Quit trying to intimidate with big words

__drmerc__
__drmerc__ Posts: 722 Member
edited November 8 in Chit-Chat
I noticed some posters around here are trying to bully others by using big words we/I don't understand. That's not going to work, we are pretty smart and figure things out too

We should all be here to support each other on our journeys
«134567

Replies

  • _John_
    _John_ Posts: 8,646 Member
    This post is ambiguous. Can you elaborate on what constitutes a big word?
  • Unknown
    Unknown
    This content has been removed.
  • Alatariel75
    Alatariel75 Posts: 18,230 Member
    I am disinclined to aquiesce to your request.
  • _John_
    _John_ Posts: 8,646 Member
    Well, just done eat carbs, then your body is incapable of making fat out of what you eat...
  • sentaruu
    sentaruu Posts: 2,206 Member
    __drmerc__ wrote: »
    _John_ wrote: »
    This post is ambiguous. Can you elaborate on what constitutes a big word?

    Like one poster here likes to throw around french words like "de novo lipogenesis" to get you to give up your argument

    just stop quarreling on the internet and it will be of no concern to you.

  • Unknown
    Unknown
    This content has been removed.
  • _John_
    _John_ Posts: 8,646 Member
    __drmerc__ wrote: »
    Alatariel75 wrote: »
    I am disinclined to aquiesce to your request.

    What the hell? Do you even lift?

    You gotta be stupid to lift?
  • jgnatca
    jgnatca Posts: 14,464 Member
    The internet is one of the few refuges I have left to express the full breadth of my vocabulary.

    I was cooking with my daughter and granddaughter the other day and I asked if I could use their "colander". My daughter asked if I could use the other word for it so they could know what I was talking about. Oh yeah, a sieve. Sheesh. So many great words, so few places to use them.
  • salembambi
    salembambi Posts: 5,585 Member
    satans work indeed
  • Unknown
    Unknown
    This content has been removed.
  • jgnatca
    jgnatca Posts: 14,464 Member
    Oh, yeah. So many words, so little time. My head does that more often these days.
  • Hornsby
    Hornsby Posts: 10,322 Member
    _John_ wrote: »
    __drmerc__ wrote: »
    Alatariel75 wrote: »
    I am disinclined to aquiesce to your request.

    What the hell? Do you even lift?

    You gotta be stupid to lift?

    Gonna need to see a peer reviewed study to confirm.

  • Unknown
    Unknown
    This content has been removed.
  • Unknown
    Unknown
    This content has been removed.
  • Lasmartchika
    Lasmartchika Posts: 3,440 Member
    __drmerc__ wrote: »
    _John_ wrote: »
    This post is ambiguous. Can you elaborate on what constitutes a big word?

    Like one poster here likes to throw around french words like "de novo lipogenesis" to get you to give up your argument

    Ummm... That's not French, it's actually Latin.
  • La_Malfaisante
    La_Malfaisante Posts: 1,509 Member
    __drmerc__ wrote: »
    _John_ wrote: »
    This post is ambiguous. Can you elaborate on what constitutes a big word?

    Like one poster here likes to throw around french words like "de novo lipogenesis" to get you to give up your argument

    Excuse me sir, do you have a problem with French people? Je me comprends pas pourquoi, nous sommes des personnes comme les autres... ;)
  • La_Malfaisante
    La_Malfaisante Posts: 1,509 Member
    __drmerc__ wrote: »
    La_Malfaisante wrote: »
    __drmerc__ wrote: »
    _John_ wrote: »
    This post is ambiguous. Can you elaborate on what constitutes a big word?

    Like one poster here likes to throw around french words like "de novo lipogenesis" to get you to give up your argument

    Excuse me sir, do you have a problem with French people? Je me comprends pas pourquoi, nous sommes des personnes comme les autres... ;)

    Just their attitude and food

    Nice...

  • JeffMeehan
    JeffMeehan Posts: 1,014 Member
    edited November 2014
    La_Malfaisante wrote: »
    __drmerc__ wrote: »
    _John_ wrote: »
    This post is ambiguous. Can you elaborate on what constitutes a big word?

    Like one poster here likes to throw around french words like "de novo lipogenesis" to get you to give up your argument

    Excuse me sir, do you have a problem with French people? Je me comprends pas pourquoi, nous sommes des personnes comme les autres... ;)

    Il ne peut pas l'aider. Il est un imbécile!
  • LiftAllThePizzas
    LiftAllThePizzas Posts: 17,857 Member
    Hornsby wrote: »
    _John_ wrote: »
    __drmerc__ wrote: »
    Alatariel75 wrote: »
    I am disinclined to aquiesce to your request.

    What the hell? Do you even lift?

    You gotta be stupid to lift?

    Gonna need to see a peer reviewed study to confirm.

    You didn't already see the study that demonstrates de novo stultogenesis?
  • Yurippe
    Yurippe Posts: 850 Member
    __drmerc__ wrote: »
    _John_ wrote: »
    This post is ambiguous. Can you elaborate on what constitutes a big word?

    Like one poster here likes to throw around french words like "de novo lipogenesis" to get you to give up your argument
    Every time I don't know what something is I google. Wish I hadn't.
    The enzymatic pathway for converting dietary carbohydrate (CHO) into fat, or de novo lipogenesis (DNL), is present in humans, whereas the capacity to convert fats into CHO does not exist. Here, the quantitative importance of DNL in humans is reviewed, focusing on the response to increased intake of dietary CHO. Eucaloric replacement of dietary fat by CHO does not induce hepatic DNL to any substantial degree. Similarly, addition of CHO to a mixed diet does not increase hepatic DNL to quantitatively important levels, as long as CHO energy intake remains less than total energy expenditure (TEE). Instead, dietary CHO replaces fat in the whole-body fuel mixture, even in the post-absorptive state. Body fat is thereby accrued, but the pathway of DNL is not traversed; instead, a coordinated set of metabolic adaptations, including resistance of hepatic glucose production to suppression by insulin, occurs that allows CHO oxidation to increase and match CHO intake. Only when CHO energy intake exceeds TEE does DNL in liver or adipose tissue contribute significantly to the whole-body energy economy. It is concluded that DNL is not the pathway of first resort for added dietary CHO, in humans. Under most dietary conditions, the two major macronutrient energy sources (CHO and fat) are therefore not interconvertible currencies; CHO and fat have independent, though interacting, economies and independent regulation. The metabolic mechanisms and physiologic implications of the functional block between CHO and fat in humans are discussed, but require further investigation.
  • Joannah700
    Joannah700 Posts: 2,665 Member
    Hippopotamus is a big word. It has many letters and many syllables. I feel like we don't talk enough about hippopotamuses around here.
  • SwannySez
    SwannySez Posts: 5,860 Member
    This thread is insultificating and I for one will not stand for the brutalizerization of innocent members of this community who are only here to practice some kumbayayasisterhood. If you won't reliquisherize the postifications made hereoninwith we cannot be responsible for the repercussionations that might resultify.
  • lishie_rebooted
    lishie_rebooted Posts: 2,973 Member
    jgnatca wrote: »
    The internet is one of the few refuges I have left to express the full breadth of my vocabulary.

    I was cooking with my daughter and granddaughter the other day and I asked if I could use their "colander". My daughter asked if I could use the other word for it so they could know what I was talking about. Oh yeah, a sieve. Sheesh. So many great words, so few places to use them.

    Sieve is not the first word that would come to mind for that.
    Colander or strainer. It is a sieve but still... lol
  • shireeniebeanie
    shireeniebeanie Posts: 293 Member
    People absolutely should refer to scientific terms when... science.
  • _lyndseybrooke_
    _lyndseybrooke_ Posts: 2,561 Member
    Balderdash!
  • Unknown
    Unknown
    This content has been removed.
  • SwannySez
    SwannySez Posts: 5,860 Member
    603reader wrote: »
    jgnatca wrote: »
    The internet is one of the few refuges I have left to express the full breadth of my vocabulary.

    I was cooking with my daughter and granddaughter the other day and I asked if I could use their "colander". My daughter asked if I could use the other word for it so they could know what I was talking about. Oh yeah, a sieve. Sheesh. So many great words, so few places to use them.

    Sieve is not the first word that would come to mind for that.
    Colander or strainer. It is a sieve but still... lol

    I am distracted by the blinding light emanating from your groinal region. I think I need to report this for the way it makes me feel. Also, is that heaven?
  • _John_
    _John_ Posts: 8,646 Member
    Yurippe wrote: »
    __drmerc__ wrote: »
    _John_ wrote: »
    This post is ambiguous. Can you elaborate on what constitutes a big word?

    Like one poster here likes to throw around french words like "de novo lipogenesis" to get you to give up your argument
    Every time I don't know what something is I google. Wish I hadn't.
    The enzymatic pathway for converting dietary carbohydrate (CHO) into fat, or de novo lipogenesis (DNL), is present in humans, whereas the capacity to convert fats into CHO does not exist. Here, the quantitative importance of DNL in humans is reviewed, focusing on the response to increased intake of dietary CHO. Eucaloric replacement of dietary fat by CHO does not induce hepatic DNL to any substantial degree. Similarly, addition of CHO to a mixed diet does not increase hepatic DNL to quantitatively important levels, as long as CHO energy intake remains less than total energy expenditure (TEE). Instead, dietary CHO replaces fat in the whole-body fuel mixture, even in the post-absorptive state. Body fat is thereby accrued, but the pathway of DNL is not traversed; instead, a coordinated set of metabolic adaptations, including resistance of hepatic glucose production to suppression by insulin, occurs that allows CHO oxidation to increase and match CHO intake. Only when CHO energy intake exceeds TEE does DNL in liver or adipose tissue contribute significantly to the whole-body energy economy. It is concluded that DNL is not the pathway of first resort for added dietary CHO, in humans. Under most dietary conditions, the two major macronutrient energy sources (CHO and fat) are therefore not interconvertible currencies; CHO and fat have independent, though interacting, economies and independent regulation. The metabolic mechanisms and physiologic implications of the functional block between CHO and fat in humans are discussed, but require further investigation.

    Telling people that isocaloric diets that contain a higher % of carbohydrates absolutely do not cause more fat gain would be counter to the sugar is the debbil hypothesis so many scientists and users promote here...

  • AsaThorsWoman
    AsaThorsWoman Posts: 2,303 Member
    Quit being intimidated by big words.

  • shireeniebeanie
    shireeniebeanie Posts: 293 Member
    Also, Google. It's free.
This discussion has been closed.

Categories