Putting on too much bodyfat, not nearly enough muscle...
Replies
-
What is your TDEE? If you're not eating above that then you're not gaining any muscle. And you're also not gaining any fat. As long as you're still eating at a deficit, what you are gaining is water weight.
My tdee is hard to gage because I lost so much weight (70 lbs) so it's going to be a lot less than that of a person who has been 133 lbs all her life, isn't that right?
For somebody who was 133 to start with, the lowest it would be (not including gym time) is 1700. With gym time added 3 times a week its something like 1900+ . Weight loss can cut a persons needed intake by several hundred calories, if I am not misinformed?
:huh: I have never heard this before...
The general idea is that if someone drops weight unhealthily and loses a lot of LBM, their maintenance calories at the end will be lower than expected. This is versus someone who has always been the same weight, because they haven't lost all the muscle. It could made a decent difference, I don't know about several hundred calories though. Maybe in extreme cases of VLCD and associated metabolic slowdown? Just another reason to lose weight slowly and lift lots of weights.0 -
I'm the same weight but shorter and cut on 1700 cals so I don't think 1530 is bulking for you unless you've done some serious damage to your metabolism.
I know I have. It's taken me a long time to get up to this many calories because I ****ed up my initial weight loss several years ago eating too little. I had no idea it was bad at the time, but once I did I slowly began reintroducing calories with no issues along the way. I told her this information, I've been UP to 1,500 for a while actually, the weight gain is relatively recent/unexplained.
how long have you been lifting?
because people see a lot of retention when they start lifting- water and the "poofy" feeling.0 -
What is your TDEE? If you're not eating above that then you're not gaining any muscle. And you're also not gaining any fat. As long as you're still eating at a deficit, what you are gaining is water weight.
My tdee is hard to gage because I lost so much weight (70 lbs) so it's going to be a lot less than that of a person who has been 133 lbs all her life, isn't that right?
For somebody who was 133 to start with, the lowest it would be (not including gym time) is 1700. With gym time added 3 times a week its something like 1900+ . Weight loss can cut a persons needed intake by several hundred calories, if I am not misinformed?
There is some truth to this (I've seen research that suggests this) but not by hundreds of calories.
Also, this change is reversible, the studies in question were done on people who did regular ways of dieting - no mention of strength training to maintain LBM while cutting or to increase it (via bulking cycles after dieting)... so my advice to you would be to get in the gym and lift heavy weights. Maybe do a bulk cycle then a cut cycle. You should be able to get your lean body mass back, and if there's any adaptive thermogenesis going on a bulk cycle will take care of that.0 -
What is your TDEE? If you're not eating above that then you're not gaining any muscle. And you're also not gaining any fat. As long as you're still eating at a deficit, what you are gaining is water weight.
My tdee is hard to gage because I lost so much weight (70 lbs) so it's going to be a lot less than that of a person who has been 133 lbs all her life, isn't that right?
For somebody who was 133 to start with, the lowest it would be (not including gym time) is 1700. With gym time added 3 times a week its something like 1900+ . Weight loss can cut a persons needed intake by several hundred calories, if I am not misinformed?
:huh: I have never heard this before...
The general idea is that if someone drops weight unhealthily and loses a lot of LBM, their maintenance calories at the end will be lower than expected. This is versus someone who has always been the same weight, because they haven't lost all the muscle. It could made a decent difference, I don't know about several hundred calories though. Maybe in extreme cases of VLCD and associated metabolic slowdown? Just another reason to lose weight slowly and lift lots of weights.
Yes, that's true if there's muscle loss.0 -
For reference, I'm a 5'7" 133-136 (fluctuating) lb female, 21 years old.
My most recent scan said my body fat went up several percentage points and my muscle mass increased to pretty much nothing.
My weight has only gone up by 3 pounds but I feel so bloated and gross.
If you're 133 pounds and, say, 20% body fat, you have 26.6 pounds of fat.
If you gain 3 pounds of fat, that would make you 136 pounds with 29.6 pounds of fat, or 21.7% fat.
Maybe I'm just picking on semantics, but that's not several percentage points, and it's not likely that you just gained 3 pounds of pure fat anyway.0 -
How long have you been doing this?
1500 calories - that's all you're eating? Are you weighing and measuring everything?
I agree with someone else who said, you are restoring your glycogen stores...I'm only 112 pounds and I retain 3-5 pounds of water on any given workout day that I lift - that's like 5% of my weight - it happens to the best of us.
I'd keep on doing what you're doing and don't obsess over the scale.
Edited: it takes a woman, under the best of circumstances and eating over maintenance, approximately 8-12 weeks to gain ONE pound of muscle. And that's under the best of circumstances. You're not eating over maintenance, so you're not going to gain muscle, but you might be able to drop more body fat (slowly) and get more "toned" (hate using that word).0 -
How long have you been doing this?
1500 calories - that's all you're eating? Are you weighing and measuring everything?
I agree with someone else who said, you are restoring your glycogen stores...I'm only 112 pounds and I retain 3-5 pounds of water on any given workout day that I lift - that's like 5% of my weight - it happens to the best of us.
I'd keep on doing what you're doing and don't obsess over the scale.
Edited: it takes a woman, under the best of circumstances and eating over maintenance, approximately 8-12 weeks to gain ONE pound of muscle. And that's under the best of circumstances. You're not eating over maintenance, so you're not going to gain muscle, but you might be able to drop more body fat (slowly) and get more "toned" (hate using that word).
^I like you. And I concur0 -
My weight has only gone up by 3 pounds but I feel so bloated and gross.
Congrats! You know you're really into fitness when body dysmorphic sets in. Keep up the good work.
Rude and completely unhelpful.
I didn't think that was rude at all, and in fact it's very helpful. The point being, 3lbs isn't going to have all kinds of dramatic effects that you are describing, even if it were 3lbs of pure fat. Increased calories will increase your weight (more water retention, more food in digestive system) so that's to be expected. Read the link above guide about bulking, it's got pretty much everything in there. If you pick a path (ie: bulking) then you have to be prepared for the consequences (weight gain and fat gain). If you're not, you're going to have a bad time (and probably make zero progress).
The sarcasm in the statement was unessecary. I know 3lbs isn't really a big deal, all I said was I FELT bad. Additionally, the person had zero constructive feedback to offer unlike many other posters. When you have lost as much weight as I have it is difficult to get used to the idea that you actually have to gain again at some point.0 -
How long have you been doing this?
1500 calories - that's all you're eating? Are you weighing and measuring everything?
I agree with someone else who said, you are restoring your glycogen stores...I'm only 112 pounds and I retain 3-5 pounds of water on any given workout day that I lift - that's like 5% of my weight - it happens to the best of us.
I'd keep on doing what you're doing and don't obsess over the scale.
Edited: it takes a woman, under the best of circumstances and eating over maintenance, approximately 8-12 weeks to gain ONE pound of muscle. And that's under the best of circumstances. You're not eating over maintenance, so you're not going to gain muscle, but you might be able to drop more body fat (slowly) and get more "toned" (hate using that word).
More recently I began measuring again! It's helping!0 -
For reference, I'm a 5'7" 133-136 (fluctuating) lb female, 21 years old.
Been eating 1,530+ calories as opposed to my regular 13-1400, adjusted my macros to what my trainer specified, and I am pretty sure I am just getting fat. My body feels softer, my face looks fuller, my boobs got bigger (a sure sign!) and my clothes still fit but feel "off"... For the first time in at least a year!!
My most recent scan said my body fat went up several percentage points and my muscle mass increased to pretty much nothing. When I voiced my concerns my trainer said gaining body fat is inevitable with building muscle mass, and my problem was probably that I wasn't lifting heavy enough or moving quickly through the exercises, which makes sense.
My question is, is there a way I can limit how much more fat I'm gonna put on during this process? My weight has only gone up by 3 pounds but I feel so bloated and gross. I asked if I should have begun cutting more first but she insisted bulking is the best way to start for me since I am not overweight/overfat and will make cutting easier and faster for me.
Also, how can I push myself to move faster/work harder in the gym? I always start on a good note but I find myself getting distracted or slowing down by the end?? Any little motivational tips (besides the obvious "you won't put on as much bodyfat if you work hard!") would be super great .:sad:
UPDATE: I spoke to my trainer who stated she knows 1500 is not enough to put on muscle. (I figured as much)
She wants me to work on form and pushing myself before adding more calories to ensure I put muscle on properly!0 -
I'm the same weight but shorter and cut on 1700 cals so I don't think 1530 is bulking for you unless you've done some serious damage to your metabolism.
I know I have. It's taken me a long time to get up to this many calories because I ****ed up my initial weight loss several years ago eating too little. I had no idea it was bad at the time, but once I did I slowly began reintroducing calories with no issues along the way. I told her this information, I've been UP to 1,500 for a while actually, the weight gain is relatively recent/unexplained.
It's most likely water weight.
I thought so too but a caliper wouldn't change based on water weight.
Actually, yes it can.0 -
For reference, I'm a 5'7" 133-136 (fluctuating) lb female, 21 years old.
Been eating 1,530+ calories as opposed to my regular 13-1400, adjusted my macros to what my trainer specified, and I am pretty sure I am just getting fat. My body feels softer, my face looks fuller, my boobs got bigger (a sure sign!) and my clothes still fit but feel "off"... For the first time in at least a year!!
My most recent scan said my body fat went up several percentage points and my muscle mass increased to pretty much nothing. When I voiced my concerns my trainer said gaining body fat is inevitable with building muscle mass, and my problem was probably that I wasn't lifting heavy enough or moving quickly through the exercises, which makes sense.
My question is, is there a way I can limit how much more fat I'm gonna put on during this process? My weight has only gone up by 3 pounds but I feel so bloated and gross. I asked if I should have begun cutting more first but she insisted bulking is the best way to start for me since I am not overweight/overfat and will make cutting easier and faster for me.
Also, how can I push myself to move faster/work harder in the gym? I always start on a good note but I find myself getting distracted or slowing down by the end?? Any little motivational tips (besides the obvious "you won't put on as much bodyfat if you work hard!") would be super great .:sad:
UPDATE: I spoke to my trainer who stated she knows 1500 is not enough to put on muscle. (I figured as much)
She wants me to work on form and pushing myself before adding more calories to ensure I put muscle on properly!
Honestly, get rid of the trainer, she is giving you bad advice. You do not have to first gain fat and THEN build muscle. And you most certainly do NOT have to stay that low calorie. Lift as heavy as you can right NOW and up your calories.0 -
if you were underweight, maybe it's healthy to put on a few fat percentage points but lifting heavier will put more muscle on you, and as long as you pay attention to how your body feels while you're lifting; if you start shaking or feel dizzy, you need to stop and eat, but if you feel fine, heavier seems like the way to get you where you're going.
that old school bulking and cutting thing has no biology behind it that i've been able to find - just pseudo science or people who do it because it's always done that way.0 -
For reference, I'm a 5'7" 133-136 (fluctuating) lb female, 21 years old.
Been eating 1,530+ calories as opposed to my regular 13-1400, adjusted my macros to what my trainer specified, and I am pretty sure I am just getting fat. My body feels softer, my face looks fuller, my boobs got bigger (a sure sign!) and my clothes still fit but feel "off"... For the first time in at least a year!!
My most recent scan said my body fat went up several percentage points and my muscle mass increased to pretty much nothing. When I voiced my concerns my trainer said gaining body fat is inevitable with building muscle mass, and my problem was probably that I wasn't lifting heavy enough or moving quickly through the exercises, which makes sense.
My question is, is there a way I can limit how much more fat I'm gonna put on during this process? My weight has only gone up by 3 pounds but I feel so bloated and gross. I asked if I should have begun cutting more first but she insisted bulking is the best way to start for me since I am not overweight/overfat and will make cutting easier and faster for me.
Also, how can I push myself to move faster/work harder in the gym? I always start on a good note but I find myself getting distracted or slowing down by the end?? Any little motivational tips (besides the obvious "you won't put on as much bodyfat if you work hard!") would be super great .:sad:
UPDATE: I spoke to my trainer who stated she knows 1500 is not enough to put on muscle. (I figured as much)
She wants me to work on form and pushing myself before adding more calories to ensure I put muscle on properly!
How long have you been lifting for?
What does your lifting routine look like?0 -
Time ! Actually your height and weight are comparable to mine. Gaining muscle is not an easy task for ectomorph body type/.female. It has literally taken me years.. I bust my butt to lift heavy- down to 5-6 rep ranges even. Its inevitable to put on some body fat and you are not going to be putting on much if you always eating at deficit. I am 5'9 I am currently cutting for a figure show and goal weight is around 125-`127 otherwise I am fine going up to 145 hopefully 150 after this year. I will eat low during a cut 1200-1400 but when off I am up to 2000-2200. But I very carefully track macros during a cut. Alos you need good food source for you body to grown- lean proteins, good sources of carbs veggies, sweet potatoes oats rice etc.0
-
For reference, I'm a 5'7" 133-136 (fluctuating) lb female, 21 years old.
Been eating 1,530+ calories as opposed to my regular 13-1400, adjusted my macros to what my trainer specified, and I am pretty sure I am just getting fat. My body feels softer, my face looks fuller, my boobs got bigger (a sure sign!) and my clothes still fit but feel "off"... For the first time in at least a year!!
My most recent scan said my body fat went up several percentage points and my muscle mass increased to pretty much nothing. When I voiced my concerns my trainer said gaining body fat is inevitable with building muscle mass, and my problem was probably that I wasn't lifting heavy enough or moving quickly through the exercises, which makes sense.
My question is, is there a way I can limit how much more fat I'm gonna put on during this process? My weight has only gone up by 3 pounds but I feel so bloated and gross. I asked if I should have begun cutting more first but she insisted bulking is the best way to start for me since I am not overweight/overfat and will make cutting easier and faster for me.
Also, how can I push myself to move faster/work harder in the gym? I always start on a good note but I find myself getting distracted or slowing down by the end?? Any little motivational tips (besides the obvious "you won't put on as much bodyfat if you work hard!") would be super great .:sad:
UPDATE: I spoke to my trainer who stated she knows 1500 is not enough to put on muscle. (I figured as much)
She wants me to work on form and pushing myself before adding more calories to ensure I put muscle on properly!
Honestly, get rid of the trainer, she is giving you bad advice. You do not have to first gain fat and THEN build muscle. And you most certainly do NOT have to stay that low calorie. Lift as heavy as you can right NOW and up your calories.
She hasn't said any of those things though??
She isn't telling me to stay that low, we are increasing my calories gradually and ensuring proper form with (relatively) smaller weights before moving up/increasing calories because I am sort of recovering from a VLCD I was on long ago that I had no idea was bad, so my metabolism was damaged.
She also didn't say I had to gain fat before muscle, she just told me putting on some fat while putting on muscle is inevitable. Which is true, I thought?0 -
For reference, I'm a 5'7" 133-136 (fluctuating) lb female, 21 years old.
Been eating 1,530+ calories as opposed to my regular 13-1400, adjusted my macros to what my trainer specified, and I am pretty sure I am just getting fat. My body feels softer, my face looks fuller, my boobs got bigger (a sure sign!) and my clothes still fit but feel "off"... For the first time in at least a year!!
My most recent scan said my body fat went up several percentage points and my muscle mass increased to pretty much nothing. When I voiced my concerns my trainer said gaining body fat is inevitable with building muscle mass, and my problem was probably that I wasn't lifting heavy enough or moving quickly through the exercises, which makes sense.
My question is, is there a way I can limit how much more fat I'm gonna put on during this process? My weight has only gone up by 3 pounds but I feel so bloated and gross. I asked if I should have begun cutting more first but she insisted bulking is the best way to start for me since I am not overweight/overfat and will make cutting easier and faster for me.
Also, how can I push myself to move faster/work harder in the gym? I always start on a good note but I find myself getting distracted or slowing down by the end?? Any little motivational tips (besides the obvious "you won't put on as much bodyfat if you work hard!") would be super great .:sad:
UPDATE: I spoke to my trainer who stated she knows 1500 is not enough to put on muscle. (I figured as much)
She wants me to work on form and pushing myself before adding more calories to ensure I put muscle on properly!
How long have you been lifting for?
What does your lifting routine look like?
Not long, at all. And my routine isn't all weights, there are also a lot of body weight resistance exercises/bosu ball/etc. that I am doing as well. I can't lift heavy at all, the most I can squat is 40 lbs, I've worked up from 20 so I know I have to have gotten a little stronger?
I don't spend more than an hour in the gym, usually around 45 minutes when I'm on top of things and the equipment is available right away.0 -
I also am shorter than you , as other ladies posted...and I start losing around 1700. I'm 5'3. I lift VERY heavy, I got pretty strong in the short time I was training for powerlifting when I started and now kb sport..but the muscle building is much longer. Rome wasn't built in a day! Lift HEAVY.0
-
that old school bulking and cutting thing has no biology behind it that i've been able to find - just pseudo science or people who do it because it's always done that way.
What do you mean biology? you mean science to show that it's the most efficient?
because all that makes me say is
"really??"
its' done that way because it works.
Science is really far behind the curve of how we train and people have been bulking and cutting because it is the single most efficient way to put on size and reduce body fat. Recomping is terribly inefficient and slow and really only works well under certain conditions.
not trying to start a big ole fight- but what's is your alternative and for which end goal??0 -
if you were underweight, maybe it's healthy to put on a few fat percentage points but lifting heavier will put more muscle on you, and as long as you pay attention to how your body feels while you're lifting; if you start shaking or feel dizzy, you need to stop and eat, but if you feel fine, heavier seems like the way to get you where you're going.
that old school bulking and cutting thing has no biology behind it that i've been able to find - just pseudo science or people who do it because it's always done that way.
Agree that lifting heavy is the way to go, on a 250 calorie excess over your needs per day. That includes eating your exercise cals back. You may want to cut again after.
The rest of the statement here is an opinion not based in experience.
I've done recomping and it helped me lose weight and get good at lifting.
The bulk and cut I did this year (kicking and screaming the whole way about fat gain I may add) was on another level. I couldn't believe how good things got, and after a sloooow cut I'm at an athletic, but curvy and strong place. It's fantastic.0 -
I'm the same weight but shorter and cut on 1700 cals so I don't think 1530 is bulking for you unless you've done some serious damage to your metabolism.
I know I have. It's taken me a long time to get up to this many calories because I ****ed up my initial weight loss several years ago eating too little. I had no idea it was bad at the time, but once I did I slowly began reintroducing calories with no issues along the way. I told her this information, I've been UP to 1,500 for a while actually, the weight gain is relatively recent/unexplained.
This is why you're gaining weight… Because you restricted your calories too much in the past which led to a damaged metabolism. It can take up to a year to reset metabolism.0 -
Are you trying to bulk?
I guess, I don't want to be super ripped or anything, but I know the calories are far too low for that anyway. I just want more lean muscle, but building ANY muscle requires you to put on fat too, I know that...
:huh: :huh: :huh: :huh:0 -
I'm the same weight but shorter and cut on 1700 cals so I don't think 1530 is bulking for you unless you've done some serious damage to your metabolism.
I know I have. It's taken me a long time to get up to this many calories because I ****ed up my initial weight loss several years ago eating too little. I had no idea it was bad at the time, but once I did I slowly began reintroducing calories with no issues along the way. I told her this information, I've been UP to 1,500 for a while actually, the weight gain is relatively recent/unexplained.
This is why you're gaining weight… Because you restricted your calories too much in the past which led to a damaged metabolism. It can take up to a year to reset metabolism.
I disagree.
When you up your calories, you gain weight through : more food and waste in the gut, more water, more glycogen in the muscle.
You can put up to 5lbs plus of this weight on without gaining fat.
OP is still below her TDEE. There's no way she is gaining fat if her calorie counts are correct.0 -
I'm the same weight but shorter and cut on 1700 cals so I don't think 1530 is bulking for you unless you've done some serious damage to your metabolism.
I know I have. It's taken me a long time to get up to this many calories because I ****ed up my initial weight loss several years ago eating too little. I had no idea it was bad at the time, but once I did I slowly began reintroducing calories with no issues along the way. I told her this information, I've been UP to 1,500 for a while actually, the weight gain is relatively recent/unexplained.
It's most likely water weight.
I thought so too but a caliper wouldn't change based on water weight.0 -
I'm the same weight but shorter and cut on 1700 cals so I don't think 1530 is bulking for you unless you've done some serious damage to your metabolism.
I know I have. It's taken me a long time to get up to this many calories because I ****ed up my initial weight loss several years ago eating too little. I had no idea it was bad at the time, but once I did I slowly began reintroducing calories with no issues along the way. I told her this information, I've been UP to 1,500 for a while actually, the weight gain is relatively recent/unexplained.
This is why you're gaining weight… Because you restricted your calories too much in the past which led to a damaged metabolism. It can take up to a year to reset metabolism.
I disagree.
When you up your calories, you gain weight through : more food and waste in the gut, more water, more glycogen in the muscle.
You can put up to 5lbs plus of this weight on without gaining fat.
OP is still below her TDEE. There's no way she is gaining fat if her calorie counts are correct.
I said she was gaining weight. Not gaining fat. It's 3 lbs of water weight. Besides, she's bound to put on a couple pounds since her muscles are inflamed and swollen with fluid retention from recently beginning lifting.0 -
I'm the same weight but shorter and cut on 1700 cals so I don't think 1530 is bulking for you unless you've done some serious damage to your metabolism.
I know I have. It's taken me a long time to get up to this many calories because I ****ed up my initial weight loss several years ago eating too little. I had no idea it was bad at the time, but once I did I slowly began reintroducing calories with no issues along the way. I told her this information, I've been UP to 1,500 for a while actually, the weight gain is relatively recent/unexplained.
It's most likely water weight.
I thought so too but a caliper wouldn't change based on water weight.
Hydrostatic testing is the only way to know for sure.0 -
I don't really see metabolisms as being "damaged"
The metabolism responds to the circumstances it is dealing with.....
So the fact that she can still use food for energy means the metabolism is working fine.....
It is just slower.....
Back off the calories for a bit, see how you respond....
Then up them again in a few weeks.0 -
I'm the same weight but shorter and cut on 1700 cals so I don't think 1530 is bulking for you unless you've done some serious damage to your metabolism.
I know I have. It's taken me a long time to get up to this many calories because I ****ed up my initial weight loss several years ago eating too little. I had no idea it was bad at the time, but once I did I slowly began reintroducing calories with no issues along the way. I told her this information, I've been UP to 1,500 for a while actually, the weight gain is relatively recent/unexplained.
This is why you're gaining weight… Because you restricted your calories too much in the past which led to a damaged metabolism. It can take up to a year to reset metabolism.
I disagree.
When you up your calories, you gain weight through : more food and waste in the gut, more water, more glycogen in the muscle.
You can put up to 5lbs plus of this weight on without gaining fat.
OP is still below her TDEE. There's no way she is gaining fat if her calorie counts are correct.
I said she was gaining weight. Not gaining fat. It's 3 lbs of water weight. Besides, she's bound to put on a couple pounds since her muscles are inflamed and swollen with fluid retention from recently beginning lifting.
It's good to be clear though.
I'd be reluctant to diagnose someone as having a damaged metabolism though just because they are gaining weigh from upping their calories. It happens, to everyone that has been under eating. It happens when you eat more.
Damaged metabolisms....mmmm... I'm not so sure this is as ubiquitous as people make them out to be.0 -
You did not damage your metabolism, this is really a myth. ( Look at all those African kids) You lost weight.
Now that you upped your calories to barely 1500 calories. You're getting fatter because of three lbs? I highly doubt that.
You started lifting weights. This is new ? Right, means you are retaining the water glycogen into those muscles.
How did they measure your body fat? You are not going to bulk on 1500 calories. You are not going to gain muscles at 1500 calories either. If you want to gain muscle do a surplus ( lift heavy so you can have minimal fat gain & if you want to lose weight ( fat plus muscle) do a deficit ( lift heavy in order to maintain the muscle you have & limit muscle loss). I say eat more, lift heavy!. Than when you feel like you had enough muscle, start losing weight again. Make sure you are measuring everything !!! Not estimating.0 -
Would make sense that your weight went up, but you're nowhere near a bulk, so just keep eating higher and ride out the water weight storm. Think about people who are recovering from EDs -- they have to endure months of edema from upping their calories. On a much smaller scale, but I think it's a similar feeling.
I gained weight when I increased calories, after 2.5 years of eating near my BMR (lost 60lbs that way). After a few weeks, my weight dropped back to normal, but weight on the barbell increased. You'll be fine.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions