Body Fat percentage higher than I thought!? :-(
![mancgolfer](https://dakd0cjsv8wfa.cloudfront.net/images/photos/user/f984/1afe/a530/5e2b/eb85/6428/b98e/5a7f5fbc07041ee0ff91882a38ec5edac244.jpg)
mancgolfer
Posts: 12 Member
Hi, I started losing weight from the 1st Jan this year and was 249lbs and 38% bf, as of this morning I was 210lbs and 26%bf which is great.
From that I have worked out if I keep the same lean mass (which I seems to have done throughout) and drop another 2 stone, I'll be 184lbs and around 16%bf. I've trained for a 10K and done Stronglifts throughout the year so I'm 70/30 cardio to weight training split.
I'm using a tanita body fat monitor which is around 10 years old and although it may not be entirely accurate, it does show progression.
My mum bought a new fat monitor a few of weeks ago and I tried it today, to my horror, I was 32%bf! This reading was taken within a few minutes of my own monitor reading and I had not had and breakfast or water between readings.
This has just knocked me back a bit as I thought I was further along than maybe I am. I just wonder which one is the accurate one?
My stats are:
height: 5'11.5"
weight: 210lbs
neck: 16"
waist: 43"
hips: 41"
If the newer fat monitor is more accurate, so be it, but I just like to know where I am. Any help appreciated :-)
From that I have worked out if I keep the same lean mass (which I seems to have done throughout) and drop another 2 stone, I'll be 184lbs and around 16%bf. I've trained for a 10K and done Stronglifts throughout the year so I'm 70/30 cardio to weight training split.
I'm using a tanita body fat monitor which is around 10 years old and although it may not be entirely accurate, it does show progression.
My mum bought a new fat monitor a few of weeks ago and I tried it today, to my horror, I was 32%bf! This reading was taken within a few minutes of my own monitor reading and I had not had and breakfast or water between readings.
This has just knocked me back a bit as I thought I was further along than maybe I am. I just wonder which one is the accurate one?
My stats are:
height: 5'11.5"
weight: 210lbs
neck: 16"
waist: 43"
hips: 41"
If the newer fat monitor is more accurate, so be it, but I just like to know where I am. Any help appreciated :-)
0
Replies
-
The electrical inducance meters are notoriously innacurate. You're going to get better results with a tape measure or, better yet, a skin fold caliper.0
-
Do yourself a favor and through the body fat % device away.
Congrats on your fatloss. Keep up the good work. If you want to get an accurate base line go get yourself tested at a BodPod place. Google it. This will give you an accurate baseline.
Most people vastly underestimate what their body fat % is.
Koing0 -
Thanks for the advice guys, think I'll just keep on trucking and try to hit my goal weight and let bf% take care of itself.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 394.2K Introduce Yourself
- 43.9K Getting Started
- 260.4K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.1K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 438 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.1K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.9K MyFitnessPal Information
- 15 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.7K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions