When is 1200 calories appropriate? (hint: almost never)

WinnerVictorious
WinnerVictorious Posts: 4,733 Member
in Health and Weight Loss
if you are a sedentary 38-year old woman, who is 4'10" and weighs 115lbs and does not exercise, then your TDEE-20% would be approximately 1200 calories.

if you are:

more active than that...
and/or younger than that...
and/or male...
and/or taller than that...
and/or weigh more than that...
and/or engage in cardiovascular exercise, then

you should almost certainly be eating MORE than 1200 calories per day.

i would hazard to guess that 99+% of the people on MFP are in the category that should be eating more than 1200 calories. 1200 calories per day is almost certainly too low for almost everyone who does not have an unusual medical condition requiring a low calorie intake, in which case that person would have to be under medical supervision.

if you are new here or are trying to adhere to a 1200 calorie diet because you heard that's what you need to do to lose weight, i would urge you to read through Dan's Roadmap:

http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/654536-in-place-of-a-road-map-2-0-revised-7-2-12

when you are done, join the Eat, Train, Progress group run by 2 knowledgeable members who are trying to provide a safe harbor where accurate, scientifically sound health, nutrition, and fitness advice can be given without all of the background noise occasionally found in the public forums.

http://www.myfitnesspal.com/groups/home/10118-eat-train-progress

please do yourself a favor and find out the right calorie goal for yourself that allows you to change your body in a healthy and satisfying way. you don't need to starve yourself and you don't need to suffer the side effects of a 1200 calorie diet.
«134567…17

Replies

  • SRH7
    SRH7 Posts: 2,037 Member
    :flowerforyou:

    We need to do our utmost to keep this thread at the top of the forums for as long as possible!

    And when is MFP going to listen to common sense and stop advising everyone to eat 1200?!!

    I lost and gained the same 7lbs for 12 months eating 1200. Now, in a fraction of that time, I have lost 9lbs following the Roadmap (eating around 1600 calories a day plus exercise calories). And the weight is continuining to drop off. I'm not as grouchy, I drink alcohol, I have the energy to run and lift weights, my skin is better, I'm less hungry and far happier.

    'Nough said!
  • EmmaKarney
    EmmaKarney Posts: 690 Member
    Yes!
  • danika2point0
    danika2point0 Posts: 197 Member
    Thank you for this.

    I was 'started off' on 1200 but thankfully due to my intense reading of the forums realize quickly that I needed to up it ASAP! Life is definitely more awesome this way already.
  • juliesmithdiet
    juliesmithdiet Posts: 33
    I don't have any problem with any of this if people just didn't apply what works for them across the board, I am not tall, I am fat, I am disabled, I need surgery they are denying me because of my weight. If I need to drop to 1200 or less to get the surgery I will happily do so. Without the surgery I could be dead so the choice is simple for me.
    We all lose weight for different reasons just like we all put it on for our own personal reasons.
  • freelancejouster
    freelancejouster Posts: 478 Member
    This post is perfect. My sister is 5' 2" and thinks she needs to lose weight (hint: she doesn't) and would beat herself up for going over 1200. I kicked her butt up to at least 1350 ;)
  • Syndri
    Syndri Posts: 46 Member
    Bump to read later
  • CAlley1985
    CAlley1985 Posts: 8 Member
    you represent the 1%.
  • WinnerVictorious
    WinnerVictorious Posts: 4,733 Member
    I don't have any problem with any of this if people just didn't apply what works for them across the board, I am not tall, I am fat, I am disabled, I need surgery they are denying me because of my weight. If I need to drop to 1200 or less to get the surgery I will happily do so. Without the surgery I could be dead so the choice is simple for me.
    We all lose weight for different reasons just like we all put it on for our own personal reasons.

    just be aware that if 1200 is really well below where you should be, there may be unintended consequences.

    - nutritionally, it can be tough to stay healthy at 1200 calories for a long period of time. you'll need to talk to your doctor about this and they'll mostly like suggest occasional blood work to make sure you are not deficient in anything important
    - if 1200 is truly too low for your body, your body will likely respond as if its under stress. the end result is a change in the overall hormone levels in your body that inhibit the burning of stored fat. in essence, your metabolism will begin to slow down. i can't say for sure how long that will take or to what extent it will slow, but many people who start off on 1200 per day lose weight at the beginning, but eventually stall. that stall can last a long, frustrating time.

    eating just a couple hundred more calories can often prevent both of the above situations for many people, and allow them to lose more weight in the same period of time, than if they'd doggedly stuck with a 1200 calorie per day diet.
  • LuvtheCubs
    LuvtheCubs Posts: 161 Member
    Bump
  • delonda1
    delonda1 Posts: 525 Member
    One formula doesnt fit all...

    not that I eat 1200 or anything but lets not put people down for eating less than we believe they should. its their body not ours. and if they are losing and not malnourished who cares
  • suemullen27
    suemullen27 Posts: 8 Member
    I am actually struggling 2 eat 1200 calories... I never go hungry and i am 47 and 5ft 2 and 135 lb..is this because of my age??? If i tried upping my calories i would be eating for the sake of eating... :((( I have lost 5lb but have suck to this for 2 weeks now... i have started doing the 30 day shred but so unfit only lasting 15min for now :((n hoping for some advice plz :D
  • SRH7
    SRH7 Posts: 2,037 Member
    Yawns. *eye roll*

    I'm always amazed at the amount of people so focused on what other people are doing and eating....

    Less to do with focusing on what other people are doing and eating and more to do with having fallen into that trap ourselves, learning the science, climbing back out and back on track... and wanting to pass on that knowledge.

    Don't like it? Then don't read it!
  • SquidgySquidge
    SquidgySquidge Posts: 239 Member
    I started out at 1200.

    I lose weight but I was hungry. I could fit in 3 meals but no snacks.

    I upped to my TDEE -20% 2 weeks ago (1383) and just the extra 183 cals has made a difference to my mood as I am more satisfied now. And I can eat a little chocolate each day :happy:
  • crunchymommy
    crunchymommy Posts: 30 Member
    OK, first of all, MFP has 1200 set as a base number of calories for many people based on their starting weight and activity level, but then if you exercise at all, then that is bumped up. For example, I usually end up with about 1800 based on my activity for the day even though the base is 1200. So can you please clarify whether you are talking about 1200 as a starting point or end point of daily intake?

    Secondly, do you have some sources you can refer me to on this topic? Thanks!

    I did not start losing weight until I got to MFP and followed the guidelines it came up with for me, even though I had been increasing my exercise for three months.
  • SRH7
    SRH7 Posts: 2,037 Member
    I am actually struggling 2 eat 1200 calories... I never go hungry and i am 47 and 5ft 2 and 135 lb..is this because of my age??? If i tried upping my calories i would be eating for the sake of eating... :((( I have lost 5lb but have suck to this for 2 weeks now... i have started doing the 30 day shred but so unfit only lasting 15min for now :((n hoping for some advice plz :D

    Have a look at the links that WinnerVictorious has posted to check what calorie intake is genuinely best for you.

    If you need to eat more then include higher calorie food in your diet (for example, full fat dairy, nuts and seeds, meat and fish, peanut butter, coconut oil, olive oil etc etc - have a search of the forums as there will be helpful threads on this).

    :smile:
  • juliesmithdiet
    juliesmithdiet Posts: 33
    It was my doctor who suggested 1200, my dietician suggested 1000, I hover somewhere between the two most days, occasionally down as low as 700, life or death. No competition really.
  • WinnerVictorious
    WinnerVictorious Posts: 4,733 Member
    you represent the 1%.
    Yawns. *eye roll*

    I'm always amazed at the amount of people so focused on what other people are doing and eating....
    One formula doesnt fit all...

    not that I eat 1200 or anything but lets not put people down for eating less than we believe they should. its their body not ours. and if they are losing and not malnourished who cares

    these members are certainly entitled to express their opinions on these public forums (above), but i would suggest that all those new here or confused about how to set their own goals or who are currently miserable on a 1200 calorie per day diet, to check out the link and the group in the top post on this thread... there is another way.

    if you still decide to stick with a low daily calorie goal, then that's up to you. all i ask is that you make an informed choice.

    i stand by my statement that for almost everyone here, 1200 calories per day for a lengthy period of time is an unnecessarily hard way to do this that will likely have undesired consequences.
  • Unknown
    Unknown
    This content has been removed.
  • addmorecloud
    addmorecloud Posts: 78 Member
    After seeing this I entered my details into the TDEE calculator I use. Even at only 5'2" and putting a very conservative activity level, it says I would need 1200 calories a day if I weighed 63 pounds. Pretty sure I'd be dead!
  • joannbrunton
    joannbrunton Posts: 93 Member
    bump
  • WinnerVictorious
    WinnerVictorious Posts: 4,733 Member
    It was my doctor who suggested 1200, my dietician suggested 1000, I hover somewhere between the two most days, occasionally down as low as 700, life or death. No competition really.

    you do understand the false premise of your disagreement, don't you?

    you are under medical and dietary supervision for your low calorie intake, which i alluded to in my original post as being necessary to prevent malnutrition at such a low calorie level. you clearly are aware that you're not following this advice, but for reasons that can be medically justified. that makes you an exception to the rule, not an example that disproves the rule.

    doctors do put patients on VLCD for medical reasons, but they also keep a close eye on those patients' health.
  • watcheronthewall
    watcheronthewall Posts: 104
    Preach it!

    Testiffffyyyy
  • MrsK20141004
    MrsK20141004 Posts: 489 Member
    Thank you for this! I have a friend who is at 1200 cals and always worrying about going over because "MFP told me to eat 1200". I think this will help her, she only wants to lose 10 pounds but has loss set to 2 lbs per week.

    This isn't about a "one size fits all" approach, its about knowing what your body needs to function. Everyone is different and the vast majority of people won't see the results they're looking for on 1200 calories a day.

    Again, thanks for posting this!
  • lisahaug9
    lisahaug9 Posts: 23
    OK, first of all, MFP has 1200 set as a base number of calories for many people based on their starting weight and activity level, but then if you exercise at all, then that is bumped up. For example, I usually end up with about 1800 based on my activity for the day even though the base is 1200. So can you please clarify whether you are talking about 1200 as a starting point or end point of daily intake?

    Secondly, do you have some sources you can refer me to on this topic? Thanks!

    I did not start losing weight until I got to MFP and followed the guidelines it came up with for me, even though I had been increasing my exercise for three months.

    I agree....be more specific - are you talking about starting point or net? My daily goal is 1200, however I eat around 1600-1800 and then with exercise calories deducted I hit my net of 1200 and I'm seeing results, plus I'm never hungry. When I first started and was listening to all the non-professional advice my daily goal was set around 1500, so with exercise I was eating somewhere around 2000 and the scale wasn't moving. As soon as I changed to the way I am doing it now the weight started coming off and I have lost 9 pounds in about 30 days.

    I know your intention is to help people however; everyone is different and what works for you may not work for anyone else.
  • YoungDoc2B
    YoungDoc2B Posts: 1,593 Member
    Nice try, but this is going to fall on deaf ears.
  • LorinaLynn
    LorinaLynn Posts: 13,247 Member
    My TDEE is about 2300. If I were eating just 1200 calories, that only giving it about HALF the fuel my body needs.

    If your employer cut your salary in half, you'd have a hard time getting by for more than a few weeks, maybe a few months if you had a lot in savings. But you could probably manage, if you HAD to, on a 10-20% cut in wages. You'd adapt. Same thing with your body. There's only so much you can cut and still live a normal life.

    I don't mind 1200+exercise calories. Its the ones set at 1200 and don't touch exercise calories that are setting themselves up for failure.
  • LindsayLL30
    LindsayLL30 Posts: 154 Member
    Yes mine is set to 1200, and I have an open food diary.... I do NOT try to stick to the 1200 (I am for 1400-1600) and everysingle night when I complete my entry I have people telling me Tomorrows a new day, and hang in there...as if I have done something awful LOL
  • WinnerVictorious
    WinnerVictorious Posts: 4,733 Member
    Nice try, but this is going to fall on deaf ears.

    not all ears will be deaf. hopefully many of the newer folks who are still confused will take the time to read Dan's Roadmap thread and also visit the Eat, Train, Progress group.

    you can't help everybody (especially those who don't want to be helped), but you can help some.

    for the folks who insist that they are perfectly fine eating at 1200 calories, i truly hope they reach their goals with as minimal amount of struggle as possible. i suspect that some of them will eventually stall and perhaps take this advice to heart at some later date. better late than never.

    for those who want to do it the hard way and dismiss all evidence that a higher calorie goal can/will be an easier way to reach their goal... i still wish them all the luck in the world.
  • LifeIsNotADressRehearsal
    LifeIsNotADressRehearsal Posts: 745 Member
    Yawns. *eye roll*

    I'm always amazed at the amount of people so focused on what other people are doing and eating....

    This made me sad. The OP's sincere motivation is to help people. He took the time to post some very good information with an end goal to reach out and make a difference for someone....any one. He's a kind, intelligent, good man and am proud to have him as a friend. He's also incredibly funny....which is an added bonus. :smile:
  • lisahaug9
    lisahaug9 Posts: 23
    I don't mind 1200+exercise calories. Its the ones set at 1200 and don't touch exercise calories that are setting themselves up for failure.

    This I agree with 100%!! If I were to do that my Net would be like 750-850 and there is no way that would be good for me, not to mention the fact that I would be starving which would result in me going on a binge. Anyone who follows the eating 1200 without adding back in exercise calories is just asking for trouble.

Categories