Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.

Artificial sweeteners

LKArgh
LKArgh Posts: 5,179 Member
edited January 2022 in Debate Club
Just read this today, and thought of the debate board
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/860431?nlid=102903_3561
The basic idea is that some of the zero-calorie sweeteners appear to be causing more damage than real sugar, especially on glycemic control.

Replies

  • stevencloser
    stevencloser Posts: 8,911 Member
    Can't access without an account.
  • ReaderGirl3
    ReaderGirl3 Posts: 868 Member
    Can't access without an account.

    Me either, OP is it posted somewhere else that's accessible?
  • LKArgh
    LKArgh Posts: 5,179 Member
    Ugh, sorry, I forgot I have an account, I have my browser to automatically log in.
  • LKArgh
    LKArgh Posts: 5,179 Member
  • senecarr
    senecarr Posts: 5,377 Member
    Next, they tested these findings in humans, using a database with nutritional profiling in a large number of patients, with ongoing data collection.[1] They identified 381 nondiabetics in their database, with about 44% males. They looked at associations with glycemic control and ingestion of noncaloric artificial sweeteners. They had a very dynamic way to look at dietary recall with a validated dietary history questionnaire.
    So they discovered people that are diabetic or near diabetic start drinking more diet pop and using more artificial sweeteners? Or more accurately, more of these people recall (dietary recall database) using products with artificial sweeteners? I am shocked!
  • stevencloser
    stevencloser Posts: 8,911 Member
    aggelikik wrote: »

    Thanks, can you also link to the reference? The link doesn't work in the repost.
  • lithezebra
    lithezebra Posts: 3,670 Member
    I'm fascinated by the part about artificial sweeteners causing detrimental changes in gut flora.

  • Ruatine
    Ruatine Posts: 3,424 Member
    Here's the same article on Medscape, which has a ~10 minute video from the writer: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/860431#vp_2

    Here's the link to the study as published in Nature: http://weizmann-usa.org/docs/default-source/pdfs/artificial-sweeteners.pdf?sfvrsn=2
  • lithezebra
    lithezebra Posts: 3,670 Member
    edited March 2016
    Thanks, @Ruatine . I wonder if use of sugar alcohols, monk fruit, and stevia have an effect on gut microbiota.

    Here's an abstract on maltitol, which increased Bifidobacteria and the production of short chain fatty acids: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=7879346&fileId=S0007114510001078

    And one on erythritol, likely not fermented by gut microbiota: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=924264&fileId=S0007114505002291

    And one on xylitol and polydextrose: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00350.x/abstract?userIsAuthenticated=false&deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=
  • stevencloser
    stevencloser Posts: 8,911 Member
    senecarr wrote: »
    Next, they tested these findings in humans, using a database with nutritional profiling in a large number of patients, with ongoing data collection.[1] They identified 381 nondiabetics in their database, with about 44% males. They looked at associations with glycemic control and ingestion of noncaloric artificial sweeteners. They had a very dynamic way to look at dietary recall with a validated dietary history questionnaire.
    So they discovered people that are diabetic or near diabetic start drinking more diet pop and using more artificial sweeteners? Or more accurately, more of these people recall (dietary recall database) using products with artificial sweeteners? I am shocked!

    I find the part where they were actually looking if it was causal better. Not only did they feed them the ADI which is likely many times higher than what normal people would eat, they had a whole 7 participants out of which 3 had no effect whatsoever but the article makes it out like that's a huge important finding.
  • lithezebra
    lithezebra Posts: 3,670 Member
    edited March 2016
    senecarr wrote: »
    Next, they tested these findings in humans, using a database with nutritional profiling in a large number of patients, with ongoing data collection.[1] They identified 381 nondiabetics in their database, with about 44% males. They looked at associations with glycemic control and ingestion of noncaloric artificial sweeteners. They had a very dynamic way to look at dietary recall with a validated dietary history questionnaire.
    So they discovered people that are diabetic or near diabetic start drinking more diet pop and using more artificial sweeteners? Or more accurately, more of these people recall (dietary recall database) using products with artificial sweeteners? I am shocked!

    I find the part where they were actually looking if it was causal better. Not only did they feed them the ADI which is likely many times higher than what normal people would eat, they had a whole 7 participants out of which 3 had no effect whatsoever but the article makes it out like that's a huge important finding.

    Maybe there were differences in the gut microbiomes of the participants who showed no effect, that were protective. One thing about humans, rather than germ free mice who've had a standardized gut microbiome transplanted into them, is that our microbiota vary.

  • singingflutelady
    singingflutelady Posts: 8,736 Member
    @lithezebra I don't know if sugar alcohols effect the gut microbe but they sure do effect my gut and have a major laxative effect for me (especially sorbitol) even in tiny amounts. I have Crohn's so my gut is very sensitive though.
  • lithezebra
    lithezebra Posts: 3,670 Member
    edited March 2016
    @lithezebra I don't know if sugar alcohols effect the gut microbe but they sure do effect my gut and have a major laxative effect for me (especially sorbitol) even in tiny amounts. I have Crohn's so my gut is very sensitive though.

    Some of them do that to me too. It's likely that the different responses different people have to sugar alcohols is reflective of different microbial communities. I haven't found an article yet that discusses whether sugar alcohols change the makeup of the human gut microbiota. But it seems like a sweetener that some, but not all, microbes can eat would have to favor the species that can use it for energy, and any species that can use the metabolites from the initial breakdown of the sweetener, and any metabolites further down the chain.
  • GaleHawkins
    GaleHawkins Posts: 8,160 Member
    Can't access without an account.

    Steven just do it the same way you do to get on MFP.

  • GaleHawkins
    GaleHawkins Posts: 8,160 Member
    Thanks @Ruatine and @aggelikik for the different sources for the great info. The chemical cocktails are getting harder and harder on my body it seems.
  • TheNightWalker
    TheNightWalker Posts: 59 Member
    I haven't read all the links here, but I did read the medscape article and even though they write that they fed mice with saccharin, sucralose and aspartame they didn't really write about the effects of sucralose and aspartame, only saccharine.
This discussion has been closed.