Viewing the message boards in:

Paleo lifestyle... Have you tried it? How did you feel?

12357

Replies

  • Posts: 9,532 Member
    Why do you assume she would switch from paleo to eating a caloric surplus at some point in the future?

    That question doesn't make any sense. Paleo and caloric deficits are two completely separate issues.

    You can go between Paleo and Not-Paleo, or between Caloric Surplus and Deficit - not between Paleo and Deficit.
  • Posts: 1,639 Member

    That question doesn't make any sense. Paleo and caloric deficits are two completely separate issues.

    You can go between Paleo and Not-Paleo, or between Caloric Surplus and Deficit - not between Paleo and Deficit.

    I agree it makes little sense, but going from paleo to a caloric surplus is the only conclusion you can draw from ndj1979's comment that when she "can't" do paleo anymore she'll gain all the weight back. I suppose my point is that such a statement is silly, because you can stop paleo without gaining any weight whatsoever.
  • Posts: 9,532 Member
    Perhaps what the PP is trying to say is that going non-paleo does not mean the weight will come back on.

    Which in turn means the weight loss wasn't actually about being paleo.

    Which in turn means there is no weight loss reason to go paleo, it's strictly a personal preference thing.

    Which in turn means, if you have to figure out how to eat right non-paleo in the future anyway, why not skip a step and learn to do it now?
  • Posts: 1,639 Member
    Perhaps what the PP is trying to say is that going non-paleo does not mean the weight will come back on.

    Which in turn means the weight loss wasn't actually about being paleo.

    Which in turn means there is no weight loss reason to go paleo, it's strictly a personal preference thing.

    Which in turn means, if you have to figure out how to eat right non-paleo in the future anyway, why not skip a step and learn to do it now?

    I'll notice you didn't say there's no reason to go paleo, because there are reasons people prefer a paleo diet over the standard processed fare. So are "weight loss reasons" the only reasons that matter? For that matter, I don't even know what a "weight loss reason" is, but I'll assume you're alluding to the fact it still comes down to calories. Like I said though, you can still track your calories and you can still track your macros while doing paleo, and I know many people that do. So, as for figuring out how to eat right non-paleo, if someone is already accustomed to weighing their food and tracking their macros... what do they have left to learn? Weighing and logging a sweet potato is not really different than logging the processed foods the IIFYM people are so fond of. What skills are people missing to be unable to log a pop tart?

    Again, my point was all of this is based on the faulty assumption that people will at some point in the future switch from doing a paleo diet to eating a caloric surplus. There's absolutely no reason to believe this will happen though, and if someone is tracking their macros/calories on a paleo diet, there's absolutely no reason to believe they will sudden forget all of this information at some point in the future - at least no more reason than for the average IIFYM advocate.
  • Posts: 356 Member
    Paleo = Cavemen. Not related to me
    A diet with a name is a product.

    So yea no.
  • Posts: 22,505 Member
    I think Paleo is a label people are starting to use in a attempt to make themselves and others think they eat a much "healthier" diet than they actually do and that not that many people actually eat Paleo. This observation is solely based on the number of people on my FB newsfeed talking about how awesome they feel now that they eat Paleo, and then checking in two hours later from the bar with a picture of a table full of pub fare, toasting the camera with their alcohol.
  • Posts: 7,436 Member
    I think Paleo is a label people are starting to use in a attempt to make themselves and others think they eat a much "healthier" diet than they actually do and that not that many people actually eat Paleo. This observation is solely based on the number of people on my FB newsfeed talking about how awesome they feel now that they eat Paleo, and then checking in two hours later from the bar with a picture of a table full of pub fare, toasting the camera with their alcohol.

    The whole "more paleo than thou" game is really stupid. Just eat what you feel is a healthy, sustainable diet for you, and stop trying to police who is or is not allowed to call their diet "paleo" because if you're not catching your own food using stone age weapons and preparing it with stone age tools, it's not paleo and if you're eating food that's the product of farming and/or selective breeding, it's not paleo. The diet that gets touted on the internet as "paleo" isn't even close to any actual paleolithic diets. The pseudo-paleo diet of internet gurus may be reasonably healthy in that it doesn't lack any important nutrients, but it's not actually paleo. And just because you have friends who occasionally eat pub food while otherwise following the pseudo-paleo diet, does not mean that their diet is less healthy than yours.
  • Posts: 967 Member

    < does not restrict foods..I just eat in deficit, hit macros, and work out with compound movements..works fine for me...

    The point of dieting is to find a healthy way to reduce calories and put yourself into a calorie deficit. Not label foods "good" and "bad" and then restrict the "bad" foods..

    Don't you think it would be easier to eat the foods you like, and still be able to achieve your goals?

    That's super great that it works for YOU. Some people try that for years and years and it never works for them. So... if they try paleo (or some other form of "restrictive diet") and it works for them, then isn't that fabulous?! And it isn't always labeling foods as "good" and "bad", for most it's just determining which foods make them feel awesome and which ones don't. So, I don't think gluten, HFCS & dairy are "bad", I just know they aren't worth eating for ME.
  • What I like about paleo--it advocates eating whole foods that don't come with a long list of unpronounceable ingredients. So naturally your eliminating a lot of processed junk from your diet. I think that's where a whole lot of the benefits come from. But yeah I don't see myself cutting out things I love like rice, oats, pasta and bread forever. And I don't feel awful eating them so it wouldn't be sustainable for me to eat this way.
  • Posts: 22,505 Member

    The whole "more paleo than thou" game is really stupid. Just eat what you feel is a healthy, sustainable diet for you, and stop trying to police who is or is not allowed to call their diet "paleo" because if you're not catching your own food using stone age weapons and preparing it with stone age tools, it's not paleo and if you're eating food that's the product of farming and/or selective breeding, it's not paleo. The diet that gets touted on the internet as "paleo" isn't even close to any actual paleolithic diets. The pseudo-paleo diet of internet gurus may be reasonably healthy in that it doesn't lack any important nutrients, but it's not actually paleo. And just because you have friends who occasionally eat pub food while otherwise following the pseudo-paleo diet, does not mean that their diet is less healthy than yours.

    I didn't say anything about the health of my diet, or anyone else's diet, nor do I eat paleo or any other kind of "label" diet. I'm all for people finding a healthy, sustainable diet that works for them. Ok, I'm lying, I really don't give a toss what people eat, I hope they eat healthy but if they eat cupcakes all day it really has no bearing on my life.

    I'm just tired people pretending to be part of whichever revolutionary new eating plan is popular at the moment, lecturing people about how much healthier they are than other people and how certain foods are "bad" or "unhealthy," then finding ways to justify eating "bad" foods when it's something they like. So I guess you would say I'm tired of the "more healthy than thou" nonsense that seems to come with these "label" diets.
  • Posts: 29,136 Member

    That's super great that it works for YOU. Some people try that for years and years and it never works for them. So... if they try paleo (or some other form of "restrictive diet") and it works for them, then isn't that fabulous?! And it isn't always labeling foods as "good" and "bad", for most it's just determining which foods make them feel awesome and which ones don't. So, I don't think gluten, HFCS & dairy are "bad", I just know they aren't worth eating for ME.

    if you think avoiding whole food groups is a good idea and is sustainable for you, then more power to you.

    I just find it easier to eat as I please and make sure I hit my calorie goals for the day...

    and eating in a deficit does not work for you? How do you lose weight then?

    why are they not worth eating for you?
  • Posts: 29,136 Member
    What I like about paleo--it advocates eating whole foods that don't come with a long list of unpronounceable ingredients. So naturally your eliminating a lot of processed junk from your diet. I think that's where a whole lot of the benefits come from. But yeah I don't see myself cutting out things I love like rice, oats, pasta and bread forever. And I don't feel awful eating them so it wouldn't be sustainable for me to eat this way.

    the implication being that all processed foods are bad. Technically a ribeye is processed, is that bad for you?
  • Posts: 187 Member
    I do not personally agree with the Paleo diet, but for others it has really helped them feel better when they have eliminated grains and dairy. I think there is not one diet that everyone on the planet can thrive on. I truly believe - due to genetics or what have you - that some people really do thrive off of Paleo, vegetarian, or even vegan diets (assuming these diets are eaten properly and proper supplementation occurs). However, not all do. We are all so similar, yet so different. ;)

    I'm just going to be real here for a second: I don't see the logic from the community that oats, potatoes, corn, brown rice, and Greek yogurt are bad foods. Blows my mind. I read what marksdailyapple.com has to say about it in terms of the glycemic index and such, but give me a break. All the grains I just listed are natural, whole foods grown out the ground. Greek yogurt has wonderful probiotic properties. Sorry, not even Mark is going to convince me that these are foods that should be avoided. Nope.

    However, I hear it does make quite a positive difference when comparing your blood panels from being non-Paleo to then after shifting into the diet. I'm sure it's great for convenience in terms of coming up with meal ideas, too. Don't have to worry about incorporating those "pesky grains"...I believe Mark used the example of eating at a restaurant and being perfectly content with prime rib, a side of sautéed mushrooms and a glass of wine! ;)

  • the implication being that all processed foods are bad. Technically a ribeye is processed, is that bad for you?
    Well you can list and pronounce all of the ingredients that go into cooking a rib eye steak, right? Meat, spices, maybe butter and oil...Versus say a Twinkie? Lol
  • Posts: 645 Member

    Why do you assume she "can't" do paleo anymore at some point in the future? Why do you assume she would switch from paleo to eating a caloric surplus at some point in the future? Plenty of people doing diets like paleo still track their food/macros. There's no real reason to think that simply because she might change her macros in the future and incorporate non-paleo foods that the result will be a caloric surplus.

    Ummm...because she said "But for long term, I don't see this working for me at all. To those who can do it long term, I truly applaud you. But for me, I gotta have dairy, grains and legumes"...
  • Posts: 4,899 Member
    Well you can list and pronounce all of the ingredients that go into cooking a rib eye steak, right? Meat, spices, maybe butter and oil...Versus say a Twinkie? Lol

    Having an advanced degree allows one to eat more food. I like this approach . . .
  • Posts: 29,136 Member
    Well you can list and pronounce all of the ingredients that go into cooking a rib eye steak, right? Meat, spices, maybe butter and oil...Versus say a Twinkie? Lol

    If I do the cooking then yes….if Vinnie in the kitchen at so and so restaurant is doing the cooking then no….I also have no idea how they processed said ribeye when they butchered the cow and then packaged the meat either...
  • Posts: 967 Member
    and eating in a deficit does not work for you? How do you lose weight then?

    I've lost weight through calorie reduction using several different methods (weight watchers, calorie counting..etc.), but none of them were sustainable for me and I always ended up gaining most of the weight back. Counting points/cals/macros makes me want to tear my own eyeballs out of my head. It just isn't for me, and I personally think that a lifetime of counting everything that goes in mouth sounds like hell. I would much rather do what I am doing now, and have been doing for over 2 years, to maintain my weight (and much more importantly my health & quality of life) than commit to a lifetime of counting.
    why are they not worth eating for you?

    Because when I was eating them, I was sick, tired and overweight. When I do eat gluten, I become very sick for 7-10 days. Dairy, on the other hand, has a shorter term effect, but still not worth it. When I eat processed sugary foods (such as candy) I get out of control moody & tired and have hard time not eating more and more of it (even though I know it's making me feel like crap!). I've never thought legumes were very yummy, other than peanut butter, which I do eat on occasion. I'm not suffering or missing any foods that I love. I just replaced those things that make me feel bad with things that don't. I've fallen in love with a whole other list of foods like avocado, sweet potatoes, beef brisket...the list goes on & on!

  • If I do the cooking then yes….if Vinnie in the kitchen at so and so restaurant is doing the cooking then no….I also have no idea how they processed said ribeye when they butchered the cow and then packaged the meat either...
    Yes we more or less process and manipulate most foods when we preserve, cook, grill, fry and dolly them up with spices or whatever unless your on a 100% raw diet. So what then? I would be just as healthy eating a well balanced diet full of twinkies, icecream, pizza, bacon and burgers as one with lean mean meats, veggies, fruits, nut and possibly whole grains that are closer to their natural state? Lol
  • I am eating what would be considered a paleo diet. I didn't buy the book, so I don't follow that plan exactly. I have decided to "just eat real food" (JERF). I have cut out sugar (and sugar substitutes), wheat, corn, and soy. I eat eggs and dairy ocassionally. I feel MUCH better! I am not caught up in all the counting (calories, carbs, etc) and I am learning to eat only when I'm hungry - truly hungry. This was the first "diet" that I've ever done where I don't have sugar crashes because my blood sugar has stabilized and I don't get false hunger. It's been an amazing plan for me!:love::love: :love:

    I'm kind of a foodie, so I've had to find ways to make food interesting while keeping with my plan. Here's a link to one of my favorite cookbooks from chef Able James - the Fat-burning Man: http://369370uvwoxlm3mxxet9y3ipfv.hop.clickbank.net/. Also, I've just started a Facebook page for people to share products, successes, and comments: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Paleo-Living/205581602969270.
  • Posts: 720 Member

    because we all know our paleolithic brethren loved some peanut butter...

    hahaha
  • Posts: 16,913 Member
    Well you can list and pronounce all of the ingredients that go into cooking a rib eye steak, right? Meat, spices, maybe butter and oil...Versus say a Twinkie? Lol

    I checked and yeah, I can in fact pronounce everything in a twinkie.
  • Posts: 4,899 Member
    Yes we more or less process and manipulate most foods when we preserve, cook, grill, fry and dolly them up with spices or whatever unless your on a 100% raw diet. So what then? I would be just as healthy eating a well balanced diet full of twinkies, icecream, pizza, bacon and burgers as one with lean mean meats, veggies, fruits, nut and possibly whole grains that are closer to their natural state? Lol

    In a word? Yes.

  • I checked and yeah, I can in fact pronounce everything in a twinkie.
    Good but do you know what they are?
  • Posts: 16,913 Member
    Good but do you know what they are?

    Yes, actually. It's not a complicated list.

    http://www.today.com/id/38872091/ns/today-today_food/t/ingredients-twinkie-eaters-ingest/#.UuWfpRB6eUk

    Which ones of these do you not know/aren't able to figure out the purpose of via it's name?
  • Posts: 29,136 Member
    Yes we more or less process and manipulate most foods when we preserve, cook, grill, fry and dolly them up with spices or whatever unless your on a 100% raw diet. So what then? I would be just as healthy eating a well balanced diet full of twinkies, icecream, pizza, bacon and burgers as one with lean mean meats, veggies, fruits, nut and possibly whole grains that are closer to their natural state? Lol

    well, I go more 80/20…80% healthy and 20% whatever I want. I cook my own food, but do not fret over "processed" all that much. I find that hitting macros, eating in deficit, and lifting heavy works well for me and I still get to eat some of the foods that I like.

    Like tonight, I am going to have Linguine with clams and red sauce and a little bit of bread with that..and then I will have a serving of ice cream for dessert. I will be at about 2000 cals for the day which is a deficit for me…I will be a little over on carbs for the day but i will not fret it ..for the week I have hit my macros perfectly….

    ^ this just makes more sense to me then restricting a food group...

  • Yes, actually. It's not a complicated list.

    http://www.today.com/id/38872091/ns/today-today_food/t/ingredients-twinkie-eaters-ingest/#.UuWfpRB6eUk

    Which ones of these do you not know/aren't able to figure out the purpose of via it's name?
    Well thanks to the internet you can look up practically anything but come on who walks around knowing what exactly polysorbate60 is? Lol
  • Posts: 16,913 Member
    Well thanks to the internet you can look up practically anything but come on who walks around knowing what exactly polysorbate60 is? Lol

    I just want to note that there is no polysorbate60 in twinkies.

    Carry on.

  • I just want to note that there is no polysorbate60 in twinkies.

    Carry on.
    Well one site says it is an ingredient...I guess there's too many and people get confused lol. But that's beyond the point. I do not follow paleo but I originally said the positive about it was that it cuts out a lot of the processed unhealthy foods. And it more or less does. By eating primarily meats, veggies, fruits, and nuts your not eating Frankenfoods like Twinkies. And come on are we seriously going to argue that a Twinkie is highly nutritious right up there with broccoli? Lol

  • well, I go more 80/20…80% healthy and 20% whatever I want. I cook my own food, but do not fret over "processed" all that much. I find that hitting macros, eating in deficit, and lifting heavy works well for me and I still get to eat some of the foods that I like.

    Like tonight, I am going to have Linguine with clams and red sauce and a little bit of bread with that..and then I will have a serving of ice cream for dessert. I will be at about 2000 cals for the day which is a deficit for me…I will be a little over on carbs for the day but i will not fret it ..for the week I have hit my macros perfectly….

    ^ this just makes more sense to me then restricting a food group...
    I totally agree with 80/20 too lol. Your dinner sounds absolutely delicious by the way!
This discussion has been closed.