So confused, ready to kill
edennew
Posts: 231 Member
Hey. I know this has probably been asked in a hundred different ways, but I am so confused. Every source I use calculates my daily calorie goals differently! I know that calculators are a tool and not exact science, but to lose 2 pounds a week I have gotten calorie goals ranging from 1290-2073. Come on! I have used scooby's workshop, the "road map" spreadsheet, MFP and others.
Here are my stats- someone help me find a healthy place to lose 2 pounds a week!
Weight- 240
Height- 62 inches
Frame- large
Job- hairdresser, on feet for 36 hours/wk
Exercise- 7 days week; 3 fast walking, 4 vigorous weight lifting (5 hours a week)
neck- 16.5 inches
waist- 43 inches
hips- 51 inches
I have been shooting for 1350 average calories a week, with 130 grams of protein a day. My weight loss is stalling and i am feeling low energy.
Thanks for your time and input!
Here are my stats- someone help me find a healthy place to lose 2 pounds a week!
Weight- 240
Height- 62 inches
Frame- large
Job- hairdresser, on feet for 36 hours/wk
Exercise- 7 days week; 3 fast walking, 4 vigorous weight lifting (5 hours a week)
neck- 16.5 inches
waist- 43 inches
hips- 51 inches
I have been shooting for 1350 average calories a week, with 130 grams of protein a day. My weight loss is stalling and i am feeling low energy.
Thanks for your time and input!
0
Replies
-
just checked your diary.
You have 93g of carbs.... It's not enough for you.
try a 40-30-30 diet plan.... 40 carbs,30 prot, 30 fat (see if it works).
You can go in your goal section and modify these plan by hand.
You need carbs for energy. DON'T TAKE TOO MUCH but 93 ain't enough.
Could be just that simple
Take care0 -
I'd just use the MFP calculator...it's just as good as any other. I'd also do more cardio, and less weight lifting if losing fat is what you are after.0
-
also weight loss is depending on many things.....scale don't count bones,muscles etc.
use a mirror and a measuring tape.
If you melt inches, it's fine. Scale is pointless at some point when training.0 -
I'm new so this may not be accurate but perhaps you need more carbs. I'm diabetic and my nutritionist told me to eat 50% carbs. She stated I should not go under that because my energy level will crash. Just a thought. I'm 197 lbs and I was told to consume 1200 cals per day but I sit behind a desk all day.0
-
I'm not a numbers person, but it seems like you are on the right track. MFP has a function to dial to your weight loss needs, I have mine set to 0.8/week, and I have 1260 calories daily. My Home>Goals>Fitness Goals>Change Goals>Guided. Then use the toggle on the last box to update your weight loss/week desired...safely!
Good luck, am willing to be your "friend" if you log daily and have an open diary!0 -
some calculators include your exercise calories and some don't. if you use mfp and put lightly active and then eat exercise calories on top of that you should continue your 2lb per week weight loss.0
-
A lot of sources say 10 calories per pound of your goal weight, 12-14 cals if you are exercising. I stick with the 10 cals and still exercise, though not as vigorously as you.0
-
Exercise- 7 days week; 3 fast walking, 4 vigorous weight lifting (5 hours a week)
I have been shooting for 1350 average calories a week, i am feeling low energy.
I'm hoping you mean 1350/day and not for the whole week, lol!
Anyway..no expert.. maybe your body is telling you to eat more?0 -
Considering your level of avtivity, you probably need more calories.
If you use the roadmap, find the TDEE for your activity level, and subtract 20 percent from that. I think you will have more energy if you eat more.0 -
you're not eating enough it sounds like.
How long is your fast walking and how vigorous is your weight lifting? What exercises are you doing? How many sets/reps? How long do you rest between sets? Do you do the same weight lifting workout every time?0 -
Are you giving yourself any rest days?0
-
doesn't sound like enough calories to me. I stalled out after 3 weeks because MFP set my cals too low. Check out www.fat2fitradio.com. They seemed to be more accurate. Another way would be a version of WW... for your goal weight you want to be at 1200 (they don't recommend lower than that) and for every 10 lbs add 50 calories. Then for every 10 you lose, subtract 50 calories. You still need to fuel the body you have.0
-
You are going to get as many different responses here as anywhere else ;-)
The common theme seems to be to up your calories or carbs; I'm on the bandwagon that says to change your percentages of carbs, proteins and fats. The 40/30/30 plan is pretty safe though I do more carbs in the veggie category. If you MUST go so low on your calories, at least make sure you can get out of bed and go to the gym and work; more carbs will do that for you.0 -
I really hate how the lack of carbs make you tired information people always give. I am doing Insanity 6 times a week and heavy lifting 3 times a week on a low carb diet. 20-30 net carbs a day. I can post my food diary if you want proof and I have lots of energy and I do Insanity on a empty tummy in the mornings. So stop with the you need carbs in order to function talk. Different diets work for different people.
To the OP: I would look at getting at least 1500-1800 cals a day at your weight. You decide on the break-up you want to use. You can do the 10-20% fat 30-40% protein 40-50% carb diet like most people use. Or you can do a 20-30g carbs then 40-60% protein and 40-60% fat low carb diet. It's just depends on what you can stick with. I also depends on your body and if you are insulin resistant or not. Carb based diets don't work well for people who are insulin resistant. MFP has a tool under goals to figure out what you need every day just do a custom setup. set your calories around 1500-1800 or more if you like (I found I am dropping weight faster at 1800 a day then I was at 1500 a day). Then use the percent pull downs to find your macro's for the day. It's really easy to do. If you have any question please feel free to message me.0 -
Hi ratherbefishing, I'm interested in more details about what you posted. You indicated a carb diet does not work for insulin resistance. I am insulin resistant and my dietician told me to eat 50% carbs. Should I clarify that with her? Perhaps she told me no more than 50%. My protein has been higher and I've been trying to adjust to eat more healthy carbs. Maybe i should try 40% carbs? I don't eat junk at all so the carbs I eat are from veggies, fruit, almond milk and limited whole grain bread.0
-
STELLAR article , well written .... Simple, basic .... and totally right on!
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/blog/mrsbigmack/view/finding-the-sweet-spot-4521840 -
STELLAR article , well written .... Simple, basic .... and totally right on!
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/blog/mrsbigmack/view/finding-the-sweet-spot-452184
Wow, that is probably one of the best explanations I have sen. I am definitely bookmarking and passing it on. Thx for sharing.0 -
Stop relying on calculators. Take ownership of your body and weight loss
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/808325-the-one-truth?hl=the+one+truth#posts-121159420 -
you're not eating enough it sounds like.
How long is your fast walking and how vigorous is your weight lifting? What exercises are you doing? How many sets/reps? How long do you rest between sets? Do you do the same weight lifting workout every time?
I am walking 4mph for 30 minutes- so 2 miles and am at a medium heart rate
I do one body area per session, machines, lift 3 sets with reps at 12/10/8. I lift as heavy as I can with the last of each rep being very difficult. i rest about 20 secs between reps and about 60 secs between machines.0 -
Stop relying on calculators. Take ownership of your body and weight loss
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/808325-the-one-truth?hl=the+one+truth#posts-12115942
I am not relying on calculators- just trying to use them as a guide. I am absolutely taking ownership and am asking for guidance from the wealth of experienced folks out there.
i think it's interesting that step one in your process is using a calculator.0 -
When I started getting serious about all this, about 4 months ago, I tried to get as much information as possible from every source available. All I got was information overload and much if it was conflicting. Some say more carbs, some say less carbs with more protien, etc.. Personally, I tried an "Atkins" style diet for a while. I did lose quite a bit of weight, but for me it wasn't a long term solution. I felt lethargic most of the time. Low carb doesn't work for me.
What does work for me is a balanced diet of lots of veggies, a fair amount of fruits (not fruit juices), lean protien sources such as chicken breast, tuna, occasional lean red meat and pork. Carbs from whole wheat pastas, breads, brown rice, flat breads, ect..
One would think food, weight loss, and energy would be somewhat of an exact science, and in general I suppose it is. But, everyone is different and what works for some, doesn't work for all. Make changes according to what you think, or on advice you think makes sense, give it a week or two. If it works, keep it. If not, try something else.0 -
Using a calculator to find a starting point isn't the same as relying on a calculator for your weight loss journey. Did I come off as abrasive? If so, that wasn't my intention.
So what is your actual TDEE?0 -
Also, could you please define "stalling"? Weight loss is inconsistent at best and depending on what you are calling stalling, you may not need to change anything just yet. I can tell you right now, you aren't eating enough, but depending on how much weight you have to lose, you should be able to way under-eat at the cost of your metabolism and not worry about it for a while.
You would just be creating a lot of work and some weight gain later when you have to fix your metabolism.
2472 at light exercise and 2786 at moderate exercise.
That's what I get for your TDEE using the calculator at: http://www.fitnessfrog.com/calculators/tdee-calculator.html.
Even if you were to go 20% below that it would leave you at @2000 or 2288 a day. At somewhere close to that number, you would lose a pound a week.
That being said do you know what your actual TDEE is form logging calories and weight loss, and how long have you been "stalling"? 1350 is not enough for you. It is probably the main reason you feel like your energy is low, and could very well be why you are stalling.
Ask yourself how long you think you can keep eating 1350 a day without "falling off the wagon". Weight loss is not easy, but it shouldn't be as hard as we can make it by over-depriving ourselves.0 -
bump0
-
Also, could you please define "stalling"? Weight loss is inconsistent at best and depending on what you are calling stalling, you may not need to change anything just yet. I can tell you right now, you aren't eating enough, but depending on how much weight you have to lose, you should be able to way under-eat at the cost of your metabolism and not worry about it for a while.
You would just be creating a lot of work and some weight gain later when you have to fix your metabolism.
2472 at light exercise and 2786 at moderate exercise.
That's what I get for your TDEE using the calculator at: http://www.fitnessfrog.com/calculators/tdee-calculator.html.
Even if you were to go 20% below that it would leave you at @2000 or 2288 a day. At somewhere close to that number, you would lose a pound a week.
That being said do you know what your actual TDEE is form logging calories and weight loss, and how long have you been "stalling"? 1350 is not enough for you. It is probably the main reason you feel like your energy is low, and could very well be why you are stalling.
Ask yourself how long you think you can keep eating 1350 a day without "falling off the wagon". Weight loss is not easy, but it shouldn't be as hard as we can make it by over-depriving ourselves.
Thank you for both responses!
To be honest, I haven't stalled for very long, but I did gain 2 pounds inexplicably and have held on to them for days. this was not following high sodium intake. I have been dieting for most of my adult life. I have found in the past that keeping my calories at 1500 and exercising moderately keep me at maintenance. I gain weight at 2000 calories. Why? I have no idea. Maybe at 43 years of age and after so many diets, I have an incredibly slow metabolism.
The point of my post was that I want to find a reliable sweet spot where I lose consistently and I want the damn calculators to be at least close! I am working damn hard and I would like to eat more but am afraid of gaining. The truth is, I could find a calculator to fit whatever answer I wanted to get. I need to be patient and play with my calories and exercise to find that place that feels right.0 -
I'd just use the MFP calculator...it's just as good as any other. I'd also do more cardio, and less weight lifting if losing fat is what you are after.
MFP put me at 1290/ day. Seems awfully low.0 -
I did this one and it put me at 1596 cals- 306 more than MFP. That's why I'm confused.0 -
some calculators include your exercise calories and some don't. if you use mfp and put lightly active and then eat exercise calories on top of that you should continue your 2lb per week weight loss.
I paid attention to what they did and did not count so that's not the issue.0 -
Are you giving yourself any rest days?
Not consistently, but my walks are 30 minutes and although they get my heart rate up, they aren't hardcore.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions