Bumped Calories Up But I'm Worried It'll Bite Me In The Butt
sarahmbm
Posts: 36 Member
I'm pretty lean, pear-shaped, but need to lose 10-15 pounds.
After reading posts about TDEE and BMR, I figured out I needed to eat about 1700 calories to lose weight (as opposed to the 1200 I've been eating for weeks).
But today, after logging, I'm anxious that I'm misguided in upping calories, and when I get on the scale in a week, I'll have gained, not lost. Feels like a big gamble.
Any other fairly healthy lean people with 10-15 pounds to lose make the leap to bumping up calories? Did it payoff? Or bite you in the butt?
After reading posts about TDEE and BMR, I figured out I needed to eat about 1700 calories to lose weight (as opposed to the 1200 I've been eating for weeks).
But today, after logging, I'm anxious that I'm misguided in upping calories, and when I get on the scale in a week, I'll have gained, not lost. Feels like a big gamble.
Any other fairly healthy lean people with 10-15 pounds to lose make the leap to bumping up calories? Did it payoff? Or bite you in the butt?
0
Replies
-
Same problem here, I just found out that I've been eating around 300kcal less than I should and my partner even worse (around 1500 instead of 2200!!!) I'm worried that increasing the intake by such a massive amount will mess up all the effort and hard work... Would love to hear expert opinions on this!0
-
I did it. Hovered for a couple of weeks and now I'm back to losing. I went from 1200 to 1450 (+exercise calories) . When I lose another 3-4kilos I plan on upping my calories again.
Don't be scared to up.0 -
up your calories 100 a week till you get to TDEE -10%0
-
When I got to less than half a stone to lose I upped my calories and then upped them slowly again after I got to goal. I've been on maintenance for three months today and have continued to lose weight despite eating at maintenance. I'm upping my calories slowly as I don't want to lose any more.0
-
WARNING: You will initially see a gain in weight.
DON'T PANIC!
This will mostly be caused by an increase in glycogen levels due to eating more food. This is part of what people call water weight.
Try 1700 calories for at least 4 weeks before assessing if it is causing you to gain or lose weight.0 -
Whatever you do, if you are burning more calories than you consume, you will lose weight. Sometimes changes to your routine can make you stall or even gain a little temporarily, but overall if you have a calorie deficit you will lose.
Edited because I contradicted myself, ha!0 -
I did
I also started weight training the week I bumped up my calories from 1200 to 1900,
The scale went up by 2kgs and stayed there for 6 weeks.
BUT I measured myself and took photos and while the scale didnt move cm's came off, so I was losing.
Dont trust the scale for accurate weight loss, measure yourself now and check in once a week!
Good luck :flowerforyou:0 -
Would be interested to hear responses to this. I too was on a 1200kcal 'diet'. I have gradually increased to 1540kcal (based on TDEE) but not really seeing loss at the moment.0
-
i was eating around 1300-1500, training intensely 6 days a week but not loosing weight, i was told by numerous people to eat more but i kept ignoring it till last week i went away and ended up eating way over my normal range and lost weight! so for the past week iv been on 1800-2000 per day which im struggling with mentally even though im not hungry all the time and i can eat a wide variety of food, not measured myself yet :S eek!0
-
I just recently bumped to about 1700 cals vs. the range of 1100 to 1300 I was eating. Lost pretty steady til about a month ago, since I am closer to my goal I suppose? Personal trainer told me I needed to bump to like 1900, absolutely scared to do so! So im meeting half way at 1700. Resistance training and weight lifting 3x a week and cardio 3x a week. I gained about 5lbs the first two weeks but it is now tapered back off to my previous weight now after about a month. So technically no loss on the scale, but overall no gain either. Anxious to see some similar responses.0
-
Bumping up calories does not increase weight loss.
If you are eating at a deficit, you will lose weight, not matter how large or how small that deficit is.
If you weren't losing at 1200, you WILL NOT lose at whatever you bump it up to.
And if you do, you clearly weren't eating at 1200.
There are so many misconceptions when it comes to eating more to way less.
And unfortunately, most of you in this thread are severely misguided.0 -
Bumping up calories does not increase weight loss.
If you are eating at a deficit, you will lose weight, not matter how large or how small that deficit is.
If you weren't losing at 1200, you WILL NOT lose at whatever you bump it up to.
And if you do, you clearly weren't eating at 1200.
There are so many misconceptions when it comes to eating more to way less.
And unfortunately, most of you in this thread are severely misguided.
I'm sorry but that's not necessarily right.. If you're eating too few calories (1200 that I used to eat sometimes was even under my BMR!) metabolism slows down to minimum and body preserves every calorie it gets.. That's why bumping up calories but still eating at deficit can help as it kick starts the metabolism again...0 -
Bumping up calories does not increase weight loss.
If you are eating at a deficit, you will lose weight, not matter how large or how small that deficit is.
If you weren't losing at 1200, you WILL NOT lose at whatever you bump it up to.
And if you do, you clearly weren't eating at 1200.
There are so many misconceptions when it comes to eating more to way less.
And unfortunately, most of you in this thread are severely misguided.
What exactly would you suggest people do that aren't losing on 1200 then? Lower their calories to 800, for example?0 -
Very true!
I'm trying to bump to 1000, because I was used to stay around 800 ( I usually exercise everyday). My metabolism was so slow that I wasn't losing weight. In the last two days I have starting to eat carbs (not a huge amount, but enough to reach 950 cal.) And I lost 1.1 lb.
I'm still working on it. And it's hard, mentally and physically, almost like cutting cal.0 -
Bumping up calories does not increase weight loss.
If you are eating at a deficit, you will lose weight, not matter how large or how small that deficit is.
If you weren't losing at 1200, you WILL NOT lose at whatever you bump it up to.
And if you do, you clearly weren't eating at 1200.
There are so many misconceptions when it comes to eating more to way less.
And unfortunately, most of you in this thread are severely misguided.
I'm sorry but that's not necessarily right.. If you're eating too few calories (1200 that I used to eat sometimes was even under my BMR!) metabolism slows down to minimum and body preserves every calorie it gets.. That's why bumping up calories but still eating at deficit can help as it kick starts the metabolism again...
No this is not necessarily right. Adaptive thermogenisis does happen but it takes a while for that to happen and a while is not a couple weeks/months. The body does not "preserve" every calorie it gets.
I am by no means saying 1200 calories is appropriate for many people...but if you truely are eating it you will lose weight.
It is not horrible to eat under your BMR either....
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/1058378-oh-noes-i-am-eating-below-my-bmr
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/1084912-good-starvation-mode-article0 -
Bumping up calories does not increase weight loss.
If you are eating at a deficit, you will lose weight, not matter how large or how small that deficit is.
If you weren't losing at 1200, you WILL NOT lose at whatever you bump it up to.
And if you do, you clearly weren't eating at 1200.
There are so many misconceptions when it comes to eating more to way less.
And unfortunately, most of you in this thread are severely misguided.
What exactly would you suggest people do that aren't losing on 1200 then? Lower their calories to 800, for example?
No start weighing food because they are probably eating more than they think.0 -
up your calories 100 a week till you get to TDEE -10%
This this thissy this.0 -
Bumping up calories does not increase weight loss.
If you are eating at a deficit, you will lose weight, not matter how large or how small that deficit is.
If you weren't losing at 1200, you WILL NOT lose at whatever you bump it up to.
And if you do, you clearly weren't eating at 1200.
There are so many misconceptions when it comes to eating more to way less.
And unfortunately, most of you in this thread are severely misguided.
What exactly would you suggest people do that aren't losing on 1200 then? Lower their calories to 800, for example?
No start weighing food because they are probably eating more than they think.
You again! Can't you leave me alone? :laugh:0 -
Bumping up calories does not increase weight loss.
If you are eating at a deficit, you will lose weight, not matter how large or how small that deficit is.
If you weren't losing at 1200, you WILL NOT lose at whatever you bump it up to.
And if you do, you clearly weren't eating at 1200.
There are so many misconceptions when it comes to eating more to way less.
And unfortunately, most of you in this thread are severely misguided.
What exactly would you suggest people do that aren't losing on 1200 then? Lower their calories to 800, for example?
No start weighing food because they are probably eating more than they think.
You again! Can't you leave me alone? :laugh:
????? sorry not sure what you are talking about....0 -
Bumping up calories does not increase weight loss.
If you are eating at a deficit, you will lose weight, not matter how large or how small that deficit is.
If you weren't losing at 1200, you WILL NOT lose at whatever you bump it up to.
And if you do, you clearly weren't eating at 1200.
There are so many misconceptions when it comes to eating more to way less.
And unfortunately, most of you in this thread are severely misguided.
What exactly would you suggest people do that aren't losing on 1200 then? Lower their calories to 800, for example?
No start weighing food because they are probably eating more than they think.
You again! Can't you leave me alone? :laugh:
????? sorry not sure what you are talking about....
Every time I comment on one of these threads you quote me and argue/disagree with me. We will never agree. Can you not just leave it, or put me on ignore?0 -
Bumping up calories does not increase weight loss.
If you are eating at a deficit, you will lose weight, not matter how large or how small that deficit is.
If you weren't losing at 1200, you WILL NOT lose at whatever you bump it up to.
And if you do, you clearly weren't eating at 1200.
There are so many misconceptions when it comes to eating more to way less.
And unfortunately, most of you in this thread are severely misguided.
What exactly would you suggest people do that aren't losing on 1200 then? Lower their calories to 800, for example?
No start weighing food because they are probably eating more than they think.
You again! Can't you leave me alone? :laugh:
????? sorry not sure what you are talking about....
Every time I comment on one of these threads you quote me and argue/disagree with me. We will never agree. Can you not just leave it, or put me on ignore?
Not sure what you are talking about to be honest...I commented on a thread....by quoting the last post I saw.
You my good women are a bit paranoid if you think I have time to "follow" you around the forums....:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Esp considering I don't remember seeing you before....
*slowly backs away and hands poster tinfoil hat*0 -
Bumping up calories does not increase weight loss.
If you are eating at a deficit, you will lose weight, not matter how large or how small that deficit is.
If you weren't losing at 1200, you WILL NOT lose at whatever you bump it up to.
And if you do, you clearly weren't eating at 1200.
There are so many misconceptions when it comes to eating more to way less.
And unfortunately, most of you in this thread are severely misguided.
What exactly would you suggest people do that aren't losing on 1200 then? Lower their calories to 800, for example?
No start weighing food because they are probably eating more than they think.
You again! Can't you leave me alone? :laugh:
????? sorry not sure what you are talking about....
Every time I comment on one of these threads you quote me and argue/disagree with me. We will never agree. Can you not just leave it, or put me on ignore?
Not sure what you are talking about to be honest...I commented on a thread....by quoting the last post I saw.
You my good women are a bit paranoid if you think I have time to "follow" you around the forums....:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Esp considering I don't remember seeing you before....
*slowly backs away and hands poster tinfoil hat*
You said that the last time we had a disagreement. Am I going to find you hiding in my bins? Stalker! :laugh:0 -
Recently bumped my calories up also. Same concern. Close to maintenance. I've done a lot of calculations and I find that I don't really know what my caloric intake should be. Everything gives me a different answer. I'm confused. Haven't been able to meet or even get close to Protein macro, which led me to I'm not allowing enough calories in to meet that macro. Trial and error, right? What is my body trying to tell me?0
-
Bumping up calories does not increase weight loss.
If you are eating at a deficit, you will lose weight, not matter how large or how small that deficit is.
If you weren't losing at 1200, you WILL NOT lose at whatever you bump it up to.
And if you do, you clearly weren't eating at 1200.
There are so many misconceptions when it comes to eating more to way less.
And unfortunately, most of you in this thread are severely misguided.
I'm sorry but that's not necessarily right.. If you're eating too few calories (1200 that I used to eat sometimes was even under my BMR!) metabolism slows down to minimum and body preserves every calorie it gets.. That's why bumping up calories but still eating at deficit can help as it kick starts the metabolism again...
No this is not necessarily right. Adaptive thermogenisis does happen but it takes a while for that to happen and a while is not a couple weeks/months. The body does not "preserve" every calorie it gets.
I am by no means saying 1200 calories is appropriate for many people...but if you truely are eating it you will lose weight.
It is not horrible to eat under your BMR either....
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/1058378-oh-noes-i-am-eating-below-my-bmr
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/1084912-good-starvation-mode-article
Thanks for that article, it clears up a lot of mess in my head..:) Although I wasn't talking about starvation mode (yep, that 'preserving every kcal' is bull**** i know) I just believed that the slow down of metabolism plays much bigger part.. I hit the plateau and only lost about 0.3kg in like two months and after increasing the calories my weight started going down again.. But I also started tracking it more closely plus thanks to sticking to my macros I don't need a cheat days anymore (which I did have before and it included a decent amount of alcohol. I understand now what followed..). Either way I am still an advocate of increasing calories if they seem to be way too low. it certainly helped me get back on track and limit cravings that always became stronger than me eventually... However thanks to that article my arguments for this stance have changed, thank you!0 -
Such controversy! Who knew people were so passionate about caloric intake?! The drama!
To clarify: I really was eating 1200 calories and I do weigh my food.
I changed my settings to lose .5 pounds a week per the suggestion of a post I saw about people who have ten pounds or less to lose (which is me).
Since then, I've been losing weight at a much quicker rate. Also, I'm not hungry all the time.
I'm figuring out that it really is about figuring out what works for your body/situation and going with that. There is some trial and error involved.0 -
You need to give it a few weeks at least, don't get discouraged! I did it and its the best thing I ever did!0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.1K Introduce Yourself
- 43.7K Getting Started
- 260.1K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 419 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.9K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.5K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions