Males-at what weight did you acheive 32 waist?

gamerguy123
gamerguy123 Posts: 48 Member
edited November 10 in Health and Weight Loss
Title says it all, just curious. Yes I know it will be different for everybody again just wondering. Thanks.
«1

Replies

  • SergeantSausage
    SergeantSausage Posts: 1,673 Member
    edited January 2015
    175-ish ... give or take. Probably squeezed into 'em at 180, but it was a lie.

    6'0", 45 years young.

    31" is quite loose now ... and debating trying out a 30". Currently 160, give or take a weigh-in.
  • jyogit
    jyogit Posts: 280 Member
    5'9" 47 yrs old / .. i just got down to a 32/30 in some stores at 165lbs having been a 34 for years n years. i find the legs the problem not the waist
  • sjaplo
    sjaplo Posts: 974 Member
    Are you guys talking about pant size or actual measurement? I'm curious because I could probably squeeze into a 32 pant size, currently wearing LL Bean 33s, but I know my measured waste size is 36". I'm 173 +/- 2lbs. 53 yo.
  • JohnH71
    JohnH71 Posts: 123 Member
    6' 1'' About 175 ish. Currently 160 ~ starting to need a belt.
  • gamerguy123
    gamerguy123 Posts: 48 Member
    Oh man I am same height/weight as most of you..6'1 180 but barely fit in 34 relaxed fit. Oh well guess my fat is just around my stomach/waist. Thanks 4 replying
  • TMLPatrick
    TMLPatrick Posts: 558 Member
    32s are a mythical....
  • yourpalsoap
    yourpalsoap Posts: 88
    edited January 2015
    my partner wears a 32 and they're 6'1.5 and 175lbs but that's with pretty low bf%. if you've got more body fat, you'll have a larger waist.
  • MisterKinsey
    MisterKinsey Posts: 9 Member
    I think I hit a 32" waist at around 12 years old. Looking to be at 34 by this Easter.
  • TimothyFish
    TimothyFish Posts: 4,925 Member
    The last time I had a 32" waist was in grade school and I don't remember what I weighed. I could fit into 34" jeans when I was 190, but I probably shouldn't have dropped to that weight in the first place.
  • moto450
    moto450 Posts: 334 Member
    I'm in a 34 now and they fit comfortably. I can tell that I will be able to fit into a 32 eventually.I'm 5 foot 10 and 160 pounds currently.
  • performfully
    performfully Posts: 126 Member
    On behalf of my male counterpart, he wore 32s at 6'0 and 170-175 lbs.
  • Tigg_er
    Tigg_er Posts: 22,001 Member
    168 @ 5'10" but they be tite !
  • kirkor
    kirkor Posts: 2,530 Member
    performfully wrote: »
    On behalf of my male counterpart, he wore 32s at 6'0 and 170-175 lbs.

    Similar here. 5'11, 170ish.

    It depends on the "cut" of the pants as well ... some lower-rise-type pants I seem to be able to wear in a smaller size because they sit on my hips differently.
  • IronSmasher
    IronSmasher Posts: 3,908 Member
    6'3"
    32in waist trousers at around 195lb ish. Probably 200lb would be ok waist wise but my legs are always an issue.

    Plus every shop here seems to be on some slim fit kick.
    Don't they know about leg day?
  • Sydking
    Sydking Posts: 317 Member
    175lbs or 79kg now and i fit real nice in a 33,

    Last time i wore a 32 i was about 73kg
  • nsaund
    nsaund Posts: 1 Member
    At 162lbs, 5'7", 12% BF (32 inch measured, not jean size - 32 jeans are pretty loose)
  • jpaulie
    jpaulie Posts: 917 Member
    5' 6" fit into 30/30 at around 155 but my waist measures 32.25"
  • willyboff
    willyboff Posts: 3
    I managed to squeeze into 32" at around the 187lb mark. Started off at 36"!
  • Amanda4change
    Amanda4change Posts: 620 Member
    My Hubby is 6'4" and 218, he wears a 32 waist and a 36 to 38 inseam (depending on brand).
  • Carlos_421
    Carlos_421 Posts: 5,132 Member
    I'm 5' 8" and when I was in the low 180s my 32 waists were very tight (several pairs didn't even fit). Now in the low 160s most are pretty loose (I'll probably drop to 30w when I hit my goal of 150lbs).
  • erickirb
    erickirb Posts: 12,294 Member
    edited January 2015
    I think height and bf% will also have a lot to do with it. I am 5'6" 148 and wear 29-30, but my waist is 31ish (pants are made big, so are you talking measurements or pant size?) at my heaviest I was still under 32" (153lbs)
    In my profile pic my waist would be about 29-29.5" @ about 140lbs

    At the end of my last cut my waist measured 28.5", at around 9-10% BF% and 136lbs.
  • Holla4mom
    Holla4mom Posts: 587 Member
    DH fits his 32in waist jeans at 190 or below, he's 6'1" and naturally "athletic built" as the women in the department store like to tell him;)
  • SergeantSausage
    SergeantSausage Posts: 1,673 Member
    SergeantSausage wrote: »
    175-ish ... give or take. Probably squeezed into 'em at 180, but it was a lie.

    6'0", 45 years young.

    31" is quite loose now ... and debating trying out a 30". Currently 160, give or take a weigh-in.


    OK : pants size.

    I have no idea actual waist measurement as I'm not in the habit of measuring regularly. Didn't even know it would be different. Whodathunk a 32 inch waist WASN'T a 32 inch waist, right?
  • nicklippa
    nicklippa Posts: 31 Member
    It is really difficult these days with so many styles of pants and Shirts. Modern Fit, Slim Fit and Regular Fit are the 3 I see most often and now that I lost the weight, I like to wear more modern fit/slim fit clothes. So when I try on a pair of regular fit pants (ie Dockers) , I will be a 32 but if I try a slim fit it is 34. I am 49 yrs old, 5'9" and weigh 178-180lbs.
  • Auburneng14
    Auburneng14 Posts: 9
    I managed to get into 32" pants last year - I am 43, 5'7" tall and I weighed about 175, but I also had a low body fat.
  • Tim_CNY
    Tim_CNY Posts: 25 Member
    Really depends on the brand and fit. I'm 5'10 and at 168 and mostly I'm wearing 32's.
    - Nautica relaxed jeans are too loose at a 32
    - Affliction and Buffalo jeans fit well in a 32
    - Dockers classic fit are good in a 32
    - Dockers straight fit needs a 33-34
  • jimbmc
    jimbmc Posts: 83 Member
    my lowest weight has been 182lbs, and i'm in 34inch waist jeans (UK size). 32 inch are still too tight to feel comfortable. I reckon I need to be at around 170lbs, plus doing more exercise on my midriff.
  • kr1stadee
    kr1stadee Posts: 1,774 Member
    Is vanity sizing a "thing" for men, too?
  • undergloom
    undergloom Posts: 531 Member
    kr1stadee wrote: »
    Is vanity sizing a "thing" for men, too?
    It most certainly is! There seems to be an inverse correlation between size accuracy and price as well. As an engineer, it irks me to no end that 32" can mean 38" because... self esteem?

  • xMrBunglex
    xMrBunglex Posts: 1,121 Member
    edited January 2015
    The scale hasn't moved much in the last year (170-180), and I've been wearing 33s for awhile.

    Went jeans shopping a couple of weeks ago & the 33s were loose, so I tried on some 32s...and they were a perfect fit!

    Granted, I've been getting fit since 2007 (& I was 237lbs & wearing 38-40s!!) so it has taken awhile.

    But, to quote Office Space,

    damn it feels good to be a gangsta
This discussion has been closed.

Categories