Is Your Metabolism Working Against You? For those that have not seen this.

Is Your Metabolism Working Against You? 6 Simple Ways to Boost It

By CYNTHIA SASS
May 22, 2015, 3:06 AM ET

Throughout my years counseling clients I’ve seen many achieve fantastic weight loss results, including those who had not had success with other approaches, or thought they couldn’t possibly lose weight due to various circumstances, like being injured and unable to exercise, or being post-menopausal.

Based on my experience, I always believe that results are possible, but I’ve also learned that weight loss isn’t predictable or easy—and it certainly isn’t as simple as a calories in versus calories out equation. A new study, from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), illustrated this, and backs what I’ve seen in my own practice—one person’s metabolic response to eating less may not mimic another’s, due to biological differences.

NIH researchers studied a dozen obese men and women in a metabolic unit. The study measured the subjects’ calorie expenditures, both before and after a day of fasting, followed by a six-week phase during which they reduced their calorie intakes by 50%. After accounting for factors including age, sex, and starting weight, scientists found that those who lost the least weight during the reduced calorie period were those whose metabolisms decreased most during the one day fast. These people have what scientists refer to as a “thrifty” metabolism. The opposite results were also found: those with “spendthrift” metabolisms, which decreased the least during the fast, lost the most weight.

In a nutshell, the theory behind “thrifty” metabolism is that when faced with a sudden shortfall of food, some people’s bodies quickly compensate to conserve energy, by burning fewer calories. So if, for example, you went from eating 3,000 calories a day to 1,500, a thrifty metabolism would trigger a conservation mode, designed to shrink the calorie deficit. Historically, people with this adaptation were better able to survive during times of famine; but today, it presents a challenge for those trying to shed excess pounds. It’s also one of the reasons why simply slashing your intake by 500 calories a day isn’t a guarantee that you’ll shed one pound in a week.

If you think you may be in this group, and your biology is making it tough for you to see results, don’t give up. Here are six things you can do to maximize your metabolism, and counter the effects of possible “thriftiness.” While your results may be slower than a “spendthrift” counterpart, losing weight isn’t an impossibility.

Become a tea drinker
Natural substances in green tea—antioxidants called catechins, and caffeine—have been shown to help boost metabolism, and trigger increased fat burning. Aim for about five cups a day, the amount tied to a reduced risk of chronic diseases, including heart disease. Based on the research on how green tea impacts metabolism, this quantity could also translate into the loss of eight pounds over a year’s time.

Drink more water
In addition to naturally curbing calorie intake, water has been shown to positively affect metabolism. One German study found that drinking two cups (16 ounces) of water upped calorie burning by 30% within 10 minutes, and the effect was sustained for more than an hour. Shoot for a solid eight cups (64 ounces) daily, and if you dislike the taste, spruce it up with healthy add-ins like sliced cucumber, fresh grated ginger, mashed fruit, lemon, lime, basil, or mint.

Eat more produce
We all know that veggies and fruits are nutrient rich, but research shows they may also impact leanness, due to their ability to help preserve metabolism-boosting muscle. In one study, University of Florida researchers found that when two groups consumed the same number of daily calories, those who ate more plant-based foods had smaller waist circumferences, and lower body fat percentages. Aim to eat produce at every meal. One simple formula is to include one serving of fruit in every breakfast and snack, and two serving of veggies in each lunch and dinner.

Eat more whole versus processed foods
More proof that a calorie isn’t a calorie came from research conducted at Pomona College. Researchers found that when healthy women consumed meals that were similar in terms of carb, protein, and fat content, they burned about 50% more calories eating whole foods versus highly processed foods. To reap this metabolism-boosting benefit, stick with foods as close to their natural state as possible. For example, rather than a turkey sub on a processed roll and a bag of baked chips for lunch, order a chopped salad made with greens and veggies, topped with lean protein and avocado. At snack time trade anything that comes from a package with a tennis ball sized portion of fresh fruit and a golf ball sized serving of nuts.

Eat more pulses
You know about beans—black, red, white…well, pulses are a unique food group that includes beans, as well as peas, like chickpeas, and split peas, and lentils. I made a daily dose of pulses a key strategy in the weight loss plan in my new book Slim Down Now, in part because they’re so filling, nutrient rich, and gluten free, but also because of their impact on metabolism. A review published in the British Journal of Nutrition concluded that pulses increase calorie and fat burning, and help reduce visceral fat, the deep internal belly fat known to up the risk of heart disease and type 2 diabetes. To bolster your metabolism, include a half cup of a pulse in one of your daily meals, like a side of black beans with your veggie avocado omelet, lentils in your lunch salad, oven-roasted chickpeas or hummus in a snack, or white bean and kale soup at dinner. You can even incorporate pulses into desserts!

Drink coffee pre-exercise
Exercise itself can help boost metabolism, but according to a study published in the International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism drinking java before you get your heart rate up may further up your metabolic rate. Researchers found that compared to those who took in a placebo, athletes who consumed caffeine pre-exercise torched about 15% more calories for three hours post-exercise. The dose used in the study was 4.5 mg of caffeine per kilogram of body weight. That’s about 300 mg of caffeine for a 150-pound woman (68 kg), the amount in about 12 ounces of brewed coffee.

Cynthia Sass is a registered dietitian and Health’s contributing nutrition editor. She privately counsels clients in New York, Los Angeles, and long distance, and is the sports nutrition consultant to the New York Rangers NHL team and the New York Yankees MLB team.

This article originally appeared on Health.com.
«1345

Replies

  • Sued0nim
    Sued0nim Posts: 17,456 Member
    Too many rules
  • strong_curves
    strong_curves Posts: 2,229 Member
    Sounds like some bullcrap to me. I'm sure some people will incorporate these tips into their lifestyle and wonder why they still aren't losing any weight.
  • zyxst
    zyxst Posts: 9,147 Member
    I thought I needed more muscle to boost my metabolism. BRB, eating more food.
  • Asher_Ethan
    Asher_Ethan Posts: 2,430 Member
    Since I went from Paleo to CICO I have eaten A LOT less produce.... and lost a lot more weight...
  • missiontofitness
    missiontofitness Posts: 4,059 Member
    TL;DR.
    Don't even need a tl;dr, since I already know that's a nice tall glass of "nope".
  • jorinya
    jorinya Posts: 933 Member
    Ok, so basically I drink more more coffee, more water. Basically peeing out my fat. If it was that easy I would have done it years ago. New diet Pee to lose your fat, who wants it? Don't think it would work.
  • pollypocket1021
    pollypocket1021 Posts: 533 Member
    Lol. Nope.
  • booksandchocolate12
    booksandchocolate12 Posts: 1,741 Member
    Sounds like someone who believes the starvation mode myth, but cleverly renamed it "conservation mode", so that the fact that it's bullcrap wouldn't be immediately obvious.
  • echmainfit619
    echmainfit619 Posts: 333 Member
    She's selling a book. Game over.
  • williamwj2014
    williamwj2014 Posts: 750 Member
    love coming to this section of the forums for the bro science article, thanks OP
  • holybell
    holybell Posts: 69 Member
    Why does this feel like an infomercial?
  • TimothyFish
    TimothyFish Posts: 4,925 Member
    I'm all for people selling books, but what you have to realize is that conservative mode doesn't happen without a decrease in activity. When faced with fewer calories, some people respond by sitting around more, while others keep doing most of what they normally do. It isn't so much a metabolism problem as much as it is an attitude problem.
  • Sued0nim
    Sued0nim Posts: 17,456 Member
    I'm all for people selling books, but what you have to realize is that conservative mode doesn't happen without a decrease in activity. When faced with fewer calories, some people respond by sitting around more, while others keep doing most of what they normally do. It isn't so much a metabolism problem as much as it is an attitude problem.

    The crux of the majority of dieting failures right there
  • galgenstrick
    galgenstrick Posts: 2,086 Member
    Fat loss: It isn't so much a metabolism problem as much as it is an attitude problem.

    Can someone make a meme out of this?
  • 999tigger
    999tigger Posts: 5,235 Member
    OP whats your point/ views about the article? Why did you post it and what are you trying to tell us?
  • PeachyCarol
    PeachyCarol Posts: 8,029 Member
    edited May 2015
    I vaguely remember reading the abstract on the whole thrifty metabolism study... or maybe it was a write-up about it in a scientific journal or something like that.

    It wasn't anything like what this article is making it out to be, as I recall.

    I certainly don't remember any conclusions involving green tea.

    Even if the study did conclude green tea would give you super fat burning power to the tune of 5 pounds a week?

    Still wouldn't drink it. Vile stuff.

    That conclusion I just made? About as valuable to the rest of you as the ones in the article in the OP.
  • GreenIceFloes
    GreenIceFloes Posts: 1,491 Member
    WTF is a pulse...I'm pretty sure I don't want to eat that.

    20572057831432273735.jpg
  • PeachyCarol
    PeachyCarol Posts: 8,029 Member
    WTF is a pulse...I'm pretty sure I don't want to eat that.
    I find green tea disgusting
    Sorry OP but this article is horse hockey.

    Just beans, legumes, and peas!

  • snickerscharlie
    snickerscharlie Posts: 8,578 Member
    Sounds like someone who believes the starvation mode myth, but cleverly renamed it "conservation mode", so that the fact that it's bullcrap wouldn't be immediately obvious.

    Bingo! :)

  • physioprof
    physioprof Posts: 24 Member
    Actually, multiple twin studies have shown that anywhere from 25-40% of adiposity is genetic. Of course, genes only 'load' the gun, and individuals pull the trigger, but that does explain some of the variability seen in responsiveness to various weight loss methods. Also, multiple studies have shown that a reduction in weight--which includes both fat mass and muscle mass, regardless of weight loss method--does decrease metabolic rate. I have seen anywhere from a reduction of 3-4 Calories per day up to a 6% decrease in resting metabolic rate. Regular ingestion of water can cause stomach distension that will activate satiety centers, as will eating a large volume of produce; neither one contributes many (or any) Calories. Caffeine is a potent and efficacious ergogenic aid that causes a transient increase in metabolic rate and exercise performance. Pulses are an excellent source of fiber and some protein, both of which increase satiety.

    This article is actually scientifically-sound, which is no surprise considering the author is an RD.

  • missiontofitness
    missiontofitness Posts: 4,059 Member
    WTF is a pulse...I'm pretty sure I don't want to eat that.
    I find green tea disgusting
    Sorry OP but this article is horse hockey.
    WTF is a pulse...I'm pretty sure I don't want to eat that.
    I find green tea disgusting
    Sorry OP but this article is horse hockey.

    Just beans, legumes, and peas!

    Actually, it's when you eat the heart of your weight loss rival, and absorb their progress into your own body.
  • PeachyCarol
    PeachyCarol Posts: 8,029 Member
    I fail to see how anything of what you said support what the author said about those things "maximizing" metabolism.
  • snickerscharlie
    snickerscharlie Posts: 8,578 Member
    WTF is a pulse...I'm pretty sure I don't want to eat that.
    I find green tea disgusting
    Sorry OP but this article is horse hockey.
    WTF is a pulse...I'm pretty sure I don't want to eat that.
    I find green tea disgusting
    Sorry OP but this article is horse hockey.

    Just beans, legumes, and peas!

    Actually, it's when you eat the heart of your weight loss rival, and absorb their progress into your own body.

    Kind of like a gory Vulcan mind-meld?
  • missiontofitness
    missiontofitness Posts: 4,059 Member
    WTF is a pulse...I'm pretty sure I don't want to eat that.
    I find green tea disgusting
    Sorry OP but this article is horse hockey.
    WTF is a pulse...I'm pretty sure I don't want to eat that.
    I find green tea disgusting
    Sorry OP but this article is horse hockey.

    Just beans, legumes, and peas!

    Actually, it's when you eat the heart of your weight loss rival, and absorb their progress into your own body.

    Kind of like a gory Vulcan mind-meld?

    Exactly.
    (Really though...I've seen recipes that call for beef heart. Blehhhh.)
  • physioprof
    physioprof Posts: 24 Member
    I fail to see how anything of what you said support what the author said about those things "maximizing" metabolism.

    She just said, 'boost.' You can certainly do things to reduce your metabolic rate just like you can do things to increase it, and caffeine and exercise unequivocally increase it. There is plenty of misinformation out there--meal frequency, for instance--and in comparison, this article is pretty sound. It's still 'marketed' toward people who might not know that much about nutrition or metabolism so it has to 'sell', hence the title. I just think it's pretty humorous that a bunch of folks on the internet are bashing the article for its lack of sources...but no one else has any sources to refute her claims either.
  • physioprof
    physioprof Posts: 24 Member
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=martin+2007+rmr+weight+loss

    I mean...since when is this a myth? It's a real thing. It happens.
  • PeachyCarol
    PeachyCarol Posts: 8,029 Member
    physioprof wrote: »
    I fail to see how anything of what you said support what the author said about those things "maximizing" metabolism.

    She just said, 'boost.' You can certainly do things to reduce your metabolic rate just like you can do things to increase it, and caffeine and exercise unequivocally increase it. There is plenty of misinformation out there--meal frequency, for instance--and in comparison, this article is pretty sound. It's still 'marketed' toward people who might not know that much about nutrition or metabolism so it has to 'sell', hence the title. I just think it's pretty humorous that a bunch of folks on the internet are bashing the article for its lack of sources...but no one else has any sources to refute her claims either.

    How long does caffeine boost your metabolic rate? Seriously. Come on. That's the problem with the article. You yourself said the effect was transient.

  • PeachyCarol
    PeachyCarol Posts: 8,029 Member
    edited May 2015
    physioprof wrote: »
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=martin+2007+rmr+weight+loss

    I mean...since when is this a myth? It's a real thing. It happens.

    Well, actually, I'd like to take that on. Give me a minute.

  • physioprof
    physioprof Posts: 24 Member
    physioprof wrote: »
    I fail to see how anything of what you said support what the author said about those things "maximizing" metabolism.

    She just said, 'boost.' You can certainly do things to reduce your metabolic rate just like you can do things to increase it, and caffeine and exercise unequivocally increase it. There is plenty of misinformation out there--meal frequency, for instance--and in comparison, this article is pretty sound. It's still 'marketed' toward people who might not know that much about nutrition or metabolism so it has to 'sell', hence the title. I just think it's pretty humorous that a bunch of folks on the internet are bashing the article for its lack of sources...but no one else has any sources to refute her claims either.

    How long does caffeine boost your metabolic rate? Seriously. Come on. That's the problem with the article. You yourself said the effect was transient.

    Depending on the dose, up to 6 hours. It's more beneficial as an ergogenic aid. You take it before your workout, then you work harder, then your metabolic rate is increased for hours post-workout. The increases are variable of course, and they aren't huge, but it's not like one exercise bout or one cup of coffee is the solution to weight loss. These incremental changes add up over time.

    Someone else mentioned that 'starvation mode' is a myth and this author renamed it 'conservation theory'...it has multiple names and it's not a myth. It's just been a victim of hyperbole and overuse.
  • PeachyCarol
    PeachyCarol Posts: 8,029 Member
    Here are my problems with EVERY single study that I've seen that cites either lowered REE or RMR (some, one, or all of these conditions apply):

    1. They are short term
    2. They were done with either very low calorie diets or very aggressive deficits
    3. The macro balances were appallingly low on protein
    4. Participants did not do resistance training to preserve lean body mass

    I'd like to see some results done in a longitudinal study on formerly obese people who lost weight with reasonable deficits while taking measures to preserve lean body mass and see how their RMR's fared compared to a control group.

    THEN I'd take the information seriously.