Yes! Sugar IS the enemy.
Replies
-
I think one of the good points he makes is how many products labeled as low fat use sugars to make up for the lack of flavor from removing the fat. Many people don't know this and will buy low fat or reduced fat products assuming they are healthy due to the low grams of fat per serving.0
-
LOL. Which side is the zealots? Those who demonize foods or those who don't?0
-
Honestly, this topic's gets tiresome. It's been beaten to death.
a dead horse thread on MFP...NEVER!0 -
Sugar is Evil posts make me want to eat an entire bag of sugar with a spoon.
Ermahgerd sugar IS evil!!!!0 -
so are you trying to say sugar is bad for you or just the enemy?0
-
People are always chasing me down trying to push my face to the ground where all they really want to do is suck out my mother ****ing brains, my brains.0
-
so are you trying to say sugar is bad for you or just the enemy?
LOL0 -
People are always chasing me down trying to push my face to the ground where all they really want to do is suck out my mother ****ing brains, my brains.
ummm sugar zombies???0 -
Its sugar indirectly causing the fat
Some people cant control themselves when it comes to sugar, so it tends to be a trigger food to make them eat more
Exercise is not present, or even if exercise is present they are still in excess for their total energy
Glycogen then builds up as excess energy in their bodies
thus making them fat
sugar = devil = fat people = excessive amount of sugar is eval threads = annoyed Fitbeto = not going on the message boards as often0 -
I absolutely find it amusing when I come across forms that are bashing cereals because they are "high in sugar". How about you measure out the serving size and only eat that instead of filling the whole damn bowl?
Sticking to the serving size on cereal boxes.
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Not filling the entire bowl....0 -
LOL. Which side is the zealots? Those who demonize foods or those who don't?
The extreme end of both "sides."
Ultimately people are going to believe what they want and do what they want.
My family history is rife with heart disease and diabetes, so I like to be up-to-date with the current research going on. I am open minded and a person of science. I'm interested in all sides. I know that you shouldn't "appeal to the authority" too. But to just call a PhD a "quack" is a bit disrespectful.
I'm sorry if I beat the horse.....and put it in a hamburger.
P.S. I would look into Dihydrogen Monoxide, but I am still trying to figure out if a 100 lbs of feathers is heavier than a 100 lbs of bowling balls. (7th grade chemistry flashbacks...YAY!!!)0 -
Honestly, this topic's gets tiresome. It's been beaten to death.
this0 -
Honestly, this topic's gets tiresome. It's been beaten to death.
this
Especially since this is like the 7th thread I have seen on the subject in say... 24 hours!0 -
LOL. Which side is the zealots? Those who demonize foods or those who don't?
The extreme end of both "sides."
Ultimately people are going to believe what they want and do what they want.
My family history is rife with heart disease and diabetes, so I like to be up-to-date with the current research going on. I am open minded and a person of science. I'm interested in all sides. I know that you shouldn't "appeal to the authority" too. But to just call a PhD a "quack" is a bit disrespectful.
I'm sorry if I beat the horse.....and put it in a hamburger.
P.S. I would look into Dihydrogen Monoxide, but I am still trying to figure out if a 100 lbs of feathers is heavier than a 100 lbs of bowling balls. (7th grade chemistry flashbacks...YAY!!!)0 -
<--- Sugar zealot.0
-
LOL. Which side is the zealots? Those who demonize foods or those who don't?
The extreme end of both "sides."
Ultimately people are going to believe what they want and do what they want.
My family history is rife with heart disease and diabetes, so I like to be up-to-date with the current research going on. I am open minded and a person of science. I'm interested in all sides. I know that you shouldn't "appeal to the authority" too. But to just call a PhD a "quack" is a bit disrespectful.
I'm sorry if I beat the horse.....and put it in a hamburger.
P.S. I would look into Dihydrogen Monoxide, but I am still trying to figure out if a 100 lbs of feathers is heavier than a 100 lbs of bowling balls. (7th grade chemistry flashbacks...YAY!!!)
Well this doctor ought to come sit down with me because I only ever track Carbs, Proteins, and Fats and my caloric intake.... Never once tracked a single gram of sugar (or sodium for that matter) and found a way to get moving (water displacement in the beginning) and lost over 300 lbs. and on top of that I am a diabetic.... Call me crazy but I don't fear sugar.....0 -
Sugar has also been linked to Cancer.....
Yawn.
Just about everything we eat these days has been linked to cancer.
And damn that sun. It shines on me when I go for my walks. It's going to cause me cancer too.0 -
Sugar! I declare WAR on you.
I will feed you to my yeast farms and consume the carnage that will ensue!
:flowerforyou:0 -
Breathing has also been known to cause cancer.0
-
Hahaha . Thread of the century0
-
I love sugar it is my weakness i dont want to cut it out 100% because that seems extreme but i want to be more reasonable about it0
-
I'm so glad to know this! Sugar is edible. Enemy devoured!
NOM NOM NOM0 -
Hehevthats cute0
-
Sugar is definitely MY enemy just because I have a hard time controlling myself with it.0
-
Sugar has also been linked to Cancer.....
Yawn.
Just about everything we eat these days has been linked to cancer.
And damn that sun. It shines on me when I go for my walks. It's going to cause me cancer too.
i heard if you drink beer on the beach and get in the water that is linked to cancer too....Floridans we are F'd...!0 -
Ultimately people are going to believe what they want and do what they want.
My family history is rife with heart disease and diabetes, so I like to be up-to-date with the current research going on. I am open minded and a person of science. I'm interested in all sides. I know that you shouldn't "appeal to the authority" too. But to just call a PhD a "quack" is a bit disrespectful.
I think you started this thread sincerely. Most times when someone starts a Lustig thread, they have some kind of orthorexic axe to grind. I also, applaud you're efforts to do better than your family history and be up to date on research.
The problem with someone like Lustig and why the draw such disrespect is they stop being a researcher and scientist and start being an extremeist advocate with an agenda based on fear mongering. That is why he is viewed by many with such disdain despite his PHD, which is no guaratee of inteligence and integrity BTW.
If you really want to learn more, one of the best sites you can utilize is James Kreiger's site, Weightology.com. He has credentials and is objective. Also, you can find lot's of good info on here in the group Eat, Train, Progress, especially in the "important posts to read" thread. I've put links to both below.
http://weightology.net/weightologyweekly/?page_id=3
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/forums/show/10067-eat-train-progress-0 -
Ah, The Bitter Truth video, this is where I began my journey about a year ago into the depths of keto/ low carb/paleo land.
And a lot of fun it was, I sampled the forbidden fruits of Marks Daily Apple, I got into Underground Wellness, Mercola, etc, I did some Wheatbellyage, I cruised Robb Wolf's site (who I, incidentally, think has the best attitude).
And it did make me wonder about what I was consuming and where it was coming from and I do make better choices these days as a result (nutrient dense protein sources closer to the source, etc).
But, when it comes down to it, eat what you like unless you have a medical problem and widen that energy gap to lose the lard.. No magic food combinations, no forbidden fruit ...0 -
Ultimately people are going to believe what they want and do what they want.
My family history is rife with heart disease and diabetes, so I like to be up-to-date with the current research going on. I am open minded and a person of science. I'm interested in all sides. I know that you shouldn't "appeal to the authority" too. But to just call a PhD a "quack" is a bit disrespectful.
I think you started this thread sincerely. Most times when someone starts a Lustig thread, they have some kind of orthorexic axe to grind. I also, applaud you're efforts to do better than your family history and be up to date on research.
The problem with someone like Lustig and why the draw such disrespect is they stop being a researcher and scientist and start being an extremeist advocate with an agenda based on fear mongering. That is why he is viewed by many with such disdain despite his PHD, which is no guaratee of inteligence and integrity BTW.
If you really want to learn more, one of the best sites you can utilize is James Kreiger's site, Weightology.com. He has credentials and is objective. Also, you can find lot's of good info on here in the group Eat, Train, Progress, especially in the "important posts to read" thread. I've put links to both below.
http://weightology.net/weightologyweekly/?page_id=3
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/forums/show/10067-eat-train-progress-
Absolutely0 -
Studies show a 100% of people die of something. Pick your poisons well and stay thirsty my friends.0
-
Ultimately people are going to believe what they want and do what they want.
My family history is rife with heart disease and diabetes, so I like to be up-to-date with the current research going on. I am open minded and a person of science. I'm interested in all sides. I know that you shouldn't "appeal to the authority" too. But to just call a PhD a "quack" is a bit disrespectful.
I think you started this thread sincerely. Most times when someone starts a Lustig thread, they have some kind of orthorexic axe to grind. I also, applaud you're efforts to do better than your family history and be up to date on research.
The problem with someone like Lustig and why the draw such disrespect is they stop being a researcher and scientist and start being an extremeist advocate with an agenda based on fear mongering. That is why he is viewed by many with such disdain despite his PHD, which is no guaratee of inteligence and integrity BTW.
If you really want to learn more, one of the best sites you can utilize is James Kreiger's site, Weightology.com. He has credentials and is objective. Also, you can find lot's of good info on here in the group Eat, Train, Progress, especially in the "important posts to read" thread. I've put links to both below.
http://weightology.net/weightologyweekly/?page_id=3
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/forums/show/10067-eat-train-progress-
Absolutely
Lol, who'da thunk a year ago that I'd make a post and you'd agree with it? :drinker:0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions