How I lost 6 and a half pounds in a night...
michael300891
Posts: 275
Probably one of the greatest excuse's people forward for dropping a diet or exercise routine is that they are not losing weight.
Most of the time, "not losing weight" is a relative term.
Those who have been dieting successfully for months or years understand that consistently losing 1lb a week is a serious achievement.
Unfortunately the greater proportion of 'dieters' out there, lose a huge amount of weight in the first week of a diet (several lbs) and expect these losses to be maintained. This of course never happens, and motivation is inevitably lost.
Most people refer to these large early losses as 'water weight'. In simple terms, when you have eaten a lot of nutrients, your muscle and liver is packed full of sugar, which is stored with water. If you stop eating or exercise, some of this sugar is burned up and the water is used elsewhere or urinated.
I wanted to demonstrate how extreme these losses can be.
In picture 1 (Last night: February 25) I have maintained a normal dietary intake, not eaten any food within 2-3 hours prior to the picture, I have urinated, and I am wearing joggers and socks (regret that decision now!)
In picture 2 (Tonight: February 26) I have eaten very little sugar (carbohydrate) throughout the day, and immediately before this picture I ran 3.5 miles and the picture is taken in the nude.
Picture 1: February 25
Picture 2: February 26
The difference in body weights is a staggering 6.5lbs.
Admittedly, the clothes take account for around 1lb of the difference, but the remaining 5.5lbs result entirely from differences in body sugar levels and hydration (as well as sodium intake and a few other factors).
IF I were to interpret this 5.5lb as a successful fat loss, which many poorly informed dieters unfortunately would, I am concluding that I have:
- Burned 19250kcal in a night. Which is equivalent to any of the following:
- The energy expended in 10 days of body weight maintenance for most females, or 7-8 day for most average males
- The energy expended running 6 to 8 marathons
- The energy expended in 70 hours of walking at a moderate intensity (3mph)
- The energy contained in 2-3 litres of vegetable oil
- The energy contained in 75 kitkat chunky bars
- The energy contained in 370oz sirloin steak
I am sure you can see where I am going with this. The amount of weight loss many people expect to achieve is entirely impossible. Only when you look at what a single pound of fat actually equates to, does this become clear.
There is a whole lot of energy in a pound of fat (3500kcal). The only way to lose body fat is a consistent negative energy balance, which is maintainable and realistic, so that it can be conducted over a long period of time.
I hope that this post has highlighted the reality of early losses, and I strongly suggest people who want to diet, reference their weight losses against a value determined several days into a diet, and understand that a regular weight loss of even half a pound a week is an achievement!
What are your thoughts on this issue, do you include 'water weight' loss, do you know people who do?
Just as a nice final note, here is a nice picture of one pound of fat which really shows what I'm trying to get across:
All the best with your goals!
Just for a little background on me, I'm a doctoral researcher in exercise metabolism and adaptation, but still fight obesity in my personal life everyday. I try to pass on all the information I learn through these forums and other sources. Feel free to add me or ask any questions anytime you wish
Cheers, Mike
Most of the time, "not losing weight" is a relative term.
Those who have been dieting successfully for months or years understand that consistently losing 1lb a week is a serious achievement.
Unfortunately the greater proportion of 'dieters' out there, lose a huge amount of weight in the first week of a diet (several lbs) and expect these losses to be maintained. This of course never happens, and motivation is inevitably lost.
Most people refer to these large early losses as 'water weight'. In simple terms, when you have eaten a lot of nutrients, your muscle and liver is packed full of sugar, which is stored with water. If you stop eating or exercise, some of this sugar is burned up and the water is used elsewhere or urinated.
I wanted to demonstrate how extreme these losses can be.
In picture 1 (Last night: February 25) I have maintained a normal dietary intake, not eaten any food within 2-3 hours prior to the picture, I have urinated, and I am wearing joggers and socks (regret that decision now!)
In picture 2 (Tonight: February 26) I have eaten very little sugar (carbohydrate) throughout the day, and immediately before this picture I ran 3.5 miles and the picture is taken in the nude.
Picture 1: February 25
Picture 2: February 26
The difference in body weights is a staggering 6.5lbs.
Admittedly, the clothes take account for around 1lb of the difference, but the remaining 5.5lbs result entirely from differences in body sugar levels and hydration (as well as sodium intake and a few other factors).
IF I were to interpret this 5.5lb as a successful fat loss, which many poorly informed dieters unfortunately would, I am concluding that I have:
- Burned 19250kcal in a night. Which is equivalent to any of the following:
- The energy expended in 10 days of body weight maintenance for most females, or 7-8 day for most average males
- The energy expended running 6 to 8 marathons
- The energy expended in 70 hours of walking at a moderate intensity (3mph)
- The energy contained in 2-3 litres of vegetable oil
- The energy contained in 75 kitkat chunky bars
- The energy contained in 370oz sirloin steak
I am sure you can see where I am going with this. The amount of weight loss many people expect to achieve is entirely impossible. Only when you look at what a single pound of fat actually equates to, does this become clear.
There is a whole lot of energy in a pound of fat (3500kcal). The only way to lose body fat is a consistent negative energy balance, which is maintainable and realistic, so that it can be conducted over a long period of time.
I hope that this post has highlighted the reality of early losses, and I strongly suggest people who want to diet, reference their weight losses against a value determined several days into a diet, and understand that a regular weight loss of even half a pound a week is an achievement!
What are your thoughts on this issue, do you include 'water weight' loss, do you know people who do?
Just as a nice final note, here is a nice picture of one pound of fat which really shows what I'm trying to get across:
All the best with your goals!
Just for a little background on me, I'm a doctoral researcher in exercise metabolism and adaptation, but still fight obesity in my personal life everyday. I try to pass on all the information I learn through these forums and other sources. Feel free to add me or ask any questions anytime you wish
Cheers, Mike
0
Replies
-
Nice post!0
-
Scrolled down fast for the nude pic!
Yep, 1lb fat looks truly vile!0 -
Unfortunately the greater proportion of 'dieters' out there, lose a huge amount of weight in the first week of a diet (several lbs) and expect these losses to be maintained. This of course never happens, and motivation is inevitably lost.
Just the post I needed to read.
My first two weeks I lost 3.3 and 4.1 pounds. It was great but then I lost only .7 in the 3rd week. It was a little diassapointing at first but then I remembered I am in a marathon, not a sprint.
All the best for you and your studies. :drinker:0 -
Awesome!0
-
Awesome post...however...
...you've got me craving KitKat Chunky bars!!0 -
AWESOME POST!!!!0
-
I really thought this was going to be a post about the norovirus.0
-
Great post!0
-
Thx for the enlightenment!0
-
This post directly answers a long whiny screed I wrote (and deleted before posting) about 20 minutes ago about poor me, I've been at the same weight for 8 days, blah blah blah. Fortunately I came to my senses and did not post it. But apparently you read it and answered anyway. How did you do that?!0
-
I know so many people who need to wrap their minds around this exact concept! Thank you!0
-
spot on. good post!0
-
This may indirectly answer a question I have looming. At some point I'll transition from deficit to surplus and try to build some muscle. I never really understood what the whole "water weight" thing meant and wondered if that transition would result in a big, quick move up on the scale. Kinda sounds like it will. Not that it matters, but good to be prepared for it. I knew the first week I started MFP that I didn't really lose 4 or 5 lbs. of fat. Same thing the other direction, I assume. Don't want to think you put on 5 lbs. of muscle after one work out. lol0
-
bump.0
-
Thanks for the positive comments so far guys its much appreciated, some really good points in here too!This may indirectly answer a question I have looming. At some point I'll transition from deficit to surplus and try to build some muscle. I never really understood what the whole "water weight" thing meant and wondered if that transition would result in a big, quick move up on the scale. Kinda sounds like it will. Not that it matters, but good to be prepared for it. I knew the first week I started MFP that I didn't really lose 4 or 5 lbs. of fat. Same thing the other direction, I assume. Don't want to think you put on 5 lbs. of muscle after one work out. lol
Yes that's a really important flip side of this post. If you suddenly up your energy intake from a cutting cycle, because your lifting weight, and your bodyweight jumps up 6 pounds, which it could do, your right it doesn't mean 6lb gains in muscle - which some people might think. However, I still think the 'water weight' concept is much more of an issue for your classic weight-loss dieter.0 -
:flowerforyou:0
-
I try not to think or say the word diet as it is an automatic sabotage for me butt when I am trying to loose weight and watch what I eat it seems all I think about is food more than I do when I am not dieting any suggestions or am I just nuts0
-
Fantastic post, my accountant brain loves all the numbers! Thanks for the reminder, I'm working on my patience, no giving up this time!!0
-
Wow I'm impressed. I should really celebrate every little success.0
-
:laugh:
Exactly.
The more we know, the more we grow.
Information is so important to shut that NEGATIVE loser in our heads UP!0 -
Thank you for putting it this way! Every time I've failed at dieting/eating right has been because of disillusionment with a weight plateau (that, or brownies). Or me expecting to lose 3 pounds a week, and being frustrated when I lose zero or 1 pound a week.
Side note, I have no idea what those numbers on your scale mean.0 -
Thank you for putting it this way! Every time I've failed at dieting/eating right has been because of disillusionment with a weight plateau (that, or brownies). Or me expecting to lose 3 pounds a week, and being frustrated when I lose zero or 1 pound a week.
Side note, I have no idea what those numbers on your scale mean.
I think the numbers on the scale mean Stones and then Pounds. In Europe that is how they measure things. We just had to do straight pounds here because we are American and thus difficult and we were pretty much desperately trying to stick it to the Brits in any way we could. How do you think we got American English? Webster basically messed around with European English until he made things different but still familiar. :laugh:
OP, Thanks for the enlightenment and the encouragement. The numbers on the scale pale in comparison to how much better I feel when I work out and eat right. :drinker:0 -
This makes me feel so much better. Wow.0
-
Thanks, Mike! This was awesome.0
-
I like to think of my fat loss in the form of how many Big Macs I would have to eat to gain it back.
10 lbs of fat is the equal to eating 63.67 Big Macs (42.67 if you also get medium fries and a diet Coke).
Those are US Big Macs and fries, so your mileage may vary.0 -
awesome post!0
-
I think the numbers on the scale mean Stones and then Pounds. In Europe that is how they measure things. We just had to do straight pounds here because we are American and thus difficult and we were pretty much desperately trying to stick it to the Brits in any way we could. How do you think we got American English? Webster basically messed around with European English until he made things different but still familiar
stones in england, kilograms for the rest of europe.0 -
Excellent OP and something I'm just about hitting. Woke up today feeling tired ... I have been exercising and eating some calories back but never to surplus for the last month. Today I realised I needed only to eat well & keep ticking over & it'll be fine... the scales hit a big low at 217 & I pretty much know I feel pre-ovulation bloated so I'm fairly confident later in the month it'll even out & be lower again0
-
this is a great post, actually, but i was hoping for a massive poop story.0
-
.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions