Do you burn empty calories before fat?
fitmama0914
Posts: 83
I am recommitting myself to a lifestyle change, and yesterday I quit drinking pop, but today I realized that I have been drinking 3,584 calories every week, just in pop and coffee. I am trying to figure out how this translates to my workouts. Am I working out just to burn those calories? Do I burn that before I even get to the fat?
With the exception of pregnancies, I have weighed 113 for the last 12 years. I don't lose weight (other than the time I unintentionally went down to 102), and I have trouble gaining weight on purpose (during pregnancy). When I was tracking my calories before, I had trouble getting to 1600. I have somewhere between 27 and 32% bodyfat (mostly in my hips and belly). I don't think I need or can afford a calorie deficit. I think I just need to workout, because I'm fairly sedentary. I don't eat junk food, so once I cut out my drinkable bad calories, and get into my workouts, should it be fairly easy for me to burn fat?
With the exception of pregnancies, I have weighed 113 for the last 12 years. I don't lose weight (other than the time I unintentionally went down to 102), and I have trouble gaining weight on purpose (during pregnancy). When I was tracking my calories before, I had trouble getting to 1600. I have somewhere between 27 and 32% bodyfat (mostly in my hips and belly). I don't think I need or can afford a calorie deficit. I think I just need to workout, because I'm fairly sedentary. I don't eat junk food, so once I cut out my drinkable bad calories, and get into my workouts, should it be fairly easy for me to burn fat?
0
Replies
-
if you are in a deficit then you are burning fat…if you are in a surplus then you are not burning fat…
Your post is kind of confusing…are you trying to lose weight, gain weight, etc? Why can't you afford a calorie deficit?
Are you using MFP method or TDEE method?
0 -
Yeah, I'm confused, too. Are you trying to lose fat, but not lose weight? The only way to do that would be to gain muscle, and you won't do that without a calorie surplus. I would suggest eating more and lift. Then, if you gain more weight/fat than you would like, cut.0
-
Cutting pop and coffee, if you don't replace them (people often do), would lead to a loss of 1 lb/week assuming you are right about the calories.
My interpretation of your post is that you don't want to lose weight, but recomp--lose fat and add muscle? If so, that's tough to do, but you'd want to eat around maintenance. If you add exercise and cut the drinkable calories, you'd want to add healthy calories to replace them, quite possibly protein depending on what you are currently eating. You'd also want to be doing some weight training with heavy weights and not just any exercise.
0 -
Thanks. I have a hard time eating even 1400 calories, even when I was clean eating, and eating so often that I was never hungry. If I go into deficit, I'll be eating much less than maintenance. I am replacing the coffee and pop with water. I'm OK with gaining muscle weight, I'm just not sure if I can loose much more and it still be healthy? I can't remember my lowest "acceptable" weight for my height.
As far as my mfp goals, I'm not sure if I qualify as losing, gaining, or maintaining. If I lose fat and gain muscle, regardless of together or one at a time, will I end up a lower muscular weight, or higher? Right now, I am doing a combination of compound exercises for upper and lower.0 -
You're going to lose if you don't replace those calories.0
-
fitmama0914 wrote: »Thanks. I have a hard time eating even 1400 calories, even when I was clean eating, and eating so often that I was never hungry. If I go into deficit, I'll be eating much less than maintenance. I am replacing the coffee and pop with water. I'm OK with gaining muscle weight, I'm just not sure if I can loose much more and it still be healthy? I can't remember my lowest "acceptable" weight for my height.
As far as my mfp goals, I'm not sure if I qualify as losing, gaining, or maintaining. If I lose fat and gain muscle, regardless of together or one at a time, will I end up a lower muscular weight, or higher? Right now, I am doing a combination of compound exercises for upper and lower.
If you're in a calorie deficit, you will not gain muscle mass, it just won't happen. If you do it right, you can have a net gain in muscle mass and a net loss in fat mass by cutting and then bulking, or bulking and then cutting. By doing it right, I mean you have to have patience, you have to consume adequate protein, and for best results you have to incorporate heavy lifting. During a bulk you will gain muscle mass and fat mass, but you will gain more muscle than you will fat. During a cut you will lose fat mass and most likely lose muscle mass, but you will lose more fat than you will muscle. The net result of this is a drop in overall fat mass and an increase in overall muscle mass.0 -
AJ, I was explaining why I don't want to go in a deficit.
So I basically have to decide if I want to lose fat first, or gain muscle while gaining fat too? 0 -
fitmama0914 wrote: »AJ, I was explaining why I don't want to go in a deficit. So I basically have to decide if I want to lose fat first, or gain muscle while gaining fat too?
Well that's a kind of a personal choice. Do you think you can handle putting on weight right now, or would you like to lose more fat before you start that process? It's really just preference. Either way if you do it right you'll end up where you want to be.0 -
I believe what would be good for you to do is go slightly above maintenance. So about 150 - 250 calories above. You should also make sure you eat back your exercise calories to make sure you are not in a calorie deficit.
In terms of exercising, strength training would do great for your body composition, that mixed with a little bit of cardio will make sure you stay pretty good. You can pick any beginner program and make sure you have progressive overload and you will be fine
I have found this routine pretty good and you could start with only 2 out of 4 of the days instead if its overwhelming
As for not being able to eat, i would suggest looking up calorie dense healthy food to fit into your diet
Don't forget a good ratio of protein everyday would help your composition immensely (i find the mfp ones a little too small).
0 -
I think I'd rather start with less fat, really. I have definition in my arms and legs (I know there's no such thing as spot reducing) but I'm more concerned with the fat I have than a 4 pack. But I think what I was trying to get at, is that if I continue to eat the same calories, but increase my activity drastically, won't that in itself, create a deficit?0
-
I believe what would be good for you to do is go slightly above maintenance. So about 150 - 250 calories above. You should also make sure you eat back your exercise calories to make sure you are not in a calorie deficit.
In terms of exercising, strength training would do great for your body composition, that mixed with a little bit of cardio will make sure you stay pretty good. You can pick any beginner program and make sure you have progressive overload and you will be fine
I have found this routine pretty good and you could start with only 2 out of 4 of the days instead if its overwhelming
As for not being able to eat, i would suggest looking up calorie dense healthy food to fit into your diet
Don't forget a good ratio of protein everyday would help your composition immensely (i find the mfp ones a little too small).
Thanks0 -
That's pretty much how I was trying to work it out in my head.0
-
This content has been removed.
-
I'm 5'2 and 113lbs0
-
0
-
fitmama0914 wrote: »Thanks. I have a hard time eating even 1400 calories, even when I was clean eating, and eating so often that I was never hungry. If I go into deficit, I'll be eating much less than maintenance. I am replacing the coffee and pop with water. I'm OK with gaining muscle weight, I'm just not sure if I can loose much more and it still be healthy? I can't remember my lowest "acceptable" weight for my height.
As far as my mfp goals, I'm not sure if I qualify as losing, gaining, or maintaining. If I lose fat and gain muscle, regardless of together or one at a time, will I end up a lower muscular weight, or higher? Right now, I am doing a combination of compound exercises for upper and lower.
as far as having a difficult time eating enough calories, if you are dedicated to what you call "clean eating" (which I assume is what people say when they mean they avoid fast food, cookies, chips and the like), adding in higher calorie foods like avocado, peanut butter, almonds and other nuts, and things like that will help you reach your calorie goal. Also full-fat milk will add calories.0 -
Yes, I was eating no processed foods. I was eating avacado, whole grain, high protein... For awhile I was paying attention to macros... 5 to 6 times a day. I had been looking for higher calorie healthy foods and snacks, but didn't know what. So I was always under my goal.0
-
Is it OK to increase the portion size to make up the calories?0
-
fitmama0914 wrote: »Thanks. I have a hard time eating even 1400 calories, even when I was clean eating, and eating so often that I was never hungry. If I go into deficit, I'll be eating much less than maintenance. I am replacing the coffee and pop with water. I'm OK with gaining muscle weight, I'm just not sure if I can loose much more and it still be healthy? I can't remember my lowest "acceptable" weight for my height.
As far as my mfp goals, I'm not sure if I qualify as losing, gaining, or maintaining. If I lose fat and gain muscle, regardless of together or one at a time, will I end up a lower muscular weight, or higher? Right now, I am doing a combination of compound exercises for upper and lower.
fitmama it sounds like other than the sugary drinks you are eating well. I expect you are correct you could be getting into trouble if you cut more calories plus if one cuts calories the body hormones just slows the metabolism and you may even gain fat in unwanted places on the lower calorie diet. Well at first you may lose weight but over time many can expect to see a net weight gain and many of us are living proof of losing weight only to find it again plus a few pounds.
Our bodies are quite complex and good at surviving on less than a maintenance diet but the long term damage may lead to a health wreck.
-5 -
fitmama0914 wrote: »Is it OK to increase the portion size to make up the calories?
Definitely!0 -
A calorie is just a unit of energy. You need XXXX amount of energy to maintain the status quot...just to live...to fuel your day to day...to workout, etc. When you consume less energy (calories) than your body requires to do the above, your body has to make up the difference...it does this by dipping into your energy reserves...aka your fat stores...and you burn fat...and a bit of muscle, etc...large deficits tend to lead to a greater ratio of the later than necessary.0
-
fitmama0914 wrote: »Yes, I was eating no processed foods. I was eating avacado, whole grain, high protein... For awhile I was paying attention to macros... 5 to 6 times a day. I had been looking for higher calorie healthy foods and snacks, but didn't know what. So I was always under my goal.
0 -
cwolfman13 wrote: »A calorie is just a unit of energy. You need XXXX amount of energy to maintain the status quot...just to live...to fuel your day to day...to workout, etc. When you consume less energy (calories) than your body requires to do the above, your body has to make up the difference...it does this by dipping into your energy reserves...aka your fat stores...and you burn fat...and a bit of muscle, etc...large deficits tend to lead to a greater ratio of the later than necessary.
cwolfman if you factor in the brain decreasing one's metabolism when they are starving the body over a period of a few weeks or long one may even gain weight on the lower cals after initially dropping some weight. If one cuts cals and drops some pounds then regain them after a while they have set up a health crisis perhaps in the long run.0 -
GaleHawkins wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »A calorie is just a unit of energy. You need XXXX amount of energy to maintain the status quot...just to live...to fuel your day to day...to workout, etc. When you consume less energy (calories) than your body requires to do the above, your body has to make up the difference...it does this by dipping into your energy reserves...aka your fat stores...and you burn fat...and a bit of muscle, etc...large deficits tend to lead to a greater ratio of the later than necessary.
cwolfman if you factor in the brain decreasing one's metabolism when they are starving the body over a period of a few weeks or long one may even gain weight on the lower cals after initially dropping some weight. If one cuts cals and drops some pounds then regain them after a while they have set up a health crisis perhaps in the long run.
No, this is not possible. You cannot gain weight in a calorie deficit.0 -
This content has been removed.
-
GaleHawkins wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »A calorie is just a unit of energy. You need XXXX amount of energy to maintain the status quot...just to live...to fuel your day to day...to workout, etc. When you consume less energy (calories) than your body requires to do the above, your body has to make up the difference...it does this by dipping into your energy reserves...aka your fat stores...and you burn fat...and a bit of muscle, etc...large deficits tend to lead to a greater ratio of the later than necessary.
cwolfman if you factor in the brain decreasing one's metabolism when they are starving the body over a period of a few weeks or long one may even gain weight on the lower cals after initially dropping some weight. If one cuts cals and drops some pounds then regain them after a while they have set up a health crisis perhaps in the long run.
No, this is not possible. You cannot gain weight in a calorie deficit.
He's talking about adaptive thermogenesis, but it doesn't happen that drastically over a matter of a few weeks. Adaptive thermogenesis is a slow process, and it's true that the larger the deficit, the more aggressive the adaptation, but that's not a real concern as long as you're not eating like 500 calories a day for weeks and months on end.0 -
GaleHawkins wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »A calorie is just a unit of energy. You need XXXX amount of energy to maintain the status quot...just to live...to fuel your day to day...to workout, etc. When you consume less energy (calories) than your body requires to do the above, your body has to make up the difference...it does this by dipping into your energy reserves...aka your fat stores...and you burn fat...and a bit of muscle, etc...large deficits tend to lead to a greater ratio of the later than necessary.
cwolfman if you factor in the brain decreasing one's metabolism when they are starving the body over a period of a few weeks or long one may even gain weight on the lower cals after initially dropping some weight. If one cuts cals and drops some pounds then regain them after a while they have set up a health crisis perhaps in the long run.
No, this is not possible. You cannot gain weight in a calorie deficit.
Yeah kinda struggling with this one myself!!!
0 -
fitmama0914 wrote: »I think I'd rather start with less fat, really. I have definition in my arms and legs (I know there's no such thing as spot reducing) but I'm more concerned with the fat I have than a 4 pack. But I think what I was trying to get at, is that if I continue to eat the same calories, but increase my activity drastically, won't that in itself, create a deficit?
Yes. If you are at the edge of an unhealthy weight (edit: you aren't, depending on frame, but you don't need to lose any more either), I think you'd be better off starting by focusing on building muscle. Chances are you'd like the changes in your body and you can always cut fat afterwards. If you are at maintenance and want to cut 3500 calories in drinks, then, you'll need to add something, probably protein (although what are your current total calories and macros?).
0 -
I'm a small frame. Depending on brand of jeans, I can comfortably wear size 1 to 3. I can wear my 10 year old's clothes. I'm "skinny-fat". I haven't yet figured out my macros or calories again. I think you're right, and for now I am just going to focus on strength for a few months and see where that takes me. I might incorporate some HIIT too.0
-
fitmama0914 wrote: »I'm a small frame. Depending on brand of jeans, I can comfortably wear size 1 to 3. I can wear my 10 year old's clothes. I'm "skinny-fat". I haven't yet figured out my macros or calories again. I think you're right, and for now I am just going to focus on strength for a few months and see where that takes me. I might incorporate some HIIT too.
Based on your weight:
Protein - 93g
Fat - 45g
Carbs - Remaining calories
0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions