Accepting a thicker lower body?
Options
artlover47
Posts: 76 Member
I am just a few pounds away from my goal weight after losing over 105 pounds throughout the course of seven years (progress was sidetracked by foot surgery, and two pregnancies/ breastfeeding), but my upper body is much thinner than my lower body. My current BMI is 21.5. I had anticipated more of an overall loss in fat even though I expected my legs would be my toughest area to slim down. I can now see my spine, shoulder bones, ribs, and my shoulder blades look "sharp." I am starting to get comments about being too "bony" up top. I am not large now...I presently wear a US size 4 because my waist and hips are no longer big, and I anticipate being a size 2 when I am through losing. However, my thighs and calves are still heavier than I'd like. If I thought that lowering my goal weight another five pounds would fix this - that it would all come off my lower body, then that would be fine, but that may not be the case as I'm aware you can't spot reduce or pick where you lose your weight. My wrists have always been much smaller than my ankles, relatively (wrists measure for small frame, ankles for larger frame) so my overall bone structure seems slightly unbalanced top to bottom anyway.
Here's the issue: At what point do I just accept that my body is going to be disporportionate and switch to maintainence? I feel like if I keep lowering my body fat, eventaully the legs will get to a size where I am satisfied, and I am OK with dropping a few more pounds. Yet those who see me everyday are begininng to worry about my upper body looking skeletal, and that's NOT the look I am trying to achieve. I'm not looking for advice on how to eat or exercise, just wondering if anyone else has a similar body type, and how you handled when to stop losing? At what BMI or body fat level did you see your legs finally get small if you are a pear shaped woman? Or did you embrace your stockier lower body shape?
Here's the issue: At what point do I just accept that my body is going to be disporportionate and switch to maintainence? I feel like if I keep lowering my body fat, eventaully the legs will get to a size where I am satisfied, and I am OK with dropping a few more pounds. Yet those who see me everyday are begininng to worry about my upper body looking skeletal, and that's NOT the look I am trying to achieve. I'm not looking for advice on how to eat or exercise, just wondering if anyone else has a similar body type, and how you handled when to stop losing? At what BMI or body fat level did you see your legs finally get small if you are a pear shaped woman? Or did you embrace your stockier lower body shape?
0
Replies
-
I lift weights. It is the only thing that has tightened up the look of my lower body-and helped to even out my overall shape. Even when I am very lean I have thicker legs. Years of lifting has shifted my view to embrace them.
I get to have abs even when I'm heavier than I like, and my legs get this awesome curve to the quads when I'm on a cut. The BF loves them-and we consider my abs and booty a trade off for when I get lean and have zero boobs
Embrace the thighs! 0 -
Why not lower it another 5 pounds (or whatever) and see instead of speculating?
I'm sure it'd be pretty easy to bulk back up if you don't like it.
BTW, my legs were first to go. Ended up looking like this guy for a while (round gut, no legs)
0 -
I'm for embracing. I've hit menopause and I've read that the fat redistributes to the belly. I'm pretty sure I'm not exempt from that. It seems to me a body that is thicker below would be great for running, cycling, balancing, and leaping.
Try spending some time gazing at your body with an uncritical eye, appreciating all the things it can do.
Classic beauties all look the same but outlying beauties are lovely each in their own way. And are much more memorable.0 -
it sounds like youre a classic pear shape and theres not much you can do about that LOL
if the issue is fat, you can lose it, but if its body SHAPE - you only have your genetics to thank. My lower half always has been, and always will be a size larger (sometimes 2! LOL) than my top half just due to bone structure. the only time they were the same size was when i weighed 250 pounds. ill pass on that, thanks.
its not like anyone cares. LOL0 -
I agree with the psoet above- you sound like a classic pear-shape. You are in good company- Beyonce is a pear shape and considered extreamly sexy- also Kera Knightly is pear-shape too, just at a much lower body weight. So I'd say embrace your shape. It would'nt hurt to drop a few more pounds to see the effect- and if you don't liek it you cab always regain the weight.0
-
Do you lift? Thought of a body recomp?0
-
I am slightly heavier than you and have a similar body size. When I lose weight the first to go is my waist, next is upper body. I lift heavy and have found that weights have broadened my shoulders a bit giving me a more hourglass shape. Embrace it, I think it's hot.0
-
As an apple, I also say another argument for acceptance is that a pear distribution is a relatively healthy distribution. I think there are a lot of costs to seeking some ideal, it's like trying to wedge a square peg into a triangle hole.0
-
It's better than having a big belly and no legs. Embrace it!0
-
Yes, this^^.lmjohnson110 wrote: »I am slightly heavier than you and have a similar body size. When I lose weight the first to go is my waist, next is upper body. I lift heavy and have found that weights have broadened my shoulders a bit giving me a more hourglass shape. Embrace it, I think it's hot.
I'm a Pear too but have quite broad shoulders, so when looking at me - i don't really look Pear shaped.
As others have said, maybe do some weightlifting to broaden your shoulders and try to incorporate some Lunges and Squats, to firm up your Legs.
0 -
Luckily, I look fairly hourglass shape except for the thighs. My hips slimmed down well. I am going to go ahead and try losing down to 115 and see what it looks like... I agree that gaining a bit back would be easy! LOL. As far as lifting, I talked to a trainer a my local gym and she advised me to wait until I get to my maintainence weight before I start lifting or using weight machines so that I won't be discouraged with a stall or a gain. She told me to give it a month, and call her on August 15 to see where I am. I do plan to try lifting, though, I have been reading up on it some. Thanks, all - we'll see how 115 looks.0
-
Looked at your pics and think you look fabulous! I'm way over weight still but am 5'2, and used to be about 115 before kids. I was always bottom heavy (bigger thighs, calves (like gigantic), an hips) I look weight up around my neck first etc. Interesting to read the comments here because I think I may be in the same boat. I'm trying to focus on being okay with it-it's much better than where I am coming from (204 at 5'2). May I ask how you find out about ankle size vs wrist size (small/large frame)?0
-
artlover47 wrote: »I am just a few pounds away from my goal weight after losing over 105 pounds throughout the course of seven years (progress was sidetracked by foot surgery, and two pregnancies/ breastfeeding), but my upper body is much thinner than my lower body. My current BMI is 21.5. I had anticipated more of an overall loss in fat even though I expected my legs would be my toughest area to slim down. I can now see my spine, shoulder bones, ribs, and my shoulder blades look "sharp." I am starting to get comments about being too "bony" up top. I am not large now...I presently wear a US size 4 because my waist and hips are no longer big, and I anticipate being a size 2 when I am through losing. However, my thighs and calves are still heavier than I'd like. If I thought that lowering my goal weight another five pounds would fix this - that it would all come off my lower body, then that would be fine, but that may not be the case as I'm aware you can't spot reduce or pick where you lose your weight. My wrists have always been much smaller than my ankles, relatively (wrists measure for small frame, ankles for larger frame) so my overall bone structure seems slightly unbalanced top to bottom anyway.
Here's the issue: At what point do I just accept that my body is going to be disporportionate and switch to maintainence? I feel like if I keep lowering my body fat, eventaully the legs will get to a size where I am satisfied, and I am OK with dropping a few more pounds. Yet those who see me everyday are begininng to worry about my upper body looking skeletal, and that's NOT the look I am trying to achieve. I'm not looking for advice on how to eat or exercise, just wondering if anyone else has a similar body type, and how you handled when to stop losing? At what BMI or body fat level did you see your legs finally get small if you are a pear shaped woman? Or did you embrace your stockier lower body shape?
This is ME
I have been 106 pounds (5'5" tall) in search of the ever allusive "slim thighs." Even my face was skinny. I have to accept that I will never have slim thighs. I'm a pear. Some women are just like that. It does make maintenance much harder. Pick a weight you can live with. Strength train to firm up what you can. I'm older so I strength train before goal...I can't afford to lose more lean muscle.0 -
I have thicker legs, always have. You know what else I have, strong legs. I will admit I sometimes look at some other women wearing their cute little sundresses with their cute little legs and have a little pity party, but it's fleeting. My legs get me where I need to go. I also know that since I am sitting pretty at my goal weight....it's not fat (at least not much), it's the way my legs are shaped. I have strong, thick thighs. I have big, strong ankles.
However, I am also continuing to work on my legs. I have noticed a change in the last few months as I have lost weight. I've also noticed a change because I am running 20+ miles a week. My legs are showing the work I am making them do. I don't think I'll ever have those legs of those girls in the pretty sundresses, but I can have the best legs that my mama gave me.
This. It's so easy to compare myself to others, and I do it more often than I realize. While I'm still learning to accept myself (we all have those down moments), I have also come to terms that my natural shape is more thick on the bottom. I still have fat to lose, so I'm working on that... but jeans have always been a headache. Those waist and thigh measurements just don't work for me, haha!
Self-love. Embracing and working it to the best you can
0 -
Even after I hit maintenance, my body continued to change shape for months. Your body will need to adjust to the "new you," so don't fret. You may be pleasantly surprised. 0
-
I am also pear shaped. I don't really have hips anymore, but all the booty and thighs.
I'm close to goal now, have abs and great shoulders, the thighs don't change much,
I'm a size 8 in pants and a size 2-4 in shirts.
Lifting will definitely help you. I have increased my shoulders and arms and look
much more balanced than before. I would encourage you to start now and learn
the basics with good form; squat, bench press, shoulder press, row, deadlift.
Find a good program.
The bad: Your legs will probably never get slim. I have big ankles, big calves, big
thighs. I find that everything gets smaller, so they always look large in comparison
to the rest of me.
The good: Your upper body will balance you better and adding muscle will make you
look less skeletal at smaller sizes. You can add muscle to your lower body which
will make it look better despite the size. You will get strong and look more fit!0 -
So, you've been losing but not lifting even for muscle sparing reasons. You've most likely lost mass due to this, and in all probability that loss was disproportionate, since we typically perform more work with our lower bodies than our upper bodies, during normal daily activity.
Sadly, the damage is already done ... waiting another month wont change that. But there isn't any reason to wait either. You know the landscape, and I doubt a couple lb. fluctuation is gonna throw you off track.You've only got 3 lbs. to go to reach goal, you could probably reach that in a week just by forcing less water retention ( less sodium, fewer carbs ).
Eat at maintenance and train for a couple months, I'm pretty sure you'll see and like the improvement, and you can still make it into that size 2.0 -
I do 5 lb hand weight exercises occasionally, and things where I lift my own body weight, but mainly I lift my toddler girls all day! I also push them on hills in a double stroller which works my arms and back as well. I personally don't mind my upper body - it is the other people who are bothered by it. My husband thinks I look fine, and he's the main one I trust to tell me when to stop or what needs improving. I'm pleased with my shape except for the thighs, and I honestly think the extra weight loss will see another inch to inch and a half come off my legs which may be all I need to feel OK with them. I'm mainly interested in the weight training for the health benefits of more muscle, not so much the look. I don't aspire to look super muscular. I may wait to start the weights because I'd liketo figure out my "normal" maintenance calories as a baseline before I start adding calories for lifting. I am also not going to switch to a high protein diet. I actually do organic farming, so I eat tons of fruit and veggies that I grow. I am not changing that. I'm happy with my macros and they work for me. As far as losing muscle mass, I could've stood to lose some - I am smaller now and don't need as much muscle to move my body as I used to! Sorry - I don't buy into the idea that lifting is the only way to be fit. Thanks for all the input, though.
As far as the frame measurements, just google it and find some online calculators. I tried several different ones, as some ask for more detailed measurements than others. The ones that only ask for height, weight, wrist or elbow measurements and sometimes waist always put me at small frame because they are only factoring my smaller upper body. The ones that look at more body parts are more accurate for me. Same on body fat calculators.0 -
berriboobear wrote: »I have thicker legs, always have. You know what else I have, strong legs. I will admit I sometimes look at some other women wearing their cute little sundresses with their cute little legs and have a little pity party, but it's fleeting. My legs get me where I need to go. I also know that since I am sitting pretty at my goal weight....it's not fat (at least not much), it's the way my legs are shaped. I have strong, thick thighs. I have big, strong ankles.
However, I am also continuing to work on my legs. I have noticed a change in the last few months as I have lost weight. I've also noticed a change because I am running 20+ miles a week. My legs are showing the work I am making them do. I don't think I'll ever have those legs of those girls in the pretty sundresses, but I can have the best legs that my mama gave me.
This. It's so easy to compare myself to others, and I do it more often than I realize. While I'm still learning to accept myself (we all have those down moments), I have also come to terms that my natural shape is more thick on the bottom. I still have fat to lose, so I'm working on that... but jeans have always been a headache. Those waist and thigh measurements just don't work for me, haha!
Self-love. Embracing and working it to the best you can
Oh I can definitely relate in re to the jeans issue! Self-love all the way!0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.9K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.8K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.7K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 398 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.8K Motivation and Support
- 7.9K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.4K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 977 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.4K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions