Abs?

I am 139 pounds
5'6 Female
23 BMI
How do I get abs and how much do I need to lift ?

Replies

  • singingflutelady
    singingflutelady Posts: 8,736 Member
    Lower your body fat percentage
  • malibu927
    malibu927 Posts: 17,562 Member
    Lower your body fat percentage

    This. Calorie deficit plus heavy lifting/enough protein.
  • jessef593
    jessef593 Posts: 2,272 Member
    Lower body fat percentage and develop decent musculature. Has nothing to do with lifting a certain weight
  • psuLemon
    psuLemon Posts: 38,427 MFP Moderator
    Lower your body fat percentage

    And good body composition.
  • evilokc
    evilokc Posts: 263 Member
    They dont pop out quickly either. Mine have been slowly peeking out for a few weeks. Its like the fat on my torso is slowly sliding down and off my body. Top two look really good. Middle two are about half way there.. Few more weeks!
  • sgt1372
    sgt1372 Posts: 3,997 Member
    Hard to achieve for men, even harder for women. Lower BF may not help either.

    Genetics have a lot to do w/it. FWIW, I've got a GREAT 4-pack at about 20% BF but still have fat stored in my lower abs that hide the rest even when I was at 15% BF. Abs/core are strong and all the crunches/sit-ups in the world will not make them any stronger.

    Working on a recomp that I "hope" will help but, in the end, lipo may be the only solution and I'm not vain enough to go that route. Any pair of shorts/pants will hide the lower abs and shirtless people will think that I've got a real 6-pack. LOL!!!
  • purple18194
    purple18194 Posts: 52 Member
    What everyone said ^^ you have to lower your body fat % enough to be able to see them basically. Which usually means clean eating to lower your fat % (which is mostly where that phrase "abs are made in the kitchen" comes from) and then toning up so that you have muscles to show.

  • LolBroScience
    LolBroScience Posts: 4,537 Member
    What everyone said ^^ you have to lower your body fat % enough to be able to see them basically. Which usually means clean eating to lower your fat % (which is mostly where that phrase "abs are made in the kitchen" comes from) and then toning up so that you have muscles to show.

    *cues "define clean eating" comments*
  • Michael190lbs
    Michael190lbs Posts: 1,510 Member
    edited August 2016
    What everyone said ^^ you have to lower your body fat % enough to be able to see them basically. Which usually means clean eating to lower your fat % (which is mostly where that phrase "abs are made in the kitchen" comes from) and then toning up so that you have muscles to show.

    *cues "define clean eating" comments*

    You know washing the fruits and Veggies Clean eating... lol
  • VeryKatie
    VeryKatie Posts: 5,961 Member
    edited August 2016
    Um just wanted to comment that I'm the same height AND weight as you. Which I don't see often! Twin! Also wanting abs.. but that will likely have to wait. Will work on hamstrings and glutes for now.
  • psuLemon
    psuLemon Posts: 38,427 MFP Moderator
    What everyone said ^^ you have to lower your body fat % enough to be able to see them basically. Which usually means clean eating to lower your fat % (which is mostly where that phrase "abs are made in the kitchen" comes from) and then toning up so that you have muscles to show.

    The phrase stems from the fact that training your abs wont give you abs and you need a calorie deficit to reduce body fat to a low enough level to reveal abs.
  • RoxieDawn
    RoxieDawn Posts: 15,488 Member
    "clean eating"? no wonder my 2 upper abs are all i can still see.
  • fitgamercatlady
    fitgamercatlady Posts: 63 Member
    Wait, what's wrong with the phrase "clean eating?" I'm a healthy diet noob and I don't know exactly what "clean eating" is exactly, but I thought it was when you eat unprocessed fresh food. Can someone explain what it actually is and why it's so terrible?
  • LazSommer
    LazSommer Posts: 1,851 Member
    Wait, what's wrong with the phrase "clean eating?" I'm a healthy diet noob and I don't know exactly what "clean eating" is exactly, but I thought it was when you eat unprocessed fresh food. Can someone explain what it actually is and why it's so terrible?

    No junk food, all WHOLE GRAIN NON GMO GRASS FED ORGANICALLY NON PASTEURIZED REAL FOOD. NONE OF THEM CHEMTRAILS.

    It's made fun of because it doesn't really matter, although if you want constantly visible abs your margin for "non-wholesome" foods is much smaller assuming you have other fitness goals in mind.
  • Rlha2017
    Rlha2017 Posts: 158 Member
    Starve yourself or do meth. If you get skinny enough all people have abs. Starving kids in Africa have abs
  • Rlha2017
    Rlha2017 Posts: 158 Member
    That was a joke. Btw
  • LazSommer
    LazSommer Posts: 1,851 Member
    Rlha2017 wrote: »
    Starve yourself or do meth. If you get skinny enough all people have abs. Starving kids in Africa have abs

    #bodygoals
  • AnvilHead
    AnvilHead Posts: 18,343 Member
    Wait, what's wrong with the phrase "clean eating?" I'm a healthy diet noob and I don't know exactly what "clean eating" is exactly, but I thought it was when you eat unprocessed fresh food. Can someone explain what it actually is and why it's so terrible?

    Ask a vegan what "clean eating" is.
    Ask a paleo dieter what "clean eating" is.
    Ask a keto dieter what "clean eating" is.
    Ask an IIFYM'er what "clean eating" is.

    See if any of the answers match up.

    "Clean eating" (by whatever definition), in and of itself, has nothing to do with reducing body fat or losing weight. Dietary fat does not equal body fat, and fat is an essential nutrient for many biological processes. To reduce body fat/lose weight, one must eat in a caloric deficit - preferably with adequate protein intake to assist in preserving lean body mass.
  • This content has been removed.
  • purple18194
    purple18194 Posts: 52 Member
    Even when I was working out every day and eating only 1200 calories a day, I was not losing weight when I was eating heavily processed/fried/etc nightly. It was a caloric deficit and I did not lose weight. Now that I work out almost every day and pay pretty close attention to how much processed, fried, additive-filled foods I eat regularly, I lose weight and ta-da... have abs. Yeah, it's a caloric deficit but it's not the same thing, in my experience.

    It's not going to be the same for everyone, but it has really worked for me and just about everyone I know who has tried it. In my opinion, eating 1200 calories of ice cream, cheesy pasta, fried chicken, etc. every day is not going to give you the same result as eating 1200 calories a day of lean protein, vegetables, fruits, healthy fats, etc. even if you're in a caloric deficit.
  • psuLemon
    psuLemon Posts: 38,427 MFP Moderator
    Even when I was working out every day and eating only 1200 calories a day, I was not losing weight when I was eating heavily processed/fried/etc nightly. It was a caloric deficit and I did not lose weight. Now that I work out almost every day and pay pretty close attention to how much processed, fried, additive-filled foods I eat regularly, I lose weight and ta-da... have abs. Yeah, it's a caloric deficit but it's not the same thing, in my experience.

    It's not going to be the same for everyone, but it has really worked for me and just about everyone I know who has tried it. In my opinion, eating 1200 calories of ice cream, cheesy pasta, fried chicken, etc. every day is not going to give you the same result as eating 1200 calories a day of lean protein, vegetables, fruits, healthy fats, etc. even if you're in a caloric deficit.

    The question would be how you were tracking your calories. A lot of processed stuff is also packages and there is a lot of variation in actual calorie count. Also, if you ate a lot then its even to miscalculate calories in.

    We agree that one should have a solid diet full of nutrients dense foods but you can eat dirty and get abs.
  • AnvilHead
    AnvilHead Posts: 18,343 Member
    edited August 2016
    Even when I was working out every day and eating only 1200 calories a day, I was not losing weight when I was eating heavily processed/fried/etc nightly. It was a caloric deficit and I did not lose weight. Now that I work out almost every day and pay pretty close attention to how much processed, fried, additive-filled foods I eat regularly, I lose weight and ta-da... have abs. Yeah, it's a caloric deficit but it's not the same thing, in my experience.

    It's not going to be the same for everyone, but it has really worked for me and just about everyone I know who has tried it. In my opinion, eating 1200 calories of ice cream, cheesy pasta, fried chicken, etc. every day is not going to give you the same result as eating 1200 calories a day of lean protein, vegetables, fruits, healthy fats, etc. even if you're in a caloric deficit.

    But it's not possible to have a viable solution somewhere between the two extremes? You know, where you eat mostly lean protein, vegetables, fruits and healthy fats, etc., but mix in the occasional ice cream, cheesy pasta, fried chicken, etc.?

    I ask because usually when the "clean eating" discussions take place, many self-proclaimed "clean eaters" act as if it's a completely binary, black and white issue. Either you're eating nothing but kale washed in angels' tears or you're shoveling pounds of packaged, processed junk food down your gullet every day. Context and dosage are important considerations in any diet.

    The whole junk food diet is a strawman because I have never seen anybody on MFP, nor on any other site related to nutrition/fitness/overall health advocate that anybody eat a diet consisting mostly or entirely of ice cream, cheesy pasta, fried chicken, etc., nor have I ever seen anybody state that it's an optimal diet for weight loss or overall health.
  • purple18194
    purple18194 Posts: 52 Member
    I didn't say it's one or the other. The majority of my diet is "clean," and once or a twice a week you bet your *kitten* I'm eating something junky, but I didn't think I needed to spell it out that "clean eating" doesn't mean "nothing but clean 100%, no balance at all," and I guess I trusted the OP to know that. Sorry.

    Also, my example wasn't literal. I was responding to everyone saying that losing weight only depends on caloric deficit. My point is that you can't just eat 1200 calories of ANYTHING as just lose weight. It does matter somewhat WHAT those 1200 calories are coming from.
  • queenliz99
    queenliz99 Posts: 15,317 Member
    I didn't say it's one or the other. The majority of my diet is "clean," and once or a twice a week you bet your *kitten* I'm eating something junky, but I didn't think I needed to spell it out that "clean eating" doesn't mean "nothing but clean 100%, no balance at all," and I guess I trusted the OP to know that. Sorry.

    Also, my example wasn't literal. I was responding to everyone saying that losing weight only depends on caloric deficit. My point is that you can't just eat 1200 calories of ANYTHING as just lose weight. It does matter somewhat WHAT those 1200 calories are coming from.

    Clean! so is mine! the majority anyway.
  • AnvilHead
    AnvilHead Posts: 18,343 Member
    edited August 2016
    I didn't say it's one or the other. The majority of my diet is "clean," and once or a twice a week you bet your *kitten* I'm eating something junky, but I didn't think I needed to spell it out that "clean eating" doesn't mean "nothing but clean 100%, no balance at all," and I guess I trusted the OP to know that. Sorry.

    Also, my example wasn't literal. I was responding to everyone saying that losing weight only depends on caloric deficit. My point is that you can't just eat 1200 calories of ANYTHING as just lose weight. It does matter somewhat WHAT those 1200 calories are coming from.

    As they say - "you're entitled to your own opinions, but you're not entitled to your own facts". The scientific fact is that, assuming 1200 calories is a caloric deficit for a person, they will lose weight eating 1200 calories whether it's 100% "clean" (by whatever definition) or comprised entirely of junk food. Nutrition and overall health are completely different topics, we're speaking purely in terms of weight loss here.

    [ETA:] On topic to the OP, the correct answer is that she needs to create a sustained caloric deficit to eventually lose the subcutaneous fat in her abdomen, which will create definition of her abdominal muscles. Eating "clean" has nothing whatsoever to do with it, the OP can eat in whatever manner she chooses to create the necessary caloric deficit. A strength training program will help with preserving lean body mass and strengthening the muscles beneath the fat, but it won't result in spot reduction.
  • errollmaclean
    errollmaclean Posts: 562 Member
    edited August 2016
    Wait, what's wrong with the phrase "clean eating?" I'm a healthy diet noob and I don't know exactly what "clean eating" is exactly, but I thought it was when you eat unprocessed fresh food. Can someone explain what it actually is and why it's so terrible?

    Clean eating is old "broscience". Basically your body can only absorb so much macro/micronutrients in a given time period, so you don't get bonus points for more once you reach your daily threshold. The newer way of looking at it is a macro approach. Once you've, met your daily macro/micro goals (protein/fat/fiber/vitamins) there is no gold star for having more "clean food" and if you stay within your calories there is no negative consequences to eating "dirty/bad" food (provided you've met your macro and micronutrient goals). With your daily goals met and staying within your calories "bad" food won't magically make you fat.

    Clean eating is pushed by the diet industry, and is almost impossible to maintain long term. And once you fail, and eat bad food, there is guilt. This cycle causes a poor relationship with food, deaming some good and some bad. A macro approach categorizes food by it's macro content and calories. Does it fit within you daily calories and contribute to your macros goals? If it does then eat it. If it doesn't fit, then don't. It leads to a better relationship with food. There's no good or bad, just it's component macros and calories.

    *edit to add that this is based on my experience with clean eating and iifym. If you simply enjoy clean eating and it works for you, great. You still need to eat "clean" foods to meet your macros/micros doing flexible dieting and iifym.
  • errollmaclean
    errollmaclean Posts: 562 Member
    I am 139 pounds
    5'6 Female
    23 BMI
    How do I get abs and how much do I need to lift ?

    Judging by your picture, you are pretty thin. I'd recommend changing your body composition (add more muscle) by lifting heavy. Here's an example of what changing your body composition by adding muscle can do:
    3fdxoryl3q0w.jpg

  • rybo
    rybo Posts: 5,424 Member
    Wait, what's wrong with the phrase "clean eating?" I'm a healthy diet noob and I don't know exactly what "clean eating" is exactly, but I thought it was when you eat unprocessed fresh food. Can someone explain what it actually is and why it's so terrible?

    That's what the definition originally started out as, but the Internet allows people to define it thousands of different ways and then the MFP nit picking semantics police take over and ruin every thread that even mentions clean eating.