low carb ??? anyone try this before

124»

Replies

  • maryelgin1988
    maryelgin1988 Posts: 185 Member
    I lost 100 lbs in 5 months. I was strictly low carbing, though i would have the occasional cheat day. Every 2 weeks or so....I had to restart the process of ketosis each time but still lost a ton of weight. I also was completely dedicated to working out 5 days a week. Mostly HIIT, long walks and strength training.
    I should add that my starting weight was around 340 and thus the reason that I lost so much so quickly.
    I will say that it is a great diet to shed pounds quickly but as far as keeping it off, unless you are committed to a lifetime of low carbing....you WILL slowly but surely gain the weight back.
    I am not trying to calorie counting approach, seems more sustainable because there are no restrictions on quality, just quantity restrictions.
    Good luck!
  • maryelgin1988
    maryelgin1988 Posts: 185 Member
    I lost 100 lbs in 5 months. I was strictly low carbing, though i would have the occasional cheat day. Every 2 weeks or so....I had to restart the process of ketosis each time but still lost a ton of weight. I also was completely dedicated to working out 5 days a week. Mostly HIIT, long walks and strength training.
    I should add that my starting weight was around 340 and thus the reason that I lost so much so quickly.
    I will say that it is a great diet to shed pounds quickly but as far as keeping it off, unless you are committed to a lifetime of low carbing....you WILL slowly but surely gain the weight back.
    I am not trying to calorie counting approach, seems more sustainable because there are no restrictions on quality, just quantity restrictions.
    Good luck!

    ***I am NOW trying ***
  • RedVonMunster
    RedVonMunster Posts: 18 Member
    You'd honestly be better off just watching what you eat, holding yourself accountable for what you do eat and exercise. Losing weight is all about fuel intake and energy output. Find your bmr and work with that.
  • JPW1990
    JPW1990 Posts: 2,424 Member
    I lost 100 lbs in 5 months. I was strictly low carbing, though i would have the occasional cheat day. Every 2 weeks or so....I had to restart the process of ketosis each time but still lost a ton of weight. I also was completely dedicated to working out 5 days a week. Mostly HIIT, long walks and strength training.
    I should add that my starting weight was around 340 and thus the reason that I lost so much so quickly.
    I will say that it is a great diet to shed pounds quickly but as far as keeping it off, unless you are committed to a lifetime of low carbing....you WILL slowly but surely gain the weight back.
    I am not trying to calorie counting approach, seems more sustainable because there are no restrictions on quality, just quantity restrictions.
    Good luck!

    That has nothing to do with LC, and everything to do with developing a strategy for maintenance. It doesn't matter if someone loses with LC, vegan, or eating everything on earth in moderation, they will gain when they're done if they eat too much of anything, the same way they got fat in the first place.
  • snickerscharlie
    snickerscharlie Posts: 8,578 Member
    peter56765 wrote: »
    I low carbed for a little over a year. I lost 40 lbs but ultimately found the diet unsustainable and gained everything back. There's just too much delicious food out there that has a lot of carbs and since calorie restriction is the real key to weight loss and maintenance, I can't see the point of living with an unnecessary dietary restriction.

    If other people want to only eat Kosher, Halal, vegan, organic or low carb foods - good for them I guess. For me, life's a banquet and our time on this earth is short. There are already enough external realities that put limits and restrictions on my life so I sure as hell am not adding one of my own.

    ^^^ This. :)

  • QuilterInVA
    QuilterInVA Posts: 672 Member
    vgrezzy wrote: »
    Unless you have a medical condition that would warrant low carbs, I wouldn't go below 40-50% carbs. your body needs carbs for lots of energy, and fats and proteins are too difficult for your body to digest, so having too high fat% or protein% can harm your liver & back you up

    Your body has no need for any amount of carbs. It does require adequate amounts of fat and protein for health. You will keep more muscle eating low carb than a high carb diet. I've done low carb for many years and have had no adverse affects. I keep my carbs to 25% (about 50 net carbs) a day. You need no carbs for energy. Your body converts fat and protein to glucose if carbs aren't available.

    If you'd like a scientific explanation, read Gary Taubes "Good Calories, Bad Calories."
  • Dnarules
    Dnarules Posts: 2,081 Member
    JPW1990 wrote: »
    I lost 100 lbs in 5 months. I was strictly low carbing, though i would have the occasional cheat day. Every 2 weeks or so....I had to restart the process of ketosis each time but still lost a ton of weight. I also was completely dedicated to working out 5 days a week. Mostly HIIT, long walks and strength training.
    I should add that my starting weight was around 340 and thus the reason that I lost so much so quickly.
    I will say that it is a great diet to shed pounds quickly but as far as keeping it off, unless you are committed to a lifetime of low carbing....you WILL slowly but surely gain the weight back.
    I am not trying to calorie counting approach, seems more sustainable because there are no restrictions on quality, just quantity restrictions.
    Good luck!

    That has nothing to do with LC, and everything to do with developing a strategy for maintenance. It doesn't matter if someone loses with LC, vegan, or eating everything on earth in moderation, they will gain when they're done if they eat too much of anything, the same way they got fat in the first place.

    This! I lost 54 pounds, and have gained almost all back. And I was not low carb. A large majority fails at keeping the weight off.

  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member
    vgrezzy wrote: »
    Unless you have a medical condition that would warrant low carbs, I wouldn't go below 40-50% carbs. your body needs carbs for lots of energy, and fats and proteins are too difficult for your body to digest, so having too high fat% or protein% can harm your liver & back you up

    Your body has no need for any amount of carbs. It does require adequate amounts of fat and protein for health. You will keep more muscle eating low carb than a high carb diet. I've done low carb for many years and have had no adverse affects. I keep my carbs to 25% (about 50 net carbs) a day. You need no carbs for energy. Your body converts fat and protein to glucose if carbs aren't available.

    If you'd like a scientific explanation, read Gary Taubes "Good Calories, Bad Calories."

    bahahahahah taubes.....oh man, you had to go there...
  • This content has been removed.
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member
    shell1005 wrote: »
    JPW1990 wrote: »
    I lost 100 lbs in 5 months. I was strictly low carbing, though i would have the occasional cheat day. Every 2 weeks or so....I had to restart the process of ketosis each time but still lost a ton of weight. I also was completely dedicated to working out 5 days a week. Mostly HIIT, long walks and strength training.
    I should add that my starting weight was around 340 and thus the reason that I lost so much so quickly.
    I will say that it is a great diet to shed pounds quickly but as far as keeping it off, unless you are committed to a lifetime of low carbing....you WILL slowly but surely gain the weight back.
    I am not trying to calorie counting approach, seems more sustainable because there are no restrictions on quality, just quantity restrictions.
    Good luck!

    That has nothing to do with LC, and everything to do with developing a strategy for maintenance. It doesn't matter if someone loses with LC, vegan, or eating everything on earth in moderation, they will gain when they're done if they eat too much of anything, the same way they got fat in the first place.

    This. The stats say 90% of all people who lose weight fail to keep it off, so it's not all about low carb.

    When I lost the majority of my weight in 2008/2009 (87 lbs), I maintained the loss for 3+ years. When I gained about half back it was because I stopped following my maintenance plan, not because low carb diets are non sustainable and DOOMED FOR FAILURE.

    anything that restricts a specific macro is doomed for failure, IMO
  • This content has been removed.
  • maryelgin1988
    maryelgin1988 Posts: 185 Member
    JPW1990 wrote: »
    I lost 100 lbs in 5 months. I was strictly low carbing, though i would have the occasional cheat day. Every 2 weeks or so....I had to restart the process of ketosis each time but still lost a ton of weight. I also was completely dedicated to working out 5 days a week. Mostly HIIT, long walks and strength training.
    I should add that my starting weight was around 340 and thus the reason that I lost so much so quickly.
    I will say that it is a great diet to shed pounds quickly but as far as keeping it off, unless you are committed to a lifetime of low carbing....you WILL slowly but surely gain the weight back.
    I am not trying to calorie counting approach, seems more sustainable because there are no restrictions on quality, just quantity restrictions.
    Good luck!

    That has nothing to do with LC, and everything to do with developing a strategy for maintenance. It doesn't matter if someone loses with LC, vegan, or eating everything on earth in moderation, they will gain when they're done if they eat too much of anything, the same way they got fat in the first place.

    Actually what I was trying to say was staying away from high Carb foods indefinitely was not sustainable for me.
    As in with calorie counting nothing is completely off limits.
  • Acg67
    Acg67 Posts: 12,142 Member
    yarwell wrote: »
    What we see :-
    02bzc1cwk9ds.jpg

    Probably fair to assume that the poster meant "we don't need to eat carbs" or "we don't need dietary carbs.

    Ah, assuming a low carb advocate means something else than what they actually posted? Well you know what they say about people who make assumptions


  • Acg67
    Acg67 Posts: 12,142 Member
    carfaa963 wrote: »
    shell1005 wrote: »
    vgrezzy wrote: »
    Unless you have a medical condition that would warrant low carbs, I wouldn't go below 40-50% carbs. your body needs carbs for lots of energy, and fats and proteins are too difficult for your body to digest, so having too high fat% or protein% can harm your liver & back you up

    Your body doesn't need carbs and a low carb diet is completely appropriate and healthy, if that is what one so chooses. Your body digests protein and carbs just fine. Your body also can function just fine without the presence of carbs, it's called ketosis. If you have a healthy liver and kidney....there is nothing unhealthy about low carb.

    Low carb is not for everyone, but the fear mongering is totally not cool.

    This^^^.

    What's the point of repeating falsehoods? They don't become anymore true if you repeat them
  • Acg67
    Acg67 Posts: 12,142 Member
    yarwell wrote: »
    What we see :-
    02bzc1cwk9ds.jpg

    Probably fair to assume that the poster meant "we don't need to eat carbs" or "we don't need dietary carbs.

    You should probably ask yourself, what group believed their diet works by magic, not the energy balance equation before you make such assumptions
  • This content has been removed.
  • Sabine_Stroehm
    Sabine_Stroehm Posts: 19,263 Member
    sarahlifts wrote: »
    South beach diet many years ago, I was miserable.

    the only time I low carb now is if I want most of the water off of me for a beach day (which rarely happens in Chicago) or if I have an event and I want to wear a skin tight dress. Its just getting the water off.

    Otherwise the long term effects come from being in a deficit bc you are no longer consuming many high calorie carbs and something else about ketosis. I don't follow that info bc I like carbs and decent smelling breath.

    Maybe look into a KEto diet. I dunno. Just sharing my experience.

    South
    I lost 100 lbs in 5 months. I was strictly low carbing, though i would have the occasional cheat day. Every 2 weeks or so....I had to restart the process of ketosis each time but still lost a ton of weight. I also was completely dedicated to working out 5 days a week. Mostly HIIT, long walks and strength training.
    I should add that my starting weight was around 340 and thus the reason that I lost so much so quickly.
    I will say that it is a great diet to shed pounds quickly but as far as keeping it off, unless you are committed to a lifetime of low carbing....you WILL slowly but surely gain the weight back.
    I am not trying to calorie counting approach, seems more sustainable because there are no restrictions on quality, just quantity restrictions.
    Good luck!

    If CICO is "fact" then you only gain it back if you eat at a surplus, right? Because, well, CICO.

    If you stop calorie counting, and go back to eating more than you burn, you WILL slowly but surely gain the weight back.

    You will ALWAYS gain it back until you have a plan for eating at maintenance.
  • Acg67
    Acg67 Posts: 12,142 Member
    shell1005 wrote: »
    Acg67 wrote: »
    yarwell wrote: »
    What we see :-
    02bzc1cwk9ds.jpg

    Probably fair to assume that the poster meant "we don't need to eat carbs" or "we don't need dietary carbs.

    You should probably ask yourself, what group believed their diet works by magic, not the energy balance equation before you make such assumptions

    You might wanna read my posts, even though I know you won't waste your time with facts. I have never EVER said that CICO isn't the common denominator for every single way of losing weight. For those who do low carb, it is just the tool they use to most easily get a deficit. But reacting to those little facts would take away your ability to grandstand and argue, so carry one. Jeepers.

    Why so defensive? I'd love you to point out where anyone claimed did

    now You Did Make the claim the body doesn't need carbs please substantiate
  • This content has been removed.
  • Unknown
    edited June 2015
    This content has been removed.
  • Acg67
    Acg67 Posts: 12,142 Member
    shell1005 wrote: »
    Acg67 wrote: »
    shell1005 wrote: »
    Acg67 wrote: »
    shell1005 wrote: »
    Acg67 wrote: »
    yarwell wrote: »
    What we see :-
    02bzc1cwk9ds.jpg

    Probably fair to assume that the poster meant "we don't need to eat carbs" or "we don't need dietary carbs.

    You should probably ask yourself, what group believed their diet works by magic, not the energy balance equation before you make such assumptions

    You might wanna read my posts, even though I know you won't waste your time with facts. I have never EVER said that CICO isn't the common denominator for every single way of losing weight. For those who do low carb, it is just the tool they use to most easily get a deficit. But reacting to those little facts would take away your ability to grandstand and argue, so carry one. Jeepers.

    Why so defensive? I'd love you to point out where anyone claimed did

    now You Did Make the claim the body doesn't need carbs please substantiate

    You did in response to what someone thought I might have meant. Oh well. It's right above. Take care.

    Right you claimed I don't waste time with facts, yet you're posting blatant falsehoods? Making baseless Claims? Day in the life of a low carb advocate

    None of that is true, but who cares. You are a dog with a bone.

    If I am a strong advocate for anything it is always and forever calories in and calories out. But whatever. I'm done with your silliness. Pester another.

    To the others in the thread, here is a pretty comprehensive study about if carbs are essential or not: http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/75/5/951.2.full

    as we've seen with other low carbers, that study doesn't support your statement of"Your body doesn't need carbs"

    so it is indeed baseless
  • umayster
    umayster Posts: 651 Member
    "The lower limit of dietary carbohydrate compatible with life appar-
    ently is zero, provided that adequate amounts of protein and fat are con-
    sumed. However, the amount of dietary carbohydrate that provides for
    optimal health in humans is unknown." page 275

    www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/DRI/DRI_Energy/265-338.pdf

    From what I've read, the general nutrition community refuses to acknowledge that eating carbohydrates has never been proven to be essential for life.
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member
    Acg67 wrote: »
    shell1005 wrote: »
    Acg67 wrote: »
    shell1005 wrote: »
    Acg67 wrote: »
    shell1005 wrote: »
    Acg67 wrote: »
    yarwell wrote: »
    What we see :-
    02bzc1cwk9ds.jpg

    Probably fair to assume that the poster meant "we don't need to eat carbs" or "we don't need dietary carbs.

    You should probably ask yourself, what group believed their diet works by magic, not the energy balance equation before you make such assumptions

    You might wanna read my posts, even though I know you won't waste your time with facts. I have never EVER said that CICO isn't the common denominator for every single way of losing weight. For those who do low carb, it is just the tool they use to most easily get a deficit. But reacting to those little facts would take away your ability to grandstand and argue, so carry one. Jeepers.

    Why so defensive? I'd love you to point out where anyone claimed did

    now You Did Make the claim the body doesn't need carbs please substantiate

    You did in response to what someone thought I might have meant. Oh well. It's right above. Take care.

    Right you claimed I don't waste time with facts, yet you're posting blatant falsehoods? Making baseless Claims? Day in the life of a low carb advocate

    None of that is true, but who cares. You are a dog with a bone.

    If I am a strong advocate for anything it is always and forever calories in and calories out. But whatever. I'm done with your silliness. Pester another.

    To the others in the thread, here is a pretty comprehensive study about if carbs are essential or not: http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/75/5/951.2.full

    as we've seen with other low carbers, that study doesn't support your statement of"Your body doesn't need carbs"

    so it is indeed baseless

    from the study ..
    Although there is certainly no evidence from which to conclude that extreme restriction of dietary carbohydrate is harmless, I was surprised to find that there is similarly little evidence to conclude that extreme restriction of carbohydrate is harmful. In fact, the consequential breakdown of fat as a result of carbohydrate restriction may be beneficial in the treatment of obesity (7). Perhaps it is time to carefully examine the issue of whether carbohydrate is an essential component of human nutrition.

    does not really seem to substantiate what that poster was claiming...
  • kgeyser
    kgeyser Posts: 22,505 Member
    2419891-dunno.gif

    1. No Attacks or Insults and No Reciprocation

    a) Do not attack, mock, or otherwise insult others. You can respectfully disagree with the message or topic, but you cannot attack the messenger. This includes attacks against the user’s spelling or command of written English, or belittling a user for posting a duplicate topic.

    b) If you are attacked by another user, and you reciprocate, you will also be subject to the same consequences. Defending yourself or a friend is not an excuse! Do not take matters into your own hands – instead, use the Report Post link to report an attack and we will be happy to handle the situation for you.

    2. No Hi-Jacking, Trolling, or Flame-baiting

    Please stay on-topic in an existing thread, and post new threads in the appropriate forum. Taking a thread off-topic is considered hi-jacking. Please either contribute politely and constructively to a topic, or move on without posting. This includes posts that encourage the drama in a topic to escalate, or posts intended to incite an uproar from the community.

This discussion has been closed.