Calories in the leftover unpopped popcorn kernels?
losingthehealthyway
Posts: 46
A bag of the popcorn I was eating tonight potentially has 325 calories in it. But once I got to the bottom of the bowl, I thought, "Do the nutrition facts account for there being kernels left unpopped, or do they assume I'll eat every single one?" Because if they don't take that into consideration, I can subtract more than a tablespoon's worth of unpopped popcorn calories from my count, if not, I can only subtract the kernels that my dad pilfered from the bowl. Help?
0
Replies
-
Better eat them all or else the nutritional value will be off :devil:0
-
Seriously? You're worried about a tbsp of unpopped kernels? Just log it for what it was supposed to be and assume it evens out some place else where you probably under estimated food or over estimated exercise.0
-
Hey, I have wondered about that too!
I use the 100 calorie bags or measure the amount for 100 calories into the air popper.
I usually do just keep the count but no harm in wondering!0 -
Seriously? You're worried about a tbsp of unpopped kernels? Just log it for what it was supposed to be and assume it evens out some place else where you probably under estimated food or over estimated exercise.
^^this!0 -
Do you take off the cals for the sauce left on your plate/dripped on your shirt too? :laugh:0
-
Do you take off the cals for the sauce left on your plate/dripped on your shirt too? :laugh:0
-
Just count them all and be done with it. Better to overestimate than under...0
-
0
-
Do you worry about the undigested sweetcorn?0
-
I weigh it before I pop it then weigh the unpopped bits at the end and discount them :-)0
-
I weigh it before I pop it then weigh the unpopped bits at the end and discount them :-)
Seriously? I can't believe people actually do this :noway:0 -
I love this it's so funny, thank you0
-
Wow. I seriously do not even know what to say. This is a level of obsession that feel highly unnecessary. I'd rather have this:
0 -
edit: double post0
-
Don't become that obsessed
Also, the popcorn that I usually buy has the facts for the unpopped kernels and each popped cup. What about yours?0 -
Y'all are kinda onry (how the hell do you spell that anyways?) for it being a Friday morning - funny, but onry.
I like what another said - assume you've over/under estimated somewhere else and move along
Or, you can be like my frugal coworker and try to pop those kernels again...0 -
If it's flavored popcorn, and I'm assuming it is if it's 300+ calories a bag, than most of the calories are coming from the flavoring, not the popcorn. And the flavoring is in the bag, not in the kernels, so you are eating nearly all of that anyway. The calories in a teaspoon of unpopped kernels is roughly 17 calories. I did the math for you.
Do yourself a favor, don't worry about 17 calories one way or the other. Calorie counts, even if you weigh everything down to the gram are likely to be off by at least that much anyway. Legally, calorie information listed on packaged food can be off by up to 10% one way or the other, and fresh food, as an agricultural product, is even more likely to be slightly different every time! Plus, 17 calories is about 0.4% of a pound.
ETA: Just saw it was a tablespoon, not a teaspoon. So your calories could be as high as 51. Still not really enough to get worked up about.0 -
My spelling senses are tingling... :grumble:0 -
My spelling senses are tingling... :grumble:
I think that's part of the joke.0 -
My spelling senses are tingling... :grumble:
My god I want a fig roll!!0 -
Y'all are kinda onry (how the hell do you spell that anyways?)
I have absolutely no idea what you mean by "onry"0 -
ornery
and
...you guys....0 -
Just measure the amount you are actually eating ---not the unpopped kernels and log it:huh:0
-
when i eat a sleeve of cookies, I'm always sure to dump the crumbs out onto a food scale so I know how many micrograms to subtract from the calories.0
-
ornery
Oh
0 -
Just measure the amount you are actually eating ---not the unpopped kernels and log it:huh:
I love you all.0 -
I weigh it before I pop it then weigh the unpopped bits at the end and discount them :-)0
-
I weigh it before I pop it then weigh the unpopped bits at the end and discount them :-)
The thing is, all this is estimates. Calories, exercise, the whole deal.
However, counting counts, because it shows you care. And you're a lot more able to control your situation when you care. But please don't trust these numbers to be accurate. That's why I'd rather over-log food and under-log exercise. If you ever see someone post a 1 calorie burn, please don't question them. They're probably trying to balance some numbers.0 -
I weigh it before I pop it then weigh the unpopped bits at the end and discount them :-)
Oh boy! Now you've started it!! The OCD will be kicking in double time!! :laugh:
However, this is the most legitimate point. There is always a margin of error. It's just not worth trying to get it down to that level of detail, mainly because measureing calories is never that precise. Over the long haul, if you stress over trying to get every little detail precise, you will make yourself crazy and quit trying at all.
If you have, say, an 1800 calorie target for the day and that is 500 calories under maintenance to lose 1 pound per week, some days you will eat roughly 1900 and some days you will eat roughly 1700 no matter how hard you try to be accurate. Over time, you are in deficit and you will lose weight. If you are that concerned, set your calorie goal 100 less to factor in margin of error. Or go for a 30 minute walk. But really over time, it is just not that critical and no matter how hard you try, you will likely not be able to dial it in to perfection. It just doesn't matter!0 -
I weigh it before I pop it then weigh the unpopped bits at the end and discount them :-)
Oh boy! Now you've started it!! The OCD will be kicking in double time!! :laugh:
However, this is the most legitimate point. There is always a margin of error. It's just not worth trying to get it down to that level of detail, mainly because measureing calories is never that precise. Over the long haul, if you stress over trying to get every little detail precise, you will make yourself crazy and quit trying at all.
If you have, say, an 1800 calorie target for the day and that is 500 calories under maintenance to lose 1 pound per week, some days you will eat roughly 1900 and some days you will eat roughly 1700 no matter how hard you try to be accurate. Over time, you are in deficit and you will lose weight. If you are that concerned, set your calorie goal 100 less to factor in margin of error. Or go for a 30 minute walk. But really over time, it is just not that critical and no matter how hard you try, you will likely not be able to dial it in to perfection. It just doesn't matter!
^^THIS
I think that is all anyone is trying to say, and really, I haven't seen anyone be overly rude on this thread. It is all just an estimation, so trying to be that highly accurate is just a setup for failure. Log in the full serving, take a little walk, and relax! It will happen. :flowerforyou:0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 427 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions