bad food

2»

Replies

  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    Yeah caloric deficit but I never overlook food quality, living on twinkies can't be really good. I'd try to choose healthier food and well,allow some indulgence here and there.

    who is advocating living on twinkies...???

    No one,gee but a guy said you can live on twinkies and cake and lose weight if you eat less calories overall, which I may agree but I think QUALITY of calories matters a lot,not just the numbeeeeers
    that's all

    That poster said you could do it and lose weight but it would not be the best option from a nutritional stand point and then you created a straw man about a diet of twinkles...
  • initialsdeebee
    initialsdeebee Posts: 83 Member
    Also, "I don't eat vegetables" ? Eh, I don't know... You gotta figure that one out at some point in your life. Take a cooking class, get some books with good ideas, try some new things, learn about the hundreds of vegetables out there that provide huge amounts of the nutrition we need and the thousands of ways to prepare them and I'd hope you'd be able to find something you can handle.
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    No one,gee but a guy said you can live on twinkies and cake and lose weight if you eat less calories overall, which I may agree but I think QUALITY of calories matters a lot,not just the numbeeeeers

    Yes, but no one said other things don't matter, for nutrition. Your post suggested that others were saying it was recommended to eat just Twinkies, when in fact if anyone proposed that they'd be told that was a bad idea (although you could lose weight doing it if you could manage not to overeat).
  • diannethegeek
    diannethegeek Posts: 14,776 Member
    lemurcat12 wrote: »
    No one,gee but a guy said you can live on twinkies and cake and lose weight if you eat less calories overall, which I may agree but I think QUALITY of calories matters a lot,not just the numbeeeeers

    Yes, but no one said other things don't matter, for nutrition. Your post suggested that others were saying it was recommended to eat just Twinkies, when in fact if anyone proposed that they'd be told that was a bad idea (although you could lose weight doing it if you could manage not to overeat).

    ^Out of all of the posts on this thread, why on Earth was this one flagged? It doesn't meet any of the criteria of abuse! I can't even figure out how it was read as anything other than a calm, factual response.

    http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10007789/flagged-content-reported-posts-warning-points

  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member
    Also, "I don't eat vegetables" ? Eh, I don't know... You gotta figure that one out at some point in your life. Take a cooking class, get some books with good ideas, try some new things, learn about the hundreds of vegetables out there that provide huge amounts of the nutrition we need and the thousands of ways to prepare them and I'd hope you'd be able to find something you can handle.

    or just take a multi vitamin
  • Sweets1954
    Sweets1954 Posts: 507 Member
    First of all, there are no "bad" foods. There are healthy choices and not so healthy choices. You have to make the decision of what is important to you. Do you really want to lose the weight or would you rather pig out on whatever it is that you have decided is "bad"?
  • jeffpettis
    jeffpettis Posts: 865 Member
    Oreos. Oreos are BAD, BAD, BAD!!!

    But oh sooooo GOOD!!!
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member
    jeffpettis wrote: »
    Oreos. Oreos are BAD, BAD, BAD!!!

    But oh sooooo GOOD!!!
    jeffpettis wrote: »
    Oreos. Oreos are BAD, BAD, BAD!!!

    But oh sooooo GOOD!!!

    why would oreos be bad?

    I have seven oreos and a glass of milk prelogged into today and I will be under my calorie goal, hit my macros, and micros...
  • jeffpettis
    jeffpettis Posts: 865 Member
    ...and yes. I did type that while munching on Oreos!!! >:)
  • Need2Exerc1se
    Need2Exerc1se Posts: 13,575 Member
    cityruss wrote: »
    Eat at a calorie deficit.

    This ^^

    If weight loss is your only goal, all you need to do is eat less than you burn.
  • callsitlikeiseeit
    callsitlikeiseeit Posts: 8,626 Member
    bad food?

    did it back talk you?
    steal from you?
    insult you?

    no such thing as 'bad food'.

    LOL You have teenagers don't you?

    omg is it that obvious ????????????????? LOLOLOL
  • Katzedernacht
    Katzedernacht Posts: 266 Member
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    Yeah caloric deficit but I never overlook food quality, living on twinkies can't be really good. I'd try to choose healthier food and well,allow some indulgence here and there.

    who is advocating living on twinkies...???

    No one,gee but a guy said you can live on twinkies and cake and lose weight if you eat less calories overall, which I may agree but I think QUALITY of calories matters a lot,not just the numbeeeeers
    that's all

    That poster said you could do it and lose weight but it would not be the best option from a nutritional stand point and then you created a straw man about a diet of twinkles...

    I created nothing, I just don't like how people think what matters is only the calorie deficit, that is it. relax
  • RGv2
    RGv2 Posts: 5,789 Member
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    Yeah caloric deficit but I never overlook food quality, living on twinkies can't be really good. I'd try to choose healthier food and well,allow some indulgence here and there.

    who is advocating living on twinkies...???

    No one,gee but a guy said you can live on twinkies and cake and lose weight if you eat less calories overall, which I may agree but I think QUALITY of calories matters a lot,not just the numbeeeeers
    that's all

    That poster said you could do it and lose weight but it would not be the best option from a nutritional stand point and then you created a straw man about a diet of twinkles...

    I created nothing, I just don't like how people think what matters is only the calorie deficit, that is it. relax

    Thing is, no one has said that.
  • RGv2
    RGv2 Posts: 5,789 Member
    lemurcat12 wrote: »
    No one,gee but a guy said you can live on twinkies and cake and lose weight if you eat less calories overall, which I may agree but I think QUALITY of calories matters a lot,not just the numbeeeeers

    Yes, but no one said other things don't matter, for nutrition. Your post suggested that others were saying it was recommended to eat just Twinkies, when in fact if anyone proposed that they'd be told that was a bad idea (although you could lose weight doing it if you could manage not to overeat).

    Seriously...this got flagged? SMH.
  • mccindy72
    mccindy72 Posts: 7,001 Member
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    Yeah caloric deficit but I never overlook food quality, living on twinkies can't be really good. I'd try to choose healthier food and well,allow some indulgence here and there.

    who is advocating living on twinkies...???

    No one,gee but a guy said you can live on twinkies and cake and lose weight if you eat less calories overall, which I may agree but I think QUALITY of calories matters a lot,not just the numbeeeeers
    that's all

    That poster said you could do it and lose weight but it would not be the best option from a nutritional stand point and then you created a straw man about a diet of twinkles...

    I created nothing, I just don't like how people think what matters is only the calorie deficit, that is it. relax

    Don't read too far into things. No one said that - what has been said is that you can eat the foods you like, while eating in a calorie deficit. That's not the same thing.
  • WinoGelato
    WinoGelato Posts: 13,454 Member
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    Yeah caloric deficit but I never overlook food quality, living on twinkies can't be really good. I'd try to choose healthier food and well,allow some indulgence here and there.

    who is advocating living on twinkies...???

    No one,gee but a guy said you can live on twinkies and cake and lose weight if you eat less calories overall, which I may agree but I think QUALITY of calories matters a lot,not just the numbeeeeers
    that's all

    That poster said you could do it and lose weight but it would not be the best option from a nutritional stand point and then you created a straw man about a diet of twinkles...

    I created nothing, I just don't like how people think what matters is only the calorie deficit, that is it. relax

    What matters for weight loss, is only the calorie deficit.

    What matters for overall health and satiety is to eat a nutritionally dense diet, and if trying to lose weight, make sure that you are in a calorie deficit.

    OP seemed despondent that they couldn't lose weight because they thought they had to completely overhaul what they were eating and cut out "bad foods". People were simply pointing out that by making small changes, you can continue to eat the foods you enjoy, and still lose weight. Many people who start out by just eating smaller portions of the same things they were already eating, eventually start incorporating other, more nutrient dense foods, into their diet, to help with satiety.


  • Queenmunchy
    Queenmunchy Posts: 3,380 Member
    edited July 2015
    We eat a lot of things that have vegetables as a base or incorporated into them - I don't relegate them to the side.
    Cheesy vegetable zucchini noodles
    lu0gmrbf3jad.jpg
    Vegetable enchilada stuffed peppers
    6fpoi4nmbz20.jpg
    Mushroom/spinach turkey burgers5p8geyftdhvx.jpg
    Zucchini/chicken nuggets
    fvysiq9yo5py.jpg
    Buffalo cauliflower
    ig70eowmkti9.jpg

    And so on.





  • Katzedernacht
    Katzedernacht Posts: 266 Member
    -sighs- fine you people win.
    i shall be quiet now.
  • jennifer_417
    jennifer_417 Posts: 12,344 Member
    lemurcat12 wrote: »
    Who lives on Twinkies?

    Wate iz dat bad?
This discussion has been closed.