Sex

13

Replies

  • kk_inprogress
    kk_inprogress Posts: 3,077 Member
    rabbitjb wrote: »
    Most partners disapprove of pausing to ensure your heart rate is in you fat burning target zone

    Fat burning zone @juggernaut1974 ? :huh:

    :bigsmile:

    As for the thread I'm personally of the opinion that if sex isn't in your general activity level you're probably doing life wrong ;)

    Amen, sista.
  • ald783
    ald783 Posts: 688 Member
    I'm pretty much never spending 60 straight minutes having sex. Sorry I'm lazy.
  • mccindy72
    mccindy72 Posts: 7,001 Member
    roblloyd89 wrote: »
    For all you cardio haters, I've got something you might like.

    Sex burns up to 200 calories an hour, and it's fun.

    Just sayin.

    During orgasm, which lasts for about 5-10 seconds for a man, and up to 2 minutes for a woman (sorry, guyz). Unless you are doing it Swayze against the wall in the old barn in Roadhouse-style, you really aren't doing that much cardio.
  • robs_ready
    robs_ready Posts: 1,488 Member
    mccindy72 wrote: »
    roblloyd89 wrote: »
    For all you cardio haters, I've got something you might like.

    Sex burns up to 200 calories an hour, and it's fun.

    Just sayin.

    During orgasm, which lasts for about 5-10 seconds for a man, and up to 2 minutes for a woman (sorry, guyz). Unless you are doing it Swayze against the wall in the old barn in Roadhouse-style, you really aren't doing that much cardio.

    Don't apologise, old barn Roadhouse style is something to add to my list
  • salembambi
    salembambi Posts: 5,585 Member
    this thread is basically just for people to show off how much they get laid

  • kk_inprogress
    kk_inprogress Posts: 3,077 Member
    salembambi wrote: »
    this thread is basically just for people to show off lie about how much they get laid

    FIFY
  • mccindy72
    mccindy72 Posts: 7,001 Member
    kkenseth wrote: »
    salembambi wrote: »
    this thread is basically just for people to show off lie about how much they get laid

    FIFY

    : :D:D:D
  • Karen_can_do_this
    Karen_can_do_this Posts: 1,150 Member
    LaceyBirds wrote: »
    Oh, so that's what CICO stands for . . .

    Bwahahahaha
  • senecarr
    senecarr Posts: 5,377 Member
    roblloyd89 wrote: »
    For all you cardio haters, I've got something you might like.

    Sex burns up to 200 calories an hour, and it's fun.

    Just sayin.

    So is it 400 if one person is the only participant and thus has to do all the work? I'm asking for a friend.
  • kshama2001
    kshama2001 Posts: 28,052 Member
    ald783 wrote: »
    I'm pretty much never spending 60 straight minutes having sex. Sorry I'm lazy.

    I have no interest whatsoever in 60 straight minutes of PIV, but am delighted with 60 minutes of the whole enchilada.
  • pislari_poljnamd
    pislari_poljnamd Posts: 45 Member
    Oh dear ...
  • robs_ready
    robs_ready Posts: 1,488 Member
    Oh dear ...

    Indeedy
  • kshama2001
    kshama2001 Posts: 28,052 Member
    It's interesting. The study where the figure that gives the burn closest to the 200 calories an hour cited an average length per session as being six minutes. The figure given for a burn for a 150 pound male was about 3.5 calories a minute.

    Sorrynotsorry for bursting bubbles. I'm too old and jaded to be amused by this thread.

    Not too old to be amused by sex, mind you.

    I thought it would be useful to know how the the New England Journal of Medicine defined "sexual activity" but since the average is only six minutes, it's rather moot.

    http://www.psmag.com/business-economics/the-myth-of-sexercise-sex-calories-exercise-health-52133

    ...The New England Journal’s rather more sober assessment? An average guy, supposing he weighs about 150 pounds, burns closer to 3.5 calories per minute having sex.

    The authors write, “Given that the average bout of sexual activity lasts about 6 minutes, a man in his early-to-mid-30s might expend approximately 21 kcal during sexual intercourse. Of course, he would have spent roughly one third that amount of energy just watching television, so the incremental benefit of one bout of sexual activity with respect to energy expended is plausibly on the order of 14 kcal” (emphasis added).

    So there you have it. Sex is better for you than watching Downton Abbey … but only by 14 calories.


  • robs_ready
    robs_ready Posts: 1,488 Member
    kshama2001 wrote: »
    It's interesting. The study where the figure that gives the burn closest to the 200 calories an hour cited an average length per session as being six minutes. The figure given for a burn for a 150 pound male was about 3.5 calories a minute.

    Sorrynotsorry for bursting bubbles. I'm too old and jaded to be amused by this thread.

    Not too old to be amused by sex, mind you.

    I thought it would be useful to know how the the New England Journal of Medicine defined "sexual activity" but since the average is only six minutes, it's rather moot.

    http://www.psmag.com/business-economics/the-myth-of-sexercise-sex-calories-exercise-health-52133

    ...The New England Journal’s rather more sober assessment? An average guy, supposing he weighs about 150 pounds, burns closer to 3.5 calories per minute having sex.

    The authors write, “Given that the average bout of sexual activity lasts about 6 minutes, a man in his early-to-mid-30s might expend approximately 21 kcal during sexual intercourse. Of course, he would have spent roughly one third that amount of energy just watching television, so the incremental benefit of one bout of sexual activity with respect to energy expended is plausibly on the order of 14 kcal” (emphasis added).

    So there you have it. Sex is better for you than watching Downton Abbey … but only by 14 calories.


    It's also more enjoyable than watching Downton abbey but I see your point
  • kk_inprogress
    kk_inprogress Posts: 3,077 Member
    Captain Obvious, FTW
  • PeachyCarol
    PeachyCarol Posts: 8,029 Member
    Can't I watch Downton Abbey and have sex? Not at the same time, mind. I do love me some Maggie Smith.
  • robs_ready
    robs_ready Posts: 1,488 Member
    kkenseth wrote: »
    Captain Obvious, FTW

    I'll take that as a compliment
  • jenathp
    jenathp Posts: 92 Member
    LaceyBirds wrote: »
    Oh, so that's what CICO stands for . . .

    OMG THAT IS AWESOME. I laughed so hard at that....
  • SweetMsMara
    SweetMsMara Posts: 8 Member
    I wish there was a way to add it to exercise diary
  • robs_ready
    robs_ready Posts: 1,488 Member
    I wish there was a way to add it to exercise diary

    I think it would look a bit weird...
  • grinning_chick
    grinning_chick Posts: 765 Member
    rabbitjb wrote: »

    As for the thread I'm personally of the opinion that if sex isn't in your general activity level you're probably doing life wrong ;)


    So anyone, regardless of gender/sex, who has previously engaged in, enjoys, and wants sex but isn't getting any because they refuse to be a free sexworker or a dumpster is "probably doing life wrong".

    Okay.


  • SLLRunner
    SLLRunner Posts: 12,942 Member
    Most partners disapprove of pausing to ensure your heart rate is in you fat burning target zone

    This. So this.
  • SLLRunner
    SLLRunner Posts: 12,942 Member
    It's interesting. The study where the figure that gives the burn closest to the 200 calories an hour cited an average length per session as being six minutes. The figure given for a burn for a 150 pound male was about 3.5 calories a minute.

    Sorrynotsorry for bursting bubbles. I'm too old and jaded to be amused by this thread.

    Not too old to be amused by sex, mind you.

    And this.
  • robs_ready
    robs_ready Posts: 1,488 Member
    rabbitjb wrote: »

    As for the thread I'm personally of the opinion that if sex isn't in your general activity level you're probably doing life wrong ;)


    So anyone, regardless of gender/sex, who has previously engaged in, enjoys, and wants sex but isn't getting any because they refuse to be a free sexworker or a dumpster is "probably doing life wrong".

    Okay.


    Sarcasm my dear, sarcasm
  • PeachyCarol
    PeachyCarol Posts: 8,029 Member
    rabbitjb wrote: »

    As for the thread I'm personally of the opinion that if sex isn't in your general activity level you're probably doing life wrong ;)


    So anyone, regardless of gender/sex, who has previously engaged in, enjoys, and wants sex but isn't getting any because they refuse to be a free sexworker or a dumpster is "probably doing life wrong".

    Okay.


    Ah bless. You signed up to misconstrue what rabbit said and type this out. I'm sure she'll feel flattered when she sees this.
  • Lucille4444
    Lucille4444 Posts: 284 Member
    I checked out the list of new groups(always entertaining) and one has f...ing in the title. Y'all might have initiated a new exercise trend.
  • robs_ready
    robs_ready Posts: 1,488 Member
    I checked out the list of new groups(always entertaining) and one has f...ing in the title. Y'all might have initiated a new exercise trend.

    Sexersise
  • daniwilford
    daniwilford Posts: 1,030 Member
    Dang it all. There are people asking what are you carving in on thread and this in another. I am sinking into a depression reading about all the things, I should not indulge in.
  • lynn_glenmont
    lynn_glenmont Posts: 10,093 Member
    roblloyd89 wrote: »
    brb2008 wrote: »
    enemyger wrote: »
    Guys guys stop with the pms

    It was a joke!!
    Way to be sexist, bro. Men AND women get cranky over jokes with poor form.
    enemyger wrote: »
    brb2008 wrote: »
    enemyger wrote: »
    Guys guys stop with the pms

    It was a joke!!
    Way to be sexist, bro. Men AND women get cranky over jokes with poor form.

    What even...

    Basically mate, she didn't approve of your joke, now be a good boy

    Actually, I think she misunderstood pms (private messages) for PMS (pre-menstrual syndrome).
  • lynn_glenmont
    lynn_glenmont Posts: 10,093 Member
    motivccess wrote: »
    soft/slow Or fast/rough??

    HIIT?