Is it more expensive to eat healthy?

Strip away all the chips, cookies, sweets, "instant" foods (individually packaged oatmeal, rice mixes, granola bars, etc), sodas and frozen dinners (SmartOnes, HealthyChoice, LeanCuisine) and replace with fresh produce (lots of in season/on sale veggies and fruit), lean meats, good diary products and bulk dry goods (rice, beans, rolled oats, grits). In the long run, it is much healthier and cheaper.

Cooking and making most things from scratch will save tons of money! We buy bulk freeze most of it and I end up making about 75% of my meals. Vegetables can be pretty cheap too. We eat out once a week, and buy groceries once a week to every other week. I cant really say what my bill runs a week because it varies depending on what we need, but we do have a little money left over at the end of the month. It's worth it in the long run when you look at the health benefits. Here's a little study I pulled up.


Cost of eating: whole foods versus convenience foods in a low-income model.

McDermott AJ, Stephens MB.
Fam Med. 2010 Apr;42(4):280-4.

Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:
Financial limitations in low-income populations, those at highest risk for poor health outcomes, may preclude adherence to recommended dietary guidelines. We examine the financial burden of shopping for foods to meet national dietary recommendations in a supermarket compared to eating primarily in a fast-food restaurant.
METHODS:
Using a single-parent, low-income model, we obtained whole food costs (healthy) from local supermarkets and from fast-food outlets (convenient). Using cost per calorie as a metric for comparison, we used estimated single-parent, low-income living expenses to determine the relative costs of meeting national dietary guidelines.
RESULTS:
Average food costs for healthy and convenience diets accounted for 18% and 37% of income, respectively. Dairy products and vegetables accounted for the largest cost percentages of diet costs (36% and 28%, respectively). The cost per calorie of a convenience diet was 24% higher than the healthy diet. Both models resulted in net financial loss over the course of a year for a single-parent, low-income family.
CONCLUSIONS:
Food costs represent a significant proportion of annual income. Diets based heavily on foods from convenient sources are less healthy and more expensive than a well-planned menu from budget foods available from large supermarket chains.

I was spending a lot more money on boxed, pre-packaged foods than I am now even though I'm buying a lot more fresh produce.

I definitely agree with one of the previous posters that it is absolutely less convenient to eat healthy, both in the time spent cooking and the time I spend at the the grocery store. I have to go shopping at least once a week now that I'm buying fresh food instead of shelf-stable garbage. That said, I eat very little meat and if I were buying grass-fed beef or fresh fish, my grocery budget would probably be destroyed.

Personally, I don't think healthy is more expensive.

I bought a 5 pound bag of oranges for $3.49. A 12 oz bag of potato chips would cost about the same.

I also got boneless skinless chicken breasts for $1.99 a pound, frozen carrots for $.99 a pound, 10 pounds of potatoes for $3.99 (bogo special). That'll go a lot further than a couple McDoubles and fries. Anyone who thinks anything off the dollar menu is really a bargain needs to do some math and learn to cook.

Now, if you're talking about CONVENIENCE, that's another story.

I need to live where you do. In the UK, skinless chicken breasts in the supermarket are about $8.90/lb minimum and 10lb of potatoes would be about $4.80 minimum, usually more. But a box of 'chicken' burgers from the freezer would be about 75 cents for 8.



But still, I do agree that the heavily processed stuff isn't actually as cheap at it appears to be - and everyone needs to learn to cook.


But it's what is heavily marketed instore. And poorer people are less likely to be well educated or able to understand that it's anything but a healthy bargain that's being sold to them.

So I infer the following: if you are eating somewhat reasonable with frequent episodes of bad food, eating healthy might be cheaper. However, if you are eating mostly junk food, switching to healthy eating might be more expensive. Fish is pricey where I live and my preferred source of meat protein.

What do you consider "junk food"? Is that fast food? Or unhealthy food?

So I infer the following: if you are eating somewhat reasonable with frequent episodes of bad food, eating healthy might be cheaper. However, if you are eating mostly junk food, switching to healthy eating might be more expensive. Fish is pricey where I live and my preferred source of meat protein.

I think this is pretty accurate, unfortunately. Although, I still think with planning and food preparation and buying bulk money could be saved.

Here's another study I found interesting. Note the last sentence.


Poverty and obesity: the role of energy density and energy costs.
Drewnowski A, Specter SE.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 Jan;79(1):6-16.

Abstract
Many health disparities in the United States are linked to inequalities in education and income. This review focuses on the relation between obesity and diet quality, dietary energy density, and energy costs. Evidence is provided to support the following points. First, the highest rates of obesity occur among population groups with the highest poverty rates and the least education. Second, there is an inverse relation between energy density (MJ/kg) and energy cost (US dollars/MJ), such that energy-dense foods composed of refined grains, added sugars, or fats may represent the lowest-cost option to the consumer. Third, the high energy density and palatability of sweets and fats are associated with higher energy intakes, at least in clinical and laboratory studies. Fourth, poverty and food insecurity are associated with lower food expenditures, low fruit and vegetable consumption, and lower-quality diets. A reduction in diet costs in linear programming models leads to high-fat, energy-dense diets that are similar in composition to those consumed by low-income groups. Such diets are more affordable than are prudent diets based on lean meats, fish, fresh vegetables, and fruit. The association between poverty and obesity may be mediated, in part, by the low cost of energy-dense foods and may be reinforced by the high palatability of sugar and fat. This economic framework provides an explanation for the observed links between socioeconomic variables and obesity when taste, dietary energy density, and diet costs are used as intervening variables. More and more Americans are becoming overweight and obese while consuming more added sugars and fats and spending a lower percentage of their disposable income on food.

So I infer the following: if you are eating somewhat reasonable with frequent episodes of bad food, eating healthy might be cheaper. However, if you are eating mostly junk food, switching to healthy eating might be more expensive. Fish is pricey where I live and my preferred source of meat protein.

What do you consider "junk food"? Is that fast food? Or unhealthy food?

Junk food contains things that do not support your efforts. They would have things like sugar, trans-fats etc. Then there is bad food which may support weight loss, but does not support a healthy lifestyle. That would include non-whole grain bread and pasta, sodium laden canned foods, regular yogurt as apposed to fat free etc. Then there are whole and organic foods which do not use preservatives or pesticides.

I think it depends where you are and what you’re eating. Fast food restaurants aren’t actually all that cheap around where I live unless you order off the value menu, and then you get tiny things so unsatisfying that you end up consuming way more calories than you need anyway. (So, maybe the calories-to-cost ratio is cheaper, but a lot of those calories aren’t necessary, so it’s a waste all around.) I notice myself spending less on groceries when I’m buying large quantities of veggies, meat and grains and then preparing the meals myself, as opposed to pre-packaged junk or eating out. When I was a poor student, my diet was very heavily based on veggies and grains to be budget-conscious.

Definitely has a higher time cost, though. But I don’t mind.

I spend less going to the store and buying fresh fruits and veggies than I did on processed junk.

I spent nearly $20 just on a few honeycrisp apples, cantaloupe, strawberries and a bag of grapes. That is my "sweet" snacks for the week. However, junk food would cost less than that for the same number of meals.

Personally, I think eating properly/healthly costs what food should cost. Eating poorly does cost less of course, but you get what you pay for!

i think it is much more expensive to eat healthy but then we dont buy sodas and junk food so IDK how much people spend on that kind of stuff.

Fresh produce is not cheap, nor is lean meats and all organic stuff is much more expensive, IME. And i've noticed in more affluent areas the prices for healthier alternative foods such as turkey bacon and steel cut oats are REALLY expensive compared to the same product in the same grocery chain in less affluent areas.

I agree that it is more expensive but you do save money not buying fast food and in the long run on your health!

I eat less when I apply myself and eat well and feel better (get sick less - so less Dr visits)..
So my answer is yes and no.
I agree that it also depends on where you live/shop.
Doing it right, you can get by spending the same or less