The next person who says that muscle weighs more than fat
Fullsterkur_woman
Posts: 2,712 Member
in Chit-Chat
...needs to be boiled in their own pudding! And if people still continue to get it wrong, we'll have to take drastic measures!
Seriously, how can muscle weigh more than fat (full stop)?! Is it that hard to say that a given volume of muscle weighs more than a given volume of fat?!
Cripes, just say "muscle is denser than fat" and you avoid the whole issue neatly!
Seriously, how can muscle weigh more than fat (full stop)?! Is it that hard to say that a given volume of muscle weighs more than a given volume of fat?!
Cripes, just say "muscle is denser than fat" and you avoid the whole issue neatly!
0
Replies
-
02/100
-
0
-
Really....use the search feature for the forums. This topic has been beaten to death, dug up and beaten again...:ohwell:0 -
0
-
Would this be chocolate pudding? If it's chocolate pudding then I'm in, but I don't really care for tapioca.0
-
Yes! Statements like this directly effect my life. I have a hard time going on living when I hear these things come out of ignorant mouths. Thank you for bringing this to everyone's attention!0
-
In for the crowds reaction....
even though I totally agree!!!0 -
When comparing the weights of two substances, you usually weigh equal volumes of each substance, and since muscle is more dense than fat, when comparing equal volumes, muscle weighs more than fat...0
-
Muscle weighs more than fat.0
-
i stopped reading at "pudding" nom nom0 -
How it feels to walk in on OP trying to troll
0 -
A pound is a pound unless you're defying the laws of physics.0
-
But muscle does weigh more than fat look at this picture for proof
0 -
When comparing the weights of two substances, you usually weigh equal volumes of each substance, and since muscle is more dense than fat, when comparing equal volumes, muscle weighs more than fat...
Exactly, one cup of chocolate pudding weighs more than one cup of whipped cream0 -
When comparing the weights of two substances, you usually weigh equal volumes of each substance, and since muscle is more dense than fat, when comparing equal volumes, muscle weighs more than fat...
BINGO!!0 -
0
-
I think they're just jealous.0
-
How it feels to walk in on OP trying to troll
I just spit my water out laughing. Thank-you.0 -
It's just a weigh (pun intended) of saying that muscle is more dense than fat. It has greater mass, or weight, per unit volume or area, than fat does.
No kidding though...if you weigh a pound of muscle and a pound of fat, they both weigh a pound. All that's doing is arguing for/proving/confirming/supporting the definitiion of the word "pound". Nothing more! It has nothing at all to do with muscle or fat or their unique physical properties--of which different density is one that is real, and set in stone.0 -
Only if you promise to never say carrots have less calories than potato chips. You must only say "given equal volume carrots have less calories than potato chips".
If you are referring more towards the everytime someone is losing weight somebody jumps in and says "you're probably just gaining muscle and muscle weighs more than fat". Then I agree.0 -
When comparing the weights of two substances, you usually weigh equal volumes of each substance, and since muscle is more dense than fat, when comparing equal volumes, muscle weighs more than fat...
You mean I am supposed to figure out that "by volume" is very obviously implied???0 -
When comparing the weights of two substances, you usually weigh equal volumes of each substance, and since muscle is more dense than fat, when comparing equal volumes, muscle weighs more than fat...
You mean I am supposed to figure out that "by volume" is very obviously implied???
Yes, you are!0 -
Exactly, one cup of chocolate pudding weighs more than one cup of whipped cream
and when you put them together they belong in my face.0 -
Everything weighs the same. :flowerforyou:0
-
When comparing the weights of two substances, you usually weigh equal volumes of each substance, and since muscle is more dense than fat, when comparing equal volumes, muscle weighs more than fat...
THIS! All they way.0 -
When comparing the weights of two substances, you usually weigh equal volumes of each substance, and since muscle is more dense than fat, when comparing equal volumes, muscle weighs more than fat...
You mean I am supposed to figure out that "by volume" is very obviously implied???
Yes, you are!
That's crazy!!!!!! /s0 -
You're getting too worked up about this.
Accept that either people don't know what they're talking about, or they forgot to add "by unit volume". Either way, getting your panties in a wad everytime you read that will leave you with a lot of wadded panties.0 -
Everything weighs the same. :flowerforyou:
But everything does not have the same density. People who talk about muscle weighing more than fat are actually talking about fixed volume relative mass...our brains take shortcuts, and it's likely the visual learners who like to say that muscle weighs more than fat. I'm one of them. I'm a visual learner (but not only a visual learner--I can easily see both points of view simultaneously, and appreciate why both are actually correct).0 -
...needs to be boiled in their own pudding! And if people still continue to get it wrong, we'll have to take drastic measures!
Seriously, how can muscle weigh more than fat (full stop)?! Is it that hard to say that a given volume of muscle weighs more than a given volume of fat?!
Cripes, just say "muscle is denser than fat" and you avoid the whole issue neatly!
The problem is understanding how the term is used. People are comparing a pound to a pound. That's not how one defines how much an actual material weighs though. You do this by comparing equal volumes of materials to determine density.
So yes muscle does weigh more than fat.
A.C.E. Certified Personal/Group FitnessTrainer
IDEA Fitness member
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition0 -
When comparing the weights of two substances, you usually weigh equal volumes of each substance, and since muscle is more dense than fat, when comparing equal volumes, muscle weighs more than fat...
You mean I am supposed to figure out that "by volume" is very obviously implied???
Only when it pertains to muscle and fat. If they said helium is lighter than air no one throws a hissy fit.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions