ground beef cooked or raw weight?
Replies
-
Wow, wait until you get to pasta0
-
This content has been removed.
-
What if i rinse my ground beef under the hot tap after cooking?0
-
flyingtanuki wrote: »Liftng4Lis wrote: »Wow, wait until you get to pasta
SNORT
I love you!0 -
-
Cannibal sandwiches?0
-
log raw and move on. 200g of 80/20 ground beef at 500 calories sounds right.
1 serving of most meats are around 4 oz raw or 113g.0 -
0 -
Liftng4Lis wrote: »Wow, wait until you get to pasta
Snort!
Always weigh your pasta, rice, quinoa raw too.0 -
That burger is pretty cold by now0
-
TheVirgoddess wrote: »It's plain ridiculous the difference in calories for the same piece of food cooked or raw. Weights are different and cals are different.
Of course they are - everyone's 200g of raw meat is going to make different weights of cooked meat, depending on how you cook them. That's why it's best to log it as raw meat.
If it was 80/20, search: ground beef, 80/20, raw - and log it.
Exactly. I like my burgers medium rare so I use raw for logging, no matter what the fat % is.
0 -
It's plain ridiculous the difference in calories for the same piece of food cooked or raw. Weights are different and cals are different.
You do understand that when it's raw there is water in it that comes out when it cooks? And the chemical make up of the meat itself changes, affecting the density of the meat? The fat also cooks, some cooking into the meat and some cooking out of the meat. All of these things affect the weight and the calorie count.
Weigh everything raw, think of it this way, you take two 200g(raw) pattys and cook both to different temperatures, once cooked you have no idea what the calorie count is, the well done burger will weigh less than the medium cooked burger but they are the same calories. It's up to you, if you want a half pound burger, weigh it raw and make it fit.0 -
Liftng4Lis wrote: »Wow, wait until you get to pasta
Snort!
Always weigh your pasta, rice, quinoa raw too.
0 -
Liftng4Lis wrote: »Wow, wait until you get to pasta
Pasta was easier to figure out....it increases in weight when cooked. I just weighed raw and cooked separate and used the nutrition info right on the box.
0 -
The next pack of hamburger I buy Im going to go by what is right on the package label and weigh and log raw.0
-
TheVirgoddess wrote: »It's plain ridiculous the difference in calories for the same piece of food cooked or raw. Weights are different and cals are different.
Of course they are - everyone's 200g of raw meat is going to make different weights of cooked meat, depending on how you cook them. That's why it's best to log it as raw meat.
If it was 80/20, search: ground beef, 80/20, raw - and log it.
Exactly. I like my burgers medium rare so I use raw for logging, no matter what the fat % is.
Yikes. In Canada it is suggested to cook burgers with no pink in them as we don't allow the pink slime (ammonia) that kills the bacteria that is allowed in US ground beef.
0 -
200 grams raw is a giant burger, but I don't see how it becomes 100 grams cooked. Either it's got way more than the normal fat content, was way overcooked, or--perhaps most likely--there was an error in the weighing either before or after cooking.0
-
Quarter Pounders or 4oz or 115g burger are all the same. If you are getting up to 200g thats a big burger. Since most diets recommend portions of meat around 3-4 oz your burger would be closer to 7oz and therefore it probably would be closer to 600 calories than not. These are raw weights.0
-
TheVirgoddess wrote: »It's plain ridiculous the difference in calories for the same piece of food cooked or raw. Weights are different and cals are different.
Of course they are - everyone's 200g of raw meat is going to make different weights of cooked meat, depending on how you cook them. That's why it's best to log it as raw meat.
If it was 80/20, search: ground beef, 80/20, raw - and log it.
Exactly. I like my burgers medium rare so I use raw for logging, no matter what the fat % is.
Yikes. In Canada it is suggested to cook burgers with no pink in them as we don't allow the pink slime (ammonia) that kills the bacteria that is allowed in US ground beef.
It is suggested here as well. Many people just take the risk. I have taken food handlers courses and know the gross reasons why rare hamburger is risky when a rare steak is not. I still eat my hamburgers medium rare.0 -
Great thanks! Will definately be looking at all this closer next time i have burgers.....as for eating with pink, nope! Can't handle that...steak on the other hand....ya i little bit of pink!0
-
Also curious how my topsirloin steak will differ in weight from raw to cooked. Call it a steak project!0
-
ALSO have to keep an eye on when i scoop up browned ground beef into my tacos and stuff. Gotta test using the cooked weight and cooking separate for the raw weight...Im tellin ya, i wanna be nothing but accurate for success.0
-
Alatariel75 wrote: »What if i rinse my ground beef under the hot tap after cooking?
0 -
TheVirgoddess wrote: »It's plain ridiculous the difference in calories for the same piece of food cooked or raw. Weights are different and cals are different.
Of course they are - everyone's 200g of raw meat is going to make different weights of cooked meat, depending on how you cook them. That's why it's best to log it as raw meat.
If it was 80/20, search: ground beef, 80/20, raw - and log it.
Exactly. I like my burgers medium rare so I use raw for logging, no matter what the fat % is.
Yikes. In Canada it is suggested to cook burgers with no pink in them as we don't allow the pink slime (ammonia) that kills the bacteria that is allowed in US ground beef.
It is suggested here as well. Many people just take the risk. I have taken food handlers courses and know the gross reasons why rare hamburger is risky when a rare steak is not. I still eat my hamburgers medium rare.
It helps when you know your butcher. When I get my meat for cannibal sandwiches he grinds up the sirloin in front of me. He is super fastidious in keeping his machinery clean and never purchases meat pre-ground from his wholesaler.
0 -
Alatariel75 wrote: »What if i rinse my ground beef under the hot tap after cooking?
Buy the leanest you can afford, or better yet try to fit ground bison instead of beef. It is much leaner so cook slower at lower temp. Less weight is lost in cooking. I am fortunate to buy an 1/4 bison and keep various cuts in the freezer. Less waste from trimming and cooking so factor that in the cost. Leaner roasts need a little different cooking style than beef (lower temp watch the time) also makes great tacos, lasagana, kabobs, shred for bbq style, breakfast etc. Most beef about makes me gag, I can taste the fat regardless of trimming.
With the leanest of the bison I believe you can safely weigh cooked or raw you just don't lose much, if anything.0 -
oldcargirl62 wrote: »Alatariel75 wrote: »What if i rinse my ground beef under the hot tap after cooking?
Buy the leanest you can afford, or better yet try to fit ground bison instead of beef. It is much leaner so cook slower at lower temp. Less weight is lost in cooking. I am fortunate to buy an 1/4 bison and keep various cuts in the freezer. Less waste from trimming and cooking so factor that in the cost. Leaner roasts need a little different cooking style than beef (lower temp watch the time) also makes great tacos, lasagana, kabobs, shred for bbq style, breakfast etc. Most beef about makes me gag, I can taste the fat regardless of trimming.
With the leanest of the bison I believe you can safely weigh cooked or raw you just don't lose much, if anything.
why the leanest? fat is not bad for you actually quite the opposite. adequate fat is good for hair, skin, nail, digestive tract health/function, and for vitamin absorption.
Besides the health benefits of fat, the fattier the burger the better tasting and the better it will stay together.
0 -
oldcargirl62 wrote: »Alatariel75 wrote: »What if i rinse my ground beef under the hot tap after cooking?
Buy the leanest you can afford, or better yet try to fit ground bison instead of beef. It is much leaner so cook slower at lower temp. Less weight is lost in cooking. I am fortunate to buy an 1/4 bison and keep various cuts in the freezer. Less waste from trimming and cooking so factor that in the cost. Leaner roasts need a little different cooking style than beef (lower temp watch the time) also makes great tacos, lasagana, kabobs, shred for bbq style, breakfast etc. Most beef about makes me gag, I can taste the fat regardless of trimming.
With the leanest of the bison I believe you can safely weigh cooked or raw you just don't lose much, if anything.
why the leanest? fat is not bad for you actually quite the opposite. adequate fat is good for hair, skin, nail, digestive tract health/function, and for vitamin absorption.
Besides the health benefits of fat, the fattier the burger the better tasting and the better it will stay together.
Because there seemed to be disbelief in the advise from other in weighing raw vs cooked and that she says half the weight was cooked away.
There is also a difference between healthy fats and cheap ground beef fat, imho. I'll utilize my fat intake with nuts and olive oil on a salad over ground up beef fat.
I did not say eliminate fats, just making the point that buying leaner ground beef would eliminate cooking, apparently literally, half of what you just bought away.0 -
Fyi: i cooked 400g of reg ground beef in frying pan loose. Once cooked the weight dropped to 285g. Crazy! I will log raw from now on!0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 427 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions