu.

These immunizations are pointless and stupid.

All of a sudden, it would be against my religion to get a flu shot.

^^^^ THIS

It should be a personal choice, and also should be against the law to force anyone to do it. Also, there is evidence to support that flu shots contribute to early onset alzheimers. I have never had one, and never will.