What the frick?!
Replies
-
I am currently 146 and am 5'2 I am wearing a size 10 in jeans and it varies by where they are from. I have tried to not get so caught up on what the size of my pants or what my weight is and more about how I feel when I look in the mirror... But it is an extremely hard battle.
i think anyone who is unhappy with themselves or their body probably feels similar to how i do. i blame the media. all the glam they put on the teeny tiny girls. but never any glam for the curvy ones.0 -
Im 5'9", too I was 176 a month ago, and I was a size 14. I could squeeeeeze into a 12, but my muffin top was SCREAMING to get out. Now, I am 169 and a 12 is loose on me, and I can get into my 10s and feel good after I wear them for a minute. II am trying to get back to 150, where I was a size 8, or a tight-ish size 6. I consider myself a medium/large frame. (Not quite medium, but not entirely large either.)0
-
I'm 5'9 as well and sounds like we may be built very similar. I was 250 when I delivered my daughter and wearing a size 20. Lost all that weight over a year ago and was at 180 and in a size 14. I started MFP at 188 and am down to 178 and still in a 14 but they are loose. At my thinnest a few years ago I was 139 and in a size 8 and I was seriously skin and bones...so I wouldn't worry about the numbers. Screw the numbers...they don't mean anything and you'll be a lot happier and less stressed when you stop focusing on them. Good luck!0
-
Have you noticed a difference in the sizing of say, GAP 18s and Lane Bryant 18s? "Plus" size clothing (or "W" or "Women's") can be decieving because it is meant for a fuller figure. I can remember being an 18 in Lane Bryant jeans, but couldn't squeeze my butt in to GAP or Old Navy 18s to save my life. Just a thought...
never mind i see who you are referring to now
?? I wasn't referring to anyone...0 -
There was a spot on a news program recently in which a selection of popular brands pants with a tag of lets say 16 or 18 or 20 were taken to a tailor and measured and it turned out that the pants were misrepresented size wise. They all measured a full size bigger than the label stated. So for example, I wear 18 according to the label however, when I measure my pants they're actually a size 20.
Sad but true...unfortunately.0 -
Maybe your size 16's ran small or maybe you were bigger in the rear at the time. I was a size 16 when I was 200 lbs. Now at 220 I am a 18.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 392.9K Introduce Yourself
- 43.7K Getting Started
- 260.1K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.8K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 415 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.9K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.6K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.5K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions