Males-at what weight did you acheive 32 waist?

2»

Replies

  • erocks308
    erocks308 Posts: 22
    6" 175 for most brands. Certain ones run bigger/smaller.
  • gamerguy123
    gamerguy123 Posts: 48 Member
    edited January 2015
    Actually just weighed myself. I am 170 6'1 but can BARELY fit into 34 relaxed fit. Guess my BF% is high. Oh well I have made progress in terms of lbs lost, but none in terms of pant size.
  • erickirb
    erickirb Posts: 12,294 Member
    edited January 2015
    gamerguy123 wrote: »
    Actually just weighed myself. I am 170 6'1 but can BARELY fit into 34 relaxed fit. Guess my BF% is high. Oh well I have made progress in terms of lbs lost, but none in terms of pant size.

    Time to hit the heavy weights and keep a moderate deficit (aim for 0.5lbs/week) while getting adequate protein (135+ grams/day) that way most of what you lose will be fat.
  • jrline
    jrline Posts: 2,353 Member
    probably depends on height but me at 5'9" about 170
  • Bry_Fitness70
    Bry_Fitness70 Posts: 2,480 Member
    I'm 6ft 168lbs, 44 years old - I think I'm more like a 31 now, but fit in 32s around 175
  • contingencyplan
    contingencyplan Posts: 3,639 Member
    I'm 5'10" and back when I was managing my weight through diet alone (no exercise really aside from light cardio, such as going for walks) I was consistently going down about 1 waist size (38 to 36, 36 to 34, etc) for every roughly 20 lbs or so. When I began adding strength training to my regimen that threw everything off, however, and there was no longer any consistent correlation between sizing + weight.
  • ruggedshutter
    ruggedshutter Posts: 389 Member
    My problem isn't getting into them...it's getting back out of them :D
  • gamagem
    gamagem Posts: 87 Member
    My hubby is 5'11 and 180 and is wearing a 32" waist. According to the calipers, his body fat is 10% and he's 49 years old.
  • glevinso
    glevinso Posts: 1,895 Member
    edited January 2015
    gamerguy123 wrote: »
    Title says it all, just curious. Yes I know it will be different for everybody again just wondering. Thanks.

    I am 5'7". At around 175lbs I think is when I needed to wear 32".

    Mostly I was around 30" though when I was under 170.

    At 145 right now and buy 28" or 29" depending on brand.


    Edit: My actual waist measurement is 30.5"
  • undergloom
    undergloom Posts: 531 Member
    6'0", 161lbs and I'm in 32" Pierre Cardin dress pants today. I get a similar fit ftom Old Navy jeans in 28" and Dockers in 30". My best pair of pants has a 34" waist and has the same fit as all of the above. That number on your pants looks like it says "inches", but get out the measuring tape and you'll be surprised.
  • nicsflyingcircus
    nicsflyingcircus Posts: 2,860 Member
    performfully wrote: »
    On behalf of my male counterpart, he wore 32s at 6'0 and 170-175 lbs.

    This sounds right. My husband is 6' and around 180 right now and wears 33's. His only extra weight is around his waist.

  • yopeeps025
    yopeeps025 Posts: 8,680 Member
    I care about a V Taper more than a 32 inch waist.
  • yopeeps025
    yopeeps025 Posts: 8,680 Member
    kr1stadee wrote: »
    Is vanity sizing a "thing" for men, too?

    Muscle mass?

  • aplcr0331
    aplcr0331 Posts: 186 Member
    Yesterday. But that was only one thigh.

    Boom!
  • benpoepen
    benpoepen Posts: 20 Member
    I've noticed long before that my weight correspondent with my waistline. Every kg I lost equals to 1 cm lower waistline. What about you guys?
  • Disoy
    Disoy Posts: 3 Member
    180lb @ 5"10
This discussion has been closed.

Categories