Salt, Sugar, Fat

I have not read it. I assume it's another book saying these things are evil and we should revolt. I just have to assume a lot of this stems from societies unhealthy relationship with food and not the food itself's fault. I've learned portion control in my life and that is how I'm getting healthy. I'm not planning on ever cutting out fast food, ice cream, pizza. None of those things made me fat or made me unhealthy. I did that by ignoring my bodies nutrient needs and over consumption.

I thought it was a great book. I have a lot of trouble with sweet cravings but then want something salty afterwards. It really opened my eyes as to how processed foods are engineered to have the perfect amount of salt, sugar and fat (the "bliss point") and the more you eat them, the more you crave them. I have definitely been more aware of the ingredients in the foods I have been eating and makes me aware that my cravings are caused by eating the exact items I am craving!

Books like that lead people the wrong way. I think the whole post-modernism about marketing from fast food chains and supermarket "tricks of the trade" has been blown way out of proportion. It's up to you whether you are responsible enough to ignore something in a supermarket aisle or whether you buy it and blame clever advertising methods to get you to buy it. In the same way one mgiht give in to peer pressure to smoke or do drugs, it's your fault if you get addicted. You should have been more responsible and just say no. It's a similar thing when the media blew up the whole "Nutella claims to be part of a healthy breakfast but is really just full of sugar and oil". If people had any basic common sense they would turn the jar around and read the ingredients themselves.

Ice cream, cheesecake and Nutella aren't "bad for you" at all. Unless you are diabetic and need to avoid large amount of sugar or your doctor has told you to reduce your level of sugar then Nutella, cheesecake or ice cream is fine to eat. From my experience those who tell you to eat "100% 'clean', 100% of the time otherwise you won't get 100% results because you didn't follow the diet and training like I told you to" are those who have a huge popularity through social media, eg fitness models who are juicing their brains out and claiming to be drug free. Even Robert Lustig's bitter truth about sugar is just some coke and bull to get you to go to his lectures, buy his articles and buy his books. His research has been heavily criticised and all he did, and all he has done, is refer people back to his studies.

In a broader sense, it's up to you what newspaper you read. If it's a tabloid rather than a broadsheet, or whether it's a middle market daily rather than a broadsheet. You need to take responsibility for your actions come to an informed decision about whether you want to spend your time reading a piece of garbage of a newspaper or piece of journalism or whether you want to read a relatively unbiased opinion based on the accepted facts at the time of the event.

these are a few of my favorite things...

I recently listened to this audiobook. It was fascinating and appalling at the same time. Corporations that we trusted (Kellogg, Nestle, Kraft, Oscar Meyer, etc.) sacrificed quality and nutrition in the relentless pursuit of market share and profitability, while the government largely ignored it. No, they aren’t solely responsible, of course there is personal responsibility involved in what you consume, but they certainly greased the skids as this country descended into the obese mess that it is today.

It was especially interesting in regard to products targeted at children like cereal, Lunchables, juice boxes, etc., and the trickery that went into marketing these things (“eating frosted mini-wheats makes your kids smarter!” “100% natural & contains fresh fruit! (fruit juice from concentrate almost totally depleted of any nutritional value)”.

The food industry preyed upon the desire for convenience when the country transitioned to two-income households and the lack of consumer sophistication in understanding the consequences of dumping sugar/salt/fat into the food supply in order to hook people and increase its shelf life.

I also listened to it in audible format, and I agree with your take on it. In addition to what you said, I also thought it was interesting from a historical aspect. I don't blame the food companies. Neither did the author. They exist to sell food. It was however interesting to see how they manipulated the blend of fat, salt and sugar (and us) in order to compete and boost profits.

It has made me more aware of the advertising and marketing to get us to buy. I have become a better shopper and read labels even more than I did before.

This.

I think the whole post-modernism about marketing from fast food chains and supermarket "tricks of the trade" has been blown way out of proportion.

Yes. I admit to really liking some salty, fat, and sweet items. I have some leftover steak from last night that has both fat and salt (and is entirely consistent with my eating plan, even at a pretty low calorie goal), and I admit that I find it incredibly appealing, as I do cheese and various other high fat items, and as explains why salt usually makes food you cook taste better and why fish can taste especially good when cooked in butter. I think blaming marketing misses the point that a lot of these foods have been quite well loved long before marketing played a role. I generally don't eat stuff advertised at all, just because I like to cook and to eat at small local restaurants, but that doesn't mean I'm not attracted to plenty of fat, salty, and sweet foods. Ice cream being one example. The question is whether you can eat them in moderation and make them fit your calories.

It also has helped me in the grocery store. I see why the put high fat ,sugar ,and salty products when you enter the store.

At both my mainstream grocery and my WF you enter in the vegetable section. Is this really so unusual?

I live in Mexico City and enter through the soft drink aisles on one side and alcoholic beverages on the other. We have Walmart here and they all have electronics and washers, refrigerators etc by the entrances. Food is always in the very back of the store. Maybe this is, because many Mexicans can only buy what they need from day-to-day.

I've read it and I think his work is poorly sourced in regards to fat, and the studies he does source are out of context. If anything, Americans should be eating much, much more fat (and less sugar, and less carbs, which he mentions). However, his look at marketing and advertising was spot-on - capitalism is an interesting thing in that it supposedly keeps the market healthy, but it does absolutely nothing to keep humans healthy.

Haroon - I agree that everyone is responsible for their own decisions, but big food corportations make it very hard for the average joe to make good decisions due to deliberately putting out false information. A small example, it's pretty common knowledge that peanut butter is healthy, right? It's a great source of healthy fats, fiber, and a little protein. However, almost all peanut butter in the grocery store, and certainly the kind that most americans are used to, are modified heavily with sugar and trans fats are actually very unhealthy. A busy mom or a college kid on a budget is just gonna swipe it off the shelf, believing they are making a responsible choice.

My Skippy Peanut Butter label says 0 trans fats. And 3 grams of sugar. Hardly horrifying.

Books like that lead people the wrong way. I think the whole post-modernism about marketing from fast food chains and supermarket "tricks of the trade" has been blown way out of proportion. It's up to you whether you are responsible enough to ignore something in a supermarket aisle or whether you buy it and blame clever advertising methods to get you to buy it. In the same way one mgiht give in to peer pressure to smoke or do drugs, it's your fault if you get addicted. You should have been more responsible and just say no. It's a similar thing when the media blew up the whole "Nutella claims to be part of a healthy breakfast but is really just full of sugar and oil". If people had any basic common sense they would turn the jar around and read the ingredients themselves.

Ice cream, cheesecake and Nutella aren't "bad for you" at all. Unless you are diabetic and need to avoid large amount of sugar or your doctor has told you to reduce your level of sugar then Nutella, cheesecake or ice cream is fine to eat. From my experience those who tell you to eat "100% 'clean', 100% of the time otherwise you won't get 100% results because you didn't follow the diet and training like I told you to" are those who have a huge popularity through social media, eg fitness models who are juicing their brains out and claiming to be drug free. Even Robert Lustig's bitter truth about sugar is just some coke and bull to get you to go to his lectures, buy his articles and buy his books. His research has been heavily criticised and all he did, and all he has done, is refer people back to his studies.

In a broader sense, it's up to you what newspaper you read. If it's a tabloid rather than a broadsheet, or whether it's a middle market daily rather than a broadsheet. You need to take responsibility for your actions come to an informed decision about whether you want to spend your time reading a piece of garbage of a newspaper or piece of journalism or whether you want to read a relatively unbiased opinion based on the accepted facts at the time of the event.

Did you even read the book? I didn't either, but you sound more like you're making a strawman argument than actually responding to the book. And yes, ice-cream, nutella, cheesecake, etc., are in fact "bad" for you. Sure, they aren't bad in small quantities. But any person with any knowledge of nutrition knows that you should limit those types of foods to less than 20-30% of your total daily calories, and fill the other 70-80% with foods are "healthy." I personally eat at least one of those three "bad" foods you mentioned every single day, but I understand that they aren't doing much for my overall nutrition. In order to be healthy and achieve my goals I need to eat mostly healthy foods.

You also give the food industry a pass by saying "well I might have put the pipe in front of his face but I didn't make him smoke it." Sure, ultimately the responsibility is with the individual. But many people are mislead by false advertising that tricks people into think junk food is healthy.

For example, do you think it's okay for the food industry to put "heart healthy" labels on foods like Honey Smacks?

Two big takeaways from the book:

1) There is nothing accidental about the way food products are positioned in the store or otherwise marketed to you. And every single ingredient is meticulously studied prior to being processed into the food - the manufacturer understands exactly how it will effect you in terms of taste, appearance, and digestion.

2) Almost none of the big food industry leaders that brought these products to market will eat or drink any of their own products themselves.

I... can't decide how I feel about this piece.

I'm not overly upset by the food industry trying to make better products, but yes -- they do go way, way too far when they want to manipulate flavor satiety to make it so it's not flavorful enough to be satiating so you'll want to eat more...

IF you lack impulse control.

And that's where my mixed feelings come in.

We're not helpless victims here.

The obesity problem can't be laid at the feet of any one bad actor.