Why are abs impossible?!
Replies
-
-
I will be in the minority and say that from personal experience I fail to see how heavy lifting is needed for visible abs. Low body fat is what it takes. If you get there by lifting or not, it is irrelevant. Contrary to what many people on MFP seem to believe, long distance runners for example usually have visible abs. At least theones who are serious about it. As in every sport.0
-
I will be in the minority and say that from personal experience I fail to see how heavy lifting is needed for visible abs. Low body fat is what it takes. If you get there by lifting or not, it is irrelevant. Contrary to what many people on MFP seem to believe, long distance runners for example usually have visible abs. At least theones who are serious about it. As in every sport.
resistance training keeps your metabolism firing for a couple of days afterwards, as does HIIT. resistance training also builds muscle. add in that most exercises engage and strengthen core (i say most as in free weights not isolation machines) and it does definitely help.
i have to say i prefer eating clean, that's just my choice though, not just for training benefits but just on the whole really, i am not sure i could eat processed foods and junk food and have abs but that's just me.0 -
hnaquin280 wrote: »why does everyone equate clean eating with abs?
When I say clean eating I just mean I've cut out processed foods and eat more fruits and vegetables and make all of my dinners from scratch. I've noticed a huge difference in my body after starting that. I don't do any crazy detoxes or anything, just eating better.
You can still eat processed foods or junk food and get abs. Some people find it easier to stick to a calorie deficit by limiting those, but you could still include them.
I get that, I just prefer to eat cleaner. It gives me more energy and makes me feel less bloated. I don't understand why everyone is honing in on the clean eating thing...I was kinda hoping for some helpful replies about effective excercises or something
0 -
I will be in the minority and say that from personal experience I fail to see how heavy lifting is needed for visible abs. Low body fat is what it takes. If you get there by lifting or not, it is irrelevant. Contrary to what many people on MFP seem to believe, long distance runners for example usually have visible abs. At least theones who are serious about it. As in every sport.
resistance training keeps your metabolism firing for a couple of days afterwards, as does HIIT. resistance training also builds muscle. add in that most exercises engage and strengthen core (i say most as in free weights not isolation machines) and it does definitely help.
i have to say i prefer eating clean, that's just my choice though, not just for training benefits but just on the whole really, i am not sure i could eat processed foods and junk food and have abs but that's just me.
Thank you! Haha I do HIIT on the treadmill 5 days a week. I'm sure it's possible to have abs and eat poorly but I'd rather not
0 -
I will be in the minority and say that from personal experience I fail to see how heavy lifting is needed for visible abs. Low body fat is what it takes. If you get there by lifting or not, it is irrelevant. Contrary to what many people on MFP seem to believe, long distance runners for example usually have visible abs. At least theones who are serious about it. As in every sport.
Because not many people on here train like an athlete, they just work out. Also, some people have low lean mass. That means they have to diet to a very low body weight to look lean. Lifting can improve body composition, meaning they don't have to lose as much weight.0 -
hnaquin280 wrote: »why does everyone equate clean eating with abs?
When I say clean eating I just mean I've cut out processed foods and eat more fruits and vegetables and make all of my dinners from scratch. I've noticed a huge difference in my body after starting that. I don't do any crazy detoxes or anything, just eating better.
Yeah but that's still not a requirement for abs. My food diary would scare a clean eater. My goal is 100% to hit my macros (I'm lenient on carbs because all my favorite foods are fatty so I tend to lose some grams to fat). I might cook a "clean" meal a couple times a week. Even my breakfast that I make relies on "unclear" deli meat.
Ever since I hit maintenance and started pushing hard with weights and nailing my protein, I've seen a good bit of leaning out and my abs are starting to pull through.
Calories, Macros, and lift.0 -
hnaquin280 wrote: »hnaquin280 wrote: »why does everyone equate clean eating with abs?
When I say clean eating I just mean I've cut out processed foods and eat more fruits and vegetables and make all of my dinners from scratch. I've noticed a huge difference in my body after starting that. I don't do any crazy detoxes or anything, just eating better.
You can still eat processed foods or junk food and get abs. Some people find it easier to stick to a calorie deficit by limiting those, but you could still include them.
I get that, I just prefer to eat cleaner. It gives me more energy and makes me feel less bloated. I don't understand why everyone is honing in on the clean eating thing...I was kinda hoping for some helpful replies about effective excercises or something
if you did not want anyone to "hone in on it" you did you even reference that you eat clean?
clean eating is necessary for absolutely nothing...except self torture.
0 -
I will be in the minority and say that from personal experience I fail to see how heavy lifting is needed for visible abs. Low body fat is what it takes. If you get there by lifting or not, it is irrelevant. Contrary to what many people on MFP seem to believe, long distance runners for example usually have visible abs. At least theones who are serious about it. As in every sport.
If you don't have thick enough abs even with low body fat, it will be difficult for them to show.0 -
hnaquin280 wrote: »hnaquin280 wrote: »why does everyone equate clean eating with abs?
When I say clean eating I just mean I've cut out processed foods and eat more fruits and vegetables and make all of my dinners from scratch. I've noticed a huge difference in my body after starting that. I don't do any crazy detoxes or anything, just eating better.
You can still eat processed foods or junk food and get abs. Some people find it easier to stick to a calorie deficit by limiting those, but you could still include them.
I get that, I just prefer to eat cleaner. It gives me more energy and makes me feel less bloated. I don't understand why everyone is honing in on the clean eating thing...I was kinda hoping for some helpful replies about effective excercises or something
if you did not want anyone to "hone in on it" you did you even reference that you eat clean?
clean eating is necessary for absolutely nothing...except self torture.
I'm just saying that wasn't the main point of the question haha
0 -
who lifts and who does not in the pic below:
0 -
hnaquin280 wrote: »Hi! I've been on MFP for about 5 months and have lost 35 pounds and hit my goal weight. I'm now focusing on maintaining and strengthening. Overall, I think I've lost a significant amount of weight, but my midsection still bothers me. I eat clean, do all kinds of abdominal excercises that are not just sit ups and crunches, and I do cardio 45 minutes a day 5 days a week. I'm just not seeing any progress in my midsection. I'm not going for a ripped 6 pack, I'd just like to tighten up and tone and see some definition and not flabby lower belly fat ): is this a problem for anyone else?
Abdominal definition in women begins to show around 15% body fat, which is pretty low for females. I would get some body fat calipers and check to see where you are at.
0 -
I will be in the minority and say that from personal experience I fail to see how heavy lifting is needed for visible abs. Low body fat is what it takes. If you get there by lifting or not, it is irrelevant. Contrary to what many people on MFP seem to believe, long distance runners for example usually have visible abs. At least theones who are serious about it. As in every sport.
Is it only me who finds it difficult to accept the opinion of someone without a profile pic? Maybe that's just me though.
The body composition I envision of a long-distance runner is personally not how I would like to achieve ab definition...but that is just my personal preference.0 -
hnaquin280 wrote: »why does everyone equate clean eating with abs?
When I say clean eating I just mean I've cut out processed foods and eat more fruits and vegetables and make all of my dinners from scratch. I've noticed a huge difference in my body after starting that. I don't do any crazy detoxes or anything, just eating better.
You can still eat processed foods or junk food and get abs. Some people find it easier to stick to a calorie deficit by limiting those, but you could still include them.
This. Per my profile pic, I'd like to think I'm on my way toward a decent set of abs, and I'll be damned if I'm about to give up my daily afternoon treat: a 4-pack of Oreos.0 -
I will be in the minority and say that from personal experience I fail to see how heavy lifting is needed for visible abs. Low body fat is what it takes. If you get there by lifting or not, it is irrelevant. Contrary to what many people on MFP seem to believe, long distance runners for example usually have visible abs. At least theones who are serious about it. As in every sport.
Distance runners still work their core. The abs are visible because they exist and have strong cores. That's why you see models with low body fat but no abs and simply a flat stomach.
Lifting is recommended because most people aren't just feeling unhappy with their lower stomach. They reached a goal and yet feel flabby. Lifting will work their entire body. With compound lifts people don't even have to target the abs with specific work (no "ab day" needed). Lifting isn't recommended because we think runners can't have abs.0 -
hnaquin280 wrote: »Hi! I've been on MFP for about 5 months and have lost 35 pounds and hit my goal weight. I'm now focusing on maintaining and strengthening. Overall, I think I've lost a significant amount of weight, but my midsection still bothers me. I eat clean, do all kinds of abdominal excercises that are not just sit ups and crunches, and I do cardio 45 minutes a day 5 days a week. I'm just not seeing any progress in my midsection. I'm not going for a ripped 6 pack, I'd just like to tighten up and tone and see some definition and not flabby lower belly fat ): is this a problem for anyone else?
Abdominal definition in women begins to show around 15% body fat, which is pretty low for females. I would get some body fat calipers and check to see where you are at.
Thank you! That's a good idea
0 -
I will be in the minority and say that from personal experience I fail to see how heavy lifting is needed for visible abs. Low body fat is what it takes. If you get there by lifting or not, it is irrelevant. Contrary to what many people on MFP seem to believe, long distance runners for example usually have visible abs. At least theones who are serious about it. As in every sport.
You certainly don't need to lift a thing to have visible abs. I lift nothing heavier than a beer glass, yet my abs are clearly visible.
0 -
I will be in the minority and say that from personal experience I fail to see how heavy lifting is needed for visible abs. Low body fat is what it takes. If you get there by lifting or not, it is irrelevant. Contrary to what many people on MFP seem to believe, long distance runners for example usually have visible abs. At least theones who are serious about it. As in every sport.
At the end of the day, your abdominal fascia is a muscle group like any other, and needs to be subjected to progressive overload, ie. resistance training, in order to grow. This is like saying "you don't need to work your biceps to have visible definition". While this in itself is true, you can lean right out and have the most defined biceps around - they just aren't going to be anything to write home about. Same goes for your abs. The old saying "abs are made in the kitchen" should really be amended to "abs are made in the gym, and shown off in the kitchen".0 -
who lifts and who does not in the pic below:
Kinda strawmannish. First, the guy on the left is well lit with the lights above him to accent the muscles, with his arms down and his abs flexed. I look like that when I also stand that way and light myself correctly. The guy on the right - is lit from the front with a brighter light, arms up (which pulls his pects up). His shoulders are back which tells me he is not flexing his abs. I can make myself look like that too by standing how he stands.0 -
I will be in the minority and say that from personal experience I fail to see how heavy lifting is needed for visible abs. Low body fat is what it takes. If you get there by lifting or not, it is irrelevant. Contrary to what many people on MFP seem to believe, long distance runners for example usually have visible abs. At least theones who are serious about it. As in every sport.
if you have little to no muscle mass- having low body fat and having visible abs- is hard. That's what people who are very small and not over weight are- skinny fat- they don't look toned- they just look super tiny and squishy. same concept.
0 -
hnaquin280 wrote: »Hi! I've been on MFP for about 5 months and have lost 35 pounds and hit my goal weight. I'm now focusing on maintaining and strengthening. Overall, I think I've lost a significant amount of weight, but my midsection still bothers me. I eat clean, do all kinds of abdominal excercises that are not just sit ups and crunches, and I do cardio 45 minutes a day 5 days a week. I'm just not seeing any progress in my midsection. I'm not going for a ripped 6 pack, I'd just like to tighten up and tone and see some definition and not flabby lower belly fat ): is this a problem for anyone else?
Abdominal definition in women begins to show around 15% body fat, which is pretty low for females. I would get some body fat calipers and check to see where you are at.
My abs are clear and visible at 21% because the muscles have volume. Most women should see some sort of ab definition around 18% and if they don't it means they have low lean mass.0 -
hnaquin280 wrote: »Hi! I've been on MFP for about 5 months and have lost 35 pounds and hit my goal weight. I'm now focusing on maintaining and strengthening. Overall, I think I've lost a significant amount of weight, but my midsection still bothers me. I eat clean, do all kinds of abdominal excercises that are not just sit ups and crunches, and I do cardio 45 minutes a day 5 days a week. I'm just not seeing any progress in my midsection. I'm not going for a ripped 6 pack, I'd just like to tighten up and tone and see some definition and not flabby lower belly fat ): is this a problem for anyone else?
Abdominal definition in women begins to show around 15% body fat, which is pretty low for females. I would get some body fat calipers and check to see where you are at.
I cosign USMCP's sentement and call rubbish on this- around 15% a woman's going to be looking quiet shredded.
I have very soft definition and I'm in the mid 20's.0 -
OK, while we are on the suject of abs.....is it possible for a woman 60 years of age, new to weight lifting, with time and patience, see some toning and definition in her lower abdomin? I've had two C sections and hystorectomy. Is there anything anyone can suggest? Thanks~0
-
who lifts and who does not in the pic below:
Kinda strawmannish. First, the guy on the left is well lit with the lights above him to accent the muscles, with his arms down and his abs flexed. I look like that when I also stand that way and light myself correctly. The guy on the right - is lit from the front with a brighter light, arms up (which pulls his pects up). His shoulders are back which tells me he is not flexing his abs. I can make myself look like that too by standing how he stands.
you could be right..I just thought it was a good example of 10% body fat vs 10% body fat.....0 -
who lifts and who does not in the pic below:
Kinda strawmannish. First, the guy on the left is well lit with the lights above him to accent the muscles, with his arms down and his abs flexed. I look like that when I also stand that way and light myself correctly. The guy on the right - is lit from the front with a brighter light, arms up (which pulls his pects up). His shoulders are back which tells me he is not flexing his abs. I can make myself look like that too by standing how he stands.
you could be right..I just thought it was a good example of 10% body fat vs 10% body fat.....
Yea - definitely shows, though, that 10% can mean different things. One additional point I forgot to make - I can make myself look almost like the guy on the left given the right light, but I never lift anything. I suspect the guy on the right does NO physical activity whatsoever (or very little). Even long-distance endurance training builds some muscle, which is where I seem to be.
0 -
who lifts and who does not in the pic below:
Kinda strawmannish. First, the guy on the left is well lit with the lights above him to accent the muscles, with his arms down and his abs flexed. I look like that when I also stand that way and light myself correctly. The guy on the right - is lit from the front with a brighter light, arms up (which pulls his pects up). His shoulders are back which tells me he is not flexing his abs. I can make myself look like that too by standing how he stands.
you could be right..I just thought it was a good example of 10% body fat vs 10% body fat.....
Yea - definitely shows, though, that 10% can mean different things. One additional point I forgot to make - I can make myself look almost like the guy on the left given the right light, but I never lift anything. I suspect the guy on the right does NO physical activity whatsoever (or very little). Even long-distance endurance training builds some muscle, which is where I seem to be.
I agree with right lighting I can look pretty shredded too
0 -
I'm personally really frustrated by this. I ran and ran and ran and ran and ran and lost 50 lbs. was at my lowest weight, smallest size, and no abs. So I started lifting and eating more, I'm sure I built muscle there because my waist line went up, but now i have more pudge on there than I want. So I am back to trying to lose fat and hopefully see something this time. My lowest weight was 123. Now I'm 143 (not suggesting I put on 20 lbs of muscle by any means!) and I'm thinking if I actually keep lifting while eating right (a hard task for me, apparently) I should (finally??) see something around 135. ...i hope.0
-
If you've been eating clean, have you tried eating ultra clean?
Don't just wash your fruits and vegetables once, or even twice with water.
Wash them with bleach (warning, not actual advice, do not do).-1 -
Pammeycakes55 wrote: »OK, while we are on the suject of abs.....is it possible for a woman 60 years of age, new to weight lifting, with time and patience, see some toning and definition in her lower abdomin? I've had two C sections and hystorectomy. Is there anything anyone can suggest? Thanks~
All i can say is my mom is 74 years old, took up lifting this year, and has muscles she has never had before in her life.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.3K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 423 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions