Advanced Spelling Lesson

24

Replies

  • itsthehumidity
    itsthehumidity Posts: 351 Member
    kgeyser wrote: »
    kgeyser wrote: »

    I appreciate the different opinion on this, and ignoring the author's good spelling and grammar in an article defending poor spelling and grammar, I'd like to say something about this excerpt:

    So if I crap on Jonny’s spelling, I’m either reinforcing an oppressive status quo, or picking on a person with a disability, or both.

    Hmm. I'm reminding people about the rules of English, and it seems like a big reach to suggest that providing examples of appropriate spelling and use of apostrophes is tantamount to reinforcing an oppressive status quo. Maybe by telling people how to lose weight, one is also reinforcing an oppressive status quo, but probably not. More likely, that person is just relaying how to do something correctly. Maybe there's a culture out there that values being overweight, or people who have thyroid issues, but the presence of any of those people does not mean that the correct way to lose weight should be censored.

    So, I stand by my spelling lesson, because those are the correct ways to use those words.

    I'm curious as to which version of "English" you are determining to be the appropriate one in an international community of users, and how you went about determining that as the standard for all to follow in said community.

    Yes because there are so many versions of "English", and they all differ wildly when it comes to these particular spelling and grammar quirks.

    To answer your question, as this is a US-based site, I'm referring to the rules and conventions governing the use of formal English in the United States.

    Your screen name directly contradicts your its/it's example of proper usage. While I realize the lack of apostrophe is due to the limitations of which characters can be included in a user name, you still opted to go with the improper usage in favor of the auditory "it's the humidity" that people would hear if the name was spoken aloud versus using the grammatically correct "it is the humidity." Should we not be taking you seriously as an adult now, or can we agree that little mistakes here and there are not what determines the value of an individual or their contributions?
    • You shouldn't be taking me seriously anyway, unless you want to.
    • I'm quite aware of the grammatical issue of my screen name and did it anyway as a personal joke. I'm as annoyed with the wrong use of its as I am with hearing the tiresome phrase it's not the heat it's the humidity that gets ya har har. My screen name allows me to see both even more often, and is for both humor and a bit of light-hearted self torture.
  • itsthehumidity
    itsthehumidity Posts: 351 Member
    People, please stop defending bad Engrish!

    :)

    I'm finding that people will defend bad English much harder than I'll defend correct English, which is interesting.
  • synchkat
    synchkat Posts: 37,368 Member
    its they're prerogative weather they want to use advanced or basic english isn't it?
  • janejellyroll
    janejellyroll Posts: 25,763 Member

    My friend, I never said anybody should be barred from anything, nor did I imply it. I didn't even ask anyone to stop making errors, and I certainly don't expect to stop seeing them. I didn't make any assertions about anybody's intelligence, background, culture, anything! I did say that you'll be taken more seriously in the adult world if you master these basics, and I think that's true. I see evidence of that everywhere I look. Do you disagree?

    I absolutely disagree. Spending 40-60 hours a week working with some of the top surgeons in the US means that I am spending a large part of my week with men and women who are taken very seriously, respected and admired. I also spend a lot of time reading their notes, transcriptions, dictations, etc., for legal purposes, and many have spelling and grammar that really is atrocious. Are they taken less seriously? Absolutely not.

    I welcome differences in opinion, and I respect yours. Personally, I want my doctor to be able to spell. I also asked a physician I know if he feels people care whether or not doctors use proper spelling/grammar. His response was that "it matters to people who know better."

    I work with a lot of talented people who sometimes deviate from standard English usage. For some of them, English is one of several languages they know. I have nothing but respect for them and their abilities. Their ability to write and speak exactly as I would is irrelevant to their ability to do the job for which they are hired. I would say it's also pretty meaningless when it comes to asking/answering questions on a weight loss and fitness forum.

    I would never reject someone's solution to a technical defect because of homonyms. Would I hire them as a copy editor (for English)? No. But it doesn't tell me anything about their talent in another area.
  • OneHundredToLose
    OneHundredToLose Posts: 8,523 Member

    I don't appreciate your assumption that I have internet access. Please check your internet access privilege.
  • jjejjtu
    jjejjtu Posts: 1,324 Member
    I am also someone who is irritated by poor grammar and spelling, but you really just have to let it go. You're fighting a losing battle. There is also this, which no one has mentioned yet (or possibly I missed it), so I will: some people have learning disabilities. My son is 16 and I have been struggling for 10 years to teach him proper grammar, punctuation and spelling because it's something I value. He speaks very well, but when it comes to writing, there is a serious disconnect that is really not his fault.

    Some people speak English as a second language
    Some people have learning disabilities or other brain issues that prevent them from recalling this type of learning.
    Some people honestly just don't know and don't care
    Some people don't know, but may have struggled with learning their entire life and have very low confidence in this area, and will feel bad about having this sort of thing pointed out.
    Some people know, but really just don't care because it's a casual environment and they assume no one is judging them.

    Let it go, and accept that no matter how much it irks you, there's no changing it! There are more important qualities for people to possess when you look at the big picture.
  • Hornsby
    Hornsby Posts: 10,322 Member
    I believe this makes thread 137 if I'm counting correctly about this very subject. Thanks for the eye opener, OP. :insertsarcasm:
  • jrevis001
    jrevis001 Posts: 505 Member
    How much can I love this thread? A lot! I make mistakes like any human. I understand that on websites we improperly use language to convey our style and current emotions, but common mistakes such as these have gotten out of hand. Our style, the use of slang, has really ruined a lot of people's ability to write and even speak in a professional or non casual setting. I'm all for using your own style but some people's post you can tell they really just don't know. I think it is brand new information to some or it's lodged deep in the caverns of their brain, forgotten. And yes, slang applies here because I've seen how slang has ruined my own knowledge of the English language and have found myself making simple mistakes. Now, let's have everyone rip me apart on my grammar and apostrophes. :D
  • mulecanter
    mulecanter Posts: 1,792 Member
    People, please stop defending bad Engrish!

    :)

    I'm finding that people will defend bad English much harder than I'll defend correct English, which is interesting.

    You are a hero to the entire Anglo-sphere. Bravo!
  • itsthehumidity
    itsthehumidity Posts: 351 Member
    Hornsby wrote: »
    I believe this makes thread 137 if I'm counting correctly about this very subject. Thanks for the eye opener, OP. :insertsarcasm:

    I'm happy to help.
  • itsthehumidity
    itsthehumidity Posts: 351 Member
    mulecanter wrote: »
    People, please stop defending bad Engrish!

    :)

    I'm finding that people will defend bad English much harder than I'll defend correct English, which is interesting.

    You are a hero to the entire Anglo-sphere. Bravo!

    Oh stop it, you're making me blush!
  • psuLemon
    psuLemon Posts: 38,432 MFP Moderator
    edited February 2016
    giphy.gif
  • beagletracks
    beagletracks Posts: 6,034 Member
    So much racism in this thread and in the several recent threads mocking threads started by people of color and non-native English speakers. It's pretty gross. Peppermint out.
  • Cblsplcr
    Cblsplcr Posts: 715 Member
    Hey I'm from Oklahoma. We have our own rules for grammar so yall back off.
  • kk_inprogress
    kk_inprogress Posts: 3,077 Member
    So much racism in this thread and in the several recent threads mocking threads started by people of color and non-native English speakers. It's pretty gross. Peppermint out.

    While there are a lot of offensive things around, I don't see this as racist or mocking non native English speakers. There is usually a very clear distinction between someone who is ESL and someone who is just too lazy to type a full sentence or use check their spelling before they post. A lot of the parody threads, in their defense, are a parody of a ridiculous idea, such as trying to hook up with a certain group of people in the forums. It's not mocking anything about the person other than them coming onto a fitness site and looking for hookups with a certain group of people.

    Then again, that's just my opinion.
  • FabulousFantasticFifty
    FabulousFantasticFifty Posts: 195,832 Member
    So does this mean that I have to also start using caps and apostrophes now on MFP? :grimace:
  • Iguessicandothis
    Iguessicandothis Posts: 2,132 Member
    w2bhbel2q2tc.jpeg
  • Hornsby
    Hornsby Posts: 10,322 Member
    Cblsplcr wrote: »
    Hey I'm from Oklahoma. We have our own rules for grammar so yall back off.

    Hey, don't paint all of us Oklahomans in that light. Some of us are very edumucated.
  • besaro
    besaro Posts: 1,858 Member
    life is too short
  • itsthehumidity
    itsthehumidity Posts: 351 Member
    besaro wrote: »
    life is too short

    Literally minutes of my life I'll never get back. The horror!
  • _John_
    _John_ Posts: 8,646 Member
    besaro wrote: »
    life is too short

    Literally minutes of my life I'll never get back. The horror!

    I wish I could trade every second I spent reading this thread having sex...but alas...
  • Rocknut53
    Rocknut53 Posts: 1,794 Member
    After reading these posts I have to ask myself if there is a correlation between poor grammar and a lack of knowledge of good nutrition. Maybe I'm reaching too far. I think (just my opinion) that both have become less important in our society. Perhaps it is a regional phenomena. I never could figure out how to spell "yall." Is there an apostrophe in there somewhere?
  • kk_inprogress
    kk_inprogress Posts: 3,077 Member
    Hornsby wrote: »
    Cblsplcr wrote: »
    Hey I'm from Oklahoma. We have our own rules for grammar so yall back off.

    Hey, don't paint all of us Oklahomans in that light. Some of us are very edumucated.

    Shhhh. Just sit there and look pretty.
  • Nige_Gsy
    Nige_Gsy Posts: 163 Member
    kgeyser wrote: »

    I appreciate the different opinion on this, and ignoring the author's good spelling and grammar in an article defending poor spelling and grammar, I'd like to say something about this excerpt:

    So if I crap on Jonny’s spelling, I’m either reinforcing an oppressive status quo, or picking on a person with a disability, or both.

    Hmm. I'm reminding people about the rules of English, and it seems like a big reach to suggest that providing examples of appropriate spelling and use of apostrophes is tantamount to reinforcing an oppressive status quo. Maybe by telling people how to lose weight, one is also reinforcing an oppressive status quo, but probably not. More likely, that person is just relaying how to do something correctly. Maybe there's a culture out there that values being overweight, or people who have thyroid issues, but the presence of any of those people does not mean that the correct way to lose weight should be censored.

    So, I stand by my spelling lesson, because those are the correct ways to use those words.

    I'm curious as to which version of "English" you are determining to be the appropriate one in an international community of users, and how you went about determining that as the standard for all to follow in said community.

    Yes because there are so many versions of "English", and they all differ wildly when it comes to these particular spelling and grammar quirks.

    To answer your question, as this is a US-based site, I'm referring to the rules and conventions governing the use of formal English in the United States.

    I really dislike getting drawn into this kind of thread. Let's face it, language is different for all sorts of reasons including, education, phonics, location, colloquialism, slang and a number of other reasons.

    However, and at the risk of starting World War 3, the clue should be in the name. It is "English" as spoken in England, not "American English" as spoken in America, or "Australian English" as spoken in Australia. So, if the OP is that much of a "Grammar Nazi" they ought to be using "English resources such as dictionary and thesaurus; it would ensure that all those missing vowels find their proper home to start with.

    So, before I back off out of this, why not just live and let live? Life is too short to be picking up on every little word that an individual may think is "wrong". Just go out there, lose weight, reshape your body and use MFP for its original purpose.
  • kshama2001
    kshama2001 Posts: 28,052 Member
    kkenseth wrote: »
    So much racism in this thread and in the several recent threads mocking threads started by people of color and non-native English speakers. It's pretty gross. Peppermint out.

    While there are a lot of offensive things around, I don't see this as racist or mocking non native English speakers. There is usually a very clear distinction between someone who is ESL and someone who is just too lazy to type a full sentence or use check their spelling before they post. A lot of the parody threads, in their defense, are a parody of a ridiculous idea, such as trying to hook up with a certain group of people in the forums. It's not mocking anything about the person other than them coming onto a fitness site and looking for hookups with a certain group of people.

    Then again, that's just my opinion.

    Half of my coworkers are ESL and don't make the mistakes I commonly see on internet forums. On another forum, I knew the members better and again it was not ESL (or learning disabled) people making these mistakes. My experience is that ESL people put a lot more effort into their communication than many native English speakers.
  • kshama2001
    kshama2001 Posts: 28,052 Member
    kgeyser wrote: »

    I appreciate the different opinion on this, and ignoring the author's good spelling and grammar in an article defending poor spelling and grammar, I'd like to say something about this excerpt:

    So if I crap on Jonny’s spelling, I’m either reinforcing an oppressive status quo, or picking on a person with a disability, or both.

    Hmm. I'm reminding people about the rules of English, and it seems like a big reach to suggest that providing examples of appropriate spelling and use of apostrophes is tantamount to reinforcing an oppressive status quo. Maybe by telling people how to lose weight, one is also reinforcing an oppressive status quo, but probably not. More likely, that person is just relaying how to do something correctly. Maybe there's a culture out there that values being overweight, or people who have thyroid issues, but the presence of any of those people does not mean that the correct way to lose weight should be censored.

    So, I stand by my spelling lesson, because those are the correct ways to use those words.

    I'm curious as to which version of "English" you are determining to be the appropriate one in an international community of users, and how you went about determining that as the standard for all to follow in said community.

    He's not complaining about issues like color vs colour, center vs centre, etc., IOW, differences between American English and British English. 'Loose' never means 'lose' in any version of English.
  • kshama2001
    kshama2001 Posts: 28,052 Member
    synchkat wrote: »
    its they're prerogative weather they want to use advanced or basic english isn't it?

    omg%2520cat.jpg
  • kk_inprogress
    kk_inprogress Posts: 3,077 Member
    kshama2001 wrote: »
    kkenseth wrote: »
    So much racism in this thread and in the several recent threads mocking threads started by people of color and non-native English speakers. It's pretty gross. Peppermint out.

    While there are a lot of offensive things around, I don't see this as racist or mocking non native English speakers. There is usually a very clear distinction between someone who is ESL and someone who is just too lazy to type a full sentence or use check their spelling before they post. A lot of the parody threads, in their defense, are a parody of a ridiculous idea, such as trying to hook up with a certain group of people in the forums. It's not mocking anything about the person other than them coming onto a fitness site and looking for hookups with a certain group of people.

    Then again, that's just my opinion.

    Half of my coworkers are ESL and don't make the mistakes I commonly see on internet forums. On another forum, I knew the members better and again it was not ESL (or learning disabled) people making these mistakes. My experience is that ESL people put a lot more effort into their communication than many native English speakers.

    Agreed. It's rather easy to tell the difference between a language difference and just plain laziness and stupidity.
  • itsthehumidity
    itsthehumidity Posts: 351 Member
    I'm seeing a lot of arguments that take this rough shape:

    People exist who can be categorized as one or more of the following:
    • those who don't speak English as a primary language
    • those who have a learning disability
    • those who grow up in a culture different from mine
    • those who grow up disadvantaged

    and this implies

    that there is no such thing as an error in English, and that anything I might call an error should be labeled a difference due to the above.

    That's false. There are errors, and the people in the above lists aren't somehow in a privileged category of not being able to be wrong.
  • itsthehumidity
    itsthehumidity Posts: 351 Member
    kshama2001 wrote: »
    kgeyser wrote: »

    I appreciate the different opinion on this, and ignoring the author's good spelling and grammar in an article defending poor spelling and grammar, I'd like to say something about this excerpt:

    So if I crap on Jonny’s spelling, I’m either reinforcing an oppressive status quo, or picking on a person with a disability, or both.

    Hmm. I'm reminding people about the rules of English, and it seems like a big reach to suggest that providing examples of appropriate spelling and use of apostrophes is tantamount to reinforcing an oppressive status quo. Maybe by telling people how to lose weight, one is also reinforcing an oppressive status quo, but probably not. More likely, that person is just relaying how to do something correctly. Maybe there's a culture out there that values being overweight, or people who have thyroid issues, but the presence of any of those people does not mean that the correct way to lose weight should be censored.

    So, I stand by my spelling lesson, because those are the correct ways to use those words.

    I'm curious as to which version of "English" you are determining to be the appropriate one in an international community of users, and how you went about determining that as the standard for all to follow in said community.

    He's not complaining about issues like color vs colour, center vs centre, etc., IOW, differences between American English and British English. 'Loose' never means 'lose' in any version of English.

    Exactly. Maybe my next discussion should be Advanced Reading Comprehension Lesson.
This discussion has been closed.