starvation mode

mtringali13
mtringali13 Posts: 41 Member
in Health and Weight Loss
will someone please explain this? is it a thing or not?
«1

Replies

  • quiksylver296
    quiksylver296 Posts: 28,439 Member
    Not.
  • Alyssa_Is_LosingIt
    Alyssa_Is_LosingIt Posts: 4,696 Member
    Not a thing.
  • Alluminati
    Alluminati Posts: 6,208 Member
    no
  • JohnBarth
    JohnBarth Posts: 672 Member
    No, and all you'd ever like to know is here:
    http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/1077746/starvation-mode-adaptive-thermogenesis-and-weight-loss/p1
  • mirrim52
    mirrim52 Posts: 763 Member
    Not in the way most people on here talk about it.

    In Nazi concentration camps, etc. it was a thing.
  • DeguelloTex
    DeguelloTex Posts: 6,652 Member
    mirrim52 wrote: »
    Not in the way most people on here talk about it.

    In Nazi concentration camps, etc. it was a thing.
    No. Starvation was a thing. Starvation mode wasn't.
  • Kalikel
    Kalikel Posts: 9,603 Member
    edited June 2015
    There is a lot of research being done about how the body reacts to different amounts of food over different time spans. No real answers yet. They don't even know why we lose weight. No answer for what triggers it, physiologically.

    A lot of people who don't study it have a lot of different opinions that they claim to be absolute facts. The truth is that nobody actually knows what the heck is going on. They will some day and I hope I live to see it.

    One thing everyone seems to agree upon - experts and wannabes alike - is that eating more food doesn't make you lose weight. :)
  • Asher_Ethan
    Asher_Ethan Posts: 2,430 Member
    It's a thing if you are less than 5% body fat.
  • andythecurefan
    andythecurefan Posts: 43 Member
    Here is how to stop "starvation mode": Eat Something
  • agal129
    agal129 Posts: 215 Member
    Kalikel wrote: »
    There is a lot of research being done about how the body reacts to different amounts of food over different time spans. No real answers yet. They don't even know why we lose weight. No answer for what triggers it, physiologically.

    A lot of people who don't study it have a lot of different opinions that they claim to be absolute facts. The truth is that nobody actually knows what the heck is going on. They will some day and I hope I live to see it.

    One thing everyone seems to agree upon - experts and wannabes alike - is that eating more food doesn't make you lose weight. :)

    NO. If you eat less, you lose weight. That's what everybody on this site is doing.
  • Kalikel
    Kalikel Posts: 9,603 Member
    asflatasapancake wrote: »
    Kalikel wrote: »
    There is a lot of research being done about how the body reacts to different amounts of food over different time spans. No real answers yet. They don't even know why we lose weight. No answer for what triggers it, physiologically.

    A lot of people who don't study it have a lot of different opinions that they claim to be absolute facts. The truth is that moody actually knows what the heck is going on. They will some day and I hope I live to see it.

    One thing everyone seems to agree upon - experts and wannabes alike - is that eating more food doesn't make you lose weight. :)

    I'd like to talk with "moody" someday about that over some nachos and a sarsaparilla.
    Thank you! I let my autocorrect get wet and fed him after midnight. I changed moody back to nobody, lol. :)

  • ElJefeChief
    ElJefeChief Posts: 650 Member
    Muh starvashun mode
  • Kalikel
    Kalikel Posts: 9,603 Member
    agal129 wrote: »
    Kalikel wrote: »
    There is a lot of research being done about how the body reacts to different amounts of food over different time spans. No real answers yet. They don't even know why we lose weight. No answer for what triggers it, physiologically.

    A lot of people who don't study it have a lot of different opinions that they claim to be absolute facts. The truth is that nobody actually knows what the heck is going on. They will some day and I hope I live to see it.

    One thing everyone seems to agree upon - experts and wannabes alike - is that eating more food doesn't make you lose weight. :)

    NO. If you eat less, you lose weight. That's what everybody on this site is doing.
    What, specifically, are you NOing?
  • Varamyr38
    Varamyr38 Posts: 258 Member
    It isn't a thing. Just keep on eating in moderation and you'll be fine. The only thing you have to worry about when eating way too little is, chances are, you'll go back to your old ways. It just isn't doable for a long-term lifestyle change. I eat what I want but everything in moderation. I don't see any food as "bad" anymore and it helped me have a good relationship with food again. Not to mention I'm losing weight too.
  • BWBTrish
    BWBTrish Posts: 2,817 Member
    No it doesn excist

    But looking at your diary and if that is what you really eat..i shouldn't worry at all about starvation mode but more about
    Losing your nails, hair, your period and some other real medical issues when you keep this low eating up.

    you do know you need calories to stay alive you know like breathing pumping blood through your body etc. About 1200

    you net ZERO!!!!!!!

    so No starvation mode is a myth...but if you eat really like that no problem at all i would say.
  • RebeccaD22
    RebeccaD22 Posts: 202 Member
    cfxpj8nte7nm.gif
  • atypicalsmith
    atypicalsmith Posts: 2,742 Member
    DeguelloTex wrote: »
    mirrim52 wrote: »
    Not in the way most people on here talk about it.

    In Nazi concentration camps, etc. it was a thing.
    No. Starvation was a thing. Starvation mode wasn't.

    Makes a lot of sense. I googled "starvation mode" and the first two or three articles validated that it wasn't valid.
  • SergeantSausage
    SergeantSausage Posts: 1,673 Member
    mirrim52 wrote: »
    Not in the way most people on here talk about it.

    In Nazi concentration camps, etc. it was a thing.

    Because all those millions of folks were getting fat "holding onto their calories", right?

  • SergeantSausage
    SergeantSausage Posts: 1,673 Member
    atypicalsmith wrote: »

    ...validated that it wasn't valid.


    Uhhh ...

  • Liftng4Lis
    Liftng4Lis Posts: 15,151 Member
    Nope.

Categories