Caloric deficiency?
suarez73
Posts: 33 Member
I've been following a 1200 calorie a day diet and kickboxing 5 times a week. Each session of kickboxing burns approximately 865 calories.
Overall in the last 3 weeks I've lost 9 lbs. but in the past 9 days I've only lost 1 lb. Lately I have been eating less than my 1200 allowance and am wondering if that's the culprit...Maybe I'm not getting enough calories/nutrition. Any advice or tips?
Overall in the last 3 weeks I've lost 9 lbs. but in the past 9 days I've only lost 1 lb. Lately I have been eating less than my 1200 allowance and am wondering if that's the culprit...Maybe I'm not getting enough calories/nutrition. Any advice or tips?
0
Replies
-
Are you eating your exercise calories back? That seems like a low amount of calories. Also, your rate of loss is fine. Weight loss will always slow down and not always is consistent.5
-
You are not going to lose weight each & every day. Too many factors influence the number on the scale at any given moment. Water weight from TOM/hormones, sodium, muscle repair, etc.
Do eat enough to fuel your body. Eating very low can have negative consequences like vitamin/mineral deficiencies, low energy/fatigue, damage to hair/skin/nails.
Hopefully your goal is to lose weight in a healthy, sustainable manner. That means taking care of yourself. It also requires patience. Try not to compare your weight day to day or even week to week. Look at the longer term trends to negate the temporary effects of water weight.4 -
Eating 1200 calories (or less) and burning 900 means your daily Net calories are around 300. That is an absurd amount to net. Eat some execise calories back!!
That aside; weight loss is not linear so don't worry about bumps in the road. If you are in a calorie deficit, your body is burning body fat even if the scale hasn't caught up yet.8 -
Overall in the last 3 weeks I've lost 9 lbs.but in the past 9 days I've only lost 1 lb.3
-
Weight fluctuates. You can't expect to lose 3 pounds a week regularly. It seems a lot by the way.
Don't go under 1200 calories a day and eat some of your exercise calories back.1 -
Its only been nine days. If you are 100% on point with your calorie consumption, then you are losing weight still.. A 1 pound weight fluction is well with in a normal weight range.. Keep in mind weight loss is NOT linear, there will be weeks when you lose and some you do not..
Keep doing what you are doing and be patience..
I will throw caution, 1200 calories seems quite low and adding to the fact that you are doing intensive exercise secessions can be a bad mix. Also going under your goal is never ever a good idea and if not eating back any exercise calories, well this too can be an issue. .2 -
Eat more.
You are at too high of a deficit.3 -
If you lost weigh every day you would disappear. 1200 isn't sufficient unless you are very petite and don't really exercise hardly ever. You lost 9 pounds rapidly because your body thinks it's starving. Do a refeed day, bump up your calories to 1500 or so, and keep at it.2
-
We all hit a plateau sometimes. There is a really nice article about it under Blogs for October which explains why this happens. Honestly I recently stood still for 3 weeks and then I started losing weight again as normal. I was just glad that I was not gaining weight . good luck1
-
Its only been nine days. If you are 100% on point with your calorie consumption, then you are losing weight still.. A 1 pound weight fluction is well with in a normal weight range.. Keep in mind weight loss is NOT linear, there will be weeks when you lose and some you do not..
Keep doing what you are doing and be patience..
I will throw caution, 1200 calories seems quite low and adding to the fact that you are doing intensive exercise secessions can be a bad mix. Also going under your goal is never ever a good idea and if not eating back any exercise calories, well this too can be an issue. .
That's what I was thinking as well. No, I'm not eating my exercise calories back. Overall I guess I have achieved a lot in 3 weeks...Thanks!1 -
robthephotog wrote: »Eat more.
You are at too high of a deficit.
Thanks, I think you're right...0 -
Thanks everyone for your feedback. I guess I just needed to hear it and look at the overall picture.0
-
Are you using a food scale and weighing everything? No measuring cups, etc.?? Either way it sounds like you have lost a lot already and are on a good track. My only point is unless you use a scale you can get some really large swings in your intake.1
-
Please explain the concept of too high a deficit. She's eating 1,200, exercising 900, and netting 300.
As long as she not consumed with hunger pangs all day and all night and feels like she's starving herself, why is this a problem? Also, the weight is coming off slowly, unlike the Biggest Loser fiasco.
Thanks in advance.
If those numbers are accurate, she's giving her body only 300kcal to survive on the entire day. That's a problem, no matter how you want to rationalize it.10 -
Eventually you will bonk on such few calories.
Have you noticed any other symptoms of under-eating such as fatigue, irritability, confusion, inability to complete a workout? Next up: hair loss, brittle fingernails, depression.
Eat, lovely! It will be good for you.4 -
Please explain the concept of too high a deficit. She's eating 1,200, exercising 900, and netting 300.
As long as she not consumed with hunger pangs all day and all night and feels like she's starving herself, why is this a problem? Also, the weight is coming off slowly, unlike the Biggest Loser fiasco.
Thanks in advance.
If those numbers are accurate, she's giving her body only 300kcal to survive on the entire day. That's a problem, no matter how you want to rationalize it.
If you have specifics, I would like to get educated.
You need specifics on why 300 net calories for the day is not a good idea?
13 -
Chef_Barbell wrote: »Please explain the concept of too high a deficit. She's eating 1,200, exercising 900, and netting 300.
As long as she not consumed with hunger pangs all day and all night and feels like she's starving herself, why is this a problem? Also, the weight is coming off slowly, unlike the Biggest Loser fiasco.
Thanks in advance.
If those numbers are accurate, she's giving her body only 300kcal to survive on the entire day. That's a problem, no matter how you want to rationalize it.
If you have specifics, I would like to get educated.
You need specifics on why 300 net calories for the day is not a good idea?cmriverside wrote: »Eventually you will bonk on such few calories.
Have you noticed any other symptoms of under-eating such as fatigue, irritability, confusion, inability to complete a workout? Next up: hair loss, brittle fingernails, depression.
Eat, lovely! It will be good for you.
OP hasn't bonked yet.
Wouldn't eating in a way to prevent bonk be a good idea?2 -
-
-
I've been following a 1200 calorie a day diet and kickboxing 5 times a week. Each session of kickboxing burns approximately 865 calories.
Overall in the last 3 weeks I've lost 9 lbs. but in the past 9 days I've only lost 1 lb. Lately I have been eating less than my 1200 allowance and am wondering if that's the culprit...Maybe I'm not getting enough calories/nutrition. Any advice or tips?
How tall are you and how many pounds do you want to lose in total?
At 300 net calories per day, you're running way too large a deficit. Under-eating stresses the body and mind. Stress increases cortisol, which leads to water retention, which makes it look like you're not making any progress:
http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/research-review/dietary-restraint-and-cortisol-levels-research-review.html/
...a group of women who scored higher on dietary restraint scores showed elevated baseline cortisol levels. By itself this might not be problematic, but as often as not, these types of dieters are drawn to extreme approaches to dieting.
They throw in a lot of intense exercise, try to cut calories very hard (and this often backfires if disinhibition is high; when these folks break they break) and cortisol levels go through the roof. That often causes cortisol mediated water retention (there are other mechanisms for this, mind you, leptin actually inhibits cortisol release and as it drops on a diet, cortisol levels go up further). Weight and fat loss appear to have stopped or at least slowed significantly. This is compounded even further in female dieters due to the vagaries of their menstrual cycle where water balance is changing enormously week to week anyhow.
And invariably, this type of psychology responds to the stall by going even harder. They attempt to cut calories harder, they start doing more activity. The cycle continues and gets worse. Harder dieting means more cortisol means more water retention means more dieting. Which backfires (other problems come in the long-term with this approach but you’ll have to wait for the book to read about that).
When what they should do is take a day or two off (even one day off from training, at least in men, lets cortisol drop significantly). Raise calories, especially from carbohydrates. This helps cortisol to drop. More than that they need to find a way to freaking chill out. Meditation, yoga, get a massage... Get in the bath, candles, a little Enya, a glass of wine, have some you-time but please just chill.5
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 392.9K Introduce Yourself
- 43.7K Getting Started
- 260.1K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.8K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 415 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.9K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.6K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.5K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions