We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

Possible Goal... or Far Reach?

Thanasi99
Thanasi99 Posts: 40 Member
edited November 2024 in Health and Weight Loss
Okay, so I am attempting to get down to about 165 lbs. by the end of August.

I currently weigh 187.8 lbs. (from 210 lbs. since April).

Is this goal/safe possible?

Replies

  • TimothyFish
    TimothyFish Posts: 4,925 Member
    It's possible, but unlikely.
  • ManiacalLaugh
    ManiacalLaugh Posts: 1,048 Member
    That's almost 2 lbs/week (if my maths aren't broken). It's possible, but it would be difficult. You'd have to do an aggressive plan, likely bottoming out at 1200 calories/day. Keep in mind too, you've lost a decent amount of weight since April. This is going to lower your TDEE and make it harder to lose.
  • IsaackGMOON
    IsaackGMOON Posts: 3,358 Member
    That's almost 2 lbs/week (if my maths aren't broken). It's possible, but it would be difficult. You'd have to do an aggressive plan, likely bottoming out at 1200 calories/day. Keep in mind too, you've lost a decent amount of weight since April. This is going to lower your TDEE and make it harder to lose.

    It's possible but it will be a challenge OP. I checked your profile and it didn't state whether you're male or female, just remember that the minimum calories for a male is 1500 and 1200 for females.

    In my eyes its best to have a moderate deficit relative to your TDEE.
  • Thanasi99
    Thanasi99 Posts: 40 Member
    That's almost 2 lbs/week (if my maths aren't broken). It's possible, but it would be difficult. You'd have to do an aggressive plan, likely bottoming out at 1200 calories/day. Keep in mind too, you've lost a decent amount of weight since April. This is going to lower your TDEE and make it harder to lose.

    It's possible but it will be a challenge OP. I checked your profile and it didn't state whether you're male or female, just remember that the minimum calories for a male is 1500 and 1200 for females.

    In my eyes its best to have a moderate deficit relative to your TDEE.

    I am a male, so it will be a little bit tougher given the higher caloric limits. However, I plan to integrate more regular exercise, as thus far I've only been doing some exercise on and off.

    Thank you for your response!
  • bpetrosky
    bpetrosky Posts: 3,911 Member
    The recommended max is about 2 lb/wk, but being so close to your target weight it is very hard to lose at that rate. 1 lb/wk is more realistic.

    You may find that you lose a big chunk of water weight when you start off on a plan, however, so you may be closer than you think.

    In short, it's possible, but not easy or advisable to push it that hard. Is there a reason for such a tight deadline?
  • davidmanfred
    davidmanfred Posts: 20 Member
    Also consider that adding more exercise will replace fat with muscle so the trade off might be a more svelte physique that isn't recorded on the scale. When I step up exercise I tend to lose fat but less weight than when I just watch calories without the exercise.
  • Thanasi99
    Thanasi99 Posts: 40 Member
    bpetrosky wrote: »
    The recommended max is about 2 lb/wk, but being so close to your target weight it is very hard to lose at that rate. 1 lb/wk is more realistic.

    You may find that you lose a big chunk of water weight when you start off on a plan, however, so you may be closer than you think.

    In short, it's possible, but not easy or advisable to push it that hard. Is there a reason for such a tight deadline?

    No reason in particular, just the goal date I had in mind. Thanks for the help!
  • IsaackGMOON
    IsaackGMOON Posts: 3,358 Member
    edited June 2015
    Also consider that adding more exercise will replace fat with muscle so the trade off might be a more svelte physique that isn't recorded on the scale. When I step up exercise I tend to lose fat but less weight than when I just watch calories without the exercise.

    No... please stop giving out misinformed information.

    OP doing exercise in a deficit will not replace fat with muscle.
    Thanasi99 wrote: »
    That's almost 2 lbs/week (if my maths aren't broken). It's possible, but it would be difficult. You'd have to do an aggressive plan, likely bottoming out at 1200 calories/day. Keep in mind too, you've lost a decent amount of weight since April. This is going to lower your TDEE and make it harder to lose.

    It's possible but it will be a challenge OP. I checked your profile and it didn't state whether you're male or female, just remember that the minimum calories for a male is 1500 and 1200 for females.

    In my eyes its best to have a moderate deficit relative to your TDEE.

    I am a male, so it will be a little bit tougher given the higher caloric limits. However, I plan to integrate more regular exercise, as thus far I've only been doing some exercise on and off.

    Thank you for your response!

    Whats your TDEE?
  • Thanasi99
    Thanasi99 Posts: 40 Member
    Also consider that adding more exercise will replace fat with muscle so the trade off might be a more svelte physique that isn't recorded on the scale. When I step up exercise I tend to lose fat but less weight than when I just watch calories without the exercise.

    No... please stop giving out misinformed information.

    OP doing exercise in a deficit will not replace fat with muscle.

    Hmm... I do think there may be some validity to the statement. I don't think he intended to mean a pound for pound trade off, but rather, some muscle growth (at a much slower rate than weight loss) may be noticed, and thus slow down weight loss to a degree.
  • BWBTrish
    BWBTrish Posts: 2,817 Member
    Also consider that adding more exercise will replace fat with muscle so the trade off might be a more svelte physique that isn't recorded on the scale. When I step up exercise I tend to lose fat but less weight than when I just watch calories without the exercise.

    You dont gain muscle when you eat in deficit!!!!!

    for the OP
    your weight loss will slow down...a lot

    But just keep going ( eat the healthy recommended calories) and you will be closer to your goal than when you started :)

  • Thanasi99
    Thanasi99 Posts: 40 Member
    Also consider that adding more exercise will replace fat with muscle so the trade off might be a more svelte physique that isn't recorded on the scale. When I step up exercise I tend to lose fat but less weight than when I just watch calories without the exercise.

    You dont gain muscle when you eat in deficit!!!!!

    for the OP
    your weight loss will slow down...a lot

    But just keep going ( eat the healthy recommended calories) and you will be closer to your goal than when you started :)

    I see... I guess I was also misinformed regarding muscle gain.

    Thanks for clearing that up!
  • Elle_Bronwyn15
    Elle_Bronwyn15 Posts: 296 Member
    Very possible as long as you stick with it!
  • BWBTrish
    BWBTrish Posts: 2,817 Member
    Thanasi99 wrote: »
    Also consider that adding more exercise will replace fat with muscle so the trade off might be a more svelte physique that isn't recorded on the scale. When I step up exercise I tend to lose fat but less weight than when I just watch calories without the exercise.

    You dont gain muscle when you eat in deficit!!!!!

    for the OP
    your weight loss will slow down...a lot

    But just keep going ( eat the healthy recommended calories) and you will be closer to your goal than when you started :)

    I see... I guess I was also misinformed regarding muscle gain.

    Thanks for clearing that up!

    yvw :)

This discussion has been closed.