CURE FOR DIABETES ????

Options
2

Replies

  • amy_kee
    amy_kee Posts: 694 Member
    Options
    Some people can halt the progression into diabetes with these changes---if caught very early. However, there are many people out there that are at a good weight, or even under weight when they get diabetes. For them, weight and fat have nothing to do with their diabetes diagnosis. I do live with one of these people and have read, went to classes, seen CDE, and specialists. Sometimes, it just happens to people.
  • macchiatto
    macchiatto Posts: 2,890 Member
    Options
    The success stories forum has lots of posts from people who have successfully reversed their pre-diabetic status, by losing weight and exercising. It's doable - go get it OP!

    I did it. Both my parents, both grandmothers and one sister all have type II diabetes. I wasn't overweight when I found out I had prediabetes (5'7" and 150 lbs) and I already had a reasonably healthy diet, so I was a little concerned losing weight wouldn't help, but fortunately it did. I lost about 12 lbs on a low carb diet, continued exercising, and at my annual physical a year later found out my bloodwork was back in the normal range. Hoping to keep it there.
  • s1rens0ng
    s1rens0ng Posts: 127 Member
    Options
    i didnt think i would get it this young, ive been over weight for a few years but ive been an active healthy weight for at least 35 yrs previous to this, where as my 6 siblings have been always been t he complete opposite, over weight and obese , none active life styles and jobs and ate as much junk as they want and go out drinking several times a week to the pubs and they are at least 10 years older than me. a few of my brothers have developed type 2 after the age of 55, but my brother and sister that have been morbidly obese for 25 years haven't got it ?

    yes i will be trying out the newcastle uni diet as soon as the gp all clears me to do it. I had gained weight after a prolapsed disc and eating ordering out for food with no exercise for months , i had to lose the weight i had gained to have surgery on that.. ive almost lost enough to have surgery now but I TOTALY failed my M.O.T. ive also come up with an underactive thyroid and seems like theyre concerned about my heart too, i keep collapsing after a bit of exercise or im woke in the night with indigestion and then collapse so jumping the que to see a cardiologist asap.

    What a kick up the backside this is.. I think i would have been much worse off if i had not started to diet and try to exercise again this time last year.
  • AllonsYtotheTardis
    AllonsYtotheTardis Posts: 16,947 Member
    Options
    Check out Eat to Live, Super Immunity by Dr.Joel Fuhrman... He will also be on Dr. Oz this Monday to discuss a new way of eating for life. I am doing Eat to Live and am loving it! Good luck in reversing or keeping your diabetes at bay!

    lol

    you're seriously sending the OP to listen to TWO quacks?
  • bdubya55
    bdubya55 Posts: 506 Member
    Options
    "How Do We Define Cure of Diabetes?"
    American Diabetes Association (ADA) Diabetes Care Journal; November 2009; vol 32.

    "A consensus group comprised of experts in pediatric and adult endocrinology, diabetes education, transplantation, metabolism, bariatric/metabolic surgery, and (for another perspective) hematology-oncology met in June 2009 to discuss
    these issues."

    "The group considered a wide variety of questions, including whether it is ever accurate to say that a chronic illness is cured; what the definitions of management, remission, or cure might be; whether goals of managing comorbid conditions revert to those of patients without diabetes if someone is “cured”; and whether screening for diabetes complications needs to continue in the “cured” patient. Since little or no scientific or actuarial evidence exists to inform the group's discussions, consensus was difficult to attain in a number of areas. The opinions and recommendations expressed herein are those of the authors and not the official position of the American Diabetes Association."

    "These definitions and consensus recommendations, summarized are based on what the consensus group felt to be reasonable given the therapies of today. The authors hope that this article will engender active discussion in the field."

    "As new therapies of curative intent emerge for type 1 and type 2 diabetes and actuarial and scientific evidence regarding prognosis builds, these issues will surely require further deliberation."

    For further discussion, along with the full article can be found at the address below.

    http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/32/11/2133.full


    A fascinating read.
  • s1rens0ng
    s1rens0ng Posts: 127 Member
    Options
    "How Do We Define Cure of Diabetes?"
    American Diabetes Association (ADA) Diabetes Care Journal; November 2009; vol 32.

    "A consensus group comprised of experts in pediatric and adult endocrinology, diabetes education, transplantation, metabolism, bariatric/metabolic surgery, and (for another perspective) hematology-oncology met in June 2009 to discuss
    these issues."

    "The group considered a wide variety of questions, including whether it is ever accurate to say that a chronic illness is cured; what the definitions of management, remission, or cure might be; whether goals of managing comorbid conditions revert to those of patients without diabetes if someone is “cured”; and whether screening for diabetes complications needs to continue in the “cured” patient. Since little or no scientific or actuarial evidence exists to inform the group's discussions, consensus was difficult to attain in a number of areas. The opinions and recommendations expressed herein are those of the authors and not the official position of the American Diabetes Association."

    "These definitions and consensus recommendations, summarized are based on what the consensus group felt to be reasonable given the therapies of today. The authors hope that this article will engender active discussion in the field."

    "As new therapies of curative intent emerge for type 1 and type 2 diabetes and actuarial and scientific evidence regarding prognosis builds, these issues will surely require further deliberation."

    For further discussion, along with the full article can be found at the address below.

    http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/32/11/2133.full


    A fascinating read.

    hi thanks for your reply, it is interesting but it is also out dated , its from almost 5 years ago. Where as the newcastle uni diet link i posted is as recent as 6 months ago. :smile:
  • bdubya55
    bdubya55 Posts: 506 Member
    Options
    Albeit previously dated by only 5 years it presents a discussion defining the term "cured" by this consensus group of medical experts. :smile:
  • s1rens0ng
    s1rens0ng Posts: 127 Member
    Options
    Newcastle is stating that the problem is being removed and the function of the organs effected are returning to normal is that not cured?
    i wouldn't call it controlled or managed would you? :)

    i guess only time will tell , people are cured of cancer and sometimes it comes back.
  • Hearts_2015
    Hearts_2015 Posts: 12,031 Member
    Options
    October 2013 Newcastle universities biomedicine research facillity England, published this...

    http://www.ncl.ac.uk/magres/research/diabetes/reversal.htm

    After the recent news i had i thought i might give it a go, i was told im pre diabetic and can try to keep it at bay by changing my diet and exercising as if i have already got full blown type 2, but that i will no doubt have diabetes type 2 in the near future because of family history, im still producing some insulin but because i gained weight in my waist area the insulin im producing wont be working anyway :P

    It makes interesting reading and could change lives of many people, i would like your thoughts on this too though.
    I found the Newcastle study very helpful. The study contends that Type 2 is caused by excess fat in liver and pancreas and can be reversed by losing enough visceral fat. I have successfully reversed my diabetes inasmuch as I have been instructed to stop medicating.

    I was diagnosed with Type 2 in August 2012 with an hba1c of 10+, and began losing weight using MFP. It took me six months to drop 10% of body weight, by which time my hba1c had improved sufficiently for my GP to give me license to experiment with reducing metformin. I was originally prescribed 2000 mg of metformin daily.

    It took me another year to hit 20% of body weight lost. By this time my hba1c had been 4.9 for two tests running (three months apart) and I was only taking a single 500 mg tablet every other day. I was instructed to stop medicating altogether. This week I did my first hba1c following three months without medication. Hoping the results are still good.
    thanks for your input, both of you:flowerforyou:
  • shinkalork
    shinkalork Posts: 815 Member
    Options
    well it's not a cure but.... if this can help.
    One thing that can greatly reduce the glycemic level is the PITAYA fruit..."Dragon Fruit"
    Low cal,low sugar,super fruit full of vitamins and fiber......awesome in many many ways and it was proven that it does reduce the glycemic level.

    Anyway, just saying... no matter what. It's an awesome fruit so.... Healthy anyway!
  • AsaThorsWoman
    AsaThorsWoman Posts: 2,303 Member
    Options
    Bumping for later

    I have personally cured pre-diabetes symptoms through extreme diet alteration.
  • SLLRunner
    SLLRunner Posts: 12,943 Member
    Options
    There is no such thing as prediabetets. Its like being a little bit pregnant. --- Your diabetic or your not.
    Mmm....many doctors would disagree with you. Are you a doctor?
  • D_T_H
    D_T_H Posts: 39 Member
    Options
    not sure if I would call it cured but you can deff put the affects of type 2 into remission I have been type 2 for 5 to 6 years. I have been taken off of meds now from diet and exercise and this is the term my doctor used and says if I continue with the path I am on that there is now strong evidence that the high blood surgar levels will not return but if I stop the path and return to old ways they will most certainly return good luck to the op I wish you all the best it can be prevented
  • PrimalGirl
    PrimalGirl Posts: 148 Member
    Options
    http://www.diabetes-warrior.net/

    This guy is being sued by the American Medical Board for "offering medical advice when he is not a trained medical practitioner" - all because he keeps a blog of how diet and exercise have cleared us every diabetic symptom he had.

    It's a fascinating read, even for someone like me, who doesn't have the condition.
  • 2hobbit1
    2hobbit1 Posts: 820 Member
    Options
    There is no such thing as prediabetets. Its like being a little bit pregnant. --- Your diabetic or your not.
    Mmm....many doctors would disagree with you. Are you a doctor?

    I am a PWD - person with diabetes, my education comes from living with this 24/7/365 as compared to most MDs who get maybe 2 hours in medical school. For most Docs that means 2 hours of information based on treatment standards and knowledge from 20 or more years ago. For me it meant reaching out to the DOC Diabetic online comunity for information and advice on how to procede when my doc was clueless.
    I have had to make my own diagnosis since the ER had it completely wrong, teach my PMD so I was able to get the correct testing and then get in with a good Endo who is up to date with the latest therapy protocols and tech. As it is i have had to lead my endo team to learn about solutions that are used in the pediatric world but not common in adult practice. In short this is my disease and I have had to find out what works for me since each PWD responds differently to meals, carbs, kinds of carbs as well as exercise, medications etc.

    I stand by the no such thing as prediabetes - let me explain why I say this - and yes MDs do use the term and so does the American diabetes Association, both to the detriment of those that they are suposed to advocate for or treat.

    Prediabetes is defined by the A1C range.
    Normal is less than 5.7, prediabetic is 5.7 to less than 6.5, and diabetic is anything equal to or greater than 6.5.

    So what exactly is an A1C - it is a test that measures the average serum glucose level for about the last 3 months. it is based on the ability of glucose to permanantly attach to your red bllod cells. These red cells have on average a three month life span before they are destroyed. new cells are constanly being made to replace those that are removed. The higher the serum glucose is at any time the higer permanntly bound glucose and the A1C will be. BUT remember that this is an average.
    It does not tell you how high you spike with the meals that you eat. You can be low over night and spike for each meal and not really see how high you go.

    If you look at the conversion tables for A1Cs the average Serum BG that coresponds to the prediabetic range is 117 to 140.
    Remember that this is the average. An average that high means there is considerable time spent well above the 140 range.

    So why is this bad - any time spent above 140 causes permanant damage to nerves, blood vesels and organs. It may be a tiny amount for each minute but it is real and it adds up over time. Persons with normal glucose metabolism rarely go over 110 - 120 so they rarely hit the 140 threshold.

    As a "Prediabetic" you are living a portion of you life in the danger zone and causing permant harm before you even get called a diabetic and offered therapy and more importantly before you are made aware that you are harming yourself. When you see your PMD and your numbers are little high what do they tell you? Watch your sugar, be more active, lose a little weigh. There is never any mention of the damage that is being done, There is also no information on how to know how high your BGs go post meals, or how to test you own individual responce to the foods you eat. If you do not have this information then how do you know what you are trying is working? Do they even tell you that all carbs - not just sugar must be restircted to prevent damage? That your pre meal and post meal BG readings should not be more than 40 points different. That some kinds of carbs, or amounts of carbs will be fine for you but others will not and the only way you will find this out is to poke your finger and test? Most of the time you can not get a MD to prescribe a glucose meter and and adequate number of test strips.

    Many presons have longstanding ireversable damage to sight, kidney, nerves by the time they final get called diabetic and even then it is a struggle to get adequete informationa on diet, BG testing as well as being almost imposible for many T2s to get adequet numbers of BG test trips without paying out of pocket. Even when you are finally diagnosed there is no real emphisis on getting you numbers into a save level quickly. Many new T2s linger in the 250-300 range for weeks before the perscribed oral meds finally have an effect. Would you want that to be you or a family menber? it is almost a gauranty of a less than favorble long term out come.

    I find it sad that here is much more emphesis on treating the side effects via big pharma than giving people the education and tools to prevent the issues in the first place. Have you seen the pharma adds recently? Have you heard about the proposed medicare/medicaid restrictions on test strips for T2s to one strip once a week?

    Alot of this has to do with the preception that there is always a poor out come for T2s, and that you will not take care of yourself so why bother treating aggressivly. And its your fault since your a lazy slob so why spend money on you, BUT if patients are provided with accurate information and the tools to *kitten*, modify and treat their disease then it does not need to happen.

    Each diabetic is different in how they handle the foods they eat. Most need to restrict their carb intake to about half of the ADA or Registerd Diatician recomended amount for diabetics. I spiked to over 300 when I ate the "Diabetic Diet" given me when I was in hospital at my diagnosis. With the right tools and the right knowledge I have my A1C down to normal levels. Am I cured - NO! Not until they have a therapy that will change my molecular genetic makeup and prevent my abnormal glucose metabolism. Can
    I keep the complications at bay? Yes as long as I have/can afford the right tools. If i stop diong what i'm doing right or if my body decides to through me a few more curves than I'm going to have to start over again.

    I'm currently blessed with very good health insurance but when I retire I'll be having to deal with Medicare and from what Im hearing these days I'm very much not looking forward to it.
  • Dragonwolf
    Dragonwolf Posts: 5,600 Member
    Options
    Newcastle is stating that the problem is being removed and the function of the organs effected are returning to normal is that not cured?
    i wouldn't call it controlled or managed would you? :)

    i guess only time will tell , people are cured of cancer and sometimes it comes back.

    I think a better term would be "remission." I think its arguable that people who have had Diabetes are at higher risk of redeveloping it, much like a cancer patient is more likely to redevelop cancer. In either case, they're "cured" in the sense that it's gone, for now, but there's a chance it'll come back.

    That said, mainstream medicine being more likely to acknowledge that diet can send at least Type 2 Diabetes into remission is a win in my book, though I think there are better ways to go about it than through starvation diets.
  • acpgee
    acpgee Posts: 7,651 Member
    Options
    October 2013 Newcastle universities biomedicine research facillity England, published this...

    http://www.ncl.ac.uk/magres/research/diabetes/reversal.htm

    After the recent news i had i thought i might give it a go, i was told im pre diabetic and can try to keep it at bay by changing my diet and exercising as if i have already got full blown type 2, but that i will no doubt have diabetes type 2 in the near future because of family history, im still producing some insulin but because i gained weight in my waist area the insulin im producing wont be working anyway :P

    It makes interesting reading and could change lives of many people, i would like your thoughts on this too though.
    I found the Newcastle study very helpful. The study contends that Type 2 is caused by excess fat in liver and pancreas and can be reversed by losing enough visceral fat. I have successfully reversed my diabetes inasmuch as I have been instructed to stop medicating.

    I was diagnosed with Type 2 in August 2012 with an hba1c of 10+, and began losing weight using MFP. It took me six months to drop 10% of body weight, by which time my hba1c had improved sufficiently for my GP to give me license to experiment with reducing metformin. I was originally prescribed 2000 mg of metformin daily.

    It took me another year to hit 20% of body weight lost. By this time my hba1c had been 4.9 for two tests running (three months apart) and I was only taking a single 500 mg tablet every other day. I was instructed to stop medicating altogether. This week I did my first hba1c following three months without medication. Hoping the results are still good.
    thanks for your input, both of you:flowerforyou:

    Yippee. My hba1c is 5.0 after 3 months without medication.
  • bcattoes
    bcattoes Posts: 17,299 Member
    Options
  • SLLRunner
    SLLRunner Posts: 12,943 Member
    Options
    2Hobbit,

    Thanks for sharing you experience as a diabetic, but you are wrong about there being no pre-diabetes. Millions have been diagnosed with it, specifically several people I know. No offense intended, but just because you are diabetic does not mean you know everything about the disease. It comes across as medical advice, for which you are not qualified to give.
  • 2hobbit1
    2hobbit1 Posts: 820 Member
    Options
    2Hobbit,

    Thanks for sharing you experience as a diabetic, but you are wrong about there being no pre-diabetes. Millions have been diagnosed with it, specifically several people I know. No offense intended, but just because you are diabetic does not mean you know everything about the disease. It comes across as medical advice, for which you are not qualified to give.

    Yes the medical profession uses the term a lot and many people are called prediabetic by their MDs. I do not doubt that you and many on the boards know many people with that designation.

    The point I'm trying to make is that the Blood Glucose and A1C levels that are used to make that designation still put the the "prediabetic" in the danger range for permanant tissue damamge. Just because your average is not above 140 does not mean you are not going above that with every carb heavy meal you eat.. The only way to know is to test your BG 90-120 minutes after your meals to see how high you peak with the various amounts and kind of carbs you eat . Any one can do this if they choose - you do not need a doctors order to do this testing - you can get a meter and strips from Walmart or you local chain Pharmacy if you choose. They are sold over the counter. The pharmacist will even help you learn how to do it if you want. If you spend a few bucks and find that your glucose metabolism is normal then good for you, but if not then you have a tool to help your self.

    If you put a group of people in a room and tell them they are prediabetic and just loose a little weight, watch your sugar, exercise a bit more and you will be fine but do not give them any other information how many people will take it seriously?

    If you put the same group of people in a room and tell them they are prediabetic and instead say that the longer you stay above 140 post meals the more permanant damage you will do to your self. BUT here are the tools and the information to keep the damage from happening, many more will folow through and take care of themselves and work to prevent any future problems.

    This same information is what should be given to all diabetics, and at this point it all too frequently does not happen even when the diagnosis is that you are are now diabetic. Most commonly you're give a perscription for an oral medication, if your lucky you get a trip to Certified diabetic Educator, and if you hit the jackpot you get a meter and test strips. Then your told to come back in a couple of months.

    Knowledge is the biggest part of getting on top of this disease - but most people have to go find it on their own since they do not get it from their medical practitioners.

    If you're interested a good book to start with is

    Think Like a Pancreas by Gary Scheiner

    Good websites - these are links to the suport forums, the main pages have a lot of info, but the member pages are outstanding

    http://community.diabetes.org/?loc=util-header_connect
    http://www.tudiabetes.org/forum

    If recomending self education is giving medical advice then so be it. There is so much mis and dis information out there in the media these days, so many quack cures and so many public policy decisions driven by this missinformation that a bit of advocacy is not out of place.