Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.
Sugar addiction like drug abuse, study reveals
GaleHawkins
Posts: 8,160 Member
in Debate Club
telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/13/sugar-addiction-like-drug-abuse-study-reveals/
Is the science strong enough to settle this debate one day?
Is the science strong enough to settle this debate one day?
6
Replies
-
Oh Gale. I love the articles you post. Always in for a good old MFP debate
1 -
A MSM article. Enough said. MSM pretty much always gets the story wrong, I don't doubt this is the case here. Looking forward to watching the discussion progress.2
-
7
-
This makes me wonder what happens when you google "Why isn't sugar addictive?"8
-
Pleasurable activities activate the pleasure centers of the brain. Drugs and eating sugar are pleasurable, which is why people do them.
So is listening to Mozart, watching a beautiful sunset, or getting a good backrub or a hug from a loved one. I would wager all of these things activate the pleasure circuits in the brain "similar to drugs of abuse." Don't know why this is even surprising or even that interesting.11 -
This study was done in rats. We can end the discussion now.3
-
This study was done in rats. We can end the discussion now.
Oh great, a rat study.
Correct me if I am wrong since I just skimmed the study, but basically this showed that rats have a preference to consuming something that is pleasurable, and if you give them a drug to make is less pleasurable they decrease that behavior? What is so surprising about that. I didn't see it in my skim through, but did they compare the levels of the stimulation of these substances to the levels stimulated by nicotine or other drugs in similar rats? If not, this does nothing except say pleasurable activities are preferentially chosen and give some idea in terms of neurotransmitters as to why. That does not seem to be ground breaking or even surprising. Now if they showed the stimulation of these substances was at a level that we the same or higher than other known addictive substances, that certainly calls for further study to confirm the results.0 -
tincanonastring wrote: »This makes me wonder what happens when you google "Why isn't sugar addictive?"
https://google.com/search?q=Why+isn%27t+sugar+addictive&rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS611US612&oq=Why+isn%27t+sugar+addictive&aqs=chrome..69i57&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-81 -
Here is the actual study:
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0150270
Thanks for the link to the actual scientific study. While I know in my case my 40 years of craving for carbs faded in a few weeks after I stopped eating sugar and all form of grains but it would still be nice to know why.3 -
-
GaleHawkins wrote: »tincanonastring wrote: »This makes me wonder what happens when you google "Why isn't sugar addictive?"
https://google.com/search?q=Why+isn%27t+sugar+addictive&rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS611US612&oq=Why+isn%27t+sugar+addictive&aqs=chrome..69i57&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
Why don't you ever post any of those for debate?5 -
tincanonastring wrote: »GaleHawkins wrote: »tincanonastring wrote: »This makes me wonder what happens when you google "Why isn't sugar addictive?"
https://google.com/search?q=Why+isn%27t+sugar+addictive&rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS611US612&oq=Why+isn%27t+sugar+addictive&aqs=chrome..69i57&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
Why don't you ever post any of those for debate?
Most nutritional articles are more like religion and politics than based on lab science that gives technical points that have merit to discuss. You want to discuss what to discuss go ahead start that thread.10 -
GaleHawkins wrote: »Here is the actual study:
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0150270
Thanks for the link to the actual scientific study. While I know in my case my 40 years of craving for carbs faded in a few weeks after I stopped eating sugar and all form of grains but it would still be nice to know why.
But fat has the same effect on the brain, basically. Not surprising, as it's pleasurable too. (Fat+carbs or fat+salt seem to have the strongest effects.)1 -
lemurcat12 wrote: »GaleHawkins wrote: »Here is the actual study:
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0150270
Thanks for the link to the actual scientific study. While I know in my case my 40 years of craving for carbs faded in a few weeks after I stopped eating sugar and all form of grains but it would still be nice to know why.
But fat has the same effect on the brain, basically. Not surprising, as it's pleasurable too. (Fat+carbs or fat+salt seem to have the strongest effects.)
Isn't there also something about the timing of the chemical release being different with food than it is with drug addiction?0 -
GaleHawkins wrote: »tincanonastring wrote: »GaleHawkins wrote: »tincanonastring wrote: »This makes me wonder what happens when you google "Why isn't sugar addictive?"
https://google.com/search?q=Why+isn%27t+sugar+addictive&rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS611US612&oq=Why+isn%27t+sugar+addictive&aqs=chrome..69i57&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
Why don't you ever post any of those for debate?
Most nutritional articles are more like religion and politics than based on lab science that gives technical points that have merit to discuss. You want to discuss what to discuss go ahead start that thread.
Fair enough.
What are your thoughts on this study-based article suggesting that food addiction is behavioral based and not about specific foods?
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140909093617.htm3 -
tincanonastring wrote: »GaleHawkins wrote: »tincanonastring wrote: »GaleHawkins wrote: »tincanonastring wrote: »This makes me wonder what happens when you google "Why isn't sugar addictive?"
https://google.com/search?q=Why+isn%27t+sugar+addictive&rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS611US612&oq=Why+isn%27t+sugar+addictive&aqs=chrome..69i57&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
Why don't you ever post any of those for debate?
Most nutritional articles are more like religion and politics than based on lab science that gives technical points that have merit to discuss. You want to discuss what to discuss go ahead start that thread.
Fair enough.
What are your thoughts on this study-based article suggesting that food addiction is behavioral based and not about specific foods?
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140909093617.htm
The scientist in me can agree with those findings. I had a hard two weeks when I left sugar and all grains cold turkey Oct 2014. It could have just been a reaction of microbe die off that had been sending chemicals to my brain demanding I eat more carbs. I will never know in my case.
I do understand why people state they had a withdrawal from sugar/carbs. The chemical/emotional pathways I do not understand.
0 -
Or is all food potentially addictive?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22641965
Is it the food that stimulates dopamine release like heroin, or is it the heroin that stimulates dopamine release like food (with the food-dopamine release being a survival mechanism).4 -
tincanonastring wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »GaleHawkins wrote: »Here is the actual study:
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0150270
Thanks for the link to the actual scientific study. While I know in my case my 40 years of craving for carbs faded in a few weeks after I stopped eating sugar and all form of grains but it would still be nice to know why.
But fat has the same effect on the brain, basically. Not surprising, as it's pleasurable too. (Fat+carbs or fat+salt seem to have the strongest effects.)
Isn't there also something about the timing of the chemical release being different with food than it is with drug addiction?
Yes, I believe so. I was comparing fat and sugar and ignoring the drug bit. Another difference that seems to me pretty compelling is that the pleasure that encourages us to eat (and have sex) makes sense from an evolutionary perspective, it should be how we work--to find pleasure in sustaining ourselves and reproducing. Drugs co-opt that pathway so that we lose interest in the behaviors that keep us alive and focused in on the drugs in a distorted way.2 -
Pleasurable activities activate the pleasure centers of the brain. Drugs and eating sugar are pleasurable, which is why people do them.
So is listening to Mozart, watching a beautiful sunset, or getting a good backrub or a hug from a loved one. I would wager all of these things activate the pleasure circuits in the brain "similar to drugs of abuse." Don't know why this is even surprising or even that interesting.
Unfortunately there are not entire industries, vending machines or supermarket aisles dedicated to selling back rubs, hugs, kittens or winning bingo.
4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6n3Yc08cww&nohtml5=False
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.3K Introduce Yourself
- 43.4K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 387 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.2K MyFitnessPal Information
- 22 News and Announcements
- 901 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.2K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions