Burning 1000 Cal a workout?????
reese1206
Posts: 229
I'm sure this has been asked tons BUT I burn about 1000 calories per workout (mostly more). MFP has me on a 1200 Cal diet.....About how many Calories should I consume daily. I would just like actual calories that I need posted.....I don't want to have to add and subtract to figure it out. I'm not good at all that. Thank you LOTS : )
I am 5'7" and about 170lbs right now.
EDIT**** I use a HRM
I am 5'7" and about 170lbs right now.
EDIT**** I use a HRM
0
Replies
-
if you wanted to keep your net calories at 1200/day, and you burn about 1000 in exercise, you should be eating 2200 calories a day.0
-
I will still lose weight this way?0
-
I'm sure this has been asked tons BUT I burn about 1000 calories per workout (mostly more). MFP has me on a 1200 Cal diet.....About how many Calories should I consume daily. I would just like actual calories that I need posted.....I don't want to have to add and subtract to figure it out. I'm not good at all that. Thank you LOTS : )
I am 5'7" and about 170lbs right now.
What do you do that burns 1000 cals and for how long! i need to try it lol0 -
Absolutely! If you are working out that much, you should be eating most, if not all, of your exercise calories! Your NET calories will still be 1200 - which is what you need to lose weight. If you didn't eat back your exercise calories, your NET would be like, 200 - and you could not survive long on that!!!0
-
How many times a week do you burn 1000 calories? My aim is to burn 1000 too at every gym session, what sort of stuff do you do?0
-
You're going to have to do trial and error. Everyone is different. I took advice & started to put my net calories at 1200/day & that was disastrous for me.0
-
Many people make a decision to eat back all of their exercise calories or just half. I eat half of my exercise calories. So if your base is 1,200 calories you would eat an addition 500 calories on top of that to eat half the exercise calories. Of course, adjust it if you're not getting results.0
-
what are you doing to burn 1000 calories each workout? I do strength and treadmill and in an hour burn between 500 - 600. How long are you working out? Just curious....I need to find something that works for me!0
-
yep! believe it or not you gotta eat to lose weight (of course you gotta eat all the good stuff)
because if you ate 1200 calories and burned 1000, your body would be running on 200 cals a day, and if you keep it up your body will start storing fat and you won't lose any weight.
some people don't eat their exercise calories back, some eat them all back, some eat 75% back. you gotta see what works for you, but I think it's important to eat back your exercise calories so your body has the fuel it needs to get through the day and process your 1000 calorie workout!0 -
I'm sort of a newbie here, but not a newbie to working out at intense levels for extended periods of time.
Bethybooo, you should really consider any activity that you do for exercise, on MFP's calcs, to be overestimated. For the first few weeks I was doing it, I'd go for a 30 minute run and it would say that I had burned 500 cals. I'm a 200lb dude, mid 30's, so I thought that seemed right. But when I enter my bicycling time and my average speed, there is a HUGE gap between what my HR monitor is showing and what MFP calcs. For instance, 100 minutes out riding my bike at 17 mph comes in somewhere around 1900 calories burned. My HR monitor shows the actual energy output to be around 1200 calories. I take the lower one.
I really do think there is a conspiracy that is buried into our public health policies to underestimate how much we are eating, and overestimate how much we are working out. It just makes good sense to do so, from a capitalistic standpoint!!0 -
you might end up gaining if you only take in 200 calories after burning 1000 on a 1200 cal diet. thats not enough to give your body the fuel it needs to function and your body may start storing calories which leads to weight gain, if im not mistaken. also depends on how often you excercise.0
-
As one responder said if you eating 1200 and burning 1000 is like eating 200 calories and not exercising you need to eat most if not all of your workout calories, follow the program as designed on MFP. MFP gives you a caloric deficit at 1200 and if you burn 1000 you must eat that 1000 to keep your deficit the same. If you are calculating calories burned correctly eating 1200 calories and not exercising is the same as burning 1000 calories and eating 2200.
How are you calculating calories burned? If you are not using an HRM you should only eat back 75%ish of you calories and your count may be quite a bit off. If you do have a HRM make sure you are backing out the calories you would have burned at rest anyway (about 1.5/min) so if you exercise for 2 hours and your HRM says 1000 you should only entre 820 (1000-180) and eat all 2020 (1200+820)0 -
Well today I burnt 1108 Calories in 88min
I did the elliptical for 15min
Treadmill for 50min
Spinning for 23 min
Everyday is different. Tomorrow will be about a 90 to 100 min workout. i will do cardio (not sure what yet) and weights. My goal each workout is to make it to at least 1000 calories. I workout Daily....On day 7 it is just the P90X stretching DVD that I do as my Rest day.0 -
I use a HRM Polar F6
Thank you so much...that helped : )As one responder said if you eating 1200 and burning 1000 is like eating 200 calories and not exercising you need to eat most if not all of your workout calories, follow the program as designed on MFP. MFP gives you a caloric deficit at 1200 and if you burn 1000 you must eat that 1000 to keep your deficit the same. If you are calculating calories burned correctly eating 1200 calories and not exercising is the same as burning 1000 calories and eating 2200.
How are you calculating calories burned? If you are not using an HRM you should only eat back 75%ish of you calories and your count may be quite a bit off. If you do have a HRM make sure you are backing out the calories you would have burned at rest anyway (about 1.5/min) so if you exercise for 2 hours and your HRM says 1000 you should only entre 820 (1000-180) and eat all 2020 (1200+820)0 -
I'm sure this has been asked tons BUT I burn about 1000 calories per workout (mostly more). MFP has me on a 1200 Cal diet.....About how many Calories should I consume daily. I would just like actual calories that I need posted.....I don't want to have to add and subtract to figure it out. I'm not good at all that. Thank you LOTS : )
I am 5'7" and about 170lbs right now.
Well- I am 5'7 too
Your calories will automatically be adjusted for the exact amount that you burn each day in your food tracker. So if you burn 1000 calories- you will receive 1000 extra calories in your food tracker- so I would say as long as you stay within the calories in the food tracker (after you log your excercise) you will be fine.0 -
To lose 10# per month you need to consume 1250 calories/day less than you are burning. That is pretty ambitious. Your calorie burn per day is your base metabolism (approximated from your age, gender & current weight) plus whatever you are burning through exercise, both normal daily activity level and formal exercise. Fitness Pal should tell you how many calories you have left after each meal and after exercise sessions if you enter the data as you go. If you can't find your exercise on the existing list check out Bodybuilding.com where they have a pretty extensive list (over 600 activities) in the calorie calculator section.0
-
I'm sort of a newbie here, but not a newbie to working out at intense levels for extended periods of time.
Bethybooo, you should really consider any activity that you do for exercise, on MFP's calcs, to be overestimated. For the first few weeks I was doing it, I'd go for a 30 minute run and it would say that I had burned 500 cals. I'm a 200lb dude, mid 30's, so I thought that seemed right. But when I enter my bicycling time and my average speed, there is a HUGE gap between what my HR monitor is showing and what MFP calcs. For instance, 100 minutes out riding my bike at 17 mph comes in somewhere around 1900 calories burned. My HR monitor shows the actual energy output to be around 1200 calories. I take the lower one.
I really do think there is a conspiracy that is buried into our public health policies to underestimate how much we are eating, and overestimate how much we are working out. It just makes good sense to do so, from a capitalistic standpoint!!
I couldnt agree more-0 -
Thank you all0
-
Also, that 1200 calories limit doesn't work for everyone. Quite a few, but not all. If I eat between 1200 - 1300 NET calories (that's taking my 500 - 650 calories workouts into account) per day, I stop losing weight. I actually have to eat more than that, around 1600 - 1700 before I actually start seeing weight loss.0
-
Does anybody know how much metabolism is sped up and how long it's in "burn" mode after a workout like this? I am new to this kind of tracking (where it subtracts off your exercise calories burned) -- not sure I like the way it implies to eat more... how do you figure out the balance there? Is it based on weight?0
-
Does anybody know how much metabolism is sped up and how long it's in "burn" mode after a workout like this? I am new to this kind of tracking (where it subtracts off your exercise calories burned) -- not sure I like the way it implies to eat more... how do you figure out the balance there? Is it based on weight?
It's going to depend on a lot of factors, and from person to person. A lot of this process is figuring out what works for you. Some things work, some things won't.0 -
I burn 1000-1300 in a 2 hour workout. Usually, I do a lot of interval running, and a lot of weights. I'd say 1 hour of running and 1 hour of weights. I usually push extra hard once I see that im near 1000, and do more sprints.0
-
To answer some of your questions when I burn 1,000 at the gym its usually by doing 1 hour on treadmill (600-700 cals- and half hour on cross trainer/eliptical 300 cal)0
-
Just a pointer, if you do not exercise every single day, remember to take into account that you may eat more on the days you do not do any exercise so only eating 75% of cals burned may work better and equal the bad days out, rather than eating them all back completely (However that is only if you sometimes eat over your allowance on days you do not exercise)0
-
Does anybody know how much metabolism is sped up and how long it's in "burn" mode after a workout like this? I am new to this kind of tracking (where it subtracts off your exercise calories burned) -- not sure I like the way it implies to eat more... how do you figure out the balance there? Is it based on weight?
MFP figures out your BMR (basal metabolic rate) based on your age, height, weight, using the Mifflin Jeor formula. This is the amount of calories you need just for your body to function, they would feed you this much if you were in a coma.
Then it asks you your activity level NOT INCLUDING exercise, for what you do in your daily life, work, school, taking care of kids, etc. It figures out your needed calories not including the exercise.
Then it asks you how many pounds you want to lose per week and subtracts a set amount of calories per day, 500 for 1 pound a week, 1,000 for 2 pounds a week, etc. (note: choosing 2 pounds a week is not the right thing to choose unless you are very obese).
It subtracts those calories, but only down to a minimum of 1200 a day.
Now, notice that all of that figuring above DID NOT INCLUDE EXERCISE. This is so that you would lose weight without any exercise, many people who come here are unable to exercise. When you DO exercise, you need to add more fuel. MFP adds those calories when you log your exercise. If you do not eat them, then you are creating too much of a calorie deficit which adds stress to your body which releases stress hormones and is unhealthy for you.0 -
I eat back at least half of my calories that I burn and I lose about 1lb per week.
I burn around 1,000-1,200 in a 90 minute zumba session.0 -
All exercise is not created equal, and it really comes down to your personal intensity level. This is why you can have a 10, 15 minute HIIT workout that burns VASTLY more calories than the figure given for 'Calishtenics - vigorous' or you can be an excellent runner and not be challenged at all for 30 minutes at 'Running - 7mph' and burn far less than it gives. My weightlifting, a pro athlete's routine, and a 2nd-week-in-the-gym lady's 30 minute weightlifting routine aren't even going to be in the same league but it's all going to tell you the same thing online. I got 775 calories for 50 minute of Brazilian Jiu Jitsu this morning, just like I do 2x every week, and I can guarantee you that some practices are quite a bit harder than others.
I personally don't like HRMs either unless you are training for an endurance event and want to fact-check yourself for pace and intensity. You don't burn any fat during a workout, after all, and there are tons of factors that can seriously affect how those calories affect you in the following period. It's a little like seeing how much stronger you are right after you finish lifting instead of waiting until the next exercise.
No to mention that high intensity conditioning and strength-training both have a lot more effect during the recovery period than moderate cardio. Rebuilding the body's infrastructure while resting increases BMR, and at rest is when you burn fat. If you don't give your body a stimulus that makes it rebuild and improve, even with the same amount of calories burned during the workout you'll burn less fat because you don't have that increased BMR in the recovery period. I think that this is a big factor in many people's plateau issues. If you don't keep updating your goals, your body won't be challenged as much as so won't burn as much during the same workout, as well as not having to do much for recovery.
These are just general guides, don't take them too seriously. If you want to get serious, get yourself some calipers and keep really close track of your body fat while keeping track of any strength/fitness gains. Lower calories until fat loss plateaus and fitness gains remain consistent. This will take quite a while and plenty of dedication but it's the only way to know for sure, with your workout and your body, what the exact reality is.0 -
So glad I am not the only one who burns close to this. (about 3 times a week!)
However I usually eat alot back. Heck one of the reasons I exercise like this is because I enjoy my food and prefer not to go on a low-cal diet!
Atleast aim for a protein shake, with milk, not water, on these sessions. And I would eat the same portion of dinner as my 6' 5 boyfriend too.
Feel free to befriend me.0 -
Eat when your hungry. I only use my exercise calories to catch me when I go over. I am not going to eat simply because this tells me too. If I am not hungry and i burned 1000 extra calories I am not going to go shove food in my face to appease myfitnesspal!0
-
Many people make a decision to eat back all of their exercise calories or just half. I eat half of my exercise calories. So if your base is 1,200 calories you would eat an addition 500 calories on top of that to eat half the exercise calories. Of course, adjust it if you're not getting results.
Everyone is different and ultimately you have to do what works for you. That said, this post and philosophy is pretty scary to me. This recommendation would result in a net of 700 calories/day. IMHO, this would be dangerous.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions